Search

BRAFV600E alterations are prevalent across multiple tumors. Here we present final efficacy and safety results of a phase 2 basket trial of dabrafenib (BRAF kinase inhibitor) plus trametinib (MEK inhibitor) in eight cohorts of patients with BRAFV600E-mutated advanced rare cancers: anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (n = 36), biliary tract cancer (n = 43), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 1), adenocarcinoma of the small intestine (n = 3), low-grade glioma (n = 13), high-grade glioma (n = 45), hairy cell leukemia (n = 55) and multiple myeloma (n = 19). The primary endpoint of investigator-assessed overall response rate in these cohorts was 56%, 53%, 0%, 67%, 54%, 33%, 89% and 50%, respectively. Secondary endpoints were median duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Median DoR was 14.4 months, 8.9 months, not reached, 7.7 months, not reached, 31.2 months, not reached and 11.1 months, respectively. Median PFS was 6.7 months, 9.0 months, not reached, not evaluable, 9.5 months, 5.5 months, not evaluable and 6.3 months, respectively. Median OS was 14.5 months, 13.5 months, not reached, 21.8 months, not evaluable, 17.6 months, not evaluable and 33.9 months, respectively. The most frequent (≥20% of patients) treatment-related adverse events were pyrexia (40.8%), fatigue (25.7%), chills (25.7%), nausea (23.8%) and rash (20.4%). The encouraging tumor-agnostic activity of dabrafenib plus trametinib suggests that this could be a promising treatment approach for some patients with BRAFV600E-mutated advanced rare cancers. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02034110.

BackgroundThe phase I first-in-human study ENGAGE-1 evaluated the humanized IgG1 OX40 agonistic monoclonal antibody GSK3174998 alone (Part 1 (P1)) or in combination with pembrolizumab (Part 2 (P2)) in patients with advanced solid tumors.MethodsGSK3174998 (0.003–10 mg/kg) ± pembrolizumab (200 mg) was administered intravenously every 3 weeks using a continuous reassessment method for dose escalation. Primary objectives were safety and tolerability; secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity.Results138 patients were enrolled (45 (P1) and 96 (P2, including 3 crossovers)). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 51% (P1) and 64% (P2) of patients, fatigue being the most common (11% and 24%, respectively). No dose-toxicity relationship was observed, and maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. Dose-limiting toxicities (P2) included Grade 3 (G3) pleural effusion and G1 myocarditis with G3 increased troponin. GSK3174998 ≥0.3 mg/kg demonstrated pharmacokinetic linearity and >80% receptor occupancy on circulating T cells; 0.3 mg/kg was selected for further evaluation. Limited clinical activity was observed for GSK3174998 (P1: disease control rate (DCR) ≥24 weeks 9%) and was not greater than that expected for pembrolizumab alone (P2: overall response rate 8%, DCR ≥24 weeks 28%). Multiplexed immunofluorescence data from paired biopsies suggested that increased infiltration of natural killer (NK)/natural killer T (NKT) cells and decreased regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the tumor microenvironment may contribute to clinical responses: CD16+CD56–CD134+ NK /NKT cells and CD3+CD4+FOXP3+CD134+ Tregs exhibited the largest magnitude of change on treatment, whereas CD3+CD8+granzyme B+PD-1+CD134+ cytotoxic T cells were the least variable. Tumor gene expression profiling revealed an upregulation of inflammatory responses, T-cell proliferation, and NK cell function on treatment with some inflammatory cytokines upregulated in peripheral blood. However, target engagement, evidenced by pharmacologic activity in peripheral blood and tumor tissue, did not correlate with clinical efficacy. The low number of responses precluded identifying a robust biomarker signature predictive of response.ConclusionsGSK3174998±pembrolizumab was well tolerated over the dose range tested and demonstrated target engagement. Limited clinical activity does not support further development of GSK3174998±pembrolizumab in advanced cancers.Trial registration numberNCT02528357.

Background Despite the clinical efficacy of enzalutamide monotherapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer, therapeutic resistance and disease progression are inevitable. We proposed a study to evaluate NLG207, a nanoparticle-drug conjugate (NDC) of the potent topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin, in combination with enzalutamide, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following progression on enzalutamide. Methods This was a single-arm, optimal two-stage, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of NLG207 in combination with enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC who received prior enzalutamide. A lead-in dose escalation evaluated the recommended phase 2 dose of NLG207 in combination with enzalutamide. Patients received NLG207 via IV infusion every 2 weeks and enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily. Results Between March 2019 and June 2021, four patients were accrued to the lead-in dose escalation. Two of the four patients were evaluable and both experienced DLTs at the NLG207 12 mg/m2 dose level; one DLT was related to a dose delay for noninfective cystitis and myelosuppression, the other a grade 3 noninfective cystitis. Further evaluation of NLG207 in combination with enzalutamide was halted and the study was ultimately terminated. PSA declines from baseline were observed in two patients. Conclusion NLG207 12 mg/m2 in combination with enzalutamide was not well tolerated in patients with mCRPC following several lines of the standard of care therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03531827.

AIM: Pharmacokinetics of small molecule kinase inhibitors (KIs) used in cancer treatment may alter with increasing age, but results are conflicting. This study aims to compare exposure to KIs between older and younger patients (≥70 and

Transporters such as ABCB1 and ABCG2 limit the exposure of several anticancer drugs to the brain, leading to suboptimal treatment in the central nervous system. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the ABCB1 and ABCG2 inhibitor elacridar on brain uptake using

Preclinical evidence suggests that concomitant BRAF and EGFR inhibition leads to sustained suppression of MAPK signaling and suppressed tumor growth in BRAF V600E colorectal cancer (CRC) models. Patients with refractory BRAF V600–mutant metastatic CRC (mCRC) were treated with a selective RAF kinase inhibitor (encorafenib) plus a monoclonal antibody targeting EGFR (cetuximab), with (n = 28) or without (n = 26) a PI3K-alpha inhibitor (alpelisib). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or a recommended phase 2 dose. Dose-limiting toxicities were reported in three patients receiving dual- and two patients receiving triple-treatment. The MTD was not reached for either group and the Phase 2 doses were selected as 200 mg encorafenib (both groups) and 300 mg alpelisib. Combinations of cetuximab and encorafenib show promising clinical activity and tolerability in patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC; confirmed overall response rates of 19% and 18% were observed, and median progression-free survival was 3.7 and 4.2 months, for the dual- and triple-therapy groups, respectively.

Learning Objectives After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Evaluate the clinical use of bevacizumab, both for cancer and for non-oncologic diseases, and discuss approved and investigational combination chemotherapies that include bevacizumab.Describe the pharmacology of bevacizumab and its mechanism of action in order to predict degrees of patient response. CME This article is available for continuing medical education credit at CME.TheOncologist.com.

This article provides a brief summary of the use of methylnaltrexone for opioid-induced constipation in patients with advanced illness receiving palliative care when the response to laxatives is insufficient.

Learning Objectives After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Identify the current indications for imatinib.Describe the pharmacokinetics of imatinib.Discuss the mechanisms involved in imatinib resistance. Access and take the CME test online and receive 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ at CME.TheOncologist.com

Learning Objectives After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Identify the main toxicity profile associated with capecitabine therapy.Identify the main clinical indications for capecitabine therapy.Identify the populations at risk for severe toxicity from capecitabine therapy. CME Access and take the CME test online and receive 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ at CME.TheOncologist.com

Previously published pharmacokinetic (PK) models for sunitinib and its active metabolite SU12662 were based on a limited dataset or lacked important elements such as correlations between sunitinib and its metabolite. The current study aimed to develop an improved PK model that circumvented these limitations and to prove the utility of the PK model in treatment optimization in clinical practice.One thousand two hundred and five plasma samples from 70 cancer patients were collected from three PK studies with sunitinib and SU12662. A semi-physiological PK model for sunitinib and SU12662 was developed incorporating pre-systemic metabolism using non-linear mixed effects modelling (nonmem). Allometric scaling based on body weight was applied. The final model was used for simulation of the PK of different treatment regimens.Sunitinib and SU12662 PK were best described by a one and two compartment model, respectively. Introduction of pre-systemic formation of SU12662 strongly improved model fit, compared with solely systemic metabolism. The clearance of sunitinib and SU12662 was estimated at 35.7 (relative standard error (RSE) 5.7%) l h(-1) and 17.1 (RSE 7.4%) l h(-1), respectively for 70 kg patients. Correlation coefficients were estimated between inter-individual variability of both clearances, both volumes of distribution and between clearance and volume of distribution of SU12662 as 0.53, 0.48 and 0.45, respectively. Simulation of the PK model predicted correctly the ratio of patients who did not reach proposed PK targets for efficacy.A semi-physiological PK model for sunitinib and SU12662 in cancer patients was presented including pre-systemic metabolism. The model was superior to previous PK models in many aspects.

Eribulin mesilate is an inhibitor of microtubule dynamics that is approved for the treatment of late-stage metastatic breast cancer. Neutropenia is one of the major dose-limiting adverse effects of eribulin. The objective of this analysis was to develop a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for eribulin-associated neutropenia.A combined data set of 12 phase I, II and III studies for eribulin mesilate was analysed. The population pharmacokinetics of eribulin was described using a previously developed model. The relationship between eribulin pharmacokinetic and neutropenia was described using a semi-physiological lifespan model for haematological toxicity. Patient characteristics predictive of increased sensitivity to develop neutropenia were evaluated using a simulation framework.Absolute neutrophil counts were available from 1579 patients. In the final covariate model, the baseline neutrophil count (ANC0) was estimated to be 4.03 × 10(9) neutrophils l(-1) [relative standard error (RSE) 1.2%], with interindividual variability (IIV, 37.3 coefficient of variation % [CV%]). The mean transition time was estimated to be 109 h (RSE 1.8%, IIV 13.9CV%), the feedback constant (γ) was estimated to be 0.216 (RSE 1.4%, IIV 12.2CV%), and the linear drug effect coefficient (SLOPE) was estimated to be 0.0451 μg l(-1) (RSE 3.2%, IIV 54CV%). Albumin, aspartate transaminase and receival of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were identified as significant covariates on SLOPE, and albumin, bilirubin, G-CSF, alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase were identified as significant covariates on mean transition time.The developed model can be applied to investigate optimal treatment strategies quantitatively across different patient groups with respect to neutropenia. Albumin was identified as the most clinically important covariate predictive of interindividual variability in the neutropenia time course.

The herbal medicine Echinacea purpurea (E. purpurea) has been shown to induce cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) both in vitro and in humans. This study explored whether E. purpurea affects the pharmacokinetics of the CYP3A4 substrate docetaxel in cancer patients.Ten evaluable cancer patients received docetaxel (135 mg, 60 min IV infusion) before intake of a commercially available E. purpurea extract (20 oral drops three times daily) and 3 weeks later after a 14 day supplementation period with E. purpurea. In both cycles, pharmacokinetic parameters of docetaxel were determined.Before and after supplementation with E. purpurea, the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve of docetaxel was 3278 ± 1086 and 3480 ± 1285 ng ml(-1) h, respectively. This result was statistically not significant. Nonsignificant alterations were also observed for the elimination half-life (from 30.8 ± 19.7 to 25.6 ± 5.9 h, P = 0.56) and maximum plasma concentration of docetaxel (from 2224 ± 609 to 2097 ± 925 ng ml(-1) , P = 0.30).The multiple treatment of E. purpurea did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in this study. The applied E. purpurea product at the recommended dose may be combined safely with docetaxel in cancer patients.

The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the mixture of botanical compounds known as LCS101 were evaluated in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced hematological toxicity in breast cancer patients in a prospective, controlled study.

To evaluate dosing and intervention strategies for the phase II programme of a VEGF receptor inhibitor using PK-PD modelling and simulation, with the aim of maximizing (i) the number of patients on treatment and (ii) the average dose level during treatment.A previously developed PK-PD model for lenvatinib (E7080) was updated and parameters were re-estimated (141 patients, once daily and twice daily regimens). Treatment of lenvatinib was simulated for 16 weeks, initiated at 25 mg once daily. Outcome measures included the number of patients on treatment and overall drug exposure. A hypertension intervention design proposed for phase II studies was evaluated, including antihypertensive treatment and dose de-escalation. Additionally, a within-patient dose escalation was investigated, titrating up to 50 mg once daily unless unacceptable toxicity occurred.Using the proposed antihypertension intervention design, 82% of patients could remain on treatment, and the mean dose administered was 21.5 mg day⁻¹. The adverse event (AE) guided dose titration increased the average dose by 4.6 mg day⁻¹, while only marginally increasing the percentage of patients dropping out due to toxicity (from 18% to 20.8%).The proposed hypertension intervention design is expected to be effective in maintaining patients on treatment with lenvatinib. The AE-guided dose titration with blood pressure as a biomarker yielded a higher overall dose level, without relevant increases in toxicity. Since increased exposure to lenvatinib seems correlated with increased treatment efficacy, the adaptive treatment design may thus be a valid approach to improve treatment outcome.

Eribulin mesylate is a non-taxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor that was recently approved for treatment of metastatic breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of rifampicin, a CYP3A4 inducer, on the plasma pharmacokinetics of eribulin in patients with solid tumours.An open-label, non-randomized phase I study was carried out. Patients received intravenous 1.4 mg m(-2) eribulin mesylate on days 1 and 15 and oral rifampicin 600 mg on days 9 to 20 of a 28 day cycle. Pharmacokinetic sampling for determination of eribulin plasma concentrations was performed up to 144 h following administration. AUC(0,∞) and C(max) for eribulin exposure without or with co-administration of rifampicin were subjected to an analysis of variance (anova) and corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Subsequently, patients were allowed to continue eribulin mesylate treatment with 1.4 mg m(-2) eribulin mesylate on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle. Also the adverse event profile and anti-tumour activity were assessed.Fourteen patients were included and 11 patients were evaluable for pharmacokinetic analysis. Co-administration of rifampicin had no effect on single dose exposure to eribulin (geometric least square means ratio: AUC(0,∞) = 1.10, 90% CI 0.91, 1.34 and C(max) = 0.97, 90% 0.81, 1.17). The most common treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events were grade 3 neutropenia (4/14, 29%), leucopenia and fatigue (both 3/14, 21%).These results indicate that eribulin mesylate may be safely co-administered with compounds that are CYP3A4 inducers.

There is no consensus regarding optimal dosing of high dose methotrexate (HDMTX) in patients with primary CNS lymphoma. Our aim was to develop a convenient dosing algorithm to target AUC(MTX) in the range between 1000 and 1100 µmol l(-1) h.A population covariate model from a pooled dataset of 131 patients receiving HDMTX was used to simulate concentration-time curves of 10,000 patients and test the efficacy of a dosing algorithm based on 24 h MTX plasma concentrations to target the prespecified AUC(MTX) . These data simulations included interindividual, interoccasion and residual unidentified variability. Patients received a total of four simulated cycles of HDMTX and adjusted MTX dosages were given for cycles two to four.The dosing algorithm proposes MTX dose adaptations ranging from +75% in patients with MTX C(24)0.5 µmol l(-1) up to -35% in patients with MTX C(24)12 µmol l(-1). The proposed dosing algorithm resulted in a marked improvement of the proportion of patients within the AUC(MTX) target between 1000 and 1100 µmol l(-1) h (11% with standard MTX dose, 35% with the adjusted dose) and a marked reduction of the interindividual variability of MTX exposure.A simple and practical dosing algorithm for HDMTX has been developed based on MTX 24 h plasma concentrations, and its potential efficacy in improving the proportion of patients within a prespecified target AUC(MTX) and reducing the interindividual variability of MTX exposure has been shown by data simulations. The clinical benefit of this dosing algorithm should be assessed in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).

The antifolate drug methotrexate (MTX) is transported by breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP; ABCG2) and multidrug resistance-associated protein1-4 (MRP1-4; ABCC1-4). In cancer patients, coadministration of benzimidazoles and MTX can result in profound MTX-induced toxicity coinciding with an increase in the serum concentrations of MTX and its main metabolite 7-hydroxymethotrexate. We hypothesized that benzimidazoles interfere with the clearance of MTX and/or 7-hydroxymethotrexate by inhibition of the ATP-binding cassette drug transporters BCRP and/or MRP2, two transporters known to transport MTX and located in apical membranes of epithelia involved in drug disposition. First, we investigated the mechanism of interaction between benzimidazoles (pantoprazole and omeprazole) and MTX in vitro in membrane vesicles from Sf9 cells infected with a baculovirus containing human BCRP or human MRP2 cDNA. In Sf9-BCRP vesicles, pantoprazole and omeprazole inhibited MTX transport (IC50 13 microm and 36 microm, respectively). In Sf9-MRP2 vesicles, pantoprazole did not inhibit MTX transport and at high concentrations (1 mm), it even stimulated MTX transport 1.6-fold. Secondly, we studied the transport of pantoprazole in MDCKII monolayers transfected with mouse Bcrp1 or human MRP2. Pantoprazole was actively transported by Bcrp1 but not by MRP2. Finally, the mechanism of the interaction was studied in vivo using Bcrp1-/- mice and wild-type mice. Both in wild-type mice pretreated with pantoprazole to inhibit Bcrp1 and in Bcrp1-/- mice that lack Bcrp1, the clearance of i.v. MTX was decreased significantly 1.8- to 1.9-fold compared with the clearance of i.v. MTX in wild-type mice. The conclusion is as follows: benzimidazoles differentially affect transport of MTX mediated by BCRP and MRP2. Competition for BCRP may explain the clinical interaction between MTX and benzimidazoles.

Phase I and II clinical trails are currently investigating the antitumor activity of cisplatin and camptothecins (CPTs; DNA topoisomerase I poisons), based on the dramatic synergistic cytotoxicity of these agents in some preclinical models. However, the mechanistic basis for this synergism is poorly understood. By exploiting the evolutionary conservation of DNA repair pathways from genetically tractable organisms such as budding and fission yeasts to mammalian cells, we demonstrate that the synergism of CPT and cisplatin requires homologous recombination. In yeast and mammalian cell lines defective for RAD52 and XRCC2/3, respectively, the combination of these agents proved antagonistic, while greater than additive activity was evident in isogenic wild-type cells. Homologous recombination appears to mediate a similar interaction of X-rays and CPT, but antagonizes the synergism of cytarabine (Ara-C) with CPT. These findings suggest that homologous recombination comprises an evolutionarily conserved determinant of cellular sensitivity when CPTs are used in combination with other therapeutics.

The food carcinogen 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) is the most abundant heterocyclic amine found in various protein containing foods. PhIP is mutagenic and carcinogenic in rodents, inducing lymphomas in mice and colon, mammary and prostate carcinomas in rats. It has also been implicated in human breast carcinogenesis. Humans on a normal Western diet are exposed to PhIP on a daily basis. The breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) transports various anticancer drugs from cells, causing multidrug resistance. By its presence in the apical membrane of the intestine and bile canalicular membrane, it also protects the body from substrate drugs and toxins. We investigated whether Bcrp1 could affect PhIP exposure of the body because this could implicate BCRP activity in the cancer risk due to PhIP. Using polarized cell lines, we found that PhIP is efficiently transported by murine Bcrp1. In vivo pharmacokinetic studies showed that at a dose of 1 mg/kg [(14)C]PhIP the area under the curve for oral administration was 2.9-fold higher in Bcrp1(-/-) compared with wild-type mice (306 +/- 39 versus 107 +/- 15 h.ng/ml) and, for i.v. administration, 2.2 fold higher (386 +/- 36 versus 178 +/- 8.9 h.ng/ml). Wild-type mice cleared [(14)C]PhIP mainly by fecal excretion, but this shifted to primarily urinary excretion in Bcrp1(-/-) mice. In mice with a cannulated gall bladder, both hepatobiliary and direct intestinal excretion of [(14)C]PhIP were greatly impaired in Bcrp1(-/-) compared with wild-type mice (9.0 +/- 4.4 versus 36.5 +/- 9.4% and 1.5 +/- 0.8 versus 4.2 +/- 1.5%, respectively). We conclude that Bcrp1 effectively restricts the exposure of mice to ingested PhIP by decreasing its uptake from the gut lumen and by mediating hepatobiliary and intestinal elimination. Intra- or interindividual differences in BCRP activity in humans may thus also affect the exposure to PhIP and related food carcinogens, with possible implications for cancer susceptibility.

To establish the maximum dose intensity of cisplatin plus gemcitabine on a weekly or two-weekly schedule in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients with NSCLC stage IIIB or IV were randomized to receive weekly or two-weekly courses of gemcitabine on day 1 and cisplatin on day 2. An interpatient dose escalation scheme was used, and pharmacokinetics were determined for both agents in plasma and WBCs.Seventy-three patients were included, 32 on the weekly schedule and 41 on the two-weekly schedule. Fifty patients received all planned courses. Dose-limiting toxicities were leukocytopenia, neutropenia, and trombocytopenia on the weekly schedule and ototoxicity on the two-weekly schedule. Most common nonhematological toxicities consisted of nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. The highest dose intensity of cisplatin could be achieved on the two-weekly schedule, and therefore, further development of the weekly schedule was abandoned. The maximum tolerated dose was established at 1500 mg/m(2) gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin 90 mg/m(2). More than half (53%) of patients achieved an objective response on the two-weekly schedule, versus 23% in the weekly treatment arm. The pharmacokinetic studies revealed a significant interaction: gemcitabine reduced both GG and AG platinum-DNA intrastrand adducts in WBCs.The combination of gemcitabine (1500 mg/m(2)) with cisplatin at a dose intensity of 50 mg/m(2)/week is feasible on a two-weekly administration scheme in NSCLC patients.

Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP)/MXR/ABCG2 is a new member of the family of ATP-dependent drug efflux proteins. Whereas overexpression of another member of this family, P-glycoprotein, minimally affects the cytotoxicity of camptothecins (CPTs), overexpression of wild-type as well as certain mutant BCRPs confers resistance to CPT analogues that are used clinically, including topotecan and irinotecan. Relatively little is known regarding the effects of BCRP on other CPT analogues. We now report studies of 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC) and 9-nitrocamptothecin (9-NC) using mammalian cells stably transfected with constructs expressing a variety of efflux proteins, including wild-type BCRP and a mutant BCRP that contains a threonine rather than an arginine at position 482 (R482T). The results indicate that overexpression of either P-glycoprotein, multidrug resistance protein type 1, or multidrug resistance protein type 2 has little effect on the cytotoxicity of 9-NC or 9-AC. By contrast, overexpression of either wild-type or R482T BCRP confers resistance to 9-AC, but not to 9-NC. Furthermore, overexpression of wild-type or mutant BCRP is associated with reduced intracellular accumulation of 9-AC, but not 9-NC. In addition, immunoblotting studies indicate that whereas increased BCRP expression is evident in cells selected for resistance to irinotecan, BCRP expression is not detectable in two different cell lines selected for resistance to 9-NC. Taken together, these findings suggest that wild-type as well as R482T BCRP mediates cellular efflux of 9-AC but not 9-NC. Furthermore, the results suggest that polar groups at the 9 or 10 position of the CPT A ring facilitate interaction with BCRP and have implications for the clinical development of new CPT analogues.

1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25D3) exhibits potent antitumor activity in the murine squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) SCCVII/SF, and the combination of 1,25D3 with cisplatin (1,25D3/cisplatin) demonstrates even greater activity. Because these agents possess different mechanisms of cytotoxicity, studies were initiated to define the mechanism by which the combination displays enhanced activity. Median dose-effect analysis demonstrates that 1,25D3 and cisplatin act synergistically to inhibit SCC growth. When SCC cells were treated with 1,25D3 (10 nM) and/or cisplatin (0.5 microg/ml), greater caspase-3 activation was observed for the combination than for either agent alone. This suggests that the enhanced cytotoxicity is, at least in part, due to greater induction of apoptosis. No alterations in cellular platinum concentration or platinum-DNA adducts were observed for 1,25D3/cisplatin cotreatment compared with cisplatin treatment alone. Effects of the combination on cisplatin and 1,25D3 signaling pathways in adherent (nonapoptotic) and floating (apoptotic) cells were explored. Cisplatin induced p53 and its downstream targets, p21(Cip1) (p21) and Bax, in both cell populations. In contrast, 1,25D3 reduced p53, p21, and Bax to nearly undetectable levels in adherent cells. In the floating cells, 1,25D3 reduced levels of p53 and p21, but Bax expression was maintained at control levels. Expression of these proteins in cells treated with 1,25D3/cisplatin was similar to treatment with 1,25D3 alone. The two agents also had divergent effects on survival and stress signaling pathways. Phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and phospho-Jun levels increased after treatment with cisplatin but decreased after treatment with 1,25D3 and 1,25D3/cisplatin. Moreover, cisplatin decreased levels of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase (MEKK-1), whereas 1,25D3 up-regulated MEKK-1, and 1,25D3/cisplatin further up-regulated MEKK-1. We propose that the increased cytotoxicity for 1,25D3/cisplatin results from cisplatin enhancement of 1,25D3-induced apoptotic signaling through MEKK-1.

Inhibitors of the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) multidrug transporter are of interest as chemosensitizers for clinical drug resistance, for improving the pharmacokinetics of substrate chemotherapeutic drugs, and in functional assays of BCRP activity for tailoring chemotherapy. The fungal toxin fumitremorgin C (FTC) is a potent and specific inhibitor of BCRP, but its neurotoxic effects preclude use in vivo. We have therefore evaluated a new tetracyclic analogue of FTC, Ko143, as a practical inhibitor of BCRP, comparing it with two other analogues in the same class and with GF120918. All three FTC analogues are effective inhibitors of both mouse Bcrp1 and human BCRP, proving highly active for increasing the intracellular drug accumulation and reversing Bcrp1/BCRP-mediated multidrug resistance. Indeed, Ko143 appears to be the most potent BCRP inhibitor known thus far. In contrast, the compounds have only low activity against P-glycoprotein, the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP1), or other known drug transporters. They are nontoxic in vitro at useful concentrations and evinced no signs of toxicity in mice at high oral or i.p. doses. Administered p.o. to inhibit intestinal Bcrp1, Ko143 markedly increased the oral availability of topotecan in mice. It is thus the first highly potent and specific BCRP inhibitor applicable in vivo. As such, Ko143 and other FTC analogues of this type represent valuable reagents for analysis of drug resistance mechanisms and may be candidates for development as clinical BCRP inhibitors.

P-glycoprotein seems to be the most important factor limiting the oral absorption of paclitaxel. We have now explored the mechanisms responsible for the low oral bioavailability of docetaxel, a structurally related taxane drug. The recovery of 33% of oxidative metabolites and only 39% of unchanged drug in the feces of FVB wild-type mice receiving 10 mg/kg of oral docetaxel indicates that the major part of the oral dose has been absorbed. The feces and bile of mice receiving 10 mg/kg of i.v. docetaxel contained large amounts of metabolites and only minor quantities of unchanged drug, highlighting the importance of metabolism as an elimination route for this drug. In wild-type and P-glycoprotein knockout mice, dose escalation of p.o. administered docetaxel from 10 to 30 mg/kg resulted in a more than proportional increase in plasma levels, which suggested saturation of first-pass metabolism. Moreover, coadministration of 12.5 mg/kg of the HIV protease inhibitor ritonavir, also a strong inhibitor of cytochrome P4503A4 with only minor P-glycoprotein inhibiting properties, increased the plasma levels after oral docetaxel by 50-fold. In vitro transport studies across monolayers of LLC-PK1 cells (parental and transduced with MDR1 or Mdr1a) suggested that docetaxel is a weaker substrate for P-glycoprotein than paclitaxel is. In conclusion, docetaxel is well absorbed from the gut lumen in mice despite the presence of P-glycoprotein in the gut wall. Subsequent first-pass extraction is the most important factor determining its low bioavailability. The inhibition of docetaxel metabolism by ritonavir provides an interesting strategy to improve the systemic exposure of oral docetaxel.

One possible explanation for variable tumor response within a single patient may be related to delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to the tumors. Microdialysis was used to evaluate inter- and intratumoral disposition of unbound platinum (Pt) after cisplatin administration to mice bearing B16 murine melanoma tumors or H23 human NSCLC xenografts. Before i.v. dosing with cisplatin (3 or 10 mg/kg), microdialysis probes were placed into the right and left sides of each tumor, and serial extracellular fluid (ECF) samples were collected for 2 h. After microdialysis, tumor samples were obtained at each probe site to measure total Pt and Pt-DNA adducts. In a separate study, serial plasma samples (n = 3 mice/time point) were obtained between 5 min and 2 h. Unbound Pt in tumor ECF and plasma and total Pt in tumor homogenates were measured by flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Pt-DNA adducts in tumor samples were measured via (32)P-postlabeling. Area under the plasma (AUC(P)) and tumor ECF (AUC(ECF)) concentration-time curves of unbound Pt were calculated. Factor VIII expression was measured by immunohistochemistry in tumor samples. After administration of 3 or 10 mg/kg of cisplatin to mice bearing B16 tumors, there was a proportional increase in AUC(PL) with dose; however, there was not a proportional increase in AUC(ECF). There was a relatively high (30-fold) inter- and low (2.5-fold) intratumoral variability in AUC(ECF). AUC(ECF) correlated better with Pt-DNA adduct formation than did total Pt concentration in tumors. There was no relationship between Factor VIII expression and Pt exposure in tumors. The variable penetration of Pt from plasma into tumor ECF may be associated with variable response of tumors.

The breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) is involved in in vitro multidrug resistance and was first identified in the breast cancer cell line MCF7/AdrVp. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of BCRP in resistance of breast cancer to anthracycline treatment.BCRP mRNA was determined with real-time reverse transcription-PCR and immunostaining in nine breast cancer cell lines and in samples of 25 primary breast carcinomas and 27 patients who received preoperative anthracycline-based therapy. Tumor response to treatment and patient survival were recorded.In cell lines, only MCF7 and BT20 had BCRP mRNA levels coinciding with membrane-bound immunostaining. In clinical samples, BCRP expression varied widely (range, 0.01-0.86). With immunohistochemistry, BCRP was detected in vessels and normal breast epithelium but not in tumor cells. There was no difference in BCRP expression between anthracycline-naïve and treated tumor samples. BCRP expression was not associated with decreased response or survival.There is no indication that elevated BCRP expression in breast carcinomas confers resistance to anthracyclines. Expression was not detectable with immunohistochemistry.