Search

Importance: There is conflicting evidence regarding weekday dependent outcome in complex abdominal surgery, including pancreatic resections. Objective: To clarify weekday-dependency of outcome after pancreatic resections in a comprehensive nationwide context. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study of anonymized nationwide hospital billing data (DRG data). Setting: Germany between 2010 and 2020. Participants and exposure: all patient records with a procedural code for a pancreatic resection. Main outcome and measures: Primary endpoint was complication occurrence and failure to rescue, i.e. mortality in case of complications, by weekday of index surgery. Results: 94,661 patient records with a pancreatic resection were analyzed, of whom 45.2% were female. Mean age was 65.3 years. In 46.3% of all patient records, the main diagnosis was pancreatic carcinoma. The most common index surgery was pancreaticoduodenectomy (61.2%). Occurrence of at least one of predefined complications was 67.6% (64,029 cases) and was highest following a Monday index surgery. In-hospital mortality in case of at least one complication, i.e. failure to rescue (FtR), accounted for 8,040 deaths (97.7% of 8,228 total deaths, 12.6% FtR, 8.7% in-hospital mortality). FtR was highest (13.1%) following a Monday index surgery and lowest (11.8%) after a Thursday index surgery. Overall in-hospital mortality followed the same trend as FtR. In a multivariable logistic regression, in the overall cohort, in addition to increased age, frailty, male sex, benign entities, and total pancreatectomy performance, Wednesday (adjusted Odd's Ratio, OR, 0.92, 95% Confidence Interval, CI, 0.85–0.99) and Thursday (adjusted OR, 0.89, CI, 0.82–0.96) index surgeries were associated with lower FtR in reference to Monday. Stratified by patient volume, complication occurrence and FtR was only dependent of the weekday of index surgery in low volume hospitals. Conclusions and relevance: Pancreatic resections are complex procedures with high complication rates and FtR, resulting in high in-hospital mortality. Complication occurrence and FtR is dependent on the weekday of index surgery and mediates the same distribution pattern for overall in-hospital mortality. Stratified by patient volume, this weekday dependency of the index surgery on complication occurrence and FtR was only observed in low volume hospitals. Key points: Question: It is unclear if the weekday of index surgery has an impact on complication occurrence and management in pancreatic surgery. Findings: In this cross-sectional study of pancreatic surgery, in-hospital complication occurrence was highest following Monday index surgeries and lower over the rest of the week, while mortality in case of complication occurrence was elevated in case of Monday surgeries. Complication occurrence and failure to rescue were dependent on the weekday of index surgery only in low volume hospitals. Meaning: In case of pancreatic resections, in-hospital patient outcome is dependent on the weekday of index surgery, which is only observed in low volume hospitals. Identification of relevant research context: PubMed® and MEDLINE were searched for existing evidence using the search terms provided in Supp. Table 1, which was last conducted on November 1st, 2023, yielding a total of 511 results. All titles and abstracts were manually screened for relevance, while studies analyzing a "weekend effect" only were excluded, resulting in 37 articles, which were then analyzed in detail. Of the resulting studies, a full text analysis was done, and all references were screened for relevance and redundancy, yielding a final number of 36 original articles included as reference. The remaining 17 articles cited in the present article were individually chosen due to relevance in methods, introduction, and/or discussion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Failure to rescue (FTR) is increasingly recognized as a quality metric but remains understudied in emergency general surgery (EGS). We sought to identify patient and operative factors associated with FTR to better inform standardized metrics to mitigate this potentially preventable event. Methods: All adult (≥18 years) non-elective hospitalizations for large bowel resection, small bowel resection, repair of perforated ulcer, laparotomy and lysis of adhesions were identified in the 2016–2020 National Readmissions Database. Patients undergoing trauma-related operations or procedures ≤2 days of admission were excluded. FTR was defined as in-hospital death following acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (AKI), myocardial infarction, pneumonia, respiratory failure, sepsis, stroke, or thromboembolism. Multilevel mixed-effect models were developed to assess factors linked with FTR. Results: Among 826,548 EGS operations satisfying inclusion criteria, 298,062 (36.1 %) developed at least one MAE. Of those experiencing MAE, 43,477 (14.6 %) ultimately did not survive to discharge (FTR). Following adjustment for fixed hospital level effects, only 3.5 % of the variance in FTR was attributable to center-level differences. Relative to private insurance and the highest income quartile, Medicaid insurance (AOR 1.33; 95%CI, 1.23–1.43) and the lowest income quartile (AOR 1.22; 95%CI, 1.17–1.29) were linked with increased odds of FTR.A subset analysis stratified complication-specific rates of FTR by insurance status. Relative to private insurance, Medicaid coverage and uninsured status were linked with greater odds of FTR following perioperative sepsis, pneumonia, and AKI. Conclusion: Our findings underscore the need for increased screening and vigilance following perioperative complications to mitigate disparities in patient outcomes following high-risk EGS.

Simple Summary: Esophageal surgery is associated with a high hospital mortality. Research shows that hospitals performing more esophageal surgeries have better outcomes due to a higher likelihood of rescuing patients from complications. Since 2004, Germany has mandated a minimum required caseload per year for hospitals to ensure quality care and, as of 2023, increased the annually required number of complex esophageal operations from 10 to 26. This review will explore how the caseload per year impacts the quality of patient care and surgical training, especially regarding robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE), which promises greater precision and better outcomes for esophageal cancer surgeries. Esophageal surgery is deemed one of the most complex visceral operations. There is a well-documented correlation between higher caseload and better outcomes, with hospitals that perform more surgeries experiencing significantly lower mortality rates. The approach to caseload per year varies across different countries within Europe. Germany increased the minimum annual required caseload of complex esophageal surgeries from 10 to 26 starting in 2023. Furthermore, the new regulations present challenges for surgical training and staff recruitment, risking the further fragmentation of training programs. Enhanced regional cooperation is proposed as a solution to ensure comprehensive training. This review explores the benefits of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) in improving surgical precision and patient outcomes and aims to evaluate how the caseload per year influences the quality of patient care and the efficacy of surgical training, especially with the integration of advanced robotic techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Vital sign monitoring needs to be timely and correct to recognize deteriorating patients early and trigger the relevant clinical response. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate compliance specifically toward the regional vital sign monitoring protocol the so called early warning score protocol (EWS‐protocol) 72 h before a medical emergency team response (MET‐response) and thereby illuminate whether poor compliance translates into a worse patient outcome. Methods: It was investigated all eligible patients that underwent MET responses during the calendar year 2019. The inclusion criteria encompassed somatic patients above 18 years of age admitted to the hospital and detailed evaluations of the medical records of the included patients were conducted. Results: Four hundred and twenty‐nine MET‐responses were included in the final analysis. EWS‐protocol failure was observed for more than half the patients within all the time frames assessed. Thirty‐day mortality was significantly higher for patients subject to EWS protocol failure in the timeframes 24−16, 16−8, 8−0 h before MET response. Adjusting for admission length, age, and gender, patients subject to EWS‐protocol failure had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.9, 2.0, 2.1, 2.3 for mortality in the time frames 72−48, 24−16, 16−8, and 8−0 h before the MET‐response, respectively. The adjusted OR for ICU‐admission was 1.7, and 1.6 for patients subject to EWS‐protocol failure in the time frames 16−8 and 8−0 h before MET‐response, respectively. Conclusion: According to all the data analysis in this article, there is evidence that compliance toward the NEWS‐protocol is poor. EWS‐protocol failure is associated with a significant higher mortality and ICU‐admission rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has posed tremendous stress on the health care system. Its effects on pediatric/congenital catheterization program practice and performance have not been described. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate how case volumes, risk-profile, and outcomes of pediatric/congenital catheterization procedures changed in response to the first wave of COVID-19 and after that wave. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective observational study was performed using Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes Registry (C3PO) data to study changes in volume, case mix, and outcomes (high-severity adverse events [HSAEs]) during the first wave of COVID (March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2020) in comparison to the period prior to (January 1, 2019, to February 28, 2020) and after (June 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020) the first wave. Multivariable analyses adjusting for case type, hemodynamic vulnerability, and age group were performed. Hospital responses to the first wave were captured with an electronic study instrument. RESULTS: During the study period, 12,557 cases were performed at 14 C3PO hospitals (with 8% performed during the first wave of COVID and 32% in the postperiod). Center case volumes decreased from a median 32.1 cases/month (IQR: 20.7-49.0 cases/month) before COVID to 22 cases/month (IQR: 13-31 cases/month) during the first wave (P = 0.001). The proportion of cases with risk factors for HSAE increased during the first wave, specifically proportions of infants and neonates (P

Background: Surgical volume is known to influence failure to rescue (FTR), defined as death following a complication. Robotic lung surgery continues to expand and there is variability in outcomes among hospitals. We sought to estimate the contribution of hospital-based factors on outcomes and FTR following robotic right upper lobectomy (RRUL). Methods: Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims database, we evaluated all patients age ≥65 years with a diagnosis of lung cancer who underwent RRUL between January 2018 and December 2020. We excluded patients who had undergone segmentectomy, sublobar, wedge, or bronchoplastic resection; had metastatic or nonmalignant disease; or had a history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Primary outcomes included FTR rate, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, conversion to open surgery, complications, and costs. We analyzed hospitals by tertiles of volume and Medicare Mortality Index (MMI). Defined as the institutional number of deaths per number of survivors, MMI is a marker of overall hospital performance and quality. Propensity score models were adjusted for confounding using goodness of fit. Results: Data for 4317 patients who underwent robotic right upper lobectomy were analyzed. Hospitals were categorized by volume of cases (low, 20) and MMI (low, 0.13). After propensity score balancing, patients from tertiles of lowest volume and highest MMI had higher costs ($34,222 vs $30,316; P = .006), as well as higher mortality (odds ratio, 7.46; 95% confidence interval, 2.67-28.2; P

Victor P Gazivoda, Timothy J Kennedy Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USACorrespondence: Timothy J Kennedy, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA, Email tk431@cinj.rutgers.eduAbstract: Historically, postoperative mortality rates were high after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), but in recent times those rates have improved, and Whipple procedures are safely performed. Multiple factors have contributed to the improvement of postoperative mortality rates after PD over time. Known risk factors leading to postoperative mortality after PD are based on patient factors, surgeon/hospital factors, and postoperative factors. These factors can be attributed to improvements in patient selection and optimization, operative techniques and regionalization to high volume centers, and better understanding and standardization of postoperative care and management of common complications. Further studies should investigate preoperative optimization using prehabilitation and explore early diagnosis of postoperative complications and interventions to prevent mortality after PD.Keywords: pancreaticoduodenectomy, mortality, risk assessment, operative volume, failure to rescue, PD, FTR

The Connection Between Caring, Knowing and Preventing Failure to Rescue in Nursing

Abstract Background and Aims Vital sign monitoring needs to be timely and correct to recognize deteriorating patients early and trigger the relevant clinical response. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate compliance specifically toward the regional vital sign monitoring protocol the so called early warning score protocol (EWS‐protocol) 72 h before a medical emergency team response (MET‐response) and thereby illuminate whether poor compliance translates into a worse patient outcome. Methods It was investigated all eligible patients that underwent MET responses during the calendar year 2019. The inclusion criteria encompassed somatic patients above 18 years of age admitted to the hospital and detailed evaluations of the medical records of the included patients were conducted. Results Four hundred and twenty‐nine MET‐responses were included in the final analysis. EWS‐protocol failure was observed for more than half the patients within all the time frames assessed. Thirty‐day mortality was significantly higher for patients subject to EWS protocol failure in the timeframes 24−16, 16−8, 8−0 h before MET response. Adjusting for admission length, age, and gender, patients subject to EWS‐protocol failure had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.9, 2.0, 2.1, 2.3 for mortality in the time frames 72−48, 24−16, 16−8, and 8−0 h before the MET‐response, respectively. The adjusted OR for ICU‐admission was 1.7, and 1.6 for patients subject to EWS‐protocol failure in the time frames 16−8 and 8−0 h before MET‐response, respectively. Conclusion According to all the data analysis in this article, there is evidence that compliance toward the NEWS‐protocol is poor. EWS‐protocol failure is associated with a significant higher mortality and ICU‐admission rate.

Objective: Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as in-hospital death following a major complication, has been increasingly studied in patients who undergo cardiothoracic surgery. This study tested the hypothesis that elderly patients undergoing lung cancer resection have greater rates of FTR compared with younger patients. Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for primary lung cancer between 2011 and 2020 and had at least 1 major postoperative complication were identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients who died following complications (FTR) were compared with those who survived in an elderly (80+ years) and younger (

Objective: Postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery is associated with long-term cognitive decline and mortality. We investigated whether increased ICU Confusion Assessment Method scores were associated with greater 30-day mortality and failure to rescue after cardiac surgery. Methods: We studied 4030 patients who underwent a Society of Thoracic Surgeons index operation at the University of Virginia Health System from 2011 to 2021. We obtained all ICU Confusion Assessment Method scores recorded during patients' admission and summarized scores for the first 7 postoperative days. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyzed the association between ICU Confusion Assessment Method score/delirium presence and postoperative complications, operative mortality, and failure to rescue. Results: Any episode of ICU Confusion Assessment Method screen-positive delirium and nearly all components of the score were associated with increased 30-day mortality on univariate analysis. We found that a single episode of delirium was associated with increased mortality. Feature 2 (inattention) had the strongest association with poorer outcomes, including failure to rescue in our analysis, as were patients with higher peak Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores. Patients with higher mean Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores had an association with decreased failure to rescue. Conclusions: A single episode of delirium, as measured using ICU Confusion Assessment Method scores, is associated with increased mortality. Inattention and higher peak Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores were associated with failure to rescue. Screening may clarify diagnosing delirium and assessing its implications on mortality and failure to rescue. Our findings suggest the importance of identifying and managing risk factors for delirium to improve patient outcomes and reduce mortality and failure to rescue rates.

Objective: The study objective was to examine the association between hospital processes of care and failure to rescue in a diverse, multi-institutional cardiac surgery network. Methods: Failure to rescue was defined as an operative mortality after 1 or more of 4 complications: prolonged ventilation, stroke, renal failure, and unplanned reoperation. Society of Thoracic Surgeons data from 20,950 consecutive patients in the Columbia HeartSource network who underwent 1 of 7 cardiac operations—coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement ± coronary artery bypass grafting, mitral valve repair or replacement ± coronary artery bypass grafting—were analyzed to calculate failure to rescue rates. Hospital-specific characteristics were ascertained by survey method. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic models assessed the association of these hospital characteristics with failure to rescue while adjusting for patient-related factors known to be associated with mortality. Results: Failure to rescue rates at affiliate hospitals ranged from 5.45% to 21.74% (median, 12.5%; interquartile range, 6.9%). When controlling for Society of Thoracic Surgeons–predicted risk of mortality with hospital as a random effect, 4 hospital characteristics were found to be associated with lower failure to rescue rates; the presence of cardiac-trained anesthesiologists (odds ratio, 0.41; CI, 0.31-0.55, P

Abstract Background Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as a postoperative complication leading to death, is a recently described outcome metric used to evaluate treatment quality. However, the predictive factors for FTR, particularly following highly advanced hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery (HBPS), have not been adequately investigated. This study aimed to identify perioperative predictive factors for FTR following highly advanced HBPS. Methods This single-institution retrospective study involved 177 patients at Gifu University Hospital, Japan, who developed severe postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo classification grades ≥ III) between 2010 and 2022 following highly advanced HBPS. Univariate analysis was used to identify pre-, intra-, and postoperative risks of FTR. Results Nine postoperative mortalities occurred during the study period (overall mortality rate, 1.3% [9/686]; FTR rate, 5.1% [9/177]). Univariate analysis indicated that comorbid liver disease, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative liver failure, postoperative respiratory failure, and postoperative bleeding significantly correlated with FTR. Conclusions FTR was found to be associated with perioperative factors. Well-coordinated surgical procedures to avoid intra- and postoperative bleeding and unnecessary blood transfusions, as well as postoperative team management with attention to the occurrence of organ failure, may decrease FTR rates.

A cancer diagnosis and its subsequent treatments are life-changing events, impacting the patient and their family. Treatment options available for cancer care are developing at pace, with more patients now able to achieve a cancer cure. This is achieved through the development of novel cancer treatments, surgery, and modern imaging, but also as a result of better understanding treatment/surgical trauma, rescue after complications, perioperative care, and innovative interventions like pre-habilitation, enhanced recovery, and enhanced post-operative care. With more patients living with and beyond cancer, the role of survivorship and quality of life after cancer treatment is gaining importance. The impact cancer treatments can have on patients vary, and the "scars" treatments leave are not always visible. To adequately support patients through their cancer journeys, we need to look past the short-term interactions they have with medical professionals and encourage them to consider their lives after cancer, which often is not a reflection of life before a cancer diagnosis.

Background: In the hospital setting RNs fulfill a vital role in patient safety by monitoring patients for signs of physical decline. RNs must monitor patients and react to a sudden deterioration that could be life threatening. Hospitals are required to have systems to summon assistance to the bedside from a Rapid Response Team (RRT). The RRT goal is to prevent failure to rescue. Outcomes from RRTs are highly variable and do not always show an impact on mortality rates. RNs do not always activate the RRT when they should. Some RNs activate the RRT more frequently than others. An increase in the frequency of RRT calls has lowered patient mortality rates. Objective: To determine if RNs with higher levels of skill in recognition of patient deterioration activate the RRT more frequently. The instrument used to measure this is tied to caring and knowing the patient. Methodology: A descriptive, cross sectional, correlational quantitative design was used. RNs (n=166) in acute care who had activated an RRT in the past year completed the Manifestations of Early Recognition (MER) instrument. RRT calls were self-reported. Results: There was a significant (p = .0120) positive correlation (r= .402) between the score on the MER and number of RRT calls. Conclusions: The MER is based on the concepts of knowing and caring. The connection between caring, knowing and preventing failure to rescue is seen as the caring stance of the RN combined with Carper's ways of knowing. These combine to allow a RN with this worldview to detect patient deterioration and act to rescue the patient by calling the RRT and avoiding FTR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The outcomes of liver surgery worldwide remain unknown. The true population-based outcomes are likely different to those vastly reported that reflect the activity of highly specialized academic centers. The aim of this study was to measure the true worldwide practice of liver surgery and associated outcomes by recruiting from centers across the globe. The geographic distribution of liver surgery activity and complexity was also evaluated to further understand variations in outcomes. Methods: LiverGroup.org was an international, prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study following the Global Surgery Collaborative Snapshot Research approach with a 3-month prospective, consecutive patient enrollment within January-December 2019. Each patient was followed up for 90 days postoperatively. All patients undergoing liver surgery at their respective centers were eligible for study inclusion. Basic demographics, patient and operation characteristics were collected. Morbidity was recorded according to the Clavien--Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications. Country-based and hospital-based data were collected, including the Human Development Index (HDI). (NCT03768141). Results: A total of 2159 patients were included from six continents. Surgery was performed for cancer in 1785 (83%) patients. Of all patients, 912 (42%) experienced a postoperative complication of any severity, while the major complication rate was 16% (341/2159). The overall 90-day mortality rate after liver surgery was 3.8% (82/2,159). The overall failure to rescue rate was 11% (82/ 722) ranging from 5 to 35% among the higher and lower HDI groups, respectively. Conclusions: This is the first to our knowledge global surgery study specifically designed and conducted for specialized liver surgery. The authors identified failure to rescue as a significant potentially modifiable factor for mortality after liver surgery, mostly related to lower Human Development Index countries. Members of the LiverGroup.org network could now work together to develop quality improvement collaboratives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as a postoperative complication leading to death, is a recently described outcome metric used to evaluate treatment quality. However, the predictive factors for FTR, particularly following highly advanced hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery (HBPS), have not been adequately investigated. This study aimed to identify perioperative predictive factors for FTR following highly advanced HBPS. Methods: This single-institution retrospective study involved 177 patients at Gifu University Hospital, Japan, who developed severe postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo classification grades ≥ III) between 2010 and 2022 following highly advanced HBPS. Univariate analysis was used to identify pre-, intra-, and postoperative risks of FTR. Results: Nine postoperative mortalities occurred during the study period (overall mortality rate, 1.3% [9/686]; FTR rate, 5.1% [9/177]). Univariate analysis indicated that comorbid liver disease, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative liver failure, postoperative respiratory failure, and postoperative bleeding significantly correlated with FTR. Conclusions: FTR was found to be associated with perioperative factors. Well-coordinated surgical procedures to avoid intra- and postoperative bleeding and unnecessary blood transfusions, as well as postoperative team management with attention to the occurrence of organ failure, may decrease FTR rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A cancer diagnosis and its subsequent treatments are life-changing events, impacting the patient and their family. Treatment options available for cancer care are developing at pace, with more patients now able to achieve a cancer cure. This is achieved through the development of novel cancer treatments, surgery, and modern imaging, but also as a result of better understanding treatment/surgical trauma, rescue after complications, perioperative care, and innovative interventions like pre-habilitation, enhanced recovery, and enhanced post-operative care. With more patients living with and beyond cancer, the role of survivorship and quality of life after cancer treatment is gaining importance. The impact cancer treatments can have on patients vary, and the "scars" treatments leave are not always visible. To adequately support patients through their cancer journeys, we need to look past the short-term interactions they have with medical professionals and encourage them to consider their lives after cancer, which often is not a reflection of life before a cancer diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: A correlation between the hospital volume and outcome is described for multiple entities of oncological surgery. To date, this has not been analyzed for the surgical treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of the annual caseload per hospital of colon resection on the postoperative incidence of complications, failure to rescue, and mortality in patients with diverticulitis. Methods: Patients receiving colorectal resection independent from the diagnosis from 2012 to 2017 were selected from a German nationwide administrative dataset. The hospitals were grouped into five equal caseload quintiles (Q1–Q5 in ascending caseload order). The outcome analysis was focused on patients receiving surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis. Results: In total, 662,706 left-sided colon resections were recorded between 2012 and 2017. Of these, 156,462 resections were performed due to sigmoid diverticulitis and were included in the analysis. The overall in-house mortality rate was 3.5%, ranging from 3.8% in Q1 (mean of 9.5 procedures per year) to 3.1% in Q5 (mean 62.8 procedures per year; p < 0.001). Q5 hospitals revealed a risk-adjusted odds ratio of 0.85 (95% CI 0.78–0.94; p < 0.001) for in-hospital mortality compared to Q1 during multivariable logistic regression analysis. High-volume centers showed overall lower complication rates, whereas the failure-to-rescue did not differ significantly. Conclusion: Surgical treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis in high-volume colorectal centers shows lower postoperative mortality rates and fewer postoperative complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We conducted a thorough literature review on the emerging role of failure to rescue (FTR) as a quality metric for cardiovascular surgery and critical care. For this purpose, we identified all original research studies assessing the implementation of FTR in cardiovascular surgery and critical care from 1992 to 2023. All included studies were evaluated for their quality. Although all studies defined FTR as mortality after a surgical complication, a high heterogeneity has been reported among studies regarding the included complications. There are certain factors that affect the FTR, divided into hospital- and patient-related factors. The identification of these factors allowed us to build a stepwise roadmap to reduce the FTR rate. Recently, FTR has further evolved as a metric to assess morbidity instead of mortality, while being also evaluated in the context of interventional cardiology. All these advances are further discussed in the current review, thus providing all the necessary information to surgeons, anesthesiologists, and physicians willing to implement FTR as a metric of quality in their establishment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Missed diagnosis of foreign bodies in esophagus occasionally results in adverse consequences for patients. This study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics of esophageal foreign body missed diagnosis in 12 cases. Among the 12 patients, 7 didn't undergo esophagus-related examination due to mild pain; One case didn't report a clear history of swallowing foreign bodies. For one case, computed tomography (CT) examination had not reached the esophageal foreign body level. Two cases were missed diagnosis because the foreign bodies were too tiny to develop clearly on CT. One case showed foreign body in esophagus during initial CT examination, but after subsequent gastroscopy, no foreign body was found. Among the 12 patients, 7 had esophageal perforation, 1 of which developed a neck abscess, and 1 had peri-esophageal abscess. It seems that, if foreign bodies in the pharynx or esophagus are suspected and no foreign bodies are found in the laryngoscope, chest CT scan is necessary. It is best to perform examination of full-length esophagus and pharynx, because foreign bodies may exist in the post-cricoid region or the deep part of the pyriform sinus, especially in older cases with longer retention times.

BackgroundHospitals with safety-net status have been associated with inferior surgical outcomes and higher costs. The mechanism of this discrepancy, however, is not well understood. We hypothesized that discrepant rates of failure to rescue after complications of routine cardiac surgery would explain the observed inferior outcomes at safety-net hospitals.MethodsThe National Inpatient Sample was used to identify adult patients who underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting and isolated or concomitant valve operations between January 2005 and December 2016. Hospitals were stratified into low-, medium-, or high-burden categories based on the proportion of uninsured or Medicaid patients to emulate safety-net status as defined by the Institute of Medicine. Failure to rescue was defined as mortality after occurrence of neurologic, cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, or infectious complications (major and minor complications). Multivariable regression was used to perform risk-adjusted comparisons of the rate of complications, failures to rescue, and resource use for high-burden hospitals versus low-burden and medium-burden hospitals.ResultsOf an estimated 2,012,104 patients undergoing elective major cardiac operations, 2% died, whereas 36% suffered major and minor complications. Safety-net hospitals had higher odds of failure to rescue after major comorbidity (adjusted odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.23). Occurrence of major and minor complications at safety-net hospitals was associated with increased costs ($2,480 [95% confidence interval $1,178-$3,935]) compared with low-burden hospitals.ConclusionSafety-net hospitals were associated with higher rates of failure to rescue after occurrence of tamponade, septicemia, and respiratory complications. Implementation of care bundles to tackle cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal complications may affect the discrepancy in incidence of and rescue from complications at safety-net institutions.

Abstract Background Quality standards in postoperative outcomes have not yet been defined for gastric cancer surgery. Also, the effect of centralization of gastric cancer surgery on the improvement of postoperative outcomes continues to be debated. Short-term postoperative outcomes in gastric carcinoma patients in centers with low-volume of annual gastrectomies were assessed. The effect of age on major postoperative morbidity and mortality was also analyzed. Methods Patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction Siewert III type carcinomas who underwent surgical treatment with curative intent between January 2013 and December 2016 were included. Data were obtained from the population-based surgical registry Esophagogastric Carcinoma Registry of the Comunitat Valenciana (RECEG-CV). The RECEG-CV gathers information on demographic characteristics and comorbidity, preoperative study and neoadjuvant treatment, surgical procedure, pathological study, postoperative outcomes, and follow-up. Seventeen hospitals belonging to the public network participated in this registry. Results Data from 591 patients were analyzed. Postoperative major morbidity occurred in 154 (26.1%) patients. Overall 30-day or in-hospital mortality, and 90-day postoperative mortality rates were 8.6% and 10.1% respectively. Failure-to-rescue was 39% and it was significantly higher in patients aged 75 years or older in comparison with younger patients (55.3% vs 23.1% p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, age ≥ 75 years (p = 0.029), laparoscopic approach (p = 0.005), and total gastrectomy (p = 0.005) were associated with major postoperative morbidity. Age ≥ 75 years (p = 0.027), pulmonary complications (p = 0.001), cardiac complications (p = 0.001), leakage (p = 0.003), and hemorrhage (p = 0.013) were associated with postoperative mortality. Conclusions Centralization of gastric adenocarcinoma treatment in centers with higher annual caseload should be considered to improve the short-term postoperative outcomes in low-volume centers. Patients aged 75 or older had a significantly increased risk of major postoperative morbidity and mortality, and higher failure-to-rescue.

Background: Although the effects of hospital volume on mortality have been studied in other procedures, data on total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are limited. Furthermore, mortality rate among surgical patients with early major complications has become an important patient safety indicator and has been shown to be an important driver of mortality in certain operations. Our objective was to examine the effect of hospital volume on early complications and in-hospital mortality rate after TJA. Material and methods: A total of 5,396,644 patients undergoing elective, unilateral TJA between 2002 and 2011 were identified using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Hospitals were divided by annual volume into tertiles. Major complications associated with postoperative mortality were identified. Risk-adjusted mortality (RAM) was calculated to adjust for hospital case mix. Results: For THAs performed at high-volume centers, RAM was significantly lower (0.03% vs 0.41%, P < .05, high vs low volume) with lower prevalence of major complications (2.2% vs 3.3%, P < .05, high vs low volume). We observed similar results for TKA where RAM was lower (

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has become common worldwide for resectable advanced esophageal cancer and frequently involves weight loss. Although failure to rescue (death after major complications) is known as an emerging surgical quality measure, little is known about the impact of weight loss during NAT on failure to rescue. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the association of weight loss during NAT and short-term outcomes, including failure to rescue after esophagectomy. Materials and methods: Patients who underwent esophagectomy after NAT between July 2010 and March 2019 were identified from a Japanese nationwide inpatient database. Based on quartiles of percent weight change during NAT, patients were grouped into four categories of gain, stable, small loss, and loss (>4.5%). The primary outcomes were failure to rescue and in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were major complications, respiratory complications, anastomotic leakage, and total hospitalization costs. Multivariable regression analyses were used to compare outcomes between the groups, adjusting for potential confounders, including baseline BMI. Results: Among 15 159 eligible patients, in-hospital mortality and failure to rescue occurred in 302 (2.0%) and 302/5698 (5.3%) patients, respectively. Weight loss (> 4.5%) compared to gain was associated with increased failure to rescue and in-hospital mortality [odds ratios 1.55 (95% CI: 1.10-2.20) and 1.53 (1.10-2.12), respectively]. Weight loss was also associated with increased total hospitalizations costs, but not with major complications, respiratory complications, and anastomotic leakage. In subgroup analyses, regardless of baseline BMI, weight loss (> 4.8% in nonunderweight or >3.1% in underweight) was a risk factor for failure to rescue and in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: Weight loss during NAT was associated with failure to rescue and in-hospital mortality after esophagectomy, independent of baseline BMI. This emphasizes the importance of weight loss measurement during NAT to assess the risk for a subsequent esophagectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To examine the impact of in situ simulation (ISS) with scripting on nursing staff's knowledge and confidence to initiate rapid response teams (RRTs) immediately after identifying patient condition deterioration. Background/Significance: Failure to rescue (FTR) related to delays in activation of RRT is on the rise, leading to poor patient outcomes. Lack of confidence, knowledge, and empowerment are associated with delayed activation of RRTs. As such, the nursing staff's confidence is integral in activating RRTs and FTR prevention. In situ simulation may help nurses increase their confidence, thus empowering timely RRT initiation. Methods: This quantitative pretest-posttest study used a convenience sample of nurses and nursing assistants. First, participants completed the Rapid Response Team Survey (RRTS) pretest. Then, they participated in the ISS scenario. Lastly, they completed debriefing and the RRTS posttest. Results: Pearson's correlation results showed no significant relationships between the variables. Dependent t-test results showed statistically significant increases between the pretest and posttest means (Part l, t = -5.51, p < .001, MD = 1.32; Part 2, t = -1.04, p < .01, MD = 3.1). These results suggest that ISS with scripting increased participants' knowledge and confidence in early activation of RRTs. Additionally, staff reported feeling more confident and empowered regarding future RRT decision-making and communication with other healthcare colleagues. Discussion: Early activation of RRTs prevents FTR. The results of this study suggest ISS with scripting increases staff's knowledge, confidence, and empowerment to activate RRTs. We recommend that hospital organizations adopt ISS with scripting to empower nurses to activate RRTs to prevent FTR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Quality standards in postoperative outcomes have not yet been defined for gastric cancer surgery. Also, the effect of centralization of gastric cancer surgery on the improvement of postoperative outcomes continues to be debated. Short-term postoperative outcomes in gastric carcinoma patients in centers with low-volume of annual gastrectomies were assessed. The effect of age on major postoperative morbidity and mortality was also analyzed. Methods: Patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction Siewert III type carcinomas who underwent surgical treatment with curative intent between January 2013 and December 2016 were included. Data were obtained from the population-based surgical registry Esophagogastric Carcinoma Registry of the Comunitat Valenciana (RECEG-CV). The RECEG-CV gathers information on demographic characteristics and comorbidity, preoperative study and neoadjuvant treatment, surgical procedure, pathological study, postoperative outcomes, and follow-up. Seventeen hospitals belonging to the public network participated in this registry. Results: Data from 591 patients were analyzed. Postoperative major morbidity occurred in 154 (26.1%) patients. Overall 30-day or in-hospital mortality, and 90-day postoperative mortality rates were 8.6% and 10.1% respectively. Failure-to-rescue was 39% and it was significantly higher in patients aged 75 years or older in comparison with younger patients (55.3% vs 23.1% p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, age ≥ 75 years (p = 0.029), laparoscopic approach (p = 0.005), and total gastrectomy (p = 0.005) were associated with major postoperative morbidity. Age ≥ 75 years (p = 0.027), pulmonary complications (p = 0.001), cardiac complications (p = 0.001), leakage (p = 0.003), and hemorrhage (p = 0.013) were associated with postoperative mortality. Conclusions: Centralization of gastric adenocarcinoma treatment in centers with higher annual caseload should be considered to improve the short-term postoperative outcomes in low-volume centers. Patients aged 75 or older had a significantly increased risk of major postoperative morbidity and mortality, and higher failure-to-rescue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of alarm configuration tactics in general care settings. Methods: Retrospective analysis of over 150,000 hours of medical/surgical unit continuous SpO2 and pulse rate data were used to estimate alarm rates and impact on individual nurses. Results: Application of an SpO2 threshold of 80% vs 88% produced an 88% reduction in alarms. Addition of a 15 second annunciation delay reduced alarms by an additional 71% with an SpO2 threshold of 80%. Pulse rate alarms were reduced by 93% moving from a pulse rate high threshold of 120–140 bpm, and 95% by lowering the pulse rate low threshold from 60 to 50 bpm. A 15 second annunciation delay at thresholds of 140 bpm and 50 bpm resulted in additional reductions of 80% and 81%, respectively. Combined alarm frequency across all parameters for every 24 hours of actual monitored time yielded a rate of 4.2 alarms for the surveillance configuration, 83.0 alarms for critical care monitoring, and 320.6 alarms for condition monitoring. Total exposure time for an individual nurse during a single shift ranged from 3.6 min with surveillance monitoring, to 1.2 hours for critical care monitoring, and 5.3 hours for condition monitoring. Conclusions: Continuous monitoring can eliminate unwitnessed/unmonitored arrests associated with significant increased mortality in the general care setting. The “alarm problem” associated with these systems is manageable using alarm settings that signify severely abnormal physiology to alert responsible clinicians of urgent situations.

"Practice makes perfect" is an old saying that can be true for complex interventions. There is a strong and persistent relationship between high volume and better outcomes with more than 300 studies being reported on the subject. The more complex the procedure, the greater the volume-outcome relationship is. Failure to rescue was shown to be one of the factors explaining higher mortality rates post complex surgery. High-volume centers provide a better safety net, thanks to the structure and better protocols, and low-volume operators have better results at high-volume centers than at low-volume centers. Finally, effort should be made to regroup complex procedures in high-volume centers, but without compromising patient access to the procedures. Adaptation to local and geographic constraints is important. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The ability to detect and treat complications of surgery early is essential for optimal patient outcomes. The failure-to-rescue (FTR) rate is defined as the death rate among patients who develop at least one complication after the surgical procedure and may be used to monitor a hospital's quality of surgical care. The aim of this observational study was to explore FTR in Norway and to see if we could identify surgical trajectories associated with high FTR.Method: Data on all abdominal surgeries in Norwegian hospitals from 2011 to 2017 were obtained from the Norwegian Patient Registry and linked with the National Population Register. Surgical and other postoperative complication rates and FTR within 30 days (deaths occurring in and out of the hospital) were assessed. We identified surgical trajectories (type of procedures-type of complication-dead/alive at 30 days after operation) associated with the highest volume of deaths (high volume of FTR [FTR-V]) and highest risk of death after a postoperative complication.Results: Of the total 626 052 primary abdominal procedures, 224 871 (35.8%) had at least one complication, which includes 83 037 patients. The most common postoperative complications were sepsis (N = 14 331) and respiratory failure (N = 7970). The high-volume trajectories (FTR-V) were endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-sepsis-death (N = 294, 13.8%); open colon resections-sepsis-death (N = 279, 28.1%) and procedures with stoma formation-sepsis-death (N = 272, 27%). Similarly, patients operated with embolectomy of the visceral arteries and experiencing postoperative sepsis were associated with an extremely high risk of 30-day FTR of 81.5%. In general, an FTR patient had a higher mean age, an increased rate of emergency surgery and more comorbidity. Hospital size was not associated with FTR.Conclusion: At a national level, there exist high-volume and high-risk surgical trajectories associated with FTR. These trajectories represent major targets for quality improvement initiatives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Surveys suggest that anaesthesiologists believe that continuous monitoring with wearables will lead to improved patient outcomes. However, evidence suggests that several critical factors, including timely recognition of physiological problems, the presence of a trained team to respond to the alerts, and that the alerts occur far in advance of the deterioration, are required before overall improvement can occur. Wearables alone will not change patients' outcomes, they must be implemented as part of a system change that takes advantage of the higher frequency observations that continuous monitoring provides.

Abstract Background Most trauma patients admitted to the hospital alive and die later on, decease during the initial care in the emergency department or the intensive care unit (ICU). However, a number of patients pass away after having been discharged from the ICU during the initial hospital stay. On first sight these cases could be seen as “failure to rescue” of potentially salvageable patients. A low rate of such patients might be a potential indicator of quality for trauma care on ICUs and surgical wards. Methods Retrospective analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU® with data from 2015 to 2017. Patients that died during the initial ICU stay were compared to those who were discharged from the initial ICU stay for at least 24 h but died later on. Results A total of 82,313 trauma patients were included in the TraumaRegister DGU®. In total, 6576 patients (8.0%) died during their hospital stay. Out of those, 5481 were admitted to the ICU alive and 972 patients (17.7%) were discharged from ICU and died later on. Those were older (mean age: 77 vs. 68 years), less severely injured (mean ISS: 23.1 vs. 30.0 points) and had a longer mean ICU length of stay (10 vs. 6 days). A limitation of life-sustaining therapy due to a documented living will was present in 46.1% of all patients who died during their initial ICU stay and in 59.9% of patients who died after discharge from their initial ICU stay. Conclusions 17.7% of all non-surviving severely injured trauma patients died within the hospital after discharge from their initial ICU treatment. Their death can partially be explained by a limitation of therapy due to a living will. In conclusion, the rate of such late deaths may partially represent patients that died of potentially avoidable or treatable complications.

Background: Several continuous monitoring solutions, including wireless wearable sensors, are available or being developed to improve patient surveillance on surgical wards. We designed a survey to understand the current perception and expectations of anaesthesiologists who, as perioperative physicians, are increasingly involved in postoperative care. Methods: The survey was shared in 40 university hospitals from Western Europe and the USA. Results: From 5744 anaesthesiologists who received the survey link, there were 1158 valid questionnaires available for analysis. Current postoperative surveillance was mainly based on intermittent spot-checks of vital signs every 4–6 h in the USA (72%) and every 8–12 h in Europe (53%). A majority of respondents (91%) considered that continuous monitoring of vital signs should be available on surgical wards and that wireless sensors are preferable to tethered systems (86%). Most respondents indicated that oxygen saturation (93%), heart rate (80%), and blood pressure (71%) should be continuously monitored with wrist devices (71%) or skin adhesive patches (54%). They believed it may help detect clinical deterioration earlier (90%), decrease rescue interventions (59%), and decrease hospital mortality (54%). Opinions diverged regarding the impact on nurse workload (increase 46%, decrease 39%), and most respondents considered that the biggest implementation challenges are economic (79%) and connectivity issues (64%). Conclusion: Continuous monitoring of vital signs with wireless sensors is wanted by most anaesthesiologists from university hospitals in Western Europe and in the USA. They believe it may improve patient safety and outcome, but may also be challenging to implement because of cost and connectivity issues.

Background: Despite advances in the treatment of abdominal injuries in patients with trauma, it remains a major public health problem worldwide. Evaluation of hazard ratio (HR) of 90-day mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with abdominal injuries compare with head injuries in trauma patients and non-trauma surgical ICU patients. Methods: This single-center, prospective cohort study was conducted on 400 patients admitted to the ICU between 2018 and 2019 due to trauma or surgery in Hamadan, Iran. The main outcome was mortality at 90-day after ICU admission. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the HR and 95% confidence interval (CI) for 90-day mortality. Results: The 90-day mortality was 21.9% in abdominal injuries patients. According to multivariate Cox regression, the expected hazard mortality was 2.758 times higher in patients with abdominal injuries compared to non-trauma patients (HR: 2.758, 95% CI: 1.077-7.063, P = 0.034). About more than 50% of all deaths in the abdominal and head trauma groups occurred within 20 days after admission. Mean time to death was 27.85 ± 20.1, 30.27 ± 18.22 and 31.43 ± 26.24 days for abdominal-trauma, surgical-ICU, and head-trauma groups, respectively. Conclusion: Difficulty in accurate diagnosis due to the complex physiological variability of abdominal trauma, less obvious clinical symptoms in blunt abdominal injuries, multi-organ dysfunction in abdominal injuries, failure to provide timely acute care, as well as different treatment methods all account for the high 90-day mortality rate in abdominal-trauma patients. Therefore, these patients need a multidisciplinary team to care for them both in the ICU and afterwards in the general ward. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Failure-to-rescue (FTR), defined as death after a surgical complication, is a quality metric that is an important variable affecting mortality rates in hospitals. This study aims to analyze complications, FTR rates, and its predictors at the index hospital setting. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study performed at an academic hospital from 2015 to 2020 in the Department of Surgical Gastroenterology. We included all patients who had major complications following elective major benign or malignant abdominal surgeries. The primary and secondary endpoint was FTR rates and the overall major complications and deaths, re-operation rate, and its predictors respectively. Results: Among 762 patients, the rate of any major complication was 14.9% . The overall mortality rate was 2.8%. However, the mortality rate among patients with complications was 27.4% (FTR). Twenty-seven (52.9%) patients underwent re-operation for complications, out of which 70% survived. Three (21.4%) patients had a delay in prompt diagnosis and interventions of complications and had FTR due to the anastomotic leak and bleeding. The ASA grade, co-morbidities,, re-operation, and nature of the disease (benign vs. malignant) did not predict the FTR. Conclusion: This study conducted at an academic, low-volume center had higher rates of FTR. It can be further reduced by both prompt and appropriate interventions of postoperative complications in a multidisciplinary setup.

Background: For many cancer resections, a hospital volume-outcome relationship exists. The data regarding gastric cancer resection—especially in the western hemisphere—are ambiguous. This study analyzes the impact of gastric cancer surgery caseload per hospital on postoperative mortality and failure to rescue in Germany. Methods: All patients diagnosed with gastric cancer from 2009 to 2017 who underwent gastric resection were identified from nation-wide administrative data. Hospitals were grouped into five equal caseload quintiles (I–V in ascending caseload order). Postoperative deaths and failure to rescue were determined. Results: Forty-six thousand one hundred eighty-seven patients were identified. There was a significant shift from partial resections in low-volume hospitals to more extended resections in high-volume centers. The overall in-house mortality rate was 6.2%. The crude in-hospital mortality rate ranged from 7.9% in quintile I to 4.4% in quintile V, with a significant trend between volume categories (p < 0.001). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, quintile V hospitals (average of 29 interventions/year) had a risk-adjusted odds ratio of 0.50 (95% CI 0.39–0.65), compared to the baseline in-house mortality rate in quintile I (on average 1.5 interventions/year) (p < 0.001). In an analysis only evaluating hospitals with more than 30 resections per year mortality dropped below 4%. The overall postoperative complication rate was comparable between different volume quintiles, but failure to rescue (FtR) decreased significantly with increasing caseload. Conclusion: Patients who had gastric cancer surgery in hospitals with higher volume had better outcomes and a reduced failure to rescue rates for severe complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The incidence of complications and mortality in patients undergoing elective surgery in India are unknown. We contributed Indian data to ISOS. Since there were fewer than ten centers, Indian data were not included in the primary analysis. We report postoperative outcomes in the Indian data set of patients following elective surgery. Materials and methods: In this prospective 7-day observational study, after obtaining a waiver of informed consent, data were collected for 30 days from consecutive patients >18 years undergoing elective surgery. The primary outcome was in-hospital postoperative complications. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital all-cause mortality, the relationship between postoperative complications and admission to critical care, and the duration of hospital stay. Complications were graded as mild, moderate, and severe. Failure to rescue was defined as mortality in patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) for the treatment of complications. Results: Complications occurred in 57 (27.5%) patients, who were older (53 vs 47 years, p < 0.001) and had American Society of Anaesthesiologists grades III and IV physical status (p = 0.029). One hundred and thirty-eight (65.7%) patients underwent a major surgical procedure of which 132 (62.8%) procedures were done for malignancy. Postoperative complications were significantly higher (41.5% vs 22.7%) in patients electively admitted to ICU. The overall mortality rate was 2.4%, whereas the mortality rate was 8.8% in those who developed complications. Conclusion: We found that 28% of patients developed postoperative complications. The overall mortality was 2.4% but was higher (8.8%) in those who developed complications. Age and complex surgical procedures independently predicted complications, while lower preoperative hemoglobin appeared to be protective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Increased life expectancy leads to older and frailer surgical patients. Co-management between medical and surgical specialities has proven favourable in complex situations. Selection of patients for co-management is full of difficulties. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical decision support tool to select surgical patients for co-management. Material and Methods: Clinical data was collected from patient electronic health records with an ICD-9 code for colorectal surgery from January 2012 to December 2015 at a hospital in Lisbon. The outcome variable consists in co-management signalling. A dataset from 344 patients was used to develop the prediction model and a second data set from 168 patients was used for external validation. Results: Using logistic regression modelling the authors built a five variable (age, burden of comorbidities, ASA-PS status, surgical risk and recovery time) predictive referral model for co-management. This model has an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81 - 0.90), a predictive Brier score of 0.11, a sensitivity of 0.80, a specificity of 0.82 and an accuracy of 81.3%. Discussion: Early referral of high-risk patients may be valuable to guide the decision on the best level of post-operative clinical care. We developed a simple bedside decision tool with a good discriminatory and predictive performance in order to select patients for comanagement. Conclusion: A simple bed-side clinical decision support tool of patients for co-management is viable, leading to potential improvement in early recognition and management of postoperative complications and reducing the ‘failure to rescue’. Generalizability to other clinical settings requires adequate customization and validation.

Latin American countries have a huge diversity in sociocultural factors, ethnicity, geography, and political systems. Provision of healthcare varies widely in Latin America, and it is unclear how these disparities relate to outcomes for individual patients undergoing surgery. The Latin American Surgical Outcome Study (LASOS), with its pragmatic design, will provide a snapshot of surgical activity throughout Latin America and identify the next steps needed to improve postoperative outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Archivos de Bronconeumología (English Edition) is the property of Sociedad Espanola de Neumologia y Cirugia Toracica (SEPAR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: In the past, for a number of abdominal surgical interventions a correlation between treatment volume of a hospital and the patient's outcome was shown in national and international studies.Methods: Based on a systematic literature search we analyzed the absolute and risk-adjusted in-house lethality as well as the rate of complications and the failure to rescue after abdominal surgery in Germany. The hospitals were grouped in quintiles according to the volume of treatment.Results: 11 studies including more than 2 million patients were identified and surgeries for the treatment of 9 disease conditions were studied. The meta-analysis shows a significantly lower absolute and risk-adjusted in-house mortality for surgery in hospitals with high treatment volumes compared to low volume hospitals. In the context of subgroup analysis, this effect is demonstrated especially for complex surgical procedures. The failure to rescue in patients suffering from sepsis is significantly lower in high volume centers compared to low volume centers.Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis shows on more than 2 million patients that there is a volume-outcome relationship for the surgical treatment of abdominal diseases in Germany across various organ systems, which is particularly true for complex interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Frailty syndrome confers a greater risk of morbidity and mortality after operative interventions. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of frailty on the outcomes after carotid interventions, including both carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS). We performed an 8-year (2005-2012) retrospective analysis of the National Surgery Quality and Improvement Program database, including patients who had undergone CEA or CAS for carotid artery stenosis. A modified frailty index score was calculated. Frail status was defined as a modified frailty index score of ≥0.27. The outcome measures were inpatient complications, mortality, failure to rescue (FTR), hospital length of stay, and 30-day readmissions. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to study the association between frailty and the perioperative outcomes. The data from 37,875 patients were included. Of the 37,875 patients, 95.7% had undergone CEA, and 27.3% of the patients were frail (27% of the CEA and 26% of the CAS groups had qualified as frail). Overall, 11.7% of the patients had experienced complications, 2.2% had died, and 6.7% had been readmitted after discharge. On regression analysis, after controlling for age, gender, albumin level, type of surgery, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class, frail status was an independent predictor of complications (23.5% vs 7.2%; P <.001), mortality (5.2% vs 1.1%; P =.02), FTR (12.1% vs 4.7%; P =.02), and 30-day readmissions (14.9% vs 3.7%; P =.03). On subanalysis of the patients who had undergone CAS, no association was found between frail status and the occurrence of complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-3.2), mortality (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.6-2.7), FTR (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.4-2.3), and 30-day readmission rate (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.5-3.1). Frailty syndrome was associated with morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing surgical interventions for carotid stenosis. In the present study, frailty was associated with significant mortality and morbidity for those who had undergone CEA but not for those who had undergone CAS. However, the present study was not designed to determine the optimal treatment of frail patients. Incorporating frailty status into the treatment algorithm (CEA vs CAS) might provide a more accurate risk assessment and improve patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]