Search

Background: The relationship between bone density and fracture has been widely studied and recognized, and the role of cortical bone in proximal femoral fractures has also been increasingly studied. However, both the determination of bone mineral density (BMD) and the determination of cortical mass are expensive and cumbersome. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether two readily available indicators, Hounsfield Units (HUs) and femoral cortical index (FCI), can be used to predict hip fracture classification and prognosis., Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 110 patients with hip fragility fractures. Cortical index was calculated on fractured and contralateral femur FCI, with HUs calculated on the proximal femur. The correlation of the FCI and HU with diabetes, hypertension, and related indicators, such as albumin, creatinine, and urea nitrogen levels, were also analyzed in the study., Results: Both the Evans classification of intertrochanteric fractures and the Garden and Pauwels classifications of femoral neck fractures showed that as the severity of the fracture increased, the HUs and FCI decreased. Age and albumin level also had a negative correlation with HUs and FCI. There was also a significant correlation between HUs and FCI., Conclusions: The HUs and FCI, which can be easily and quickly obtained, can be used to predict the classification and prognosis of hip fractures., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Previous studies have reported that positive buttress is as effective as anatomical reduction in treating young femoral neck fractures, but whether this effect is related to the Pauwels classification remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical prognosis of positive buttress in young femoral neck fractures with different Pauwels classifications, as well as to assess its biomechanical properties., Methods: A total of 170 young patients with femoral neck fractures who were treated with three cannulated screws were included in this study. Patients were divided into three groups based on their preoperative Pauwels classification. Each group was divided into three subgroups based on the reduction quality: positive buttress, negative buttress and anatomical reduction. The femoral neck shortening, the incidence of necrosis of the femoral head (AVN) and the Harris hip scores at the last follow-up were compared across the three reduction quality within each Pauwels classification. Subsequently, a volunteer was recruited, CT data of the hip was obtained, and finite element models representing different reduction quality under varying Pauwels classifications were established. The biomechanical properties of each model were then evaluated following the application of strains., Results: In Pauwels type I, there were no significant differences in postoperative femoral neck shortening, incidence of AVN, or Harris score among the three types of reduction quality (P > 0.05). However, positive buttress provided superior biomechanical stability compared to negative buttress and anatomical reduction. In Pauwels type II, the incidence of AVN was similar between the positive buttress and the anatomical reduction groups, and both were significantly lower than that in the negative buttress (P < 0.05). The Harris score of the positive buttress was higher than that of the negative buttress, and there was no significant difference in the occurrence of femoral neck shortening between the three groups (P > 0.05). Finite element analysis showed that the biomechanical stability of positive buttress was equivalent to anatomical reduction, and both were better than negative buttress. In Pauwels type III, the incidence of AVN in the anatomical reduction group was lower than that in both the positive buttress and negative buttress (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of AVN or femoral neck shortening between positive buttress and negative buttress (P > 0.05). There was also no difference in postoperative Harris scores between the three reduction qualities (P > 0.05). Both positive buttress and negative buttress exhibited identical biomechanical qualities and were inferior to anatomical reduction., Conclusions: The biomechanical and clinical dominance of positive buttress correlates with Pauwels type. Specifically, Positive buttress is biomechanically stable in Pauwels types I and II. In Pauwels type III, positive buttress is not advantageous. As the Pauwels angle increases, the biomechanical benefit of the positive buttress is lost. Therefore, regardless of the Pauwels classification, negative buttress should be avoided after reduction of femoral neck fractures in young patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Effectiveness in health care is a specific characteristic of each intervention and outcome evaluated. Especially with regard to surgical interventions, organization, structure and processes play a key role in determining this parameter. In addition, health care services by definition operate in a context of limited resources, so rationalization of service organization becomes the primary goal for health care management. This aspect becomes even more relevant for those surgical services for which there are high volumes. Therefore, in order to support and optimize the management of patients undergoing surgical procedures, the data analysis could play a significant role. To this end, in this study used different classification algorithms for characterizing the process of patients undergoing surgery for a femoral neck fracture. The models showed significant accuracy with values of 81%, and parameters such as Anaemia and Gender proved to be determined risk factors for the patient's length of stay. The predictive power of the implemented model is assessed and discussed in view of its capability to support the management and optimisation of the hospitalisation process for femoral neck fracture, and is compared with different model in order to identify the most promising algorithms. In the end, the support of artificial intelligence algorithms laying the basis for building more accurate decision-support tools for healthcare practitioners., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Rationale: Pipkin III femoral head fracture dislocation (FHFD) is rarely observed in clinical practice, and its outcome is alarming. A considerable proportion of Pipkin III fractures result from repeated or forceful closed reduction of an irreducible FHFD. Pipkin type III fractures pose a therapeutic challenge. Most patients underwent total hip arthroplasty., Patient Concerns: A 34-year-old man experienced high-energy trauma to the left hip from a terrible traffic accident. Radiography and computed tomography (CT) at the local hospital revealed a left posterior FHFD. Emergency close reduction of the hip was performed.48 hours later, the patient was transferred to our institution. New radiography and CT examinations demonstrated an iatrogenic femoral neck fracture (FNF) associated with FHFD. In addition, a right talar fracture was observed., Diagnosis: Pipkin III fracture combined with contralateral talar fracture., Interventions: Considering his Pipkin fracture classification (Pipkin Type-III) and the time to surgery after his injury (>48 hours), the patient underwent left total hip arthroplasty uneventfully, followed by below-ankle plaster cast immobilization for his right ankle., Outcomes: At the 6-month follow-up, the patient was able to walk pain-free, and plain radiographs were satisfactory, with no evidence of heterotopic ossification or osteonecrosis of the talus., Lessons: Before emergency closed reduction, early recognition of the unique characteristics of an irreducible FHFD is essential to avoid iatrogenic femoral neck fracture., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

As one of the leading causes of elderly patients' hospitalisation, proximal femur fractures (PFFs) will present an increasing socioeconomic problem in the near future. This is a result of the demographic change that is expressed by the increasing proportion of elderly people in society. Peri-operative management must be handled attentively to avoid complications and decrease mortality rates. To deal with the exceptional needs of the elderly, the development of orthogeriatric centres to support orthogeriatric co-management is mandatory. Adequate pain medication, balanced fluid management, delirium prevention and the operative treatment choice based on comorbidities, individual demands and biological rather than chronological age, all deserve particular attention to improve patients' outcomes. The operative management of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures favours intramedullary nailing. For femoral neck fractures, the Garden classification is used to differentiate between non-displaced and displaced fractures. Osteosynthesis is suitable for biologically young patients with non-dislocated fractures, whereas total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty are the main options for biologically old patients and displaced fractures. In bedridden patients, osteosynthesis might be an option to establish transferability from bed to chair and the restroom. Postoperatively, the patients benefit from early mobilisation and early geriatric care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, prolonged time until surgery and thus an increased rate of complications took a toll on frail patients with PFFs. This review aims to offer surgical guidelines for the treatment of PFFs in the elderly with a focus on pitfalls and challenges particularly relevant to frail patients., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of cannulated internal fixation in patients who sustain femoral neck fracture (FNF) and risk factors influencing the outcomes., Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 73 elderly patients aged ≥60 years old, hospitalized for FNF and treated with cannulated internal fixation between August 2008 and July 2016. The inclusion criteria were: (i) patients aged ≥60 years; (ii) patients with recent femoral neck fracture, with times of injury ranging from 12-72 h; and (iii) patients who underwent Garden II-IV closed reduction and internal fixation. Patients were classified based on the Garden fracture type and Pauwels angle. Clinical data and radiographs before and after the surgery were collected. Subsequently, surgery was performed with the patient in supine position, under general or lumbar epidural anesthesia. Closed reduction was performed until satisfactory fracture reduction quality was achieved. The weight of all included patients were <75 kg, and thus, minimal internal fixation was performed. The ischemic necrosis of the femoral head was diagnosed by considering the symptoms, signs, and radiological findings. Harris hip scores were used to evaluate postoperative recovery of hip function. Furthermore, relationships between Garden fracture type and necrosis rate of the femoral head, Pauwels angle and necrosis rate of the femoral head, Garden fracture type and Harris hip score, and age and Harris hip score were analyzed., Results: The mean duration of surgery was 1 ± 0.17 h and blood loss for all the patients was approximately 15 mL. The included patients were followed up for 13-128 months, with an average follow-up of 61 months. Among the included 73 patients, 65 (89.0%) exhibited satisfactory union, seven (9.6%) had femoral head necrosis, and one (1.4%) had nonunion. For seven patients with femoral head necrosis, there were two, two, and three patients classified as Garden IV, Garden III, and Garden II, respectively, and two and five patients classified as Pauwels II and Pauwels III, respectively. Among the seven cases, four underwent hip replacement. Garden fracture type was not significantly associated with femoral head necrosis (χ 2 = 0.44, P > 0.05) or Harris score (χ 2 = 1.43, P > 0.05). Patients with Pauwels I (0%) and II (4.3%) fractures exhibited a significantly lower necrosis rate than those with Pauwels III fractures (41.7%) (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: Cannulated internal fixation was more suitable for older Chinese patients with Pauwels I/II fractures than those with Pauwels III fractures., (© 2020 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background and purpose - Preoperative posterior tilt of the femoral head as seen on lateral radiographs has been reported to affect the risk of fixation failure in cases of minimally displaced femoral neck fractures (Garden I-II). We investigated radiological risk factors of treatment failure.Patients and methods - We included 417 patients (68% women, median age: 78 years (50-108) with a minimally displaced femoral neck fracture (Garden I-II) treated with internal fixation in a retrospective cohort study. The patients were followed for 3.4 years (2-14). Data on age, sex, housing, cognitive impairment, implant angulation, pre- and postoperative tilt, hip complications, and reoperations were recorded. The risk of fixation failure was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.Results - The overall reoperation rate was 17%, and the rate of treatment failure (fixation failure, nonunion, avascular necrosis, or posttraumatic osteoarthritis) was 13%. Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed an increased risk of treatment failure with a preoperative posterior tilt of at least 20° and a preoperative anterior tilt greater than 10°. A failure occurred in 13 of the 65 patients with a posterior tilt of at least 20° and in 5 of the 9 patients with an anterior tilt greater than 10°.Interpretation - A preoperative posterior tilt of 20° and an anterior tilt greater than 10° in cases of Garden I and II femoral neck fractures increase the risk of fixation failure necessitating additional surgery. In this group of patients, there is a need for future interventional studies regarding the feasibility of primary hip arthroplasty.

Background: The management of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) has evolved, with emphasis in radiographic features such as posterior displacement. However, the role of advanced imaging in this scenario is still not well defined. Therefore, our objective is to assess the impact of a computed tomography scan (CT) on interobserver agreement (IA) of fracture classification, posterior tilt measurement, and treatment decisions in nondisplaced FNF in elderly patients., Methods: Eleven patients with a nondisplaced (Garden 1-2) FNF were assessed by six hip surgeons. On a first stage, fracture classification, posterior tilt, and treatment plan (fixation/arthroplasty) were determined only with clinical information and X-rays. On a second stage, a CT was added. The kappa coefficient ( κ) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to determine IA., Results: IA for Garden classification was only slight in X-rays and with the addition of a CT, with a κ = 0.13 (0-0.28) and 0.18 (0.03-0.33), respectively. Conversely, posterior tilt measurement agreement was excellent in both schemes, with an ICC = 0.92 (0.83-0.98) and 0.92 (0.82-0.98). The IA for the proposed treatment was slight with X-rays ( κ = 0.44; 0.29-0.6), but moderate with the addition of a CT scan ( κ = 0.67; 0.52-0.82). Changes in surgical decision where made in 14 of 66 evaluations with an OR = 1.4 (0.62-3.2) for choosing an arthroplasty if a CT was used., Conclusion: IA for fracture classification and posterior tilt evaluation in nondisplaced FNF was not altered by the usage of a CT. There is improvement in treatment agreement when a CT scan is added to conventional imaging, with changes in treatment in 21% of cases.

Rationale: Pipkin III fracture, which is characterized by high risk of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, is extremely rare. It is more difficult to treat and has a worse prognosis when accompanied with severe acetabular fractures. Few studies show that both Pipkin type III femoral head fracture-dislocation and complicated acetabular fracture presented in one patient., Patient Concerns: A 34-year-old male suffered a terrible traffic accident with a serious damage to the left side when he was sitting in the car's cockpit. Pelvic radiograph and 3-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography revealed characteristics of fractures before the emergency operation., Diagnosis: Pipkin III fractures combined with complicated acetabular fracture., Interventions: Firstly, we used combined anterior and posterior approach for treatment to fix the femoral head fractures. Then, we completed anatomical reduction of fractures with countersunk head screw, hollow screw, and reconstruction plate., Outcomes: At the 12-months follow-up, the patient could walk freely and perform activities of daily living without necrosis of femoral head and heterotopic ossification., Lessons: Although there are serious complications in Pipkin III fractures combined with complicated acetabular fracture, early surgical treatment with appropriate approach and fixation could get satisfactory results., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Femoral neck fractures typically occur as a result of high-energy mechanisms among non-geriatric patients. Complications, including femoral neck shortening, non-union, and avascular necrosis, are relatively common after the internal fixation of this fracture pattern. These complications have serious effects on young patients. The Pauwels classification, which is the first biomechanical classification for femoral neck fractures, is still frequently used to determine and prescribe the appropriate treatment for femoral neck fractures. However, we lack a unified standard for measuring the Pauwels angle, which may make the classification unreliable. Understanding the relationship between the Pauwels classification and the complications arising from the internal fixation of femoral neck fractures is necessary. Meanwhile, a Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture among young adults, which involves a high shear load at the fracture site, is difficult to treat successfully. In addition, the recognized internal fixation for this fracture pattern remains uncertain., Main Body: This review aims to provide an update on the viewpoint on the Pauwels classification including the measurement of the Pauwels angle and to present evidence to prove the aforementioned relationship. Moreover, this article also discusses the optimal internal fixation for femoral neck fractures based on the Pauwels classification., Conclusion: A unified standard of measurement should be established for the Pauwels classification, which is still frequently used in the literature and in determining appropriate treatment for femoral neck fractures, to achieve a credible classification. In addition, more randomized, multicentric, and prospective trials should be conducted in the future to clearly understand the relationship between the Pauwels classification and complications arising from the internal fixation of femoral neck fractures and, consequently, to explore ideal fixations for a Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture.

Purpose: To evaluate whether surgeons' experience affect inter- and intra-observer reliability among mostly used classification systems for femoral neck fractures., Material and Methods: A power point presentation was prepared with 107 slides which were antero-posterior radiographs of each femoral neck fracture. Five residents, 5 orthopaedic surgeons and 5 senior orthopaedic surgeons reviewed this presentation and classified the fractures according to Garden, Pauwels and AO classifications. The order of the slides was changed and reviews were repeated after 3 months. Fleiss kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient values were calculated to evaluate inter and intra-observer reliability., Results: Garden and AO classifications' inter-observer reliabilities were similar and higher than Pauwels classification. Among three experience groups, the inter-observer reliability for Garden classification was highest in senior surgeon group, the interobserver reliability for AO classification was highest in surgeon group, and interobserver reliability of Pauwels classification was highest in low experienced groups (residents and surgeons). Intra-observer reliability was highest for Garden and lowest for Pauwels classifications. Surgical experience was found to be not effective for intraobserver reliability., Conclusion: Both Garden and AO classifications were more reliable than Pauwels classification. Surgical experience was not significantly important on these three classification systems' evaluation., Level of Evidence: Level IV, Diagnostic study., (Copyright © 2016 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to employ a new three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and modeling method to measure displacement of undisplaced femoral neck fractures (Garden stages I and II). We also aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Garden classification for determining the displacement of undisplaced femoral neck fractures. A total of 120 consecutive patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures were enrolled between 2012 and 2014, including 60 within the Garden I group and 60 within the Garden II group. The displacements of the femoral head center (d1) and the lowest point of the fovea capitis femoris (d2) and rotational displacement of the femoral head (α) in the 3D model were measured with 3D computed tomography reconstruction and modeling. Five observers, trauma surgeons, were asked to found the centers of the femoral heads and the deepest points of the foveae. The intraobserver and inter-observer agreements were calculated using Fleiss' kappa. The inter-observer and intra-observer kappa values were 0.937 and 0.985, respectively. Current method has good reliability. We discovered that many participants in our study had been misclassified by an anterior-posterior radiograph as having an "incomplete" fracture. In incomplete fracture of Garden stage I group, the average displacements d1 and d2 were 3.69 ± 1.77 mm and 14.51 ± 1.91 mm, respectively. The mean α was 4.91° ± 2.49°. For impacted fracture of Garden stage I, significant spatial displacement in the impacted fractures was observed (d1: 6.22 ± 3.36 mm; d2: 10.30 ± 5.73 mm; and α: 17.83° ± 10.72°). Similarly, significant spatial displacement was observed among the Garden stage II group (d1: 7.16 ± 4.58 mm; d2: 12.95 ± 8.25 mm; and α: 18.77° ± 9.10°). There was no significant difference in α, d1, and d2 between impacted fracture and Garden stage II groups (P > 0.05). However, significant differences were found between incomplete fracture and Garden stage II groups (P < 0.05). Our findings suggest that 3D reconstruction and modeling may be a better tool for assessing femoral neck fractures than the Garden classification. Undisplaced femoral neck fractures showed variable degrees of displacement and were not undisplaced, stable fractures. Garden classification for undisplaced femoral neck fractures has certain limitations.

Aim: To ensure a more reliable classification system for the femur neck fractures by estimating pressure and tensile force on the fracture crevice., Methods: The study compared the kappa coefficient for the inter and intraobserver agreement of the same five observers on the same radiographic sample of the femur neck fracture with a time gap of one year for the AO group and original proposal of estimated dominant pressure and tensile force on the femur neck fracture's crevice., Results: The kappa coefficient for the AO group was 0.49 and for the system for estimating the dominant force on the fracture's crevice it was 0.78. For the observer our proposal is easier to use than the AO system., Conclusion: The estimation system of the dominant force on the fracture's crevice is more reliable and thus more acceptable than the AO group system for femoral neck fractures.

Background: Vascular injury after femoral neck fracture can determine its prognosis. This study aimed to determine methods of evaluating femoral neck fracture and accurately predicting the prognosis., Methods: Forty-five patients with a single femoral neck fracture all underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and were divided into three types by DSA. DSA showing three to six supporting band vascular images crossing the fracture line was classified as type I. DSA showing one to two supporting band vascular images crossing the fracture line was classified as type II. When DSA did not show vascular images crossing the fracture line, it was classified as type III. The 45 patients were divided according to age into elderly, middle-aged and youth groups. All cases were given internal fixation operations by a hollow screw under a C-brachial machine. After a follow-up of 6-60 months, avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH) and fracture healing of different type and different ages of patients were evaluated according to symptoms and imaging examinations., Results: (1) For DSA types I, II and III, the rates of ANFH were 0, 7.14 and 100 %, respectively, and the rates of fracture disunion were 13.3, 7.15 and 0 %, respectively. Therefore, the rate of ANFH is negatively related to the visible supporting band vascular amount on DSA. (2) In the young group, the proportions of types I, II and III were 6.7, 26.67 and 66.7 %, respectively, 18.18, 36.36 and 45.45 % in the middle-aged group and 63.16, 31.58 and 5.27 % in the elderly group. The rates of necrosis for elderly, middle-aged and youth were 10.53, 45.45 and 66.67 %, respectively, and the rates of fracture disunion were 0, 0 and 6.67 %, respectively. So we can draw the conclusion that the amount of supporting band vascular images is inversely proportional to age and the union is directly related to age, but independent of the supporting band vascular amount of DSA showing., Conclusion: The new classification after superselective angiography is valuable for predicting the prognosis of femoral neck fractures.

Aim: To determine which of the classification systems for the femoral neck fracture between AO group, AO subgroup, Garden and Pauwels is much more reliable and reproducible to predict a method of treatment, radiological prediction of nonunion and prediction of outcomes., Methods: Five observers classified 77 randomly selected anterior- posterior (AP) and lateral view preoperative radiographs of the femoral neck fractures according to AO group, AO subgroup, Garden and Pauwels classification systems. The procedure was repeated on the same radiographs after three months. First classification is used to calculate interobserver agreement by kappa value between observers, while the first and second classification has served to calculate intraobserver kappa value for each examiner., Results: Overall mean for classification system for interobserver agreement is: AO 0.44, AO subgroup 0.17, Garden 0.41 and Pauwels 0.19. Mean intraobserver agreement for AO group was 0.56, AO subgroup 0.38, Garden 0.49 and Pauwels 0.38 coefficient kappa value., Conclusion: Garden and AO group are useful for the division of femoral neck fractures without displacement and with displacement, but they are not for clinical use. AO subgroup and Pauwels classification are not recommended for further use.

Background: The Garden classification is used to classify intracapsular proximal femur fractures. The reliability of this classification is poor and several authors advise a simplified classification of intracapsular hip fractures into non-displaced and displaced fractures. However, this proposed simplified classification has never been tested for its reliability., Hypothesis: We estimate simplifying the classification of femoral neck fractures will lead to a higher inter-observer agreement., Materials and Methods: Ten observers, trauma surgeons and residents, from two different institutes classified 100 intracapsular femoral neck fractures. The inter-observer agreements were calculated using the multi-rater Fleiss' kappa., Results: The inter-observer kappa for the Garden classification was 0.31. An agreement of κ0.52 was observed if the Garden classification was simplified and the fractures were classified by our observers as 'non-displaced' or 'displaced'. No difference in reliability was seen for the use of the four-grade Garden classification as well as the simplified classification between trauma surgeons and residents., Discussion: Classification of intracapsular hip fractures according to the four-grade Garden classification is unreliable. The reliability of classification improves when the Garden classification is simplified in a classification using the terms: 'non-displaced' or 'displaced'., Level of Evidence: Level IV. Diagnostic retrospective study., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The ideal treatment of the intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck still is subject of discussion. The demographic development of the population in Europe with fractures of the neck of femur being typical in the older patient, requires conclusive and stringent concepts of treatment. Adequate and patient oriented therapy should be promoted, regional differences and provisional deficiencies need to be adjusted in order to minimize the rate of complications. The guideline "Schenkelhalsfraktur" of the German board of trauma surgeons, the 'Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie', and the article at hand are meant to serve as a manual for the trauma surgeon. Based on evaluated data it simplifies rational decision-making for treatment of fractures of the proximal femur. Moreover, secondary prophylaxis as well as the subsequent outpatient treatment and the social reintegration of the patients recovering from fractures of the femoral neck remains vital- ly important. After all, even with ideal treatment of the fracture more than half of the patients are impaired for a long time and one out of four permanently depends on nursing assistance.

Background: Medical diagnosis, like all products of human cognition, is subject to error. We tested the hypothesis that errors of diagnosis in the realm of fracture classification can be reduced by a consensus (group) diagnosis; and that digital imaging and Internet access makes feasible the compilation of a diagnostic consensus in real time., Methods: Twelve orthopaedic surgeons were asked to evaluate 20 hip radiographs demonstrating a femoral neck fracture. The surgeons were asked to determine if the fractures were displaced or not. Because no reference standard is available, the maximal accuracy of the diagnosis of displacement can be inferred from inter-observer reliability: if two readers disagree about displacement, one of them must be wrong. That method was employed here. Additionally, virtual reader groups of 3 and 5 individual members were amalgamated, with the response of those groups defined by majority vote. The purpose of this step was to see if increasing the number of readers would improve accuracy. In a second experiment, to study the feasibility of amassing a reader group on the Internet in real time, 40 volunteers were sent 10 periodic email requests to answer questions and their response times were assessed., Results: The mean kappa coefficient for individual inter-observer reliability for the diagnosis of displacement was 0.69, comparable to prior published values. For 3-member virtual reader groups, inter-observer reliability was 0.77; and for 5-member groups, it was 0.80. In the experiment studying the feasibility of amassing a reader group in real time, the mean response time was 594 minutes. For all cases, a 9-member group (theoretically 99% accurate) was amassed in 135.8 minutes or less., Conclusions: Consensus may improve diagnosis. Amassing a group for this purpose on the Internet is feasible.

Background: Fractures through the proximal femur are broadly grouped into intertrochanteric fractures and intracapsular fractures. It is not clear why a patient may sustain an intertrochanteric fracture as compared with an intracapsular fracture. There is an established relationship between relative hip retroversion and the development of osteoarthritis. We postulate retroversion also may be a risk factor for having intracapsular fractures develop., Questions/purposes: We looked specifically at the geometry of the hip to analyze the possibility of a relationship between acetabular version, femoral version, and Mckibbin's instability index and fracture type., Patients and Methods: We recruited 40 patients with fractures of the femoral neck for the study. There were 15 men and 25 women with a mean age of 80 years (range, 57-92 years). There were 14 intertrochanteric fractures and 26 intracapsular fractures. After treating their fracture, the contralateral hip was scanned in a CT scanner and assessed by two independent observers to establish the acetabular and femoral version., Results: We found no correlation between proximal femoral fracture type and the contralateral femoral version, femoral neck length, acetabular version, or Mckibbin's instability index or between fracture type and age or gender., Conclusions: There appears to be no correlation between proximal femoral fracture type and acetabular or femoral version., Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Surgery is the treatment of choice for fractured neck of femur. For middle-aged patients (aged ca. 40 to 65), there is considerable debate over the indications for arthroplasty or internal fixation. The choice of surgical technique varies widely from one region to another. In this article, we discuss the main criteria that should be used in making this decision., Methods: We selectively reviewed the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of fractured neck of femur, including the current guideline of the German Society for Trauma Surgery (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie, DGU) and recent findings from the field of health services research., Results: The treatment of middle-aged patients with dislocated fractures should be based on rational decision-making. The patient's level of activity before the accident should be judged in terms of his or her previous mobility, independence in daily activities, and mental status. Internal fixation is recommended if the fracture can be adequately repositioned, the bone is of good quality, and there is no evidence of osteoarthritis. Fractures that are more than 24 hours old should be treated with total hip arthroplasty. Hemiprostheses are appropriate for very old patients. Physically frail, bedridden, and/or demented patients should undergo internal fixation of the fracture. For non-displaced or impacted fractures, functional treatment (i.e., prophylactic securing of the fracture with screws or nails) is indicated. Rapid diagnosis and a short time in bed before surgery lower the rate of complications. Internal fixation with preservation of the femoral head should ideally be performed within the first 6 hours of trauma, and within the first 24 hours at most., Conclusion: Despite the increasing scarcity of resources, treatment should still be based on well-founded clinical guidelines. Minimally invasive surgery enables better function in the early postoperative phase and can thereby lower complication rates. An interdisciplinary concept for the postoperative care of elderly patients also has a major effect on the outcome.

Simultaneous bilateral femoral neck fracture following an epileptic seizure attack are rare. Open reduction and internal fixation remains the most used therapeutic option. Arthroplasty, carrying a high risk of dislocation is less often recommended. We report the favourable evolution of a 49-year-old man who benefited from a single stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty operation for his simultaneous bilateral, femoral neck fractures secondary to a generalized seizure. This nonconsensual choice, in this case, was justified on multiple grounds: surgical care delay longer than 48 hours, substantial bone displacement, borderline bone quality, adequate antiepileptic treatment efficacy and tolerance. A ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces couple, a large-diameter head and a cementless implantation design together should be able to provide an acceptable longevity in a young and active patient., (2009 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background: The standard radiographic series for evaluation of a suspected hip fracture in most centers includes an anteroposterior (AP) radiograph of the pelvis, as well AP and cross-table lateral views of the hip. The natural femoral neck anteversion, as well as the fracture deformity, however, may make accurate fracture classification difficult. We have noted that inexperienced physicians sometimes misclassify hip fractures based on the initial radiographic series, which may lead to errors both in surgical planning and implant choice. At our institution, we routinely obtain a physician-assisted traction-internal rotation radiograph of the affected hip in all fractures of the proximal femur. The purpose of the current study was to examine the usefulness of the traction-internal rotation radiograph for the classification of hip fractures by junior residents in our department., Materials and Methods: Forty-seven sets of complete radiographs (AP pelvis, AP hip, cross-table lateral, traction- internal rotation views) of patients who sustained a proximal femur fracture were identified. Fifteen first year orthopaedic residents (PGY2) individually reviewed the cases and classified them as one of six possible choices: 1. nondisplaced femoral neck fracture, 2. displaced femoral neck fracture, 3. stable intertrochanteric fracture, 4. unstable intertrochanteric fracture, 5. intertrochanteric fracture with subtrochanteric extension, or 6. subtrochanteric fracture. Each fracture case was classified after first reviewing the standard hip series (AP pelvis, AP hip, and cross-table lateral). A traction-internal rotation radiograph was then added to each case, and any changes in the initial classification were noted. The resident's classification was then compared with those of the senior investigators (KJK, KAE), who used all four views for classification., Results: Reviewing a traction-internal rotation radiograph led to a statistically significant increase in agreement between the resident and senior investigators' classification (71.9% to 77.9%, p value < or = 0.01). The residents were more accurately able to identify fracture patterns as femoral neck (from a prior 98.5% to 99.3% after reviewing a traction-internal rotation view), intertrochanteric (a prior 87.7% to 91.3%), and subtrochanteric (prior 22.9% to 28.9%) after reviewing the additional radiograph. There were a total of 57 (8.1% of all responses) changes in classification after the traction-internal rotation view, 42 of which involved a change from an incorrect to a correct classification. In 50% of the changed responses, the correct classification would have led to a change in implant or surgical procedure choice, or both., Conclusion: The routine addition of a traction-internal rotation radiograph increased the ability to accurately classify proximal femur fractures by junior residents in our department. This has a direct impact in accurate surgical planning and implant choice.

Aims: The aims of this study were to compare the morbidity and mortality data for patients undergoing surgical fixation of a fractured neck of femur (during a 6-month period) to the predicted morbidity and mortality rates obtained from the POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Morbidity and Mortality) scoring system, adapted for orthopaedic patients. The predictive accuracy of the orthopaedic POSSUM system is evaluated for this population. The 1-year mortality for the males and females of the study group (mean ages) is compared to the 1-year mortality of male and female New Zealanders of the same age., Methods: Physiological and operative data was collected from patient notes; patient morbidity and mortality were obtained at 30 days and at 1 year postoperatively. The data were analysed with the orthopaedic POSSUM scoring system., Results: 225 complete datasets were obtained. The mean age of the patients was 83 years; 75% were female. The observed 30-day morbidity and mortality rates were 58% and 12% respectively. The observed 1-year mortality was 38% for males (mean age 79 years) and 29% for females (mean age 84 years). New Zealand census data predicts 7% and 6.4% mortality respectively based on these mean ages., Conclusions: The POSSUM system allocates patients into groups of varying risk. The observed data shows higher numbers of complications, including death, in patients allocated into higher risk groups. The 1-year mortality is much higher than that predicted based on mean patient age from the New Zealand abridged life table.

The worldwide increase in hip fractures is a major challenge to the health care system and society. The proper treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly is still controversial, and even more so from an international perspective. Optimising the treatment for improved outcomes and a reduced need for secondary surgery is mandatory for humanitarian and economical reasons. The importance of incorporating the patient's perspective of the outcome in clinical trials has been acknowledged and there are now numerous instruments for assessing the quality of life. We evaluated two quality of life instruments, the EQ-5D and the SF-36, in patients with femoral neck fractures and also measured the quality of life two years after different interventions. The EQ-5D was validated in two prospective studies and it appeared to be an appropriate quality of life instrument in elderly patients with femoral neck fractures. There was a good correlation between the quality of life (EQ-5Dindexscores) and other outcome measures such as pain, mobility and independence in activities of daily living (ADL). The results also showed high responsiveness, i.e., ability to capture clinically important changes, for both the EQ-5D and the SF-36. The questionnaire response rate for both instruments was high. The rated prefracture EQ-5Dindexscores showed good correspondence with the scores of an age-matched Swedish reference population. The quality of life in patients with femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation (IF) decreased, particularly in patients with fracture healing complications. The fracture healing complications rate at two years in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated with IF was 36% compared with 7% in patients with undisplaced fractures. The quality of life of patients with uneventfully healed fractures at two year was lower in patients with primary displaced fractures than in patients with primary undisplaced fractures. In a prospective randomised trial, patients with displaced femoral neck fractures were randomised to IF or total hip replacement (THR). IF resulted in more complications than THR, 36% versus 4%, and necessitated more reoperations, 42% versus 4%. Hip function and quality of life (EQ-5D) were generally better in the THR group. In summary, THR yielded a better outcome than IF for an elderly, relatively healthy, lucid patient with a displaced femoral neck fracture. In a study of elderly women with femoral neck fractures, nearly half of the patients displayed signs of protein-energy malnutrition. Underweight was associated with muscle fatigue, cognitive dysfunction and a low quality of life (Nottingham Health Profile). In a prospective randomised trial, protein-rich liquid supplementation in combination with an anabolic steroid given for 6 months to lean elderly women after a femoral neck fracture was shown to positively affect lean body mass, ADL and quality of life (EQ-5D). Fracture healing complications had a negative impact on body weight, lean body mass and quality of life.

Aims: To analyse the way in which case mix and outcome are related for fracture of the proximal femur in a base hospital., Methods: All patients over age 60 admitted to Waikato Hospital during one year with fracture of the proximal femur were assessed for premorbid function and comorbidity and were followed to discharge., Results: There was a low frequency of post operative morbid events. Post operative mortality was 3%. Average length of stay was 19.9 days. Increased age and disability, trochanteric fracture, residence in a rest home, previous hypertension or stroke, technical complication, simultaneous fracture of another limb and perioperative myocardial infarction were all associated with increased length of stay., Conclusion: Factors are described which will alert clinicians to people likely to have a long length of stay and may need formal rehabilitation. Continuous quality improvement techniques may be a way of improving services such as these further.

We measured the proximal-distal and anterior-posterior displacement of the femoral head in 200 femoral neck fractures. The numerical data were compared with the Garden classification. The average displacement of the Stages I and II fractures were almost equal. Moreover, the displacement of the Stage III fractures did not differ from the displacement of the Stage IV fractures. The Garden Stages I and II fractures displayed a more posterior position of the femoral head than did the normal hips. The femoral heads of Stages III and IV were situated more posterodistally than those of the Stages I and II fractures. Classification of femoral neck fractures into two groups without (Stages I and II) and with (Stages III and IV) proximal displacement is probably sufficient for clinical use.

A radiographic investigation was undertaken to determine whether an increased interest in femoral neck fractures improved the operative result. In 1977, all femoral neck fractures were operated on by any of 30 surgeons of the orthopedic department, but in 1981 all fractures were operated on by one of six specially devoted surgeons. Preoperative fracture classification was performed with three parameters and proved equal in the 1977 and 1981 groups of 105 and 114 fractures, respectively. The quality of fracture reduction, determined with four parameters, was improved somewhat. The position of the nail(s), also determined with four parameters, improved considerably. The technical result was better in Garden IV fractures than in Garden III fractures. An increased interest in femoral neck fracture treatment improved reduction and fixation.

Experiments show that the cancellum of some femoral heads and of the trochanteric region is too weak to support a nail. A simple classification of traumatic femoral neck fractures is presented. These are either vertical or, less commonly, transversely disposed. Either type may be undisplaced, impacted, or displaced. For adequate fixation of undisplaced vertical and all displaced fractures a nail plate is essential. For undisplaced transverse fractures and impacted vertical fractures two screws usually suffice. Impacted transverse fractures require no active treatment. Hammering nails into the femoral head can cause fractures of the articular cartilage, split the femoral head in two, lead to avulsion of articular cartilage under the weight-bearing area, and osteoarthrosis. Early weight-bearing on weak implants can be disastrous. For the unsolved fracture a sliding pin compressing the fragments should be used. In a series of 54 displaced fractures so treated, 50 united. Prosthetic replacement should be reserved for patients with poor-quality bone. Children are best treated with a Coventry lag screw. Non-union after internal fixation in young patients should be salvaged by an excisional osteotomy, but a prosthesis is the answer for elderly patients. Late segmental collapse is explained in terms of contact stresses.

In this study 444 consecutive cases of medial fracture of the femoral neck treated in the city of Turku are considered on the basis of the proposals of Garden (1961) and Pauwels (Leitz 1966) for the classification of fracture types. In order to find out what kind of classification is most practical and coherent a retrospective comparison of the progress of healing was made on the basis of the aforementioned classifications of fracture. Garden's classification proved to be far more logical and was much more reliable for the prognosis of recovery. For this reason and also because of the ease with which his criteria can be applied, the present authors recommend the general use of Garden's classification.