Purpose: This qualitative study explored the impact of using a biopsychosocial approach to explain the diagnosis of non-epileptic seizures (NES)., Methods: Semi-structured interviews of eleven adolescents and young adults who had participated in an inpatient follow-up stay of the diagnosis were used. The interviews were taped, transcribed, and analysed using systematic text condensation., Results: Three key themes were identified:1."Threatened self-image": Patients initially perceived their diagnosis as being purely psychological. As they did not accept that they had mental disorders, they interpreted this as frightening and threatening, and resisted the diagnosis.2."Being believed and belief in oneself": Participants had many experiences of being suspected by healthcare providers of staging their seizures. Some had even begun to have doubts themselves as to whether the attacks were voluntary or not. Explaining that unconscious processes are involved in NES contributed towards increasing patients' feelings of being believed, and thereby acceptance of the diagnosis.3."Getting an explanation that makes sense": Some participants identified connections between their personal histories and their seizures and became seizure-free. Others found that the explanatory models gave personal meaning, but did not become seizure-free, while a few continued to doubt whether NES was the correct diagnosis., Conclusion: Being believed was the most elemental factor for coping with the condition. Using a biopsychosocial approach to explain the diagnosis may facilitate identification with the explanatory models, and thus acceptance of the diagnosis., (Copyright © 2014 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)