Search

Background: Surgical procedures to treat anterior shoulder instability are essentially divided into those for significant bone loss and those without relevant bone loss. However, there is a gray area between these procedures that would not require bone grafting but would benefit from improved stabilization mechanisms. This study evaluates a technique based on the triple soft tissue block, the dynamic anterior stabilization of the shoulder, using an adjustable button. Methods: Twenty patients that underwent surgical procedure from September 2017 to March 2022 were prospectively evaluated. All were assessed with University of California-Los Angeles, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and measurement of external rotation of the shoulder before and 24 or more months after surgery, and the Rowe score at least 24 months postsurgery. The Rowe score was compared to the standard of 90, bone loss was also measured. Results: The mean University of California-Los Angeles score changed from 25.60 ± 2.83 before surgery to 34.60 ± 0.82 postsurgery P

Background: Preoperative computed tomography (CT) evaluation of bone morphometry aids in determining treatment strategies for shoulder instability. The use of zero echo time (ZTE) sequence in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a new bone cortex imaging technique, may help reduce radiation exposure and medical costs. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the glenoid morphology and detect the presence of bony Bankart lesion using ZTE MRI in shoulders with anterior instability and compare its diagnostic accuracy with that of CT. Methods: Thirty-six patients (36 shoulders) with anterior instability who underwent preoperative CT and MRI examinations between April 2019 and October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The percentages of glenoid bone defects on 3-dimensional (3D) CT and ZTE images were determined, and the correlation between these percentages was evaluated. The number of cases with bony Bankart lesion on CT and 2 types of ZTE (3D and CT-like) images was determined, and the diagnostic accuracy of ZTE for detecting bony Bankart lesion was assessed, with CT as the gold standard. Patients with bony Bankart lesion on CT images were divided into 2 groups based on whether the lesion was detectable on 3D ZTE or CT-like images. The longer diameters of bony Bankart lesion were compared between the groups. Results: The median percentage of glenoid bone loss was 12.1% (range, 1.3%-45.9%) and 12.3% (range, 0%-46.6%) on 3D CT and 3D ZTE images, respectively. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was 0.89. Bony Bankart lesion was detected in 18, 13, and 8 shoulders of the 36 patients on CT, 3D ZTE, and CT-like images, respectively. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the CT-like and 3D ZTE images for detecting bony Bankart lesion was 86.1% and 72.2%, respectively. A significant difference was observed between the groups with and without bony Bankart lesion on CT-like images in terms of the long diameter of the bone fragments on CT (P

Background: A patient-specific, 3-dimensional-printed, custom glenoid baseplate can be utilized to address severe glenoid deficiency in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Indications: A 73-year-old woman with right shoulder pain, weakness, and decreased range of motion in the setting of glenohumeral arthritis with severe glenoid bone loss. Additionally, this implant system was used in a 77-year-old man undergoing conversion to rTSA in the setting of glenoid erosion following prior failed total shoulder arthroplasty. Technique Description: A standard deltopectoral approach is utilized. In the revision setting, prior components are removed. Adequate glenoid exposure is obtained to allow for positioning and implantation of the custom glenoid baseplate. The glenoid is prepared utilizing patient-specific guides and trials before the custom glenoid component is seated within the glenoid vault and fixated with locking screws. Compatible glenosphere and humeral components are utilized for the remainder of the surgical procedure, as performed standardly. Results: There were no immediate complications following surgery. Surgical management led to improvement in the patient's pain and shoulder function. Discussion/Conclusion: Patient-specific, 3-dimensional-printed, custom glenoid baseplates may be used to manage severe glenoid deformity and bone loss in patients indicated for primary or revision rTSA. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The glenohumeral joint is characterized by its ball and socket configuration, offering the widest range of motion among major human joints. However, its shallow glenoid socket predisposes it to instability. This instability is mitigated by static and dynamic stabilizers. Glenoid bone loss, including Osseous Bankart and compression deformity, contributes to recurrent instability. Various imaging modalities, such as CT and MRI, are employed to assess glenoid bone loss, with methods like the Griffith Index and best-fit circle used for quantification. This study aims to evaluate MRI's accuracy in quantifying bone loss in glenoid compared to 3D CT in participants with anterior shoulder instability. Materials and Methods: The research was carried out at a specialized medical facility offering tertiary care services in south India. Approval was obtained from the ethical committee, and consent waiver was granted for PACS utilization. MRI and CT examinations were performed on participants to assess glenoid bone loss. MRI utilized a 1.5-T Ingenia system, while CT scans were conducted using multidetector CT scanners. Image analysis involved the best-fit circle method was employed to quantify bone loss. Results: Fifty-seven male participants with an average age of 30.72 ± 7.32 years participated. Bone loss measurements were comparable between CT and MRI. ICC and correlation coefficients indicated strong agreement between CT and MRI measurements. MRI detected Hill-Sachs lesions more frequently than CT (p

Background: The success of glenoid augmentation procedures depends on accurate placement and healing of the graft to the glenoid. Different glenoid augmentation techniques have been described, but no comparative studies between them exist. Purpose: To assess the bone graft position, healing, and resorption in a group of patients treated with 1 of 4 procedures: arthroscopic anterior bone-block procedure using either (1) fresh-frozen iliac crest allograft or (2) iliac crest autograft, (3) open Latarjet, or (4) arthroscopic Latarjet. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 40 patients (87.5% men; mean age, 29.5 ± 7.9 years) were included, with 10 patients in each of the procedure groups. The graft position in the axial and sagittal planes was assessed on postoperative computed tomography (CT). Graft healing and resorption were assessed in a second CT scan performed 1 year postoperatively. Qualitative variables were compared between the 4 procedures using the chi-square test, and quantitative variables were compared with the Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Results: No differences were found between the procedures in the axial or sagittal position. The healing rate was significantly lower in the allograft bone-block group (20%) compared with the autograft bone-block (80%), open Latarjet (90%), and arthroscopic Latarjet (90%) groups (P <.001). Graft resorption developed in 17 of 40 (42.5%) cases overall. Osteolysis occurred in 100% of cases in the allograft bone-block group compared with 50% in the autograft group, 20% in the open Latarjet group, and 0% in the arthroscopic Latarjet group (P <.001). The glenoid surface area on 1-year CT scan was significantly lower in the allograft bone-block group compared with the autograft bone-block, open Latarjet, and arthroscopic Latarjet groups (P <.001). Conclusion: Arthroscopic bone-block, open Latarjet, and arthroscopic Latarjet procedures provided accurate bone graft positioning. However, very high rates of osteolysis and nonunion were observed in the iliac crest fresh-frozen allograft bone-block procedure when compared with the other procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The treatment of bony glenoid defects after anteroinferior shoulder dislocation currently depends on the amount of glenoid bone loss (GBL). Recent studies have described the glenoid concavity as an essential factor for glenohumeral stability. The role of glenoid concavity in the presence of soft tissue and muscle forces is still unknown. Hypothesis: Glenoid concavity would have a major impact on glenohumeral stability in an active-assisted biomechanical model including soft tissue and the rotator cuff's compression forces. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: In 8 human shoulder specimens, individual coordinate systems were calculated based on anatomic landmarks. The glenoid concavity was measured biomechanically and based on computed tomography. Static load was applied to the rotator cuff tendons and the deltoid muscle. In a robotic test setup, anteriorly directed force was applied to the humeral head until translation of 5 mm (Nant) was achieved. Nant was used as a parameter indicating shoulder stability. This was performed in the following testing stages: (1) intact joint, (2) labral lesion, (3) 10% GBL, and (4) 20% GBL. The 8 specimens were divided equally into 2 subgroups (low concavity [LC] versus high concavity [HC]), with 4 specimens each, according to the previously measured concavity. Results: Anterior glenohumeral stability was highly correlated with the native glenoid concavity (R 2 = 0.8). In the testing stages 1 to 3, we found a significantly higher mean stability in the HC subgroup compared with the LC subgroup (P ≤.0142). The HC subgroup still showed higher absolute Nant values with 20% GBL; however, there was no significant difference from the LC subgroup. The loss of stability in 20% GBL was correlated with the initial concavity (R 2 = 0.86). Thus, a higher loss of Nant in the HC subgroup was observed (P =.0049). Conclusion: In an active-assisted model with intact soft tissue surrounding and muscular compression forces, the glenoid concavity correlates with shoulder stability. In bony defects, loss of concavity is an essential factor causing instability. Due to their significantly higher native stability, glenoids with HC can tolerate a higher amount of GBL. Clinical Relevance: Glenoid concavity should be considered in an individualized treatment of bony glenoid defects. Further studies are required to establish reference values and develop therapeutic algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Glenoid bone loss (GBL) is common in patients with shoulder instability and plays a major role in surgical decision-making. While a plethora of GBL estimation methods exist, all of which present specific challenges, recent studies have developed simple linear formulas estimating GBL based on glenoid height. Purpose: To assess the correlation between glenoid height and width, and to develop specific formulas based on age and sex to calculate the native glenoid width in the Lebanese population. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Computed tomography scans for 202 normal shoulders were extracted from our database. The glenoids were reconstructed in 3 dimensions and their width and height were measured. Glenoid width and height were compared between male and female groups. Correlation analysis was also performed on the width, height, age, and body mass index. Formulas estimating glenoid width were developed using regression analysis including all variables significantly influencing the model. Results were then compared with the values calculated using previously published formulas to determine the external validity when using linear formulas to estimate GBL. Results: Significant differences were found between men and women. Regression analysis found that glenoid height and width strongly influenced the model, and that age showed a weak but significant correlation; therefore, the following 2 sex-specific formulas were developed: width (mm) = 6.1 + 0.51 × height + 0.03 × age, and width (mm) = 4.55 + 0.51 × height + 0.03 × age, in men and women, respectively. The values yielded from the formulas developed in this study and the true width significantly differed from those calculated from previous reports. Conclusion: A strong correlation was found between glenoid height and width in a the Lebanese population and demonstrated that glenoid width can be accurately calculated based on the glenoid height and patient's age and sex using the following simplified formulas: width (mm) = 6 + 0.5 × height + 0.03 × age, and width (mm) = 4.5 + 0.5 × height + 0.03 × age, in men and women, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Posterior glenoid bone loss (pGBL) is frequently associated with posterior shoulder instability. Posterior glenohumeral instability accounts for a small percentage of shoulder pathologies, and critical bone loss in posterior instability has not been well defined in the literature. Younger patient populations who participate in activities that repetitively stress the posterior stabilizing structures of the shoulder are more prone to developing posterior shoulder instability. A variety of surgical options have been described, ranging from isolated capsulolabral repair to glenoid osteotomy. Soft-tissue repair alone may be an inadequate treatment in cases of pGBL and places patients at a high risk of recurrence. Our preferred technique for posterior glenoid reconstruction in cases of pGBL involves the transfer of a free iliac crest bone graft onto the native glenoid. The graft is contoured to fit the osseous defect and secured to provide an extension of the glenoid track. In this study, we review pGBL in the setting of posterior instability and describe our technique in detail. Further long-term studies are needed to refine the indications for glenoid bone graft procedures and quantify what constitutes a critical pGBL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Numerous studies indicate that glenoid bony augmentation raises the risk of complications during and after surgery. On the other hand, repairing the labrum alone in cases with subcritical glenoid bone loss results in recurrent instability and persistent apprehension. As a result, recent advancements in shoulder instability surgery prioritize fully restoring the anterior shoulder restraint. Operative Technique A novel method for treating recurrent anterior shoulder instability with subcritical glenoid bone loss and off‐track Hill‐Sachs lesion in skeletally immature patients is suggested: the use of dynamic anterior stabilization technique incorporating the long head of the biceps tendon onto the anterior glenoid rim via trans‐subscapular transfer, in conjunction with Hill‐Sachs remplissage. A practical, step‐by‐step surgical technique for a complete reconstruction of the anterior capsule‐labral‐ligamentous complex is provided. This involves utilizing a soft‐tissue dynamic anterior sling, achieved through the trans‐subscapularis transfer of the long head of the biceps tendon at the glenoid level. The procedure concludes with a Hill‐Sachs remplissage to further prevent off‐track events and alleviate apprehension. Conclusion Dynamic anterior stabilization is a suitable approach for addressing recurring anterior shoulder instability in skeletally immature patients who have subcritical glenoid bone loss and bipolar bone lesions.

Background: Native glenoid bone loss presents technical challenges in shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to report the mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients treated with structural humeral head autograft reconstruction of glenoid bone loss in the setting of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Methods: Retrospective review of 30 shoulders in 28 patients undergoing rTSA with a structural humeral head autograft to correct glenoid bone loss. Demographics, comorbidities, anatomic details, and patient-reported outcome measures were collected for analysis. Results: Range of motion and patient-reported outcome measures were all significantly improved postoperatively (P

Background: Numerous studies indicate that glenoid bony augmentation raises the risk of complications during and after surgery. On the other hand, repairing the labrum alone in cases with subcritical glenoid bone loss results in recurrent instability and persistent apprehension. As a result, recent advancements in shoulder instability surgery prioritize fully restoring the anterior shoulder restraint. Operative Technique: A novel method for treating recurrent anterior shoulder instability with subcritical glenoid bone loss and off‐track Hill‐Sachs lesion in skeletally immature patients is suggested: the use of dynamic anterior stabilization technique incorporating the long head of the biceps tendon onto the anterior glenoid rim via trans‐subscapular transfer, in conjunction with Hill‐Sachs remplissage. A practical, step‐by‐step surgical technique for a complete reconstruction of the anterior capsule‐labral‐ligamentous complex is provided. This involves utilizing a soft‐tissue dynamic anterior sling, achieved through the trans‐subscapularis transfer of the long head of the biceps tendon at the glenoid level. The procedure concludes with a Hill‐Sachs remplissage to further prevent off‐track events and alleviate apprehension. Conclusion: Dynamic anterior stabilization is a suitable approach for addressing recurring anterior shoulder instability in skeletally immature patients who have subcritical glenoid bone loss and bipolar bone lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The presence of glenoid bone defects is indicative in the choice of treatment for patients with anterior shoulder instability. In contrast to traditional linear- and area-based measurements, techniques such as the consideration of glenoid concavity have been proposed and validated. Purpose: To compare the reliability of linear (1-dimensional [1D]), area (2-dimensional [2D]), and concavity (3-dimensional [3D]) measurements to quantify glenoid bone loss performed manually and to analyze how automated measurements affect reliability. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Computed tomography images of 100 patients treated for anterior shoulder instability with differently sized glenoid defects were evaluated independently by 2 orthopaedic surgeons manually using conventional software (OsiriX; Pixmeo) as well as automatically with a dedicated prototype software program (ImFusion Suite; ImFusion). Parameters obtained included 1D (defect diameter, best-fit circle diameter), 2D (defect area, best-fit circle area), and 3D (bony shoulder stability ratio) measurements. Mean values and reliability as expressed by the intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) were compared between the manual and automated measurements. Results: When manually obtained, the measurements showed almost perfect agreement for 1D parameters (ICC = 0.83), substantial agreement for 2D parameters (ICC = 0.79), and moderate agreement for the 3D parameter (ICC = 0.48). When measurements were aided by automated software, the agreement between raters was almost perfect for all parameters (ICC = 0.90 for 1D, 2D, and 3D). There was a significant difference in mean values between manually versus automatically obtained measurements for 1D, 2D, and 3D parameters (P <.001 for all). Conclusion: While more advanced measurement techniques that take glenoid concavity into account are more accurate in determining the biomechanical relevance of glenoid bone loss, our study showed that the reliability of manually performed, more complex measurements was moderate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Our purpose was to evaluate a custom reverse total shoulder arthroplasty glenoid baseplate for severe glenoid deficiency, emphasizing the challenges with this approach, including short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications. Methods This was a single-institution, retrospective series of 29 patients between January 2017 and December 2022 for whom a custom glenoid component was created for extensive glenoid bone loss. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at intervals for up to 5 years. All received preoperative physical examinations, plain radiographs, and computed tomography (CT). Intra- and postoperative complications are reported. Results Of 29 patients, delays resulted in only undergoing surgery, and in three of those, the implant did not match the glenoid. For those three, the time from CT scan to implantation averaged 7.6 months (range, 6.1–10.7 months), compared with 5.5 months (range, 2–8.6 months) for those whose implants fit. In patients with at least 2-year follow-up (n=9), no failures occurred. Significant improvements were observed in all patient-reported outcome measures in those nine patients (American Shoulder and Elbow Score, P6 months) from CT scan to device implantation resulted in bone loss that rendered the implants unusable. Satisfactory short-term radiographic and clinical follow-up can be achieved with a well-fitting device. Level of evidenceIII.

Background: Currently, recurrent anterior shoulder instability in patients with a Hill-Sachs lesion managed using the Bankart repair showed higher recurrent instability compared with the Latarjet technique. Addition of posterior capsulodesis with infraspinatus remplissage to the Bankart repair, known as Bankart with remplissage (BR), increases shoulder stability in patients with a Hill-Sachs lesion. BR can potentially match the low recurrence rates of the Latarjet procedure while being less invasive. This systematic review compares the Bankart repair with remplissage and Latarjet procedure on postoperative pain, external rotation range of motion, and recurrent instability in anterior shoulder instability patients with a Hill-Sachs lesion. Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was performed. Studies comparing BR and Latarjet on recurrent instability and/or visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score in anterior shoulder instability patients with a Hill-Sachs lesion were included. Expert opinion, conference presentations, editorials, abstracts, case reports, and nonclinical studies were excluded. Records were initially screened by title and abstract, during the second screening full text was consulted. Study quality was examined using the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies criteria. Risk ratios were calculated for recurrent instability, and standardized mean difference (Cohen’s d) were calculated for VAS pain, external rotation, and Rowe score. Results: Eight of the 146 studies were included in the analysis. The study population consisted of a total of 845 patients, of whom 450 patients underwent the Latarjet procedure and 395 patients underwent BR. Three studies included revision surgery patients; more revision surgery patients were allocated to the Latarjet group. Risk ratios for recurrent instability varied from 0.45 to 2.41. Effect size varied for VAS pain from −2.28 to 0.04, for external rotation from −1.44 to 1.12, and for Rowe score from −0.67 to 1.37. Limitations of the included studies were differences in baseline demographics and functional outcomes. Conclusion: Recurrent instability seems equal between BR and Latarjet in patients with a Hill-Sachs lesion depth

Background: Superior inclination of the base plate in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is underestimated and may lead to major setbacks in terms of functional outcomes due to the altered biomechanics. Joint instability, scapular notching, and loosening of the glenoid component are considered the most serious sequelae. Therefore, a thorough preoperative radiological assessment of the affected shoulder joint and customized design of the prosthesis according to the glenoid morphology are decisive and directly correlated to the outcome. In this article, we propose a simple radiographic technique to assess the inclination of the glenoid preoperatively, which identifies the need for intraoperative correction. Materials and Methods: One hundred inconspicuous shoulder radiographs were included in the control group (CG) to define the normal ranges of the base plate orientation angle (BOA) and the base plate correction angle (BCA). Further, both angles were measured on 2-dimensional (2D) computed tomography scans of patients with proximal humerus fractures as well as radiographs, 2D and 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography scans of patients with cuff tear arthropathy who underwent RSA between 2018 and 2021. The interobserver reliability among three independent testers was evaluated by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient. In cuff tear arthropathy cases, the BOA and BCA measurements on different imaging modalities were compared using the Wilcoxon test. Possible variations of both angles' values based on glenoid erosion types, according to the Favard classification, were also investigated. Results: Regardless of the imaging modality used, the interobserver reliability was excellent among three independent observers. In the CG, the mean BOA and BCA values were 118° ± 6° and 17° ± 5°, respectively. The mean corrected BOA values of the CG and fracture group were 136° ± 5° and 140° ± 5°, respectively. In contrast to the BCA values, the BOA measurements on radiographs showed a statistically significant difference compared to those obtained on 2D- and 3D scans in the cuff arthropathy group. Further, both angles’ values varied according to the extent and location of the glenoid erosion. The lowest mean BOA and highest mean BCA values were observed in cases with Favard glenoid type E3. Conclusions: The BOA and the BCA are reliable tools proposed to aid in precisely positioning the glenoid component in RSA in the preoperative setting. Whereas, the BOA determines the inclination of the inferior glenoid segment, the BCA represents the extent of correction required to obtain a neutral inclination of the base plate. Glenoid type E3 of the Favard classification with superior wear is particularly susceptible to base plate superior tilt.

Aims: Glenoid bone loss is a significant problem in the management of shoulder instability. The threshold at which the bone loss is considered “critical” requiring bony reconstruction has steadily dropped and is now approximately 15%. This necessitates accurate measurement in order that the correct operation is performed. CT scanning is the most commonly used modality and there are a number of techniques described to measure the bone loss however few have been validated. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of the most commonly used techniques for measuring glenoid bone loss on CT. Methods: Anatomically accurate models with known glenoid diameter and degree of bone loss were used to determine the mathematical and statistical accuracy of six of the most commonly described techniques (relative diameter, linear ipsilateral circle of best fit (COBF), linear contralateral COBF, Pico, Sugaya, and circle line methods). The models were prepared at 13.8%, 17.6%, and 22.9% bone loss. Sequential CT scans were taken and randomized. Blinded reviewers made repeated measurements using the different techniques with a threshold for theoretical bone grafting set at 15%. Results: At 13.8%, only the Pico technique measured under the threshold. At 17.6% and 22.9% bone loss all techniques measured above the threshold. The Pico technique was 97.1% accurate, but had a high false-negative rate and poor sensitivity underestimating the need for grafting. The Sugaya technique had 100% specificity but 25% of the measurements were incorrectly above the threshold. A contralateral COBF underestimates the area by 16% and the diameter by 5 to 7%. Conclusion: No one method stands out as being truly accurate and clinicians need to be aware of the limitations of their chosen technique. They are not interchangeable, and caution must be used when reading the literature as comparisons are not reliable. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(7):478–489.

Introduction- Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair (SB) is a novel arthroscopic technique of tenodesis of upper 1/3rd fibers of subscapularis tendon to capsulo-labral repair of Bankart lesion. Treatment of Bony Bankart lesion with glenoid bone loss % (GBL%) 10%–20 % is still a grey zone where bone augmentation procedures are an overtreatment and capsulo-labral repair is associated with high recurrence. A retrospective study of 30 patients with h/o anterior instability with GBL%<20 % were classified into two groups. SB group included patients managed with arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation while CB group included patients managed with arthroscopic capsulo-labral repair. These patients were followed up after a minimum of 24 months post-surgery and functional outcomes evaluated using WOSI, ASES and ROWE scores. Patients in the SB group showed superior functional outcomes for WOSI and ROWE scores. Considering postoperative shoulder pain, the median ROWE-P (pain) score was better for SB group (10/10) when compared to CB group (5/10). Patients under SB group were more comfortable with physical symptoms of their shoulder (WOSI-P average 60/1000) and were more likely to continue their recreational sports activity (WOSI- sports for SB 63.7 and CB 119.5. In our study, none of the 15 SB patients had any restriction in range of shoulder movements [ROWE-M score of 10]. Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair is associated with minimal restriction of shoulder range, better pain relief, better acceptability and smoother return to daily living and occupation and can be considered as a routine for every patient with GBL<20 %. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glenoid bone loss associated with abnormal glenoid morphology can be encountered in complex primary and revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Strategies to deal with this include allografts, augments and custom-made prostheses. We describe a unique case of a long-standing neglected posterior fracture dislocation of the shoulder with severe glenoid bone loss and retroversion. The patient also had malunited acromial and scapula fractures and an associated rotator cuff tear. The primary challenges were access to the shoulder joint due to the malunited fractures, reconstruction of the dysplastic glenoid and providing joint stability. A reverse shoulder replacement was planned using a custom-made glenoid component and patient-specific instrumentation (PSI). The custom base plate was manufactured based on the pre-operative computerised tomography (CT) scan and conformed to the native glenoid. A post-operative CT scan confirmed adequate positioning of the implants. 30 months following surgery, there was a significant improvement in pain and range of motion with an Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) of 39/48, compared to a pre-operative score of 12/48. Plain radiographs did not show any evidence of loosening or osteolysis. This case report highlights the approach for planning a complex reverse shoulder arthroplasty and the use of custom-made prostheses and PSI in such scenarios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Posterior instability has been reported to account for up to 24% of cases of shoulder instability in certain active populations. However, there is a paucity of data available regarding the risk factors associated with posterior glenoid bone loss. Purpose: To characterize the epidemiology of, and risk factors associated with, glenoid bone loss within a cohort of patients who underwent primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization for isolated posterior-type glenohumeral instability. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization for posterior-type instability between January 2011 and December 2019. Preoperative magnetic resonance arthrograms were used to calculate posterior glenoid bone loss using a perfect circle technique. Patient characteristics and revision rates were obtained. Bone loss (both in millimeters and as a percentage) was compared between patients based on sex, age, arm dominance, sports participation, time to surgery, glenoid version, history of trauma, and number of anchors used for labral repair. Results: Included were 112 patients with a mean age of 28.66 ± 10.07 years; 91 patients (81.25%) were found to have measurable bone loss. The mean bone loss was 2.46 ± 1.68 mm (8.98% ± 6.12%). Significantly greater bone loss was found in athletes versus nonathletes (10.09% ± 6.86 vs 7.44% ± 4.56; P =.0232), female versus male patients (11.17% ± 6.53 vs 8.17% ± 5.80; P =.0212), and patients dominant arm involvement versus nondominant arm involvement (10.26% ± 5.63 vs 7.07% ± 6.38; P =.0064). Multivariate regression analysis identified dominant arm involvement as an independent risk factor for bone loss (P =.0033), and dominant arm involvement (P =.0024) and athlete status (P =.0133) as risk factors for bone loss >13.5%. At the conclusion of the study period, 7 patients had experienced recurrent instability (6.25%). Conclusion: The findings of this study are in alignment with existing data suggesting that posterior glenoid bone loss is highly prevalent in patients undergoing primary arthroscopic stabilization for posterior-type shoulder instability. Our results suggest that patients with dominant arm involvement are at risk for greater posterior glenoid bone loss. Athlete status and dominant arm involvement were identified as independent risk factors for bone loss >13.5%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: Glenoid bone loss presents distinct challenges in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) which, if unaddressed, can cause complications including poor outcomes and early implant failure. The purpose of this review is to discuss the etiology, evaluation, and management strategies of glenoid bone loss in primary rTSA. Recent Findings: Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) imaging and preoperative planning software have revolutionized the understanding of complex glenoid deformity and wear patterns from bone loss. With this knowledge, a detailed preoperative plan can be created and implemented for a more optimal management strategy. When appropriately indicated, deformity correction techniques with biologic or metal augmentation are successful in addressing the glenoid bone deficiency, creating optimal implant position, and thus providing stable baseplate fixation and improving outcomes. Summary: Thorough evaluation and characterization of the degree of glenoid deformity with 3D CT imaging is necessary prior to treatment with rTSA. Eccentric reaming, bone grafting, and augmented glenoid components have shown promising results in correcting glenoid deformity due to bone loss, but long-term outcomes are currently unknown. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: US military servicemembers experience higher rates of posterior and combined-type instability as compared with their nonmilitary peers. Purpose: (1) To determine the prevalence of glenoid bone loss (GBL) in young, active-duty military patients with combined-type shoulder instability who underwent operative shoulder stabilization; (2) to evaluate whether GBL is associated with differences in postoperative outcomes; and (3) to identify factors associated with larger defects. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This study included active-duty military patients who underwent primary surgical shoulder stabilization for combined anterior and posterior capsulolabral tears between January 2012 and December 2018. Preoperative magnetic resonance arthrograms were used to calculate anterior, posterior, and total GBL using the "perfect circle" technique. We recorded patient characteristics, revisions, complications, return to duty, range of motion, and scores on multiple outcome measures (visual analog scale for pain, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Rowe). GBL prevalence was compared by time to surgery, glenoid version, history of trauma, and number of anchors used for labral repair. Outcome scores, return to active duty, and revision procedures were compared by degree of anterior or posterior GBL: <13.5% (mild) versus ≥13.5% (subcritical). Results: GBL was noted in 28 (77.8%) of the 36 patients. Nineteen (52.8%) patients had anterior GBL, 18 (50.0%) had posterior, and 9 (25.0%) had combined. Four (11.1%) patients had subcritical anterior or posterior GBL. Increased posterior GBL was associated with history of trauma (P =.041), time to surgery >12 months (P =.024), and glenoid retroversion ≥9° (P =.010); increased total GBL was associated with longer time to surgery (P =.023) and labral repair requiring >4 anchors (P =.012); and increased anterior GBL was associated with labral repair requiring >4 anchors (P =.011). There were statistically significant improvements on all outcome measures, with no changes in range of motion postoperatively. No significant difference on any outcome score was observed between patients with mild and subcritical GBL. Conclusion: In our analysis, 78% of patients had appreciable GBL, suggesting that GBL is highly prevalent in this patient population. Longer time to surgery, traumatic cause, significant glenoid retroversion, and large labral tears were identified as risk factors for increased GBL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glenoid bone loss presents a challenging dilemma, particularly in the setting of failed arthroplasty requiring conversion to a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). The aim of our systematic review was to examine the success and failure of biologic glenoid bone grafting to address vault deficiencies in the setting of shoulder arthroplasty conversion to rTSA. Twelve articles were included and a complete PUBMED search. Inclusion criteria included glenoid bone grafting for conversion of failed arthroplasty and a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Exclusion criteria included grafting for primary rTSA, and re-revision for infection or humeral loosening. Failures were defined as failure of the graft to radiographically incorporate, symptomatic base plate loosening, and need for further surgical re-revision. Two hundred patients were identified across the 12 articles. Eighteen percent (36/200) of all cases demonstrated failure to radiographically incorporate. Thirteen percent (25/200) of all grafting cases required re-revision due to symptomatic failure (pain or functional deterioration). Femoral shaft demonstrated the highest failure rate at 88% (7/8). Grafting for glenoid bone loss in the setting of conversion to rTSA has an 82% rate of success across autograft and allograft utilization. Further studies are needed to better define the success of autografting versus allografting in the setting of shoulder arthroplasty conversion to rTSA with glenoid bone loss.

Background: Whether the extent of glenoid bone loss (GBL) affects clinical outcome after coracoid process transfer (CPT) is still unclear. Purpose: To evaluate postoperative outcomes after CPT combined with open Bankart repair in young rugby players in terms of the extent of GBL and between the Bristow and Latarjet techniques. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The authors investigated 101 shoulders in 91 competitive rugby players who underwent CPT combined with open Bankart repair by the Bristow (group B; 66 shoulders) or Latarjet (group L; 35 shoulders) procedure between 2007 and 2017. The extent of GBL was calculated from the en face view of the glenoid on preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography scans and was used to categorize shoulders into 4 grades (grade 0, 0%; grade 1, >0% and ≤10%; grade 2, >10% and ≤20%; grade 3, >20%). At the minimum 2-year follow-up, the authors analyzed the relationship between GBL or GBL grade and postoperative outcome scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Rowe score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, and patient satisfaction), return-to-play (RTP) times, graft failure (insufficient union or translocation), and recurrence. Results: The mean GBL in all shoulders was 10.9% ± 9.2% and was not significantly different between the 2 groups. There were no significant correlations between GBL and any outcome measure in either group. The mean RTP time was significantly shorter in group L versus group B (4.8 ± 1.1 vs 5.8 ± 1.8 months, respectively; P =.002), but it was not associated with GBL. In group B, the rate of graft failure was not significantly higher in shoulders with grade 0 or 1 GBL versus grade 2 or 3 GBL (8 [25.0%] vs 4 [11.8%], respectively; P =.21). In group B, graft failure was confirmed in 12 shoulders (18.2%), compared with 1 shoulder (2.9%) in group L. Postoperative recurrence occurred in significantly fewer shoulders in group B than in group L (2 [3.0%] vs 5 [14.3%], respectively; P =.047). Conclusion: The extent of GBL did not affect outcome scores after CPT, regardless of operative procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Anterior and posterior glenoid bone loss morphology have both been individually and morphologically described in previous studies. While there exists substantial literature on anterior bone loss, and emerging evidence describing posterior bone loss, a direct comparison between the two is lacking in the current literature. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively compare the anatomic and morphological differences in glenoid bone loss (GBL) in operative patients with anterior versus posterior glenohumeral instability. Methods: All patients over a 3-year period indicated for operative stabilization with posterior glenohumeral instability and suspected glenoid bone loss who underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan were reviewed. Included patients were then singularly matched by gender, laterality, and age (±3 years) to a collection of patients who presented for operative stabilization of anterior glenohumeral instability. GBL parameters were assessed based on the following characterizing measurements: (1) percentage of GBL, (2) glenoid vault version, (3) slope of the glenoid defect relative to the glenoid surface, (4) superior-inferior defect height, and (5) anterior-posterior defect width. Results: Sixty patients (30 anterior GBL, 30 posterior GBL) were included in the final analysis (60 males), with a mean age of 28.8 ± 8.15 years (range 16.0 to 51.0 years). Patients with anterior instability presented with higher GBL (24.94% ± 7.69 vs. 9.22% ± 5.58, P

Background: The pattern of glenoid bone loss (GBL) in anterior glenohumeral instability is well described. It was recognized recently that posterior GBL after instability has a posteroinferior pattern. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare GBL patterns in a matched cohort of patients with anterior versus posterior glenohumeral instability. The hypothesis was that the GBL pattern in posterior instability would be more inferior than the GBL pattern in anterior instability. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, 28 patients with posterior instability were matched with 28 patients with anterior instability by age, sex and number of instability events. GBL location was defined using a clockface model. Obliquity was defined as the angle between the long axis of the glenoid and a line tangent to the GBL. Superior and inferior GBL were measured as areas and defined relative to the equator. The primary outcome was the 2-dimensional characterization of posterior versus anterior GBL. The secondary outcome was a comparison of the posterior GBL patterns in traumatic and atraumatic instability mechanisms in an expanded cohort of 42 patients. Results: The mean age of the matched cohorts (n = 56) was 25.2 ± 9.87 years. The median obliquity of GBL was 27.53° (interquartile range [IQR], 18.83°-47.38°) in the posterior cohort and 9.28° (IQR, 6.68°-15.75°) in the anterior cohort (P <.001). The mean superior-to-inferior bone loss ratio was 0.48 ± 0.51 in the posterior cohort and 0.80 ± 0.55 (P =.032) in the anterior cohort. In the expanded posterior instability cohort (n = 42), patients with traumatic injury mechanism (n = 22), had a similar GBL obliquity compared to patients with an atraumatic injury mechanism (n = 20) (mean, 27.73° [95% CI, 20.26°-35.20°] vs 32.20° [95% CI, 21.27°-43.14°], respectively) (P =.49). Conclusion: Posterior GBL occurred more inferiorly and at an increased obliquity compared with anterior GBL. This pattern is consistent for traumatic and atraumatic posterior GBL. Bone loss along the equator may not be the most reliable predictor of posterior instability, and critical bone loss may be reached more rapidly than a model of loss along the equator may predict. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recurrent shoulder dislocation leading to shoulder instability is a cumbersome clinical problem for patients and orthopedicians. Due to a lack of knowledge in young patients of developing countries, there is a delay in presentation from the first time of dislocation. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the functional and radiographic outcomes of patients with shoulder instability after the Congruent Arc Latarjet procedure. Methods: From January 2018 to November 2021, 20 patients with history of recurrent shoulder dislocation having glenohumeral instability were treated surgically in our institute. Open Congruent Arc Latarjet procedure was performed in 20 patients. Functional outcomes were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively based on American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, ROWE score, and Active range of motion in the diseased shoulder. Results: Twenty shoulders of 20 patients were evaluated for a mean period of 24 months postoperatively. At the time of the latest consultation, the range of motion and the shoulder functional evaluations based on ROWE score which was 89.64±5.71 (range 80-95) improved from 20.36±8.87 (range 10-30), p=0.001. The mean preoperative ASES score was 22.60±1.09 (range 20.6-25) which improved to 72.50±7.33 (range 52.8-77.2), p=0.001, which is definitely improved. The overall re-dislocation rate was 0% (0 of 20). In our study, 60% had excellent outcomes, 30% had good outcomes, and 10% had fair outcomes. Conclusion: The Congruent Arc Latarjet procedure for the treatment of recurrent shoulder dislocation with glenoid bone loss of >20% is a successful and efficient method with better outcomes in daily work profile and no further episode of redislocation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Resumen: Objetivo: Evaluar los resultados clínicos y radiológicos de una serie de pacientes con defecto óseo glenoideo tratados mediante artroplastia total inversa de hombro asociada a injerto óseo estabilizado mediante componente glenoideo de titanio trabecular (Axioma SMR Lima®). Material y métodos: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo de 16 pacientes consecutivos con una edad media de 68,2 años. En 13 casos se trataba de artroplastias primarias y en 3, de revisión. Los datos incluidos en el estudio se obtuvieron mediante revisión de la historia clínica. El defecto glenoideo se clasificó de acuerdo con Gupta et al. La valoración clínica pre- y postoperatoria incluyó la puntuación en la escala visual analógica de dolor (EVA), el resultado de la escala Constant y el balance articular activo. Radiográficamente se valoró la integración del injerto óseo y la fijación de los componentes. Resultados: El seguimiento medio fue de 42,1 meses. La puntuación media en la escala EVA mejoró de 7,5 puntos preoperatorios a 2,5 puntos en el último control (p = 0,006) y en la escala de Constant de 35,8 puntos prequirúrgicos a 64,4 puntos (p = 0,001). El balance articular activo pasó de 54° de abducción, 54° de antepulsión, 24° de rotación externa y rotación interna a trocánter preoperatorios a 120° abducción (p = 0,001), 124° antepulsión (p = 0,001), 63° rotación externa (p = 0,001) y rotación interna a L5 en el último control clínico. En todos los pacientes se objetivó integración del injerto y la ausencia de aflojamiento de los componentes. La incidencia de complicaciones fue del 6,2%. Discusión: El tratamiento de defectos glenoideos mediante artroplastia inversa e injerto óseo estabilizado mediante metaglena de titanio trabecular presenta buenos resultados clínicos, radiológicos y una baja tasa de complicaciones a corto plazo. Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the clinical and radiological results of a series of patients with a glenoid bone defect treated by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty associated with a bone graft stabilized with a trabecular titanium glenoid component (Axioma SMR Lima®). Material and methods: Retrospective descriptive study of 16 consecutive patients with an average age of 68.2 years. In 13 cases they were primary arthroplasties and in 3 revision ones. The data included in the study were obtained by reviewing the clinical history. The glenoid defect was classified according to Gupta et al. The pre- and postoperative clinical assessment included the score on the visual analogue pain scale (VAS), the result of the Constant score and the active joint balance. Radiographically, the integration of the bone graft and the fixation of the components were assessed. Results: The average follow-up was 42.1 months. The average VAS score improved from 7.5 preoperative points to 2.5 points in the last control (P = .006) and on the Constant score from 35.8 pre-surgical points to 64.4 points (P = .001). The average joint balance went from 54° of abduction, 54° of antepulsion, 24° of external rotation and internal rotation to preoperative trochanter to 120° of abduction (P = .001), 124° of antepulsion (P = .001), 63° of external rotation (P = 0.001) and internal rotation at L5 in the last clinical control. In all patients, graft integration and the absence of component loosening were observed. The incidence of complications was 6.2%. Discussion: The treatment of glenoid defects by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and a bone graft stabilized by trabecular titanium metaglene presents good clinical and radiological results and a low rate of short-term complications.

Background/objective: The effect of glenoid version on the severity of glenoid bone loss is not completely understood, although the variation of glenoid version angles is considered to reflect the degree of glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability cases. The objective of this retrospective case-control study is to determine the relationship of the glenoid version and the severity of glenoid bone loss in a group of previously documented recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation patients. Methods: We retrospectively collected magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) data from 72 patients with unidirectional recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The best-fit circle method was used to identify the percentage of glenoid bone loss. Measurements of glenoid labral, chondral, and bony versions were performed using the Friedman method. Results: Using univariate regression analysis, it was found that a retroversion angle of more than 4 degrees was associated with an increased risk ratio for the occurrence of a critical glenoid defect by approximately 5 times. Conclusions: 24 Univariate logistic regression analysis, used to determine the presence of a critical glenoid bone defect, showed that both the bony version angle and the number of previous dislocations were significantly associated with the extent of glenoid bone loss. A retroversion angle of more than 4 degrees was associated with an approximately five-fold increase in the odds ratio for the presence of a critical glenoid defect. Surgeons may use the value of the measured glenoid version in prediction the required version of the reconstructive treatment.

Aims Recurrent dislocation is both a cause and consequence of glenoid bone loss, and the extent of the bony defect is an indicator guiding operative intervention. Literature suggests that loss greater than 25% requires glenoid reconstruction. Measuring bone loss is controversial; studies use different methods to determine this, with no clear evidence of reproducibility. A systematic review was performed to identify existing CT-based methods of quantifying glenoid bone loss and establish their reliability and reproducibility Methods A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review of conventional and grey literature was performed. Results A total of 25 studies were initially eligible. Following screening, nine papers were included for review. Main themes identified compared 2D and 3D imaging, as well as linear- compared with area-based techniques. Heterogenous data were acquired, and therefore no meta-analysis was performed. Conclusion No ideal CT-based method is demonstrated in the current literature, however evidence suggests that surface area methods are more reproducible and lead to fewer over-estimations of bone loss, provided the views used are standardized. A prospective imaging trial is required to provide a more definitive answer to this research question. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(2):114–122.

ObjectiveTo utilize the 3D inversion recovery prepared ultrashort echo time with cones readout (IR-UTE-Cones) MRI technique for direct imaging of lamellar bone with comparison to the gold standard of computed tomography (CT).Materials and methodsCT and MRI was performed on 11 shoulder specimens and three patients. Five specimens had imaging performed before and after glenoid fracture (osteotomy). 2D and 3D volume-rendered CT images were reconstructed and conventional T1-weighted and 3D IR-UTE-Cones MRI techniques were performed. Glenoid widths and defects were independently measured by two readers using the circle method. Measurements were compared with those made from 3D CT datasets. Paired-sample Student's t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients were performed. In addition, 2D CT and 3D IR-UTE-Cones MRI datasets were linearly registered, digitally overlaid, and compared in consensus by these two readers.ResultsCompared with the reference standard (3D CT), glenoid bone diameter measurements made on 2D CT and 3D IR-UTE-Cones were not significantly different for either reader, whereas T1-weighted images underestimated the diameter (mean difference of 0.18 cm, p = 0.003 and 0.16 cm, p = 0.022 for readers 1 and 2, respectively). However, mean margin of error for measuring glenoid bone loss was small for all modalities (range, 1.46-3.92%). All measured ICCs were near perfect. Digitally registered 2D CT and 3D IR-UTE-Cones MRI datasets yielded essentially perfect congruity between the two modalities.ConclusionsThe 3D IR-UTE-Cones MRI technique selectively visualizes lamellar bone, produces similar contrast to 2D CT imaging, and compares favorably to measurements made using 2D and 3D CT.

Background: The Latarjet procedure is effective for patients with anterior glenohumeral instability with substantial glenoid bone loss due to its triple blocking effect. Indications: Indications include high-risk patients with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability with any glenoid bone loss or low-risk patients with 15% to 30% glenoid bone loss. Technique Description: An incision is made lateral to the coracoid and the deltopectoral interval is established. The pectoralis minor is released medially off the coracoid and the coracoacromial (CA) ligament is released close to the acromion. The coracoid is cut with a right-angle saw and the inferior coracoid is decorticated with a burr. Two holes are pre-drilled in the coracoid. The subscapularis is split between the upper two-thirds and lower one-third with the arm in external rotation. The capsule is split vertically at the joint line and the humeral head is retracted. The anterior glenoid is decorticated with a burr, and a hole is drilled inferiorly. The depth is measured and added to the depth of the inferior bone block hole. A fully threaded 3.5-mm solid stainless steel screw is placed in the inferior hole. Care is taken to ensure that the lateral border of the bone block is flush with the articular margin. This is repeated for the superior hole. A 1.8-mm knotless suture anchor is placed between the screws. The repair stitch is passed through the capsule and loaded onto the anchor and tensioned. The CA ligament is laid over the capsule and repaired. The subscapularis split is repaired side to side and the wound is closed in layers. Results: High return-to-sport rates, including at the same level of play, have been observed among young competitive athletes with significant glenoid bone loss who underwent a Latarjet, with similarly favorable results in older patients. Ninety-day complication rates have been reported around 9%, 5% of which constituted graft or hardware failures. Discussion/Conclusion: The Latarjet procedure is an effective option for indicated patients with anterior glenohumeral instability and may be enhanced with solid screws, proper anatomic technique, and capsulolabral repair augmentation. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty presents itself sometimes as challenging when it comes to addressing massive bone loss, either in primary or revision settings. Custom components recently have made their way into shoulder prosthetics and are meant to help in the case of extensive glenoid bone destruction. Because of strict indication and the fairly recent introduction of these implants, the usage of custom-made glenoid implants is not very common yet. However, the early results are promising. The purpose of this review was to summarize and analyze the available literature. Therefore, a systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of the databases PubMed, Cochrane, and Livivo was performed to screen for studies reporting on clinical and radiological outcomes of custom glenoid implants. Four studies with a total of 46 shoulders were included in this review. The mean patient age was 68.8 years and the mean time of follow-up was 24.3 months. The weighted means showed an increase in CMS (32.7 points), in ASES (39.8 points), in anteversion (67.4 degrees), and in abduction (51.9 degrees) and a decrease in VAS (5.4 points). Custom-made glenoid implants are therefore a viable option in cases of large combined glenoid bone loss, both in primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Surgical management of anterior shoulder instability continues to evolve. The clinical effectiveness of arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) in patients with increasing glenoid bone loss (GBL) has not been thoroughly compared with Latarjet. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare 2-year outcomes of REMP versus open Latarjet in patients with >15% GBL. We hypothesized that there would be no difference. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective study was performed on a consecutive series of patients who underwent primary REMP or Latarjet by 4 shoulder specialists between August 2013 and December 2019 for >15% GBL. Procedure performance was based on shared decision making between the surgeon and patient. Baseline and 2-year postoperative range of motion (ROM) and the following patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected: Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and visual analog scale for pain. Return to sport, satisfaction, complications, recurrence, and revisions were reviewed. Results: A total of 47 patients were available for study, including 22 who underwent REMP and 25 who underwent Latarjet. Baseline demographic characteristics, ROM, and PROs were similar between the groups. Mean preoperative GBL (REMP 25.8% ± 7.8% vs Latarjet 25.1% ± 9.0%; P =.800) and off-track lesions (REMP 59.1% vs Latarjet 44.0%; P =.302) were similar. Postoperative change in external rotation favored Latarjet (10° ± 22° vs –4° ± 13°; P =.017). Postoperative PROs, return to the sports (86.4% vs 87.5%; P =.99), and satisfaction (95.5% vs 95.8%; P =.99) were similar between groups. There were no recurrent dislocations in either group. One infected hematoma was encountered in the Latarjet cohort. Conclusion: At short-term follow-up, the hypothesis was upheld. REMP and Latarjet provided similar outcomes for patients with >15% GBL, although REMP patients experienced slightly decreased external rotation. Although larger series and longer-term follow-ups are required, remplissage may be considered in patients with >15% glenoid bone loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To propose a new method for glenoid bone loss measurement, the constellation technique (CST); determine its reliability and accuracy; and compare the validity of CST with that of the conventional technique (CVT) and standard measurements for ratio calculation. Materials and Methods: Sixty shoulders with intact glenoids and no glenohumeral instability and arthritis underwent CT scans. Simulated osteotomies were conducted on the 3D models of glenoids at two cutting locations, expressed as clock face times (2:30–4:20; 1:30–5:00). Two experienced surgeons compared three methods for glenoid bone loss measurement; CVT (best-fit circle), CST ('5S' steps), and standard measurement. Eight undergraduates remeasured five randomly chosen shoulders with moderate to severe bone loss. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for raters. Results: With a defect range between 2:30 and 4:20, all 60 glenoids demonstrated minimal bone loss (< 15%); while between 1:30 and 5:00, 42 shoulders were with moderate bone loss (15–20%), and 18 shoulders with severe bone loss (≥ 20%). For experienced raters, no significant differences were noted between protocos for all categories of bone loss (p ≥ 0.051), with good inter- and intraobserver reliability indicated by ICC. For novice raters, post hoc Tukey analysis found that CST was more accurate in one patient with a standard mean bone loss of 23.2% ± 1.9% compared with CVT. Conclusion: The CST turned the key step of glenoid defect evaluation from deciding an en face view to determining the glenoid inferior rim. The protocol is simple, accurate, and reproducible, especially for novice raters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: The aim of this scoping review is to identify and summarize findings published in the literature over the past 5 years related to methods for assessment of bone loss in anterior shoulder instability. Recent Findings: Of the 113 clinical studies included in this review, 76 reported a cutoff for glenoid bone loss when determining the patients indicated for one of the many stabilization procedures investigated. Bone loss on the glenoid side was evaluated most commonly with three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT), and either linear or surface area–based methods were employed with the use of a best-fit circle. When combined with plain CT, the two methods comprise up to 70% of the reported measurement techniques for glenoid bone loss (79 of 113 studies). On the humeral side, Hill-Sachs lesions were assessed more heterogeneously, though plain CT or 3D CT remained the methods of choice in the majority of studies (43 of 68, 63.2%). Lastly, the glenoid track was assessed by 27 of 113 studies (23.9%), again most commonly with 3D CT (13 studies) and plain CT (seven studies). Summary: The assessment of glenoid and humeral bone loss is essential to treatment decisions for patient with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Glenoid bone loss is most commonly assessed using cross-sectional imaging, most often 3D CT, and some variation of a best-fit circle applied to the inferior portion of the glenoid. Hill-Sachs lesion assessment was also commonly done using three-dimensional imaging; however, there was more variability in assessment methods across studies and there is an obvious need to unify the approach to humeral bone loss assessment for the purposes of improving treatment decisions and to better assess on-track and off-track lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The concept of on-track versus off-track bone lesions in glenohumeral instability continues to evolve. Although much has been ascertained from an original biomechanical model, bony pathological changes, especially on 3-dimensional (3D) imaging, have not been fully evaluated., Purpose: To compare the differences in on-track versus off-track lesions to characterize glenoid and humeral head bone defects using 3D modeling software., Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: A consecutive cohort of 75 patients with recurrent anterior instability, with evidence of Hill-Sachs lesions (HSLs) and glenoid bone loss (GBL) and a mean age of 27.1 years (range, 18-48 years), were reviewed. 3D models of unilateral proximal humeri and glenoids were reconstructed. The volume, surface area, width, and depth of identified HSLs were quantified, along with their location (medial, superior) and orientation (Hill-Sachs angle). The percentage, width, and length of GBL as well as the glenoid track status were calculated. The on-track and off-track groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test., Results: The off-track group had greater HSL surface area (374.23 vs 272.64 mm 2 , respectively; P = .001), more HSL medialization (14.96 vs 17.62 mm, respectively; P = .028), greater HSL volume (603.08 vs 433.61 mm 3 , respectively; P = .007), and a greater mean HSL width (16.06 vs 11.53 mm, respectively; P = .001) than the on-track group. The off-track group also had greater GBL (22.55% vs 17.73%, respectively; P = .037), a greater GBL width (6.92 vs 3.58 mm, respectively; P < .001), and a greater GBL length (21.61 vs 16.1mm, respectively; P = .015) than the on-track group. Further analysis of large off-track lesions revealed a greater Hill-Sachs angle (33.16° vs 26.20°, respectively; P = .035) and a more superior extent of HSLs compared with borderline off-track and on-track lesions., Conclusion: Off-track lesions were found to have larger GBL, a larger HSL width, a more medialized HSL, and greater HSL surface area. This study outlines the specific characteristics of high-risk bipolar bone loss lesions to simplify the identification of patients in a clinical setting and aid in appropriate treatment planning., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: J.W.A. has received hospitality payments from Arthrex, Mid-Atlantic Surgical Systems, and Smith+Nephew; education payments from Mid-Atlantic Surgical Systems; and grants from Arthrex and DJO. C.B.R. has received grants from Arthrex and DJO and education payments from Smith+Nephew and MedInc of Texas. M.T.P. has received royalties from Anika Therapeutics, Arthrex, and Arthrosurface; consulting fees from Arthrex, Zimmer Biomet, and JRF Ortho; nonconsulting fees from Arthrex and Arthrosurface; education payments from Arthrex; and honoraria from Flexion Therapeutics and JRF Ortho. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto., (© The Author(s) 2024.)

Background: As reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) cases increase, so too will the need to revise subsequent failures. Many of the complications associated with revising anatomic total shoulder and hemiarthroplasty have been adequately addressed by RSA including glenoid bone deficiency, instability, and functional outcomes. However, the risk for complication when revising a failed reverse prosthesis may be more pronounced with increased bone and soft tissue deficiency. The ability for the reversed prosthesis to accommodate these insufficiencies following a prior reversed prosthesis is unclear. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were queried for articles which fit the inclusion criteria of a reversed prosthesis used to revise a failed primary reverse prosthesis with a minimum follow-up of 12 months and clinical outcome reporting. Results: After exclusions, 9 studies reporting on 242 reverse shoulders with a mean follow-up of 40.29 months were analyzed. The differences between preoperative and postoperative weighted means were not significant for Constant (P = .26), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score (P = .61), SSV (P = .57), and visual analog scale for pain (P = .48). Functional improvements in elevation (74°-102°) and external rotation (18°-21°) were consistent with those reported for primary reverse procedures, although differences in preoperative and postoperative measures were not statistically significant. Patient satisfaction was 89% with a major complication rate of 25%. Discussion: The reverse shoulder prosthesis has proven satisfactory in revising hemiarthroplasty and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. The current results indicate RSA is also a satisfactory treatment option when revising a prior reverse prosthesis. Inherent to revision shoulder surgery is the obstacle of humeral and glenoid bone loss, an attenuated soft-tissue envelope, and instability. The reverse prosthesis may adequately address these commonly confronted difficulties with its inherent design characteristics. RSA provides a secure glenoid fixation for bone grafting, the ability to increase construct stability with component sizing, and a reliance on the deltoid for function. As our learning about revision of RSA improves, so will our ability to preemptively address potential issues which may lead to decreased complications in these cases. Despite the 25% rate of major complication, patients reported satisfaction of 89% which demonstrates the improvements in function and pain relief that are provided by the reverse prosthesis.

Abstract Background Anterior shoulder dislocation remains a clinical challenge. This study aimed to assess the graft position and clinical outcomes of the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure and capsular repair for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with significant glenoid bone loss in 37 patients. Methods Between 2017 and 2017, 37 patients underwent arthroscopic Latarjet plus capsular repair procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation combined with significant glenoid bone loss. In follow-up examinations, Walch-Duplay scores, subjective shoulder value (SSV) scores, Rowe scores, and active range of motion (AROM) were assessed. Three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) was used to evaluate coracoid graft position and bone resorption. A new method of evaluating the position of the coracoid bone block after Latarjet (H-Z method) was developed. Results Thirty-seven patients were included in this study. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 36 months postoperatively (with an average of 13 months). No recurrent dislocation occurred at the final follow-up, and there was no significant effect on the AROM (all p > 0.05). Rowe (from 42.2 ± 5.6 to 91.1 ± 3.3), Walch-Duplay (from 31.5 ± 8.0 to 92.6 ± 3.7), and SSV (from 63.9 ± 6.1 to 79.3% ± 5.0%) scores were improved significantly after surgery (all p

Background: The investigation of Hill-Sachs and bony Bankart lesions continues to evolve. Patients with large bone lesions can present with a positive apprehension test even at ranges below 45° of abduction and external rotation of the shoulder. Modern concepts, such as glenoid track and quantification of glenoid bone loss, have been increasingly applied to shoulder instability. The objective of this study was to assess the correlation of the glenoid track and glenoid bone loss on the apprehension test conducted at 0°, 45°, and 90° of shoulder abduction. Methods: Ninety-four shoulders of 90 patients with anterior glenohumeral instability were retrospectively assessed. The apprehension test was performed at 0°, 45°, and 90° of shoulder abduction. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or magnetic resonance arthrogram scans were performed to calculate the glenoid track and glenoid bone loss. A descriptive analysis, an association analysis, and a logistic regression analysis were used in this study. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the influence of glenoid track and glenoid bone loss when the apprehension test was positive in lower degrees of abduction. Results: A positive apprehension test at 0°, 45°, and 90° of abduction revealed significant association with off-track lesions, glenoid bone losses greater than 13.5%, and bipolar bone lesions. Shoulders classified as off-track were 36.4 times more likely to test positive at 0°, 45°, and 90° than on-track shoulders. The logistic regression analysis revealed that the positive apprehension test at 0°, 45°, and 90° of abduction seems to be more influenced by off-track lesions than by glenoid bone loss greater than the 13.5% threshold. Conclusion: Shoulders with a positive apprehension test at 0°, 45°, and 90° are significantly associated with off-track lesions, bipolar bone lesions, and glenoid bone losses greater than 13.5%.

Background: Distal tibia allograft reconstruction of the glenoid in shoulder instability has garnered significant attention over the last decade. Prior studies demonstrate significant improvement in all reported patient outcomes albeit the approach is through a subscapularis split. There have not been prior studies evaluating outcomes after lesser tuberosity osteotomy which provides excellent exposure to the anterior glenoid.We hypothesize there is significant improvement in functional outcomes and no deleterious effects after lesser tuberosity osteotomy for distal tibia allograft reconstruction of the glenoid for shoulder instability. Methods: A retrospective review was performed from 2016 of 2019 of patients undergoing distal tibia allograft reconstruction of the glenoid through a lesser tuberosity osteotomy. Patients were indicated if they had recurrent anterior shoulder instability with >20% glenoid bone loss and evidence of an off-track lesion. Clinical, imaging, and operative data were evaluated. Objective follow-up data evaluated at minimum 2 years included radiographs, range of motion, DASH, SANE, VAS, SST, ASES, and Constant scores. Results: A total of 12 patients were available with average follow-up 28 months, average age 26 years old, and average glenoid bone loss of 33%. The patients demonstrated significant improvement in their clinical outcomes at final follow-up: DASH 42.9-8.9 (P = .004), SANE 32.2-85 (P = .00005), VAS 4.6-1.1 (P = .003), SST 7-11.4 (P = .01), ASES 50.2-90.5 (P = .001), and Constant 37.6-86.2 (P = .01). Range of motion at final follow-up was forward flexion to 161.4° (135-170°), external rotation 49.5° (40-65°), and internal rotation to T12-L1 (T7-L2) vertebral body. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates the effectiveness of a lesser tuberosity osteotomy in exposure of the glenoid for reconstruction with a distal tibia allograft. The functional integrity of the subscapularis is maintained and the patient-reported outcomes are comparable with current literature.

Introduction: Fragment-type glenoid bone loss is known to remodel after arthroscopic Bankart repair. To our knowledge, no studies have been reported about the morphologic changes of the erosion-type bone loss. Aim: To determine the morphologic changes of erosion-type glenoid bone loss after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Methods: Twenty-eight patients (mean age: 31 years) with traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability with an erosion-type glenoid bone loss

Background: Revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) reliably improves shoulder pain and function in patients with failed shoulder arthroplasty, although it can lead to significant postoperative complications. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of postoperative complications on shoulder pain and function after revision RTSA. Methods: We evaluated 36 patients at an average of 4.3 years (range, 2-8.6 years) after revision of a shoulder arthroplasty to RTSA. Of these patients, 9 had a failed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, 23 had a failed hemiarthroplasty, and 4 had a failed RTSA. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score were evaluated postoperatively, and patients with and without postoperative complications were compared. Results: The final ASES score and VAS pain score were 61 ± 23 and 2.4 ± 2.3, respectively. A major postoperative complication occurred in 7 patients (19%) (infection in 3, hematoma in 1, instability in 1, and acromial and/or scapular spine fracture in 2). Further surgical treatment was required in 5 patients (14%) (irrigation and débridement and component exchange for infection in 3, irrigation and débridement for hematoma in 1, and open reduction–internal fixation of scapular spine fracture in 1). On comparison of clinical outcomes between patients with and patients without complications, the ASES score and VAS pain score were significantly worse in patients with complications vs. those without them (ASES score, 43 ± 24 vs. 66 ± 21 [P = .04]; VAS pain score, 4.3 ± 2 vs. 2 ± 2.2 [P = .03]). Conclusion: Revision RTSA resulted in postoperative pain and shoulder function comparable to primary RTSA reported in the literature, although postoperative complications led to clinically significant declines in function and increases in pain.

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the short-term outcomes for patients who underwent revision surgery for shoulder instability, including both revision arthroscopic repair and Latarjet. Methods: This study included patients who underwent revision of a prior arthroscopic labral repair to arthroscopic labral repair or Latarjet at our institution from 2012 to 2017. After collection of preoperative demographic data, preoperative 3-dimensional imaging was reviewed to determine percent glenoid bone loss (%GBL) and to determine whether each shoulder was on-track or off-track. Patients were contacted to obtain postoperative patient-reported outcome metrics including visual analog scale pain, Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and instability recurrence (full dislocation, subluxation, or subjective apprehension) data at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Results: Of 62 patients who met criteria, 45 patients were able to be contacted. Of them, 21 underwent revision arthroscopy and 24 underwent a Latarjet procedure. In the revision arthroscopy group, 5 of 15 had %GBL >20% and 4 of 21 were contact athletes. In the Latarjet group, 11 of 22 had %GBL >20% and 5 of 24 were contact athletes. Of 21 revision arthroscopy patients, 8 underwent concomitant remplissage. Eight of 21 patients in the revision arthroscopy group and 7 of 21 patients in the Latarjet group reported instability postoperatively. Three of 21 patients in the revision arthroscopy group and 2 of 21 patients in the Latarjet group reported full dislocations postoperatively. Zero patients in the revision arthroscopy group and 1 of 21 patients in the Latarjet group underwent reoperation. Conclusion: Our results suggest that both revision Latarjet and arthroscopic stabilization can be of benefit in select circumstances. However, in revision settings, postoperative instability symptoms are common with both procedures.

Abstract Purpose To assess the anthropometric dimensions of the coracoid process and the glenoid articular surface and to determine possible implications with the different commercially available Latarjet fixation techniques. Methods In a total of 101 skeletal scapulae the glenoid length (GL), the glenoid width (GW), the coracoid length (CL), the coracoid width (CW) and the coracoid thickness (CTh) were measured. In order to assess the ability of the transferred coracoid to restore the glenoid anatomy we created a hypothetical model of 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% glenoid bone loss. We analyzed four common surgical fixation techniques for the Latarjet procedure (4.5 mm screws, 3.75 mm screws, 3.5 mm screws, and 2.8 mm button). The distances from the superior-inferior and medio-lateral limits of the coracoid using the four different fixation methods were calculated. We hypothesized that the “safe distance” between the implant and the coracoid osteotomy should be at least equal to the diameter of the implant. Results The intra and inter-observer reliability tests were almost perfect for all measurements. The mean GH was 36.8 ± 2.5 mm, the GW 26.4 ± 2.2 mm, the CL 23.9 ± 3 mm, the CW 13.6 ± 2.mm, and the mean CTh was 8.7 ± 1.3 mm. The CL was

A bony Bankart lesion is a torn labrocapsular complex with a glenoid rim fracture. In this case report, a patient with an acute bony Bankart injury presented with severe shoulder pain and limited range of motion following a road traffic accident. The injury was diagnosed through imaging studies and required arthroscopic bony Bankart repair. The post-surgery rehabilitation program restored the patient's shoulder mobility, strength, and stability, significantly improving pain relief and functional ability. Overall, the case report highlights the importance of prompt diagnosis and appropriate surgical intervention in acute bony Bankart injuries, followed by a well-structured rehabilitation program to achieve optimal outcomes in pain relief, range of motion, and functional ability., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Ethics Sub-Committee, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune issued approval I.E.S.C./W/71/2024. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Shevate et al.)

Purpose of Review: The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview of the literature published over the past 5 years related to the management of bone loss in anterior shoulder instability. Recent Findings: During recent years, there has been a focus on patients at high risk for failure following soft tissue anterior stabilization (Bankart repair). A growing body of evidence suggests that anterior capsulolabral repair is insufficient in the setting of subcritical glenoid bone loss with an off-track Hill Sachs lesion. In such cases, the addition of a remplissage procedure to a Bankart repair or a bone-block augmentation to the glenoid (Latarjet, for example) is often advocated to decrease the risk of recurrent instability. Recent studies have also evaluated the role of alternative bone-block procedures in comparison to the Latarjet, outcomes with arthroscopic and open techniques as well as various fixation methods and radiological outcomes (bone graft resorption, glenohumeral osteoarthritis). Summary: Advances in our understanding of subcritical glenoid bone loss and the glenoid track concept have significantly impacted clinical decision making and treatment selection. The development of arthroscopic techniques has allowed for minimally invasive and safe arthroscopic bone-block procedures as an alternative to open procedures. Further research related to free bone-block procedures will inform long-term outcomes between these procedures and the gold standard Latarjet. Additionally, high-quality evidence is lacking to identify the ideal treatment for patients with glenoid subcritical glenoid bone defect. Variability in outcome reporting suggests the need to standardize outcome measures for future instability trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]