Search

Resuscitation thoracotomy is a rarely performed procedure whose use, in France, remains marginal. It has five specific goals that correspond point-by-point to the causes of traumatic cardiac arrest: decompression of pericardial tamponade, control of cardiac hemorrhage, performance of internal cardiac massage, cross-clamping of the descending thoracic aorta, and control of lung injuries and other intra-thoracic hemorrhage. This approach is part of an overall Damage Control strategy, with a targeted operating time of less than 60minutes. It is indicated for patients with cardiac arrest after penetrating thoracic trauma if the duration of cardio-pulmonary ressuscitation (CPR) is15minutes, or10minutes in case of closed trauma, and for patients with refractory shock with systolic blood pressure65mm Hg. The overall survival rate is 12% with a 12% incidence of neurological sequelae. Survival in case of penetrating trauma is 10%, but as high as 20% in case of stab wounds, and only 6% in case of closed trauma. As long as the above-mentioned indications are observed, resuscitation thoracotomy is fully justified in the event of an afflux of injured victims of terrorist attacks.

Damage control for thoracic trauma combines definitive and temporary surgical gestures specifically adapted to the lesions present. A systematic assessment of all injuries to prioritize the specific lesions and their treatments constitutes the first operative stage. Packing and temporary closure have a place in the care of chest injuries.

Management of patients with penetrating trauma of the abdomen, pelvis and their surrounding compartments as well as vascular injuries depends on the patient's hemodynamic status. Multiple associated lesions are the rule. Their severity is directly correlated with initial bleeding, the risk of secondary sepsis, and lastly to sequelae. In patients who are hemodynamically unstable, the goal of management is to rapidly obtain hemostasis. This mandates initial laparotomy for abdominal wounds, extra-peritoneal packing (EPP) and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in the emergency room for pelvic wounds, insertion of temporary vascular shunts (TVS) for proximal limb injuries, ligation for distal vascular injuries, and control of exteriorized extremity bleeding with a tourniquet, compressive or hemostatic dressings for bleeding at the junction or borderline between two compartments, as appropriate. Once hemodynamic stability is achieved, preoperative imaging allow more precise diagnosis, particularly for retroperitoneal or thoraco-abdominal injuries that are difficult to explore surgically. The surgical incisions need to be large, in principle, and enlarged as needed, allowing application of damage control principles.

Summary Introduction In France, non-operative management (NOM) is not the widely accepted treatment for penetrating wounds. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of NOM for the treatment of penetrating abdominal traumas at 3 hospitals in the Southeast of France. Methodology Our study was multicentric and retroprospective from January, 2010 to September, 2013. Patients presenting with a penetrating abdominal stab wound (SW) or gunshot wound (GSW) were included in the study. Those with signs of acute abdomen or hemodynamic instability had immediate surgery. Patients who were hemodynamically stable had a CT scan with contrast. If no intra-abdominal injury requiring surgery was evident, patients were observed. Criteria evaluated were failed NOM and its morbidity, rate of non-therapeutic procedures (NTP) and their morbidity, length of hospital stay and cost analysis. Results One hundred patients were included in the study. One patient died at admission. Twenty-seven were selected for NOM (20 SW and 7 GSW). Morbidity rate was 18%. Failure rate was 7.4% (2 patients) and there were no mortality. Seventy-two patients required operation of which 22 were NTP. In this sub-group, the morbidity rate was 9%. There were no mortality. Median length of hospital stay was 4 days for the NOM group and 5.5 days for group requiring surgery. Cost analysis showed an economic advantage to NOM. Conclusion Implementation of NOM of penetrating trauma is feasible and safe in France. Indications may be extended even for some GSW. Clinical criteria are clearly defined but CT scan criteria should be better described to improve patient selection. NOM reduced costs and length of hospital stay.

Severe trauma patients should be received at the hospital by a multidisciplinary team directed by a "trauma leader" and all institutions capable of receiving such patients should be well organized. As soon as the patient is accepted for care, the entire team should be prepared so that there is no interruption in the pre-hospital chain of care. All caregivers should thoroughly understand the pre-established protocols of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to allow optimal management of unstable trauma victims in whom hemostasis must be obtained as soon as possible to decrease the morbid consequences of post-hemorrhagic shock. In patients with acute respiratory, circulatory or neurologic distress, several surgical procedures must be performed without delay by whichever surgeon is on call. Our goal is to describe these salvage procedures including invasive approaches to the upper respiratory tract, decompressive thoracostomy, hemostatic or resuscitative thoracotomy, hemostatic laparotomy, preperitoneal pelvic packing, external pelvic fixation by a pelvi-clamp, decompressive craniotomy. All of these procedures can be performed by all practitioners but they require polyvalent skills and training beforehand.

Bronchial injury is a rare and serious complication after a blunt trauma. An early management can provide complete recovery. We describe two cases of blunt bronchial injury. The two cases showed some common features, but the surgical management was different and so the courses. Indications for a surgical management of this kind of lesion are not univocal in the literature. In most of the cases, non-operative management has to be discussed for moderate lesions in high-risk surgical population. We proposed a surgical indication for severe tracheo-bronchial injury (TBI), for TBI associated to other intra-thoracic lesion and for lesion involving carinal region. Co-operation with the emergency team is necessary.