1. Impact shock origin of diamonds in ureilite meteorites
- Author
-
Nestola F.[1, Goodrich C.A.[3], Morana M.[4], Barbaro A.[4], Jakubek R.S.[5], Christ O.[1], Brenker F.E.[2], Domeneghetti M.C.[4], Dalconi M.C.[1], Alvaro M.[4], Fioretti A.M.[6], Litasov K.D.[7], Fries M.D.[8], Leoni M.[9, 10], Casati N.P.M.[11], Jenniskens P.[12], and Shaddad M.H.[13]
- Subjects
Multidisciplinary ,Materials science ,Diamond ,diamond ,impact shock ,ureilitic diamonds ,ureilites ,carbon phases ,Planetary geology ,Ureilite ,engineering.material ,Troilite ,Cohenite ,Astrobiology ,Shock metamorphism ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Schreibersite ,Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences ,Meteorite ,chemistry ,Physical Sciences ,engineering - Abstract
Significance The origin of diamonds in ureilites is still a debated issue among the scientific community, with significant implications for the sizes of early Solar System bodies. We investigated three diamond-bearing ureilites by a multimethodological approach using scanning electron microscopy, micro X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, and micro-Raman spectroscopy, with the aim of determining the origin of the diamonds. Our results show that formation of both microdiamonds and nanodiamonds in ureilites can be explained by impact shock events on a small planetesimal and does not require long growth times at high static pressures within a Mercury- or Mars-sized body., The origin of diamonds in ureilite meteorites is a timely topic in planetary geology as recent studies have proposed their formation at static pressures >20 GPa in a large planetary body, like diamonds formed deep within Earth’s mantle. We investigated fragments of three diamond-bearing ureilites (two from the Almahata Sitta polymict ureilite and one from the NWA 7983 main group ureilite). In NWA 7983 we found an intimate association of large monocrystalline diamonds (up to at least 100 µm), nanodiamonds, nanographite, and nanometric grains of metallic iron, cohenite, troilite, and likely schreibersite. The diamonds show a striking texture pseudomorphing inferred original graphite laths. The silicates in NWA 7983 record a high degree of shock metamorphism. The coexistence of large monocrystalline diamonds and nanodiamonds in a highly shocked ureilite can be explained by catalyzed transformation from graphite during an impact shock event characterized by peak pressures possibly as low as 15 GPa for relatively long duration (on the order of 4 to 5 s). The formation of “large” (as opposed to nano) diamond crystals could have been enhanced by the catalytic effect of metallic Fe-Ni-C liquid coexisting with graphite during this shock event. We found no evidence that formation of micrometer(s)-sized diamonds or associated Fe-S-P phases in ureilites require high static pressures and long growth times, which makes it unlikely that any of the diamonds in ureilites formed in bodies as large as Mars or Mercury.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF