1. Lessons Learned From an Intensive Writing Training Course for Applied Epidemiologists
- Author
-
Malorie Polster, John S Moran, Jessica Arrazola, Richard L Vogt, and Paul Etkind
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Epidemiology ,Writing ,Case Study/Practice ,Epidemiologists ,Session (web analytics) ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Mentorship ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Publishing ,Medical education ,030504 nursing ,Peer feedback ,business.industry ,Public health ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Middle Aged ,Workforce development ,United States ,Council of State ,Education, Medical, Continuing ,Female ,Curriculum ,0305 other medical science ,business ,Psychology - Abstract
Although writing is a valued public health competency, authors face a multitude of barriers (eg, lack of time, lack of mentorship, lack of appropriate instruction) to publication. Few writing courses for applied public health professionals have been documented. In 2017 and 2018, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention partnered to implement a Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Intensive Writing Training course to improve the quality of submissions from applied epidemiologists working at health departments. The course included 3 webinars, expert mentorship from experienced authors, and a 2-day in-person session. As of April 2020, 39 epidemiologists had participated in the course. Twenty-four (62%) of the 39 epidemiologists had submitted manuscripts, 17 (71%) of which were published. The program’s evaluation demonstrates the value of mentorship and peer feedback during the publishing process, the importance of case study exercises, and the need to address structural challenges (eg, competing work responsibilities or supervisor support) in the work environment.
- Published
- 2020