Search

Falls are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality in aged care services and falls risk increasing drugs (FRIDs) are often overlooked as a contributor to falls. This study aims to investigate the association between the risk of falling and use of FRIDs from aged care services. Inverse-probability-weighted multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate the association between falls risk and regular FRIDs in 383 residents from six Australian aged care services. Overall, residents at high and low falls risk had similar prevalence of FRIDs. Prevalence of antipsychotics and sedative-hypnotics was low. Residents at high falls risk had higher adjusted odds of using >= 2 psychotropic medications (odds ratio [OR] = 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17-2.61) and >= 2 medications that cause/worsen orthostatic hypotension (OR = 3.59, 95% CI = 2.27-5.69). High prevalence of FRIDs was mainly attributable to medications for which residents had clinical indications. Clinicians appeared to have largely avoided FRIDs that explicit criteria deem potentially inappropriate for high falls risk.

BACKGROUND: Statins are associated with muscle-related adverse events, but few studies have investigated the association with fall-related hospitalizations among residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs). OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to investigate whether statin use is associated with fall-related hospitalizations from LTCFs. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted among residents aged >= 65 years admitted to hospital from 2013 to 2015. Cases (n = 332) were residents admitted for falls and fall-related injuries. Controls (n = 332) were selected from patients admitted for reasons other than cardiovascular and diabetes. Cases and controls were matched 1:1 by age (+/- 2 years), index date of admission (+/- 6 months), and sex. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using conditional logistic regression, after considering for history of falls, hypertension, dementia, functional comorbidity index, polypharmacy (>= 9 regular preadmission medications), and fall-risk medications. Subanalyses were performed for individual statins, dementia, and statin intensity. RESULTS: Overall, 43.1% of cases and 27.1% of controls used statins. Statins were associated with fall-related hospitalizations (aOR = 2.24, 95% CI 1.56-3.23), in particular simvastatin (aOR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.22-4.20) and atorvastatin (aOR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.33-3.24). Statins were associated with fall-related hospitalizations in residents with (aOR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.33-4.11) and without dementia (aOR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.46-3.63). There was no association between statin intensity and fall-related hospitalizations (aOR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.43-1.40). CONCLUSION: This study suggests a possible association between statin use and fall-related hospitalizations among residents living in LTCFs. However, there was minimal evidence for a relationship between statin intensity and fall-related hospitalizations. Further research is required to substantiate these hypothesis-gen

Objective Our objective was to investigate associations between proton pump inhibitor (PPIs) use and infection- related hospitalizations among residents of long-term care facilities ( LTCFs). Methods This was a case-control study of residents aged = 65 years admitted to hospital between July 2013 and June 2015. Residents admitted for infections (cases) and falls or fall-related injuries (controls) were matched for age (+/- 2 years), sex, and index date of admission (+/- 6 months). Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between PPI use and infection-related hospitalizations. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, polypharmacy, diabetes, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and concomitant use of cancer and immunosuppressant medications. Subgroup analyses were performed for high- and low/moderate-intensity PPIs and for respiratory and non-respiratory infections. Logistic regression was used to compare the odds of infection- related hospitalizations among users of high- and low/moderate-intensity PPIs. Results Overall, 181 cases were matched to 354 controls. Preadmission PPI use was associated with infection-related hospitalizations (aOR 1.66; 95% CI 1.11-2.48). In subgroup analyses, the association was apparent only for respiratory infections (aOR 2.26; 95% CI 1.37-3.73) and high-intensity PPIs (aOR 1.93; 95% CI 1.23-3.04). However, the risk of infection-related hospitalization was not significantly higher among users of high- versus low/moderate-intensity PPIs (aOR 1.25; 95% CI 0.74-2.13). Conclusion Residents who use PPIs may be at increased risk of infection-related hospitalizations, particularly respiratory infections. Study findings provide further support for initiatives to minimize unnecessary PPI use in the LTCF setting.