Search

Copyright of Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology / Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi is the property of KARE Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective: Acute coronary syndrome patients should be closely followed-up to maintain optimal adherence to medical treatments and to reduce adverse events. Digital health interventions might provide improved outcomes for patient care by providing closer follow-up, compared to standard care. Thus, in this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the effect of digital health interventions on follow-up in acute coronary syndrome patients. Methods: We searched medical databases to obtain all relevant studies comparing digital health interventions with standard care in acute coronary syndrome patients. After reviewing all eligible studies, a meta-analysis was conducted with the remaining 11 randomized controlled studies and 2 non-randomized controlled studies. A modified Jadad scale and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess the quality of the publications for randomized controlled studies and non-randomized controlled studies, respectively. Results: This meta-analysis consisted of 7657 patients. The all-cause mortality rate was 49% lower in the digital health intervention cases, compared to those who received standard care [relative risk (RR) = 0.51 (0.37; 0.70), P < .01]. There was a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure in the digital health interventions group, compared to the standard care group [mean difference = -5.28 (-9.47; -1.08), P = .01]. The rate of nonadherence to anti-aggregant drugs was 69% lower in the digital health interventions than in the standard care group [RR = 0.31 (0.20; 0.46), P < .01]. Also, nonadherence rates for statin and beta-blockers were lower in the digital health interventions group. The risk of rehospitalization was observed to be 55% less in the digital health interventions patients, compared to the standard care group [RR = 0.45 (0.30; 0.67), P < .01]. Conclusion: Digital health interventions can be effective in follow-up for secondary prevention in acute coronary syndrome patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score has been proposed in predicting short-term death in patients who are diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome. The aim of the present study was to investigate the significance of the GRACE score for acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS)-ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively examined a total of 492 consecutive patients with CS-STEMI who had undergone PPCI. The GRACE score was calculated for each patient. Patients were stratified by tertiles (T1, T2, and T3) according to the GRACE score, and the incidence of AKI was compared between the groups. Results: In univariate analysis, the incidence of AKI was significantly higher for patients allocated into the T3 group than for patients in the T1 group (odds ratio (OR) 2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-4.1, p<0.001). Following including all confounding variables, participants in the T3 group had a 3.1-fold higher incidence of AKI (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.9-5.4, p<0.001). In a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the GRACE score of the area under the curve value for AKI was 0.70 (95% CI 0.65-0.74, p<0.001) with 69.2% sensitivity and 68.8% specificity. Conclusion: The GRACE score provides an independent prognostic marker of AKI in patients with CS related with STEMI. Based on our data, we propose that the GRACE score is a simple and clinically applicable directive tool for rapid risk stratification of AKI in patients with STEMI complicated with CS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology / Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi is the property of KARE Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The prognostic impact of nutritional status in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) is poorly understood. A well-accepted nutritional status parameter, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), which was first demonstrated to be valuable in patients with cancer and gastrointestinal surgery, was introduced to patients with PE. Our aim was to evaluate the predictive value of PNI in outcomes of patients with PE. We evaluated the in-hospital and long-term (53.8 ± 5.4 months) prognostic impact of PNI on 251 patients with PE. During a median follow-up of 53.8 ± 5.4 months, 27 (11.6%) patients died in hospital course and 31 (13.4%) died in out-of-hospital course. The patients with lower PNI had significantly higher in-hospital and long-term mortality. The Cox proportional hazard analyses showed that PNI was associated with an increased risk of all-cause death for both unadjusted model and adjusted for all covariates. Our study demonstrated that PNI, calculated based on serum albumin level and lymphocyte count, is an independent prognostic factor for mortality in patients with PE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The predictive significance of ST-segment elevation (STE) in lead V4 R in patients with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has not been well-understood. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of early and late STE in lead V4 R in patients with anterior STEMI.Methods: A total 451 patients with anterior STEMI who treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) were prospectively enrolled in this study. All patients were classified according to presence of STE (>1 mm) in lead V4 R at admission and/or 60 min after PPCI. Based on this classification, all patients were divided into three subgroups as no V4 R STE (Group 1), early but not late V4 R STE (Group 2) and late V4 R STE (Group 3).Results: In-hospital mortality had higher rates at group 2 and 3 and that had 2.1 and 4.1-times higher mortality than group 1. Late V4 R STE remained as an independent risk factor for cardiogenic shock (odds ratio [OR] 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-4.3; p < .001) and in-hospital mortality (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.8-4.1; p < .001). The 12-month overall survival for group 1, 2, and 3 were 91.1%, 82.4%, and 71.4% respectively. However, the long-term mortality also had the higher rate at group 3; late V4 R STE did not remain as an independent risk factor for long-term mortality (OR 1.5; 95% CI 0.8-4.1; p: .159).Conclusion: Late V4 R STE in patients with anterior STEMI is strongly associated with poor prognosis. The record of late V4 R in patients with anterior STEMI has an important prognostic value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology / Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi is the property of KARE Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology / Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi is the property of KARE Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology / Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi is the property of KARE Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) may lead to life-threatening conditions such as cardiac death and congestive heart failure. Thus, a proper diagnosis and management play a crucial role to prevent such complications. Moreover, APE is a rare clinical onset of chronic myeloproliferative disease. We herein describe a 67-year-old patient with polycythemia vera presented to our cardiology clinic with pulmonary embolism despite the fact that an intense antiplatelet treatment started secondary to acute myocardial infarction prior. Because the patient had hypotension and head trauma, rheolytic thrombectomy was performed successfully to restore adequate pulmonary perfusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study attempted to fill the gaps in evidence related to response to clopidogrel treatment in the Turkish population. The study aimed to determine the prevalence, associated risk factors, and clinical outcomes of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) of clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a tertiary cardiovascular hospital in Turkey. Methods: In this prospective studied a total of 1.238 patients undergoing PCI were included in the present study. Blood samples were analyzed using a Multiplate analyzer. All patients were examined in the outpatient clinics at the end of the first and sixth months for recording drug therapy compliance and study endpoints. Results: Among the study population, 324 (30.2%) patients were found to have HTPR (mean age 58.03±11.88 years, 71.7% men). The incidence of HTPR was higher amongst females than amongst males (38.3% vs. 27%, p=0.010). Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were more frequently observed in the HTPR group (57.7% vs. 48.7%, p=0.004; 35% vs. 29.1%, p=0.040, respectively). When the recorded data were analyzed using multinomial regression analysis, hypertension, hemoglobin level, platelet, lymphocyte, and eosinophil count were independently associated with HTPR. Conclusion: On the basis of the results obtained from our study, we conclude that 30.2% of the Turkish population has HTPR. Our results also led us to believe that hypertension is an associated risk factor and decreased hemoglobin level as well as increased platelet counts are laboratory parameters that are strongly associated with the presence of HTPR. However, no differences were observed with regard to cardiovascular mortality and stent thrombosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]