Search

Inflammatory skin diseases involve various different immune cells in a localised area. Here the authors use spatial transcriptomics to show that disease relevant cytokine transcripts are sparsely expressed in lesional skin, yet are associated with local amplification cascades that promote skin inflammation.

Nailfold capillaroscopy, based on bright-field microscopy, is widely used to diagnose systemic sclerosis (SSc). However it cannot reveal information about venules and arterioles lying deep under the nailfold, nor can it provide detailed data about surface microvasculature when the skin around the nail is thick. These limitations reflect the fact that capillaroscopy is based on microscopy methods whose penetration depth is restricted to about 200 μm. We investigated whether ultra-wideband raster-scan optoacoustic mesoscopy (UWB-RSOM) can resolve small capillaries of the nailfold in healthy volunteers and compared the optoacoustic data to conventional capillaroscopy examinations. We quantified UWB-RSOM-resolved capillary density and capillary diameter as features that relate to SSc biomarkers, and we obtained the first three-dimensional, in vivo images of the deeper arterioles and venules. These results establish the potential of UWB-RSOM for analyzing SSc-relevant markers.

Purpose: Currently, in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) there is a lack of evidence demonstrating optimal biologic treatment response with respect to disease duration. The aim of this post-hoc analysis, using real world data from the Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO), is to provide evidence if early intervention with biologics is associated with better treatment outcomes and if there is any difference among drug classes or individual biologics., Materials and Methods: For this post-hoc analysis patients were categorised into two subgroups according to shorter (≤2 years) or longer (>2 years) disease duration. Analysis was performed on anti-interleukin (IL)-17A cohort vs other biologics cohort, anti-IL-17A vs other drug classes, and pairwise comparisons of ixekizumab vs individual biologics, provided that the statistical models converged. Analysis investigated the association of disease duration with the proportion of patients achieving 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index score (PASI 100) at week 12. Adjusted comparative analyses, reported as odds ratio (OR), were performed using Frequentist Model Averaging (FMA) for each cohort or treatments within each subcategory of the subgroups., Results: At week 12, anti-IL-17A and other biologics cohorts displayed minimal differences in numerical response rate for PASI 100 with respect to disease duration. The anti-IL-17A cohort showed a higher numerical PASI 100 response rate compared to the other biologic cohort irrespective of disease duration (≤2 years: 36.7% vs 21.8%; >2 years: 35.8% vs 21.9%)., Conclusion: Overall, the results do not clearly indicate that treating patients early is critical in achieving optimal patient outcomes. Furthermore, patients treated with ixekizumab show numerically higher response rates relative to other individual biologics irrespective of disease duration.

Objective: Patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) frequently show spontaneous improvement of skin fibrosis. Our aim was to examine whether an improvement in skin fibrosis predicts lower likelihood of visceral organ progression and better survival., Methods: Patients from the European Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) cohort with dcSSc, baseline modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) ≥7, and valid mRSS at 12±3 months follow up were included. Regression/progression of skin fibrosis was defined as a decrease/increase in mRSS >5 points and ≥25% from baseline to follow up. The outcomes included progression of lung, renal, cardiac and gastrointestinal manifestations using consensus derived definitions and all-cause death. Regressive, stable and progressive patients were compared by univariate, Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox regression analysis., Results: Of 1257 included patients, 883 (70.2%) were stable, 282 (22.4%) regressive, and 92 (7.3%) progressive. Regressive patients, adjusted for baseline mRSS, baseline immunosuppression, baseline FVC, and disease duration, showed a significantly lower probability of FVC decline ≥10% than progressive patients (p=0.00003), lower probability of all-cause mortality during follow up (p=0.035) compared to progressive patients. .Improvement of skin fibrosis was not associated with progression of other organ manifestations., Conclusion: We found that regression of skin fibrosis is associated with a lower probability of lung progression and better survival at follow up. The link between the disease course of skin and lung fibrosis in SSc can help to better stratify patients in clinical practice and enrich for ILD progressive patients in clinical trials., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD), with its hallmark symptoms of pruritus and skin lesions, often impairs patients' quality of life. We assessed time spent with clear/almost clear skin and no/minimal itch during upadacitinib treatment versus placebo or dupilumab among patients with moderate-to-severe AD., Methods: This analysis consisted of a post hoc analysis of Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293), Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422), and Heads Up (NCT03738397). Measure Up 1 and 2 were replicate, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies with patients randomized (1:1:1) to once-daily oral upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg, or placebo for 16 weeks. Heads Up was a head-to-head, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3b study with patients randomized (1:1) to upadacitinib 30 mg or subcutaneous dupilumab 300 mg for 24 weeks. Skin clearance was assessed with the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at baseline, weeks 1, 2, and 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter. Itch was assessed using the Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS) daily over 16 weeks and every 2 weeks thereafter to week 24 in Heads Up., Results: This analysis included 1683 patients in Measure Up 1 and 2 and 673 patients in Heads Up. Through 16 weeks in Measure Up 1 and 2, patients receiving upadacitinib spent 9.8-13.4 times as many days with an EASI 90 response and 7.0-10.3 times as many days with a WP-NRS 0/1 response versus placebo. In Heads Up, patients receiving upadacitinib spent 2.0 and 1.7 times as many days through 16 and 24 weeks, respectively, with an EASI 90 response versus dupilumab. Through 16 and 24 weeks, patients receiving upadacitinib spent 3.0 and 2.6 times as many days, respectively, with a WP-NRS 0/1 response versus dupilumab., Conclusions: Patients with moderate-to-severe AD spent more time with clear/almost clear skin and no/minimal itch with upadacitinib versus placebo or dupilumab., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293), Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422), Heads Up (NCT03738397)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common chronic inflammatory skin diseases, with an increasing number of targeted therapies available. While biologics to treat AD exclusively target the key cytokines of type 2 immunity, Janus kinase inhibitors target a broad variety of cytokines, including IFN-γ. To better stratify patients for optimal treatment outcomes, the identification and characterization of subgroups, especially with regard to their IFNG expression, is of great relevance, as the role of IFNG in AD has not yet been fully clarified. This study aims to define AD subgroups based on their lesional IFNG expression and to characterize them based on their gene expression, T cell secretome and clinical attributes. RNA from the lesional and non-lesional biopsies of 48 AD patients was analyzed by RNA sequencing. Based on IFNG gene expression and the release of IFN-γ by lesional T cells, this cohort was categorized into three IFNG groups (high, medium, and low) using unsupervised clustering. The low IFNG group showed features of extrinsic AD with a higher prevalence of atopic comorbidities and impaired epidermal lipid synthesis. In contrast, patients in the high IFNG group had a higher average age and an activation of additional pro-inflammatory pathways. On the cellular level, higher amounts of M1 macrophages and natural killer cell signaling were detected in the high IFNG group compared to the low IFNG group by a deconvolution algorithm. However, both groups shared a common dupilumab response gene signature, indicating that type 2 immunity is the dominant immune shift in both subgroups. In summary, high and low IFNG subgroups correspond to intrinsic and extrinsic AD classifications and might be considered in the future for evaluating therapeutic efficacy or non-responders., Competing Interests: Sophia Wasserer has received honoraria and travel support from Novartis, Sanofi-Regeneron, Janssen and Lilly. Felix Lauffer has been an advisor and/or received speaker’s honoraria and/or received grants and/or participated in clinical trials for the following companies: Abbvie, Almirall, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer Inglheim, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, Union Therapeutics and Biogen. Kristine E. Mayer has received travel support from Novartis. Kilian Eyerich has received grants and honoraria and has served as a speaker, investigator, consultant and/or advisor for AbbVie, Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Celgene, Hexal, Galapagos, Galderma, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Sanofi and UCB Pharma. Tilo Biedermann gave advice to and received honoraria for talks or research grants from the following companies: Abbvie, Alk-Abelló, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene-BMS, Leo Pharma, Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Regeneron and Viatris. No specific conflicts of interest were declared in relation to this article.

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) affects multiple areas of the body, some of which may be more refractory to treatment. We evaluated improvements in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) by body region and clinical signs for each body region in lebrikizumab-treated patients with moderate-to-severe AD., Methods: ADvocate 1 and ADvocate 2 compared lebrikizumab 250 mg as monotherapy every 2 weeks versus placebo for 16 weeks. Efficacy measures included EASI, which rates the extent and severity of four clinical signs (erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, lichenification) in four body regions (head/neck, upper extremities, trunk, lower extremities). Analyses are post hoc., Results: Mean baseline EASI, body region EASI subscores, and the severity of clinical signs were consistent across both studies (EASI ranging from 16.0 to 72.0). At week 16 in both studies, patients treated with lebrikizumab showed significantly greater percent improvement in EASI across all body regions versus placebo (p ≤ 0.001), with improvements as early as week 2. In ADvocate 1, all clinical signs significantly improved across all body regions at week 16 with lebrikizumab (51.4-71.6% improvement) versus placebo (23.1-43.5%, p ≤ 0.001), with significant improvements as early as week 2 for all signs. Significant improvements for all clinical signs at week 16 were also seen in ADvocate 2 for lebrikizumab (53.5-75.6%) versus placebo (28.5-41.2%, p ≤ 0.001) and as early as week 2 for all body regions and signs except head/neck erythema and lower extremity erythema, edema/papulation, and lichenification, which showed significant improvement by week 4., Conclusions: Lebrikizumab as monotherapy consistently and rapidly reduced the extent of involvement and severity of AD in all EASI clinical signs and body regions, including the head and neck region and clinical sign of lichenification, compared with placebo., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ADvocate 1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate 2 (NCT04178967)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Interleukin (IL)-23, an IL-12 cytokine family member, is a hierarchically dominant regulatory cytokine in a cluster of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), including psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease. We review IL-23 biology, IL-23 signaling in IMIDs, and the effect of IL-23 inhibition in treating these diseases. We propose studies to advance IL-23 biology and unravel differences in response to anti-IL-23 therapy. Experimental evidence generated from these investigations could establish a novel molecular ontology centered around IL-23-driven diseases, improve upon current approaches to treating IMIDs with IL-23 inhibition, and ultimately facilitate optimal identification of patients and, thereby, outcomes., Competing Interests: JK served as a consultant for and/or received honoraria from AbbVie, Allergan, Almirall, Amgen, Arena, Aristea, Asana, Aurigene, Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Escalier, Galapagos, Janssen, Eli Lilly, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, Nimbus, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sienna Biopharmaceuticals, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Target-Derm, UCB, Valeant, and Ventyx. KE received speaker fees from and/or served on an advisory board for AbbVie, Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Novartis, Sanofi, and UCB. VK served as a consultant for iTeos; has an ownership interest in and is a member of the scientific advisory board for Tizona Therapeutics; is a cofounder of and has an ownership interest in Celsius Therapeutics; and is a cofounder of Bicara Therapeutics. CR received grant/research support and consulting fees from UCB, AbbVie, and Amgen; and received consulting fees from Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Gilead, and Janssen. MA is a consultant or served on advisory boards for AbbVie Inc, Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc now Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celsius Therapeutics, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences Inc, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Global Services, Pfizer Pharmaceutical, Prometheus Biosciences, UCB Biopharma SRL. She has received fees for lecturing from Alimentiv, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Prime CME and WebMD Global LLC. IM received consulting fees and grant/research support from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, and UCB; received consulting fees from AbbVie, Cabaletta, Compugen, Gilead, Pfizer, and Sanofi; serves as a shareholder of Compugen and Causeway Therapeutics, and as a board member for National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde; and is a trustee for Versus Arthritis. ME, AF, SF, JS, Y-WY, and DC are employees of Janssen and hold stock in Johnson & Johnson. Box 1Questions to consider for future investigation to advance the science of IL-23 and approaches to IL-23 inhibitor therapy.A multiomics approach to advancing the science of IL-23 Are there any trends in the literature that identify how the IL-23/IL-17 axis may function and drive nuanced effects in different cell types or tissues?Does the impact of this pathway change over time or with progression of disease, identifying an ideal timeframe or context in the course of disease to initiate IL-23 inhibitor treatment?Are there any differences in biomarker profiles between inadequate responders and responders to therapy that may be used to predict clinical outcomes?What is the epigenetic profile of IL-23 signaling in various immune and non-immune cell types and how may this impact disease pathogenesis, disease progression, or response to treatment?What post-translational modifications of downstream cytokines/effector molecules are associated with IL-23 signaling?What are the functional consequences of changes in multiomics profiles and associated changes in immune cell populations over the course of disease and in response to treatment?“Broad sweep” of IL-23 receptor–expressing cells Which cells express the IL-23 receptor in healthy and inflamed tissues in humans?What is the role of IL-23 receptor signaling in diverse T-cell targets?How may a comprehensive assessment of IL-23 receptor expression across cell types and tissues identify new disease states that may be treatable through targeted intervention with IL-23 inhibition?How does IL-23 receptor expression change at various timepoints and tissue types across IMIDs and in response to treatment with IL-23 blockade?Is the IL-23 receptor coexpressed with other molecules of interest (ie, other cytokines or receptors) that may help to explain differences between currently available therapies and help design future treatments?Gaps in understanding IL-23 signaling and cellular activity Are there different nuances to IL-23 signaling in different cell types or tissues that may have functional consequences impacting disease pathogenesis or response to treatment?Do these signaling nuances change over the course of disease progression, and normalize with treatment with an IL-23 inhibitor?What is the role of STAT3 and STAT4 signaling in the context of IL-23 receptor signaling in Treg cells?What is the relationship between tissue-specific microbiota and IL-23 receptor signaling?Durability of response What is the effect of targeting IL-23p19 on TRM cells and the ratio of TRM/Treg cells across IMIDs?What are the mechanisms underlying the long-lasting effects of targeting IL-23p19?Can early intervention with IL-23 blockade after recent onset of disease modify the course of disease progression by suppressing TRM cells?Future IL-23 inhibitor molecules What molecular attributes of IL-23 inhibitors may be relevant for optimizing inhibition of IL-23 across IMIDs?Are there therapeutic advantages in targeting the IL-23 receptor versus IL-23p19 subunit directly in treating IMIDs?Combination therapy What potential therapeutic benefits may derive from combining IL-23 inhibition with blockade of another complementary inflammatory disease-driving pathway in treating IMIDs?What complementary pathway(s) would be optimal for blockade in combination with IL-23 inhibition for treatment of given IMIDs?IL, interleukin; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; Treg, regulatory T., (Copyright © 2024 Krueger, Eyerich, Kuchroo, Ritchlin, Abreu, Elloso, Fourie, Fakharzadeh, Sherlock, Yang, Cua and McInnes.)

Sebaceous glands drive acne, however, their role in other inflammatory skin diseases remains unclear. To shed light on their potential contribution to disease development, we investigated the spatial transcriptome of sebaceous glands in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis patients across lesional and non-lesional human skin samples. Both atopic dermatitis and psoriasis sebaceous glands expressed genes encoding key proteins for lipid metabolism and transport such as ALOX15B, APOC1, FABP7, FADS1/2, FASN, PPARG , and RARRES1. Also, inflammation-related SAA1 was identified as a common spatially variable gene. In atopic dermatitis, genes mainly related to lipid metabolism (e.g. ACAD8, FADS6 , or EBP) as well as disease-specific genes, i.e., Th2 inflammation-related lipid-regulating HSD3B1 were differentially expressed. On the contrary, in psoriasis, more inflammation-related spatially variable genes (e.g. SERPINF1 , FKBP5 , IFIT1/3, DDX58 ) were identified. Other psoriasis-specific enriched pathways included lipid metabolism (e.g. ACOT4, S1PR3) , keratinization (e.g. LCE5A, KRT5/7/16 ), neutrophil degranulation, and antimicrobial peptides (e.g. LTF, DEFB4A, S100A7-9 ). In conclusion, our results show that sebaceous glands contribute to skin homeostasis with a cell type-specific lipid metabolism, which is influenced by the inflammatory microenvironment. These findings further support that sebaceous glands are not bystanders in inflammatory skin diseases, but can actively and differentially modulate inflammation in a disease-specific manner., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Seiringer, Hillig, Schäbitz, Jargosch, Pilz, Eyerich, Szegedi, Sochorová, Gruber, Zouboulis, Biedermann, Menden, Eyerich and Törőcsik.)

For decades, topical corticosteroids have been the mainstay of treatment for mild-to-moderate inflammatory skin diseases, even though only short-term use is approved for these agents and systemic inflammation is not addressed. Increased understanding of the immunopathogenesis of these conditions, especially for psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, has facilitated the development of antibody-based drugs that neutralize single key cytokines or their associated receptors, such as interleukin (IL)-17A/F, IL-23, and IL-17RA in psoriasis and IL-13 and IL-4Rα in atopic dermatitis. However, oral therapy is still preferred by many patients owing to the ease of use and needle-free administration. Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors have been approved for both oral and topical use for inflammatory skin diseases. In this review, we present a summary of an emerging class of selective PDE4B/D inhibitors under clinical development and compare the differences in selectivity of this new generation of PDE4 inhibitors with the less selective currently approved PDE4 inhibitors., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Mechanistic insight into ageing may empower prolonging the lifespan of humans; however, a complete understanding of this process is still lacking despite a plethora of ageing theories. In order to address this, we investigated the association of lifespan with eight phenotypic traits, that is, litter size, body mass, female and male sexual maturity, somatic mutation, heart, respiratory, and metabolic rate. In support of the somatic mutation theory, we analysed 15 mammalian species and their whole-genome sequencing deriving somatic mutation rate, which displayed the strongest negative correlation with lifespan. All remaining phenotypic traits showed almost equivalent strong associations across this mammalian cohort, however, resting heart rate explained additional variance in lifespan. Integrating somatic mutation and resting heart rate boosted the prediction of lifespan, thus highlighting that resting heart rate may either directly influence lifespan, or represents an epiphenomenon for additional lower-level mechanisms, for example, metabolic rate, that are associated with lifespan., (© 2023 The Authors. Aging Cell published by Anatomical Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

What Is This Summary About?: Atopic dermatitis (AD, also called atopic eczema) is a skin disease that that can affect a person for a long time and causes red or flaky skin that can be itchy and uncomfortable. Healthcare providers can prescribe medicated creams and ointments to reduce the visible signs and symptoms of AD, but these treatments are not always enough to keep it under control. A new medicine called abrocitinib is taken every day as a tablet. Abrocitinib works by slowing a part of the body's defense mechanism, called immune response, that is not functioning properly in AD. The clinical study described in this plain language summary, called JADE DARE, investigated how well and how safely 26 weeks of treatment with abrocitinib worked in adults with AD compared to an injected medicine, called dupilumab, that is also approved for AD., What Were the Results?: The study showed that abrocitinib was more effective than dupilumab in providing itch relief after 2 weeks. In addition, people who were taking abrocitinib for 4 and 16 weeks experienced greater improvement in the visible skin signs of AD than people who were taking dupilumab. The number of people who had health complaints while taking abrocitinib was similar to the number of people who had health complaints while taking dupilumab. Most of these complaints were minor., What Do the Results Mean?: Abrocitinib was more effective than dupilumab in quickly improving the signs and symptoms of moderate or severe AD in people who did not show improvement with prescribed medications like creams or ointments. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04345367 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Highly effective targeted therapies are available to treat noncommunicable chronic inflammatory skin diseases. In contrast, the exact diagnosis of noncommunicable chronic inflammatory skin diseases is complicated by its complex pathogenesis and clinical and histological overlap. Particularly, the differential diagnosis of psoriasis and eczema can be challenging in some cases, and molecular diagnostic tools need to be developed to support a gold standard diagnosis. The aim of this work was to develop a real-time PCR-based molecular classifier to distinguish psoriasis from eczema in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded-fixed skin samples and to evaluate the use of minimally invasive microbiopsies and tape strips for molecular diagnosis. In this study, we present a formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded-based molecular classifier that determines the probability for psoriasis with a sensitivity/specificity of 92%/100%, respectively, and an area under the curve of 0.97, delivering comparable results to our previous published RNAprotect-based molecular classifier. The psoriasis probability, as well as levels of NOS2 expression, positively correlated with the disease hallmarks of psoriasis and negatively with eczema hallmarks. Furthermore, minimally invasive tape strips and microbiopsies were effectively used to differentiate psoriasis from eczema. In summary, the molecular classifier offers broad usage in pathology laboratories as well as outpatient settings and can support the differential diagnosis of noncommunicable chronic inflammatory skin diseases on a molecular level using formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue, microbiopsies, and tape strips., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Darier's disease (DD) is a genodermatosis caused by mutations of the ATP2A2 gene leading to disrupted keratinocyte adhesion. Recurrent episodes of skin inflammation and infections with a typical malodour in DD indicate a role for microbial dysbiosis. Here, for the first time, we investigated the DD skin microbiome using a metabarcoding approach of 115 skin swabs from 14 patients and 14 healthy volunteers. Furthermore, we analyzed its changes in the context of DD malodour and the cutaneous DD transcriptome., Results: We identified a disease-specific cutaneous microbiome with a loss of microbial diversity and of potentially beneficial commensals. Expansion of inflammation-associated microbes such as Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus warneri strongly correlated with disease severity. DD dysbiosis was further characterized by abundant species belonging to Corynebacteria, Staphylococci and Streptococci groups displaying strong associations with malodour intensity. Transcriptome analyses showed marked upregulation of epidermal repair, inflammatory and immune defence pathways reflecting epithelial and immune response mechanisms to DD dysbiotic microbiome. In contrast, barrier genes including claudin-4 and cadherin-4 were downregulated., Conclusions: These findings allow a better understanding of Darier exacerbations, highlighting the role of cutaneous dysbiosis in DD inflammation and associated malodour. Our data also suggest potential biomarkers and targets of intervention for DD. Video Abstract., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Modern treatments continue to be developed based on identifying targets within the innate and adaptive immune pathways associated with psoriasis. Whilst there is a sound biologic rationale for increased risk of infection following treatment with immunomodulators, the clinical evidence is confounded by these agents being used in patients affected with several comorbidities. In an era characterized by an ever greater and growing risk of infections, it is necessary to always be updated on this risk. In this mini-review, we will discuss recent updates in psoriasis immunopathogenesis as a rationale for systemic therapy, outline the risk of infections linked to the disease itself and systemic therapy as well, and provide an overview of the prevention and management of infections.

Abundant heterogeneous immune cells infiltrate lesions in chronic inflammatory diseases and characterization of these cells is needed to distinguish disease-promoting from bystander immune cells. Here, we investigate the landscape of non-communicable inflammatory skin diseases (ncISD) by spatial transcriptomics resulting in a large repository of 62,000 spatially defined human cutaneous transcriptomes from 31 patients. Despite the expected immune cell infiltration, we observe rather low numbers of pathogenic disease promoting cytokine transcripts (IFNG, IL13 and IL17A), i.e. >125 times less compared to the mean expression of all other genes over lesional skin sections. Nevertheless, cytokine expression is limited to lesional skin and presented in a disease-specific pattern. Leveraging a density-based spatial clustering method, we identify specific responder gene signatures in direct proximity of cytokines, and confirm that detected cytokine transcripts initiate amplification cascades of up to thousands of specific responder transcripts forming localized epidermal clusters. Thus, within the abundant and heterogeneous infiltrates of ncISD, only a low number of cytokine transcripts and their translated proteins promote disease by initiating an inflammatory amplification cascade in their local microenvironment., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Psoriasis (PSO) and Atopic dermatitis (AD) are common inflammatory skin diseases that affect people of all ages globally. They negatively impact the quality of life (QoL) of patients in health-related aspects such as physical, psychological and mental functioning. Here, we conducted a review of studies relating to candidate biomarkers and indicators associated with QoL impairment in PSO and AD. Data research was performed using PUBMED and SCOPUS databases from inception to September 2022. Most of the included studies reported genomic or proteomic biomarkers associated with disease activity and QoL outcomes. Sociodemographic, clinical and therapeutic factors have also been implicated in deterioration of life quality in these patients. The inclusion of clinical characteristics, QoL impairment and co-diagnosis should be considered in drug development programs, since processing biomarkers based on an increased number of features in addition to drug class and disease will intensify the value of the biomarker itself, thereby maximizing the future clinical utility as a stratification tool.

In recent years, a growing interest in the characterization of the molecular basis of psoriasis has been observed. However, despite the availability of a large amount of molecular data, many pathogenic mechanisms of psoriasis are still poorly understood. In this study, we performed an integrated analysis of 23 public transcriptomic datasets encompassing both lesional and uninvolved skin samples from psoriasis patients. We defined comprehensive gene co-expression network models of psoriatic lesions and uninvolved skin. Moreover, we curated and exploited a wide range of functional information from multiple public sources in order to systematically annotate the inferred networks. The integrated analysis of transcriptomics data and co-expression networks highlighted genes that are frequently dysregulated and show aberrant patterns of connectivity in the psoriatic lesion compared with the unaffected skin. Our approach allowed us to also identify plausible, previously unknown, actors in the expression of the psoriasis phenotype. Finally, we characterized communities of co-expressed genes associated with relevant molecular functions and expression signatures of specific immune cell types associated with the psoriasis lesion. Overall, integrating experimental driven results with curated functional information from public repositories represents an efficient approach to empower knowledge generation about psoriasis and may be applicable to other complex diseases., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

T cells are key drivers of autoimmunity in numerous noncommunicable inflammatory skin diseases by directly harming host tissue or through helping B cells in producing autoantibodies. Technological advances have contributed to identifying autoantigens, the Holy Grail of autoimmunity, in many inflammatory disorders of the skin. Novel therapeutic approaches such as chimeric (auto)antibody receptor T cells are a milestone on the way to finding individualized, well-tolerated, targeted therapies. This review summarizes the current knowledge on pathogenesis, immune response pattern‒related ontology, diagnostic approaches, and treatment options of autoimmune skin diseases., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Allergies have an enormous individual and economic impact worldwide and affect more than one quarter of the population in Germany. Various factors influence the development of allergies: besides genetic predisposition the environment in which a person is raised and living also plays a role. The aim of the study was to evaluate differences in allergy prevalence in relation to age, sex, occupation, and living area (settlement structures)., Methods: A cross-sectional study using a paper-based questionnaire about allergies was performed at the Munich Oktoberfest 2016. Participants were divided into 4 occupational groups and compared using descriptive statistics and multiple regression., Results: Overall, 2701 individuals (mean age 51.9 ± 15.3 years; 53.5% women) participated in the study. The overall rate of any self-reported allergy was 27.3% in the study population, in which women were more likely to be affected than men (OR = 1.82; 95% CI [1.50; 2.22]). Compared to farmers, all other occupational groups had a higher risk of reporting pollen allergies. Participants from rural areas (OR = 0.38; 95% CI [0.26; 0.58]) and suburban areas (OR = 0.44; 95% CI [0.30; 0.64]) were significantly less affected by allergies than participants from urban areas. Around 45.2% of the participants affected by allergies reported not receiving any treatment at all., Conclusion: Differences in the self-reported prevalence of allergies were shown for age groups, sex, living area, and occupation. Especially the reported pollen allergy prevalence ranged widely between different occupations, indicating that those individuals with an occupational exposure to pollen may have a lower risk than indoor workers. Overall, there remains a high need for sufficient treatment of allergies., Competing Interests: L. Tizek declares a conflict of interest with Novartis Pharma GmbH and Beiersdorf Dermo Medical GmbH. E. Redlinger: none declared. J. Ring: none declared. Dr. Eyerich reports other from Novartis Pharma GmbH, other from Beiersdorf Dermo Medical GmbH, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from Almirall, personal fees from BMS, grants and personal fees from LEO, personal fees from Lilly, grants and personal fees from Janssen, grants and personal fees from UCB, grants and personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. T. Biedermann gave advice to or got a honorarium for talks or research grants from the following companies: Alk-Abelló, Celgene-BMS, Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Mylan, Novartis Pharma GmbH, Phadia-Thermo Fisher, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Regeneron. A. Zink has been an advisor and/or received speaker's honoraria and/or received unrestricted research grants and/or participated in clinical trials of the following companies: Abbvie, Amgen, Almirall, Beiersdorf Dermo Medical GmbH, Bencard Allergie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen Cilag, Leo Pharma, Miltenyi BiotecMiltenyi Biotec, Pfizer, Novartis, Phadia Thermofischer GmbH, Sanofi-Aventis, and Takeda Pharma., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Introduction: In the real-world APPRECIATE study (NCT02740218), most patients with psoriasis demonstrated notable improvements on disease severity measures and reported clinically meaningful treatment benefits with apremilast., Objective: We aim to further describe patient-relevant needs and benefits and patient satisfaction with apremilast, including subgroup analyses based on patient characteristics., Methods: APPRECIATE, a multinational, retrospective, cross-sectional study, enrolled patients with chronic plaque psoriasis who started apremilast according to the European label. Patient Benefit Index (PBI; range 0 (no patient-relevant benefit) to 4 (maximum patient-relevant benefit), global PBI score ≥ 1 indicating minimum patient-relevant benefit and ≥ 3 indicating high benefit) and nine-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9; range 0-100) were assessed 6 (± 1) months after apremilast initiation and summarized descriptively. Relationships between global PBI and TSQM-9 assessments were analyzed by Pearson correlations., Results: Of 480 enrolled patients, 347 (72.3%) had remained on apremilast at 6 (± 1) months; 90.9% (300/330) achieved global PBI score ≥ 1. Mean (standard deviation) global PBI score was 2.8 (1.2). Higher achievement of global PBI score ≥ 3 was observed in patients with no prior treatments (61.1% (22/36)) or prior phototherapy (64.6% (42/65)) versus prior conventional systemic (54.4% (100/184)) or biologic (38.6% (17/44)) treatment. Strong correlations were observed between the global PBI score and the TSQM-9 global satisfaction and effectiveness subscale scores., Conclusion: Patients continuing apremilast for 6 (± 1) months in APPRECIATE reported patient-relevant treatment benefits. Findings suggest that receiving apremilast earlier versus later in treatment management is consistent with greater improvements in patient-relevant treatment outcomes., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

IFN-1s are early sentinels of potential danger in skin. Two interconnected axes exist: plasmacytoid dendritic cells (DCs) secreting IFN-α in response to single strand RNA or DNA and keratinocytes secreting IFN-κ after stimulation with double strand RNA or other IFNs. Both IFN-α and IFN-κ induce macrophages and DC subpopulations to secrete master regulators of cytotoxicity or wound healing, the latter related to psoriasis pathogenesis., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

(1) Background: Calcinosis cutis is a frequent symptom of autoimmune connective tissue diseases leading to pain, transcutaneous expulsion of calcified material and bacterial superinfection. There is a high need for new therapeutic options as no standardized treatment algorithm is established. While case reports indicate beneficial effects of bisphosphonates, standardized evaluation of treatment effects is missing. (2) Methods: In this retrospective analysis we evaluate the effects of intravenous pamidronate, a second-generation bisphosphonate, in seven patients with calcinosis cutis using consecutive clinical pictures, radiological examinations and patient's subjective evaluation. (3) Results: 5/6 patients reported a reduction of pain, improvement of general condition and cessation of calcinosis progression. Regression of skin lesions was detectable in clinical pictures of 2/6 patients, while 1/6 patients had stable disease. Radiological examination revealed improvement or stable disease in 3/5 patients. Fever was the most common side effect. One out of seven patients developed osteonecrosis of the jaw. (4) Conclusions: Bisphosphonates appear to have beneficial effects in a subgroup of calcinosis cutis patients. While patient's subjective evaluation was mainly positive, objective assessments showed improvement in approximately half of the cases. With regard to potential severe side effects, a careful risk-benefit evaluation is necessary before treatment initiation.

Background: Guselkumab is an interleukin (IL)-23 pathway blocker with proven efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Early intervention with guselkumab may result in changes to the clinical disease course versus later intervention., Methods and Analysis: Here we present the rationale and design of a phase 3b, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study (GUIDE), comparing treatment effects of guselkumab in patients with short (≤2 years) or longer (>2 years) duration of plaque-type psoriasis, measured from first appearance of psoriatic plaques. Participants achieving skin clearance (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)=0) by week 20 and maintaining complete clearance at week 28 visit ('super-responders' (SRe)) will be randomised to continue approved maintenance dosing every 8 weeks (q8w) versus an investigational maintenance dosing interval of 16 weeks (q16w) until week 68. Primary endpoint: proportion of participants in the q8w vs q16w arms with absolute PASI <3 at week 68. Participants with PASI <3 at week 68 will be withdrawn from guselkumab treatment for up to 48 weeks. Participants not achieving SRe criteria (non-SRe) will remain in the study with q8w guselkumab dosing through week 68. Additional to serum samples obtained from all patients, skin biopsies and whole-blood samples will be taken from SRe and non-SRe participants at various time points in optional substudies. Analyses include: genetics; immunophenotyping (fluorescence-activated cell sorting); gene and protein expression profiling; immunohistology. By merging clinical endpoints with mechanistic findings, this study aims to elucidate how IL-23 blockade with guselkumab can modify the disease course by altering molecular and cellular drivers that cause relapse after treatment withdrawal, particularly among SRe., Ethics and Dissemination: Approval obtained from ethics committee Medical Council Hamburg, Germany (PVN5925). GUIDE is compliant with the Declaration of Helsinki., Trial Registration Number: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03818035). All primary endpoint results (prespecified analyses) will be submitted to peer-reviewed, international journals within 18 months after primary completion date., Competing Interests: Competing interests: KE reports grants and personal fees from Janssen during the conduct of the study, grants from AbbVie, LEO Pharma, UCB and Novartis, and personal fees from AbbVie, Almirall, BMS, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Sanofi, UCB, Galderma and Novartis outside the submitted work; PW reports receiving honoraria as consultant or speaker from the following companies involved in the development or distribution of drugs for psoriasis: AbbVie, Almirall, Biogen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Medac and Novartis, and honoraria received by his institution for active participation in clinical studies sponsored by Janssen, AbbVie and Eli Lilly; AP has no conflicts of interest to report; KS reports conducting clinical studies during the past 36 months with the following companies: AbbVie, Almirall, Boehringer, Celgene, Chugai, Galapagos, Galderma, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis Regeneron and UCB Pharma; KA reports honoraria for participation in advisory boards, consultation, clinical trials or as speaker from AbbVie, Almirall, Antabio, Bayer, BMS, Euroimmune, Emphasis, Emeritipharma, Galderma, Janssen, La Roche-Posay, LEO Pharma, L’Oréal, Novartis, Parexel International, Pierre Fabre, Roxall, RG, Sanofi Genzyme, TFS Trial Form Support and UCB; SW is a full-time employee of Janssen-Cilag Germany; EJM-E is a full-time employee of Johnson & Johnson, and is listed as an inventor on a patent application related to uses of guselkumab to treat psoriasis, pending; HB reports personal fees from Janssen-Cilag Germany during the conduct of the study, and personal fees from Janssen-Cilag Germany outside the submitted work; FJHT reports personal fees from Janssen-Cilag, Germany during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Janssen-Cilag, Germany outside the submitted work; KR reports grants and personal fees from Janssen during the conduct of the study, grants from AbbVie, Lilly, LEO Pharma, UCB, Pfizer, Affibody, Biogen-Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, BMS, Celgene, Covagen, Forward Pharma, Fresenius Medical Care, Galapagos, Kyowa Kirin, Medac, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Milteny, Novartis, Ocean Pharma, Sandoz, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, Takeda and XBiotech; personal fees from AbbVie, Lilly, LEO Pharma, UCB, Pfizer, Amgen, Affibody, Biogen-Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, BMS, Celgene, Covagen, Forward Pharma, GSK, Kyowa Kirin, Medac, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, Novartis, Ocean Pharma, Samsung Bioepis, Sandoz, Sanofi, Takeda, Valeant and Xenoport outside the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease primarily affecting apocrine gland-rich areas of the body. It is a multifactorial disease in which genetic and environmental factors play a key role. The primary defect in HS pathophysiology involves follicular occlusion of the folliculopilosebaceous unit, followed by follicular rupture and immune responses. Innate pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1β, and TNF-α); mediators of activated T helper (Th)1 and Th17 cells (e.g., IFN-γ, and IL-17); and effector mechanisms of neutrophilic granulocytes, macrophages, and plasma cells are involved. On the other hand, HS lesions contain anti-inflammatory mediators (e.g., IL-10) and show limited activity of Th22 cells. The inflammatory vicious circle finally results in pain, purulence, tissue destruction, and scarring. HS pathogenesis is still enigmatic, and a valid animal model for HS is currently not available. All these aspects represent a challenge for the development of therapeutic approaches, which are urgently needed for this debilitating disease. Available treatments are limited, mostly off-label, and surgical interventions are often required to achieve remission. In this paper, we provide an overview of the current knowledge surrounding HS, including the diagnosis, pathogenesis, treatments, and existing translational studies.

Characterization of the complex interplay between cytokines, chemokines and microorganisms has led to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of both psoriasis and AD and resulted in new therapeutics targeting distinct immune responses. Psoriasis and AD share many characteristics: they are highly prevalent, chronic, cause primarily skin inflammation, but are associated with comorbidities, and come with a devastating quality of life due to itch and stigmatization. However, the pathogenesis of psoriasis and AD is opposing - psoriasis is dominated by a Th17 immune response that causes neutrophil migration, induction of innate immunity and exaggerated epithelial metabolism. Leading cytokines of this Th17 immune response are IL-17A and F, IL-22 and TNF-a. AD is characterized by Th2 immunity characterized by the signature cytokines IL-4 and IL-13 leading to an impaired epidermal barrier, dampened innate immunity and eosinophil migration. This review compares genetics, microbiome and T-cell infiltrate and resulting epithelial response in psoriasis and AD. Whilst the antagonistic course of psoriasis and AD is confirmed by response to specific biologics targeting the key cytokines of inflammation in psoriasis and AD, respectively, clinically overlapping phenotypes are challenging in our daily clinical practice. We conclude this review by summarizing what is known about these mixed phenotypes and how the identification of clinically relevant endotypes and molecular-driven decision-making is the next step in the field of dermato-immunology., (© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Internal Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Publication of The Journal of Internal Medicine.)

Whilst the importance of keratinocytes as a first-line defense has been widely investigated, little is known about their interactions with non-resident immune cells. In this study, the impact of human keratinocytes on T cell effector functions was analyzed in an antigen-specific in vitro model of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to nickel sulfate. Keratinocytes partially inhibited T cell proliferation and cytokine production. This effect was dependent on the keratinocyte/T cell ratio and was partially reversible by increasing the number of autologous dendritic cells. The inhibition of T cell proliferation by keratinocytes was independent of the T cell subtype and antigen presentation by different professional antigen-presenting cells. Autologous and heterologous keratinocytes showed comparable effects, while the fixation of keratinocytes with paraformaldehyde abrogated the immunosuppressive effect. The separation of keratinocytes and T cells by a transwell chamber, as well as a cell-free keratinocyte supernatant, inhibited T cell effector functions to the same amount as directly co-cultured keratinocytes, thus proving that soluble factor/s account for the observed suppressive effects. In conclusion, keratinocytes critically control the threshold of inflammatory processes in the skin by inhibiting T cell proliferation and cytokine production.