Search

The prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remain poor despite the impressive improvement of treatments observed over the last 20 years that led to an increase in median overall survival from 6 mo, with the only best supportive care, to approximately 30 mo with the introduction of active chemotherapy drugs and targeted agents. The monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) cetuximab and panitumumab, directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), undoubtedly represent a major step forward in the treatment of mCRC, given the relevant efficacy in terms of progression-free survival, overall survival, response rate, and quality of life observed in several phase III clinical trials among different lines of treatment. However, the anti-EGFR moAbs were shown only to be effective in a subset of patients. For instance, KRAS and NRAS mutations have been identified as biomarkers of resistance to these drugs, improving the selection of patients who might derive a benefit from these treatments. Nevertheless, several other alterations might affect the response to these drugs, and unfortunately, even the responders eventually become resistant by developing secondary (or acquired) resistance in approximately 13-18 mo. Several studies highlighted that the landscape of responsible alterations of both primary and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR drugs biochemically converge into MEK-ERK and PIK3CA-AKT pathways. In this review, we describe the currently known mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR moAbs together with the various strategies evaluated to prevent, overcame or revert them.

There is evidence that people who are insured by Medicaid have difficulty accessing health care from private providers. This study documents access to dermatology care for a hypothetical patient insured by Medicaid in the State of Hawai'i. Posing as young Medicaid patient with a changing mole, we called all dermatologists listed on the American Academy of Dermatology website and requested an appointment to be seen. Only 23% of dermatologists contacted accept all Medicaid plans and an additional 12% accept some. Thus 65% of dermatologists called do not provide specialist care to Hawai'i's Medicaid population.

More than 40% of cases of all lung cancers are diagnosed in patients over the age of 70 years. Elderly patients have more comorbidities and tend to be less tolerant to toxic medical treatments than their younger counterparts. Thus, clinical data obtained in a younger population cannot be automatically extrapolated to the great majority of nonselected elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The bulk of prospective clinical data regarding chemotherapy and molecularly targeted therapy for elderly NSCLC patients come from studies in advanced disease. In elderly advanced NSCLC patients, single-agent chemotherapy with third-generation agents (vinorelbine, gemcitabine, taxanes) is to be considered the routine standard of care for unselected patients, based on phase II and III trials specifically designed for this special population. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy with cisplatin at attenuated doses has been demonstrated to be an active and feasible option in phase II trials. Among targeted therapies, the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, erlotinib and gefitinib, have relevant phase II prospective data showing activity and good tolerability as first-line treatment in this population. Concerning the antivascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody, bevacizumab, combined with chemotherapy, particular care must be taken for elderly patients because of the higher incidence of cardiovascular comorbidities. The lack of data on octogenarians suggest that clinicians should exercise caution when applying the existing data on chemotherapy and targeted therapies for patients aged 70-79 years to those aged >80 years. Further specifically designed clinical trials are needed to optimize medical treatment of NSCLC in elderly patients.

Carcinoma of the lung is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constituting about 85% of all new diagnoses. Standard approaches for each NSCLC stage have reached a plateau in effectiveness. A variety of novel approaches are now being investigated to improve the outcome of this disease. Despite decades of research, no specific active cancer vaccine has, to date, been approved for NSCLC therapy; nevertheless, vaccine therapy has recently re-emerged as a potential therapeutic approach. In particular, several new paradigms have stemmed from recent clinical findings both in the use of combination therapy approaches with more sophisticated specific vaccines and in clinical trial design and endpoint analyses. Several vaccine therapies have been investigated in NSCLC, including in the early and advanced disease stages. The best results appear to be in the adjuvant settings and in locally advanced NSCLC. In fact, in these two settings, phase III randomized trials are ongoing evaluating the melanoma-associated antigen A3 vaccine and the liposomal BLP25 vaccine. This paper reviews the main clinical trials involving several different cancer vaccines employed in the treatment of early and advanced stage NSCLC, focusing on those in advanced stages of development.

Improving outcomes for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major research area considering that a significant percentage of such patients develop recurrent disease within 5 years of complete lung resection. Adjuvant chemotherapy prolongs survival, with an absolute improvement in 5-year overall survival of about 5% with drawbacks such as treatment toxicity. Approximately, one third of patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC have locally advanced disease not amenable for surgical resection - in this setting of patients concurrent chemoradiation is the standard of therapy. However, the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC is still controversial and clinical outcomes are disappointing, and so new approaches are required to improve the clinical benefit in this setting of patients. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key angiogenic factor implicated in tumor blood vessels formation and permeability, and tumor VEGF overexpression in patients with early stage lung cancer has been associated with worse relapse free and overall survival. Several agents have been developed that inhibit VEGF or its receptor signalling system. Bevacizumab is the first recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody binding VEGF to demonstrate clinical benefit or rather a survival prolongation in combination with chemotherapy in the treatment of non-squamous advanced NSCLC patients. These positive results led to a large number of clinical trials to evaluate bevacizumab in combination with other targeted agents in advanced disease, and to define the role of this agent in early stage NSCLC such as the impact of bevacizumab integration in chemoradiotherapy strategy for locally advanced disease.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 85% of all new diagnoses of lung cancer. Unfortunately, few NSCLC patients are suitable for radical treatment for curative intent. Because most patients with NSCLC have advanced disease at diagnosis, chemotherapy represents the standard of care, although, to date, a plateau has been reached with this approach. Improvements in the knowledge of tumor biology and mechanisms of oncogenesis have identified the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a member of the ErbB family, as a molecular target for NSCLC treatment. EGFR is commonly overexpressed in NSCLC and has been associated with impaired prognosis; therefore, its inhibition may lead, through the suppression of tumor proliferation, to improvement in clinical outcomes. Strategies to block EGFR include tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, ligand-linked toxins, and antisense approaches. This article focuses on the treatment of NSCLC with the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies, including cetuximab, for which the largest amount of data in the literature exists. Recently, a phase III randomized trial performed in advanced NSCLC patients yielded a statistically significant survival advantage for patients treated with cetuximab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. Other anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies, such as panitumumab, matuzumab, nimotuzumab, and ch806, are in different stages of development for the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Although substantial progress has been made in the therapeutic options currently available for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the overall survival profile remains poor for most patients. One of the strategies currently under investigation with the aim of prolonging survival in NSCLC patients is maintenance treatment with either a chemotherapeutic agent or a molecularly targeted agent after first-line chemotherapy. Moreover, this can consist of drugs included in the induction regimen or other noncrossresistant agents. With the currently available data, maintenance treatment with a different noncrossresistant agent (i.e., an early second-line treatment) is perhaps the most promising strategy. The drug chosen for the early second-line treatment should be a well-tolerated agent, considering that patients have just completed a particularly toxic platinum-based chemotherapy. Extending treatment with targeted agents rather than chemotherapy can provide longer progression-free and overall survival times without increasing toxicity. However, at the moment, only progression-free survival has been shown to be consistently superior with maintenance approaches; the evaluation of survival benefits is warranted before defining this strategy as a possible treatment option. Further studies are warranted to establish the role of maintenance chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.