Search

Introduction: The practice of child marriage is quite common and is rife in Gorontalo Province. From 2019 to 2021, there were 1,383 data on applicants for child marriage dispensation at the Religious Courts of the Gorontalo Province Regency/City. Purposes of the Research: To complement the shortcomings of previous studies that did not pay attention to legal protection against neglect of children's rights in line with the increasing age of child marriage in terms of the perspective of children's rights. Methods of the Research: This study uses empirical legal research using a statutory approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. sources of data using primary and secondary data. Data collection techniques using literature review techniques and interviews Data analysis uses qualitative data analysis, which is analyzed theoretically to obtain prescriptive legal solutions. Results of the Research: The neglect of children's rights in cases of child marriage is more due to the unavailability of legal protection that guarantees the fulfillment of children's human rights and the legitimacy aspect of customs, culture, and traditions regarding social status in society

Halal labeling is not simply a means of meeting the bodily needs. Simultaneously, it serves to satisfy the spiritual needs. Both Halal and haram foods are easy to identify when still in its fresh state. But as it underwent processing, it might be difficult to determine its halal status. The objectives of this paper are to determine the aspects of legal protection available for the consumers to be able to conveniently trade any food product they desired, to illustrate the MUI Authority as the competent authority with sole power to issue a fatwa to decide halal or haram status of food products around Indonesia; and finally to identify the extent of control held by the Government, LPKSM, and society as the parties playing important roles in monitoring the products or goods on the market. The results showed that the legal protection for the consumers remains weak. Furthermore, there is no maximum supervision carried out by the government, LPKSM, or through society. The presence of JPH Law No. 33 of 2014 still incites polemic, one of which related to the monopoly of authority by MUI.