Search

Background: Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH), associated with increased mortality, can limit treatment options for liver diseases. Data on the continuum of clinical risk related to cardiopulmonary hemodynamics in PoPH are lacking., Methods and Results: As part of the United States national Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking database, we performed a retrospective cohort study of adults with cirrhosis undergoing right heart catheterization between October 1, 2017, and September 30, 2022. Pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary arterial pressure [mPAP] >20 mm Hg without PoPH) and PoPH (mPAP >20 mm Hg+pulmonary artery wedge pressure ≤15 mm Hg+pulmonary vascular resistance ≥3 WU) were defined by right heart catheterization hemodynamics. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards using natural splines for hemodynamic variables were used to evaluate the association between cardiopulmonary hemodynamics and mortality following right heart catheterization. A total of 4409 patients were included in the final analysis, predominantly men (96.3%), with a mean age of 68.5 years. Pulmonary hypertension and PoPH were observed in 71.6% and 10.2% of the cohort, respectively. Compared with a reference cardiac index of 2.5 L/min per m 2 , the hazard for mortality increased progressively with decreasing cardiac index, even after adjustment for mPAP and pulmonary vascular resistance. The minority of patients with PoPH (N=65, 14.5%) were prescribed pulmonary vasodilator therapy., Conclusions: These data suggest that pulmonary hypertension and PoPH are prevalent in veterans with chronic liver disease, but low use of targeted PoPH therapy persists. Cardiac function discriminated mortality risk across a wide range of mPAP and pulmonary vascular resistance values and may diagnose and clarify prognosis in this patient population.

Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) is a type of pulmonary vascular disease due to portal hypertension that exhibits high morbidity and mortality. The mechanisms driving disease are unknown, and transcriptional characteristics unique to the PoPH liver remain unexplored. Here, we apply single nuclear RNA sequencing to compare cirrhotic livers from patients with and without PoPH. We identify characteristics unique to PoPH in cells surrounding the central hepatic vein, including increased growth differentiation factor signaling, enrichment of the arginine biosynthesis pathway, and differential expression of the bone morphogenic protein type II receptor and estrogen receptor type I genes. These results provide insight into the transcriptomic characteristics of the PoPH liver and mechanisms by which PoPH cellular dysfunction might contribute to pulmonary vascular remodeling., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

Treprostinil is a prostacyclin analogue that targets multiple cellular receptors to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In certain scenarios, patients may require aggressive treprostinil titration. Several studies have demonstrated that higher doses of treprostinil lead to greater clinical benefit. Data supports successful transitions from parenteral to oral treprostinil; however, administration routes, transition duration, and transition setting vary in the real-world. The EXPEDITE clinical trial (NCT03497689) prospectively studied whether rapid parenteral treprostinil induction can be used to achieve high doses of oral treprostinil (total daily dose: ≥12 mg) in prostacyclin naïve PAH patients. Parenteral prostacyclin induction may be more appropriate for patients who need to reach therapeutic dosing more urgently than longer titration durations reported with conventional de novo oral treprostinil initiation. This summary provides strategies utilized in EXPEDITE. Parenteral treprostinil was initiated at 2 ng/kg/min intravenously or subcutaneously; clinicians determined the frequency and dose increment of up-titration. Two distinct transition schedules from parenteral to oral treprostinil were employed: rapid cross-titration in an inpatient setting (median: 2 days) or gradual cross-titration in an outpatient setting (median: 5 days). Patient status was closely monitored after transition; oral treprostinil dose was titrated to clinical effect and tolerability. Factors considered when individualizing dosing strategies included parenteral and oral treprostinil target doses, nursing support, patient education, medication counseling and adverse events management. EXPEDITE demonstrated the time to a therapeutic dose of oral treprostinil is significantly shorter when utilizing a short-term parenteral induction strategy and may be suitable for patients requiring aggressive titration of oral treprostinil., Competing Interests: J. F. Kingrey is part of the speaker bureau for United Therapeutics, Bayer pharmaceuticals, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, attends advisory boards for United Therapeutics, Bayer, and Janssen, consults for United Therapeutics, Bayer, Janssen, and conducts research for United Therapeutics, Janssen, Acceleron, Gossamer Bio. C. E. Miller is part of the speaker bureau for United Therapeutics, Janssen, and Bayer, attends advisory boards for United Therapeutics and Janssen, consults for United Therapeutics, and conducts clinical research for United Therapeutics, Janssen, Bayer, and Insmed. J. S. Smith serves as a speaker for and has received research funds from Bayer and United Therapeutics. V. Franco has served on advisory boards for United Therapeutics and has supported research for United Therapeutics, Merck, Acceleron, Johnson and Johnson, Respira, Aerovate, Cereno, and Abbott. R. Zolty has received payments for consulting on behalf of United Therapeutics, Bayer, and Janssen/Johnson and Johnson. R. J. Oudiz has received grants from Acceleron/Merck, Gossamer Bio, Insmed, Janssen, and United Therapeutics and honoraria/speaker fees from Merck, Janssen, and United Therapeutics. J. M. Elwing consults for United Therapeutics, Altavant, Aerovate, Bayer, Gossamer Bio, Liquida, and Merck and has received research support and grants from Janssen, United Therapeutics, Liquidia, Phase Bio, Gossamer Bio, Bayer, Acceleron, Altavant, Aerovate, Tenax, and Pharmosa. J. H. Huston has conducted clinical trials for Acceleron, CardiolRx, and Aadi Bioscience. L. Melendres‐Groves has received honoraria and/or fees for consultancy and advisory committees for United Therapeutics Corporation outside of submitted works. A. Ravichandran reports personal fees from United Therapeutics, Bayer, and Actelion outside the submitted work. V. Balasubramanian serves as a consultant for United Therapeutics. B. Wu, S. Hwang, S. Seaman, and M. Broderick are paid employees of United Therapeutics. F. F. Rahaghi has consulted for United Therapeutics, Janssen PH, Merck, and Altavant; served as a speaker for United Therapeutics, Janssen PH, and Bayer; and received research funding from Janssen, Bayer, Merck, Gossamer, and Bellerophon., (© 2023 The Authors. Pulmonary Circulation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute.)

Right heart (RH) structure and function are major determinants of symptoms and prognosis in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). RH imaging provides detailed information, but evidence and guidelines on the use of RH imaging in treatment decisions are limited. We conducted a Delphi study to gather expert opinion on the role of RH imaging in decision-making for treatment escalation in PAH. A panel of 17 physicians with expertise in PAH and RH imaging used three surveys in a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on the role of RH imaging in PAH. Survey 1 used open-ended questions to gather information. Survey 2 contained Likert scale and other questions intended to identify consensus on topics identified in Survey 1. Survey 3 contained Likert scale questions derived from Survey 2 and summary information on the results of Survey 2. The Delphi panel reached consensus that RH imaging is likely to improve the current risk stratification algorithms and help differentiate risk levels in patients at intermediate risk. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, right ventricular fractional area change, right atrial area, tricuspid regurgitation, inferior venae cavae diameter, and pericardial effusion should be part of routine echocardiography in PAH. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is valuable but limited by cost and access. A pattern of abnormal RH imaging results should prompt consideration of hemodynamic evaluation and possible treatment escalation. RH imaging is an important tool for decisions about treatment escalation in PAH, but systematically collected evidence is needed to clarify its role., Competing Interests: Paul Forfia has served on a speaker's bureau and consulted for Bayer, Janssen, and United Therapeutics. Raymond Benza has received consulting fees from Bayer, Janssen, United Therapeutics, Acceleron, CERENO, Abbott, and Gossamer; and advisory board fees from Acceleron. Michele D'Alto has received consulting fees from Janssen, MSD, Dompè, Ferrer, and AOP. Teresa De Marco has received research funding from Acceleron; and has served as a consultant for Action/Janssen, United Therapeutics, BIAL, Merck, NXT, Aerovate, and Pulnovo. Jean M. Elwing has served as a consultant for United Therapeutics, Altavant, Aerovate, Bayer, Gossamer Bio, Acceleron, Janssen, Liquid, and Insmed; and has participated in clinical research funded by Janssen, United Therapeutics, Liquidia, Phase Bio, Gossamer Bio, Bayer, Acceleron, Altavant, and Aerovate. Robert Frantz has received consulting fees from Altavant, Gossamer Bio, Insmed, Liquidia, ShouTi, and Tenax; serves on DSMB for IQVIA; and has received research grants from Bayer and United Therapeutics. Francois Haddad has received research funding from Janssen. Ronald Oudiz has received research funding, advisory board honoraria, and speaker fees from United Therapeutics. Ioana R. Preston has received research funding from Acceleron/Merck, Janssen, United Therapeutics, and PhaseBio; and consulting fees from Acceleron/Merck, Janssen, United Therapeutics, Aerovate, Gossamer Bio, and Respira. Stephan Rosenkranz has received fees for lectures and/or consultations from Abbott, Acceleron, Actelion, Aerovate, Altavant, AOP Orphan, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Edwards, Ferrer, Gossamer, Janssen, MSD, United Therapeutics, and Vifor; and his institution has received research grants from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Janssen. John Ryan has received consulting fees and payment or honoraria from lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or education events from Bayer, Merck, United Therapeutics, Kiniksa, and Janssen PH. Robert Schilz has received research funding from Acceleron/Merck, United Therapeutics, Respira, and Bellerophon; consulting fees from Janssen, United Therapeutics, and Acceleron; and currently serves on speakers' bureaus for Bayer, Janssen, and United Therapeutics. Oksana A. Shlobin has received consulting fees from United Therapeutics and Janssen; has received honoraria from Medscape, Total CME, and Bayer; and has participated in a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Janssen and Altavant. Jean‐Luc Vachiery has received consulting fees from Acceleron, Actelion Pharmaceuticals (now Janssen), Altavant, Bayer HealthCare, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Gossamer Bio, MSD, Novartis, and Shouti. Carmine Dario Vizza has received consulting fees from Acceleron, Janssen, Altavant, Bayer HealthCare, Ferrer, GlaxoSmithKline, Gossamer Bio, and MSD. Anton Vonk Noordegraaf has served as a member of the scientific advisory board of Morphogen‐X, Ferrer, Gosamer Bio, and Johnson & Johnson. The institute of Anton Vonk Noordegraaf has received consulting fees from a speakers' bureau for Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Actelion, Bayer, and Ferrer. Margaret R. Sketch and Meredith Broderick are employees and shareholders of United Therapeutics Corporation. Vallerie McLaughlin has received research funding from Acceleron, Janssen, Sonovie, and United Therapeutics; and consulting fees from Acceleron, Aerovate, Altavant, Bayer, Caremark LLC, CiVi Biopharma Inc., Corvista, Gossamer Bio, Janssen, Merck, and United Therapeutics., (© 2023 The Authors. Pulmonary Circulation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute.)

Background: Interhospital transfer (IHT) of patients with acute life-threatening pulmonary embolism (PE) is necessary to facilitate specialized care and access to advanced therapies. Our goal was to understand what barriers and facilitators may exist during this transfer process from the perspective of both receiving and referring physicians., Methods: This qualitative descriptive study explored physician experience taking care of patients with life threatening PE. Subject matter expert physicians across several different specialties from academic and community United States hospitals participated in qualitative semi-structured interviews. Interview transcripts were subsequently analyzed using inductive qualitative description approach., Results: Four major themes were identified as barriers that impede IHT among patients with life threatening PE. Inefficient communication which mainly pertained to difficulty when multiple points of contact were required to complete a transfer. Subjectivity in the indication for transfer which highlighted the importance of physicians understanding how to use standardized risk stratification tools and to properly triage these patients. Delays in data acquisition were identified in regards to both obtaining clinical information and imaging in a timely fashion. Operation barriers which included difficulty finding available beds for transfer and poor weather conditions inhibiting transportation. In contrast, two main facilitators to transfer were identified: good communication and reliance on colleagues and dedicated team for transferring and treating PE patients ., Conclusion: The most prominent themes identified as barriers to IHT for patients with acute life-threatening PE were: (1) inefficient communication, (2) subjectivity in the indication for transfer, (3) delays in data acquisition (imaging or clinical), and (4) operational barriers. Themes identified as facilitators that enable the transfer of patients were: (1) good communication and (2) a dedicated transfer team. The themes presented in our study are useful in identifying opportunities to optimize the IHT of patients with acute PE and improve patient care. These opportunities include instituting educational programs, streamlining the transfer process, and formulating a consensus statement to serve as a guideline regarding IHT of patients with acute PE., Competing Interests: CK is consultant for BMS and Abbott, and provided by a grant from Grifols and Diagnostica Stago. RR is consultant for Abbott, BMS, Dova, Janseen, Inari Medical, and Penumbra, and provided by a grant from Janssen and BMS. OF is consultant for Inari Medical. BR-L is consultant for Inari Medical and Johnson & Johnson, and provided by a grant from Johnson & Johnson. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 DeBerry, Rali, McDaniel, Kabrhel, Rosovsky, Melamed, Friedman, Elwing, Balasubramanian, Sahay, Bossone, Farmer, Klein, Hamm, Ross and Rivera-Lebron.)

Background Diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH) is often delayed or missed, leading to disease progression and missed treatment opportunities. In this study, we measured variation in care provided by board-certified cardiologists and pulmonologists in simulated patients with potentially undiagnosed PH. Methods and Results In a cross-sectional study (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04693793), 219 US practicing cardiologists and pulmonologists cared for simulated patients presenting with symptoms of chronic dyspnea and associated signs of potential PH. We scored the clinical quality-of-care decisions made in a clinical encounter against predetermined evidence-based criteria. Overall, quality-of-care scores ranged from 18% to 74%, averaging 43.2%±11.5%. PH, when present, was correctly suspected 49.1% of the time. Conversely, physicians incorrectly identified PH in 53.7% of non-PH cases. Physicians ordered 2-dimensional echocardiography in just 64.3% of cases overall. Physicians who ordered 2-dimensional echocardiography in the PH cases were significantly more likely to get the presumptive diagnosis (61.9% versus 30.7%; P <0.001). Ordering other diagnostic work-up items showed similar results for ventilation/perfusion scan (81.5% versus 51.4%; P =0.005) and high-resolution computed tomography (60.4% versus 43.2%; P =0.001). Physicians who correctly identified PH were significantly more likely to order confirmatory right heart catheterization or refer to PH center (67.3% versus 15.8%; P <0.001). Conclusions A wide range of care in the clinical practice among simulated patients presenting with possible PH was found, specifically in the evaluation and plan for definitive diagnosis of patients with PH. The delay or misdiagnosis of PH is likely attributed to a low clinical suspicion, nonspecific symptoms, and underuse of key diagnostic tests. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04693793.

Social determinants of health (SDoH) can impact the vulnerable pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) population, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Providers' understanding of SDoH at the point of care and their impact is unknown. We conducted semi-structured virtual interviews with US clinicians at 17 pulmonary hypertension (PH) centers and one patient advocate from the Pulmonary Hypertension Association. We sought participants' perspective on SDoH in PAH and their impact. Transcripts were developed and analyzed for key themes to assess potential policy implications. Participants served a large PAH population and demonstrated high awareness of SDoH and its impact on treatment and outcomes. They reported that patients' SDoH, including socioeconomic status, health insurance, access to health care, education levels, health literacy, employment status, and insecurities associated with housing, food, transportation, and family support, impacted health and well-being. COVID-19-related social isolation, mental health, and substance abuse contributed to significant inequities in care provision and outcomes. While telemedicine helped clinicians manage patients remotely during the pandemic, there was a concern for patients with limited access to this medium. Participants reported no formal screening for SDoH at the point of care. With the recognition and the desire to act upon health inequities associated with SDoH, participants felt that it was vital for their centers to have a dedicated PH social worker and support staff to optimize care and outcomes. An approach that integrates SDoH in PAH care management, streamlined through institutional policy, could address health disparities leading to improved healthcare access, outcomes, and quality of care., Competing Interests: Vijay R. Nadipelli is a Master of Science Health Policy Candidate at Thomas Jefferson University's College of Population Health. Portions of this study were previously presented at the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Scientific Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, June 9–12, 2022. The culminating study has been submitted in fulfillment of Vijay R. Nadipelli's institutional academic degree requirements. The other authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2022 The Authors. Pulmonary Circulation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute.)

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a chronically progressive fatal disease. A goal-oriented approach to achieve low risk status has been associated with improved survival. A variety of risk stratification tools are available, but use is low. We conducted a survey to assess potential reasons for under-utilization. We conducted a survey-based study of global PAH disease specialists with a goal of assessing risk assessment utilization and identifying modifiable barriers to use. The survey was designed by the American College of Chest Physicians' Pulmonary Vascular Diseases (PVD) NetWork. Respondents were global members of the PVD NetWork and Pulmonary Hypertension Association. Survey invitations were sent electronically to all members. Participation was anonymous and no provider or patient level data was collected. Participants from four countries responded with the majority (84%) being from the United States. Our survey found suboptimal use of any risk stratification tool with 71/112 (63%) reporting use. A total of 85% of the respondents had more than 5 years of experience in managing PAH. REVEAL 2.0 and European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society risk tools were the most commonly used. A total of 44 (65%) surveyed felt that use of risk tools led to change in PAH therapies. Only 6 (9%) felt they prompted additional testing or changed the frequency of follow-up. A total of 5 (7%) reported they prompted goals of care/palliative care discussions and 2 (3%) that they triggered lung transplant referral. The vast majority indicated that incorporation of risk tools into electronic medical records (EMR) would improve utilization. PAH risk assessment tools remain under-utilized. Most respondents were experienced PAH clinicians. More than one-third were not routinely using risk tools. Most felt that risk tools led to PAH therapy changes but few reported impacts on other aspects of care. The most commonly identified barriers to use were time constraints and lack of integration with EMR., Competing Interests: Sandeep Sahay: Consultant for United Therapeutics, Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer Pharmaceuticals. Advisor and speaker for United Therapeutics, Actelion and Bayer. Research grant support from ACCP CHEST and United Therapeutics. Clinical Trial site PI for United Therapeutics, Actelion, Merck, Liquidia Altavant Sciences, and Gossamer Bio. Vijay Balasubramanian: Research support—United Therapeutics, Speaker bureau—Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Consultant—Bayer, United Therapeutics. Lana Melendres‐Groves: Consultant, speaker and advisor—Bayer, United Therapeutics, Janssen. Stephen C Mathai: Consultant: Actelion, Bayer, Acceleron, United Therapeutics, Funding: NHLBI, DOD. Oksana Shlobin: Speaker & Consultant for United Therapeutics, J&J, and Bayer. Jean M Elwing: Consultant/advisor for Janssen/Actelion, United Therapeutics, Acceleron, Liquidia, Altavant, Aerovate, Gossamer Bio, and participated in clinical trials with Actelion, Acceleron, Altavant, Aerovate, Reata, United Therapeutics, Liquidia, Phase Bio, Gossamer Bio, Bayer, LungLLC. All other authors declare no conflict of interests., (© 2022 The Authors. Pulmonary Circulation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute.)

Dual combination therapy with a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) and endothelin receptor antagonist is recommended for most patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The RESPITE and REPLACE studies suggest that switching from a PDE5i to a soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) activator may provide clinical improvement in this situation. The optimal approach to escalation or transition of therapy in this or other scenarios is not well defined. We developed an expert consensus statement on the transition to sGC and other treatment escalations and transitions in PAH using a modified Delphi process. The Delphi process used a panel of 20 physicians with expertise in PAH. Panelists answered three questionnaires on the management of treatment escalations and transitions in PAH. The initial questionnaire included open-ended questions. Later questionnaires consolidated the responses into statements that panelists rated on a Likert scale from -5 ( strongly disagree ) to +5 ( strongly agree ) to determine consensus. The Delphi process produced several consensus recommendations. Escalation should be considered for patients who are at high risk or not achieving treatment goals, by adding an agent from a new class, switching from oral to parenteral prostacyclins, or increasing the dose. Switching to a new class or within a class should be considered if tolerability or other considerations unrelated to efficacy are affecting adherence. Switching from a PDE5i to an SGC activator may benefit patients with intermediate risk who are not improving on their present therapy. These consensus-based recommendations may be helpful to clinicians and beneficial for patients when evidence-based guidance is unavailable., Competing Interests: Franck F. Rahaghi reports consultation, research, and speakership honoraria from Bayer and Janssen, consultation and speakership from United Therapeutics, and consultation fees from Acceleron. Vijay P. Balasubramanian reports a research grant from United Therapeutics and serves on a speakers bureau for Bayer. Robert C. Bourge reports research grant support to my institution from United Therapeutics and Bayer, and service on a Scientific Advisory Board at United Therapeutics. Murali M. Chakinala reports grants or contracts from Actelion/Janssen, Bayer, Medtronic, NIH, Reata, Liquidia, Phase Bio, Complexa, United Therapeutics, Altavant, Trio Health Analytics, Reata, Acceleron, Arena, and Gossamer; consulting fees from Altavant, Vaderis Therapeutics, Aerovate, Reata, VWave, and Arena; honoraria from Bayer, Gilead, Simply Speaking, WebMD, and United Therapeutics; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Actelion/Janssen, United Therapeutics, Bayer, Acceleron, Reata, and Gilead; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Actelion/Janssen, Express Scripts, Phase Bio, Altavant, Gossamer, United Therapeutics, Bayer, Acceleron, and Liquidia; and leadership or a fiduciary role in the Pulmonary Hypertension Association and the Cure HHT Global Research and Medical Advisory Board. Michael S. Eggert reports research contracts with United Therapeutics (BREEZE and ADVANCE Outcomes), Acceleron, and Actelion. Jean M. Elwing reports grants from Actelion, Acceleron, Reata, United Therapeutics, Liquidia, Phase Bio, Complexa, Gossamer Bio, Bayer, Arena, Eiger, Akros, Bellerophon, and Lung LLC and consulting fees from United Therapeutics, Acceleron, Liquidia, Altavant, Bayer, Gossamer Bio, Actelion, Bayer. Jeremy Feldman reports consulting and giving talks for Bayer, United Therapeutics, and Jansen. Christopher King reports personal fees from Actelion, personal fees from Genentech, United Therapeutics, and Boehringer Ingelheim; has served on advisory boards for and is on the Speakers’ Bureau of Actelion, Boehringer‐Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, and United Therapeutics. James R. Klinger reports that his institution receives research funding from United Technologies, service on a Steering Committee and a Clinical Outcomes Committee for Bayer, and a leadership role in the Pulmonary Hypertension Association. Stephen C. Mathai reports personal fees from United Therapeutics; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from United Therapeutics, Actelion, and Bayer, and leadership or a fiduciary role in the PCORI Rare Disease Advisory Panel and the World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension. John Wesley McConnell reports consulting fees from Actelion, Bayer, Gossamer, Altavant, and Liquidia; honoraria from Actelion, Bayer, Simply Speaking, Impact PH, and Reata, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Actelion, Liquidia, Gossamer, and Altavant. Harold I. Palevsky reports honoraria for serving on scientific advisory boards for Acceleron, Actelion/Janssen, PhaseBio and United Therapeutics, and serving on a DSMB for United Therapeutics. Ricardo Restrepo‐Jaramillo reports serving on speaker's bureau for United Therapeutics, Bayer, and Actelion. Zeenat Safdar reports serving on a speakers bureau, consultation and advisory boards for Actelion, United Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Roche. Jeffrey S. Sager reports personal fees from Bayer pharmaceuticals, grants and personal fees from United Therapeutics, grants and personal fees from Janssen (J and J), and grants from Reata outside the submitted work. Namita Sood reports a speaking fee from Bayer. Roxana Sulica reports research grants from Bayer, United Therapeutics, Complexa, and Reata, and serves on advisory boards for Actelion, Bayer, United Therapeutics, and Reata. R. James White reports research grants from United Therapeutics, Reata, Bayer, Merck, and Janssen and consulting fees from Merck and Bayer. Nicholas S. Hill reports honoraria from Axon Research for this study; grants to his institution from Actelion, Bayer, Gilead, and United Therapeutics; consulting fees from United Therapeutics; and participation in Data Safety Monitoring Boards for United Therapeutics and Pfizer. All authors had access to the Delphi questionnaire analysis and data and participated in the review, revision, and approval of the content of the manuscript for submission. Charles D. Burger reports no disclosures or conflicts of interest., (© 2022 The Authors. Pulmonary Circulation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute.)

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive, ultimately fatal cardiopulmonary disease associated with a number of physiologic changes, which is believed to result in imbalances in the intestinal microbiota. To date, comprehensive investigational analysis of the intestinal microbiota in human subjects is still limited. To address this, we performed a pilot study of the intestinal microbiome in 20 PAH and 20 non-PAH healthy control subjects, recruited from a single center, with each PAH subject recruited simultaneously with a cohabitating non-PAH control subject. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was used to analyze the microbiome profiles. There were no differences between PAH and non-PAH subjects across several measures of microbial abundance and diversity (Alpha Diversity, Beta Diversity, F/B ratio). The relative abundance of Lachnospiraceae bacterium GAM79 was lower in PAH stool samples as compared to non-PAH control subject' stool. There was no strong or reproducible association between PAH disease severity and global microbial abundance, but several bacterial species (a relative abundance of Anaerostipes rhamnosivorans and a relative deficiency of Amedibacterium intestinale , Ruminococcus bicirculans , and Ruminococcus albus species were associated with disease severity (most proximal right heart catheterization hemodynamics and six-minute walk test distance) in PAH subjects. Our results support further investigation into the presence, significance, and potential physiologic effects of a PAH-specific intestinal microbiome., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests., (© 2022 The Authors. Pulmonary Circulation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute.)

Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) is a type of pulmonary vascular disease occurring exclusively in those with underlying liver disease, associated with significant mortality in patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT). LT is curative in HPS, and these patients are granted Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception points to expedite LT. The purpose of this study is to use multivariable competing risk Accelerated Failure Time models and propensity matching to examine the relationship between pre-LT hypoxemia and post-LT outcomes in HPS. We performed a retrospective cohort study of UNOS/OPTN database of all adult patients undergoing LT between January 1, 2006 and January 12, 2020. Pre-LT PaO 2 was significantly associated with post-LT mortality in HPS, with each 1 mmHg increase in PaO 2 significantly decreasing the risk of post-LT mortality (coefficient 0.039, HR = 0.95, p = 0.001). HPS patients with a pre-LT PaO 2 < 54 mmHg demonstrated increased mortality following LT as compared to matched non-HPS cirrhotic patients. We conclude that HPS patients with a PaO 2 , 54 mmHg are at increased risk of post-LT mortality and may identify high-risk patients who would benefit from additional resources during LT, and that the effects of HPS MELD exception points to optimize post-LT outcomes should be continuously re-evaluated., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare, morbid, potentially curable subtype of pulmonary hypertension that negatively impacts health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Little is known about differences in HRQoL and hospitalization between CTEPH patients and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) patients. Using multivariable linear regression and mixed effects models, we examined differences in HRQoL assessed by emPHasis-10 (E10) and SF-12 between CTEPH and IPAH patients in the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry, a prospective multicenter cohort of patients newly evaluated at a Pulmonary Hypertension Care Center. Multivariable negative binomial regression models were used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRR) for hospitalization amongst the two groups. We included 461 IPAH patients and 169 CTEPH patients. Twenty-one percent of CTEPH patients underwent pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) before the end of follow-up. At baseline, patients with CTEPH had significantly worse HRQoL (higher E10 scores) (ß 2.83, SE 1.11, p = 0.01); however, differences did not persist over time. CTEPH patients had higher rates of hospitalization (excluding the hospitalization for PTE) compared to IPAH patients after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, WHO functional class and six-minute walk distance (IRR 1.66, 95%CI 1.04-2.65, p = 0.03). CTEPH patients who underwent PTE had improved HRQoL as compared to those who were medically managed, but patients who underwent PTE were younger, had higher cardiac outputs and greater six-minute walk distances. In this large, prospective, multicenter cohort, CTEPH patients had significantly worse baseline HRQoL and higher rates of hospitalizations than those with IPAH. CTEPH patients who underwent PTE had significant improvements in HRQoL., (© The Author(s) 2021.)

Compared to idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), patients with portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) have worse survival. Health disparities may contribute to these differences but have not been studied. We sought to compare socioeconomic factors in patients with POPH and IPAH and to determine whether socioeconomic status and/or POPH diagnosis were associated with treatment and health-care utilization. We performed a cross-sectional study of adults enrolled in the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry. Patients with IPAH (n = 344) and POPH (n = 57) were compared. Compared with IPAH, patients with POPH were less likely to be college graduates (19.6% vs. 34.9%, p = 0.02) and more likely to be unemployed (54.7% vs. 30.5%, p < 0.001) and have an annual household income below poverty level (45.7% vs. 19.0%, p < 0.001). Patients with POPH had similar functional class, quality of life, 6-min walk distance, and mean pulmonary arterial pressure with a higher cardiac index. Compared with IPAH, patients with POPH were less likely to receive combination therapy (46.4% vs. 62.2%, p = 0.03) and endothelin receptor antagonists (28.6% vs. 55.1%, p < 0.001) at enrollment with similar treatment at follow-up. Patients with POPH had more emergency department visits (1.7 ± 2.1 vs. 0.9 ± 1.2, p = 0.009) and hospitalizations in the six months preceding enrollment (1.5 ± 2.1 vs. 0.8 ± 1.1, p = 0.02). Both POPH diagnosis and lower education level were independently associated with a higher number of emergency department visits. Compared to IPAH, patients with POPH have lower socioeconomic status, are less likely to receive initial combination therapy and endothelin receptor antagonists but have similar treatment at follow-up, and have increased health-care utilization., (© The Author(s) 2021.)

Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a life-limiting complication in patients with systemic sclerosis. Current recommendations suggest a minimum screening of an annual transthoracic echocardiogram and pulmonary function test. We hypothesize that modifiable provider-level hurdles contribute to inadequate screening and can be alleviated., Methods and Results: We performed a longitudinal study over 23 months of all systemic sclerosis patients seen in pulmonary and/or rheumatology clinics. Pulmonary arterial hypertension screening was measured monthly as percentage of patients with up-to-date transthoracic echocardiogram and pulmonary function test out of the total systemic sclerosis patients with an outpatient encounter that month. Tests were considered "up-to-date" if they were performed 12 months prior or within the next 6 months post-encounter. Baseline adherence to PAH screening was assessed using a 9-month preproject period. Physicians in rheumatology and pulmonary clinics were surveyed for knowledge and perceived as barriers to screening. Interventions focused on provider-level hurdles to improve the screening rate to >90%. Adherence to systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension was compared between baseline and post-intervention phases as a continuous variable using nonparametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test and as categorical variable using chi-square test for overall adherence rate. A total of 18 providers were surveyed, of which 67% knew minimal screening recommendations and 44% identified "difficulty ordering tests" as a barrier. Our interventions were as follows: (1) didactic education and literature dissemination and (2) best practice alert in the electronic medical record to facilitate just-in-time ordering of screening. Adherence was measured for 23 months, comprising 166 systemic sclerosis patients. Monthly adherence to pulmonary arterial hypertension screening increased by 10.4% (69.2%-79.6%, p  = 0.01 with chi-square and p  = 0.09 with Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test), with an increase in transthoracic echocardiogram by 7.5% and pulmonary function test by 4.9%., Conclusion: Provider-level hurdles contribute to sub-optimal systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension screening. Lack of knowledge and difficulty in ordering tests were major barriers. Structured education and decision-support aids improve screening. These interventions, however, were insufficient to improve screening to a goal target of >90%., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s) 2020.)

Systemic anticoagulation may be beneficial in pulmonary arterial hypertension, but there is no randomized clinical trial data to guide therapeutic decision making, and current guidelines do not account for patient preferences or quality of life. Decision analytic models to evaluate the potential risks and benefits of systemic anticoagulation in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients, focusing on the benefit in quality-adjusted life years, may be helpful in clarifying this uncertainty. We constructed a 31-state Markov decision analytic model to explore anticoagulation and no anticoagulation strategies. Modeled patient characteristics included gender, use of central catheter-based pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy, type of pulmonary arterial hypertension (idiopathic, idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension, or connective-tissue associated, connective tissue disease-pulmonary arterial hypertension), and use of oral contraceptive medication by females. Modeled events included mortality, thromboembolic complications, atrial fibrillation, stroke, and anticoagulation bleeding. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Anticoagulation was favored in all idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension cases, with a gain of 0.43-0.51 quality-adjusted life years, and detrimental in all connective tissue disease-pulmonary arterial hypertension cases, with a loss of 0.66-1.89 quality-adjusted life years. Anticoagulation would need to demonstrate a hazard ratio for pulmonary arterial hypertension mortality of 0.95 or better to be favored. In our model, idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension patients benefit from anticoagulation in terms of quality-adjusted life years, and connective tissue disease-pulmonary arterial hypertension patients were harmed, with a hazard ratio for pulmonary arterial hypertension mortality of 0.95 or better being required to favorably impact quality-adjusted life years. These results suggest that anticoagulation significantly improves quality adjusted life years and should be offered to all idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension patients. Shared decision models based on these results may help clarify therapeutic decision-making uncertainty in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients., (© The Author(s) 2019.)

Oral treprostinil was recently labeled for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Similar to the period immediately after parenteral treprostinil was approved, there is a significant knowledge gap for practicing physicians who might prescribe oral treprostinil. Despite its oral route of delivery, use of the drug is challenging because of the requirement for careful titration and management of drug-related adverse effects. We aimed to create a consensus document combining available evidence with expert opinion to provide guidance for use of oral treprostinil. Following a methodology commonly used in business and social sciences (the 'Delphi Process'), two investigators from the oral treprostinil (Freedom) studies created a series of statements based on available evidence and the package insert. The set of 'best practice' statements was circulated to nine other Freedom trial investigators. Their comments were incorporated into the document as new line items for further vote and comment. The subsequent document was put to vote line by line (scale of -5 to +5) and a final statement was drafted. Consensus recommendations include initial therapy with 0.125 mg for treatment naÿ patients, three times daily dosing, aggressive use of antidiarrheal medication, and a strong preference for use of the drug in combination with other approved PAH therapies. This process was particularly valuable in providing guidance for the management of adverse events (where essentially no data is available). The Delphi process was useful to codify investigator experience and subsequently develop investigator consensus about practical issues for physicians who may wish to prescribe oral treprostinil.

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with increased morbidity across the cardiopulmonary disease spectrum. Based primarily on expert consensus opinion, PH is defined by a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mm Hg. Although mPAP levels below this threshold are common among populations at risk for PH, the relevance of mPAP <25 mm Hg to clinical outcome is unknown., Methods and Results: We analyzed retrospectively all US veterans undergoing right heart catheterization (2007-2012) in the Veterans Affairs healthcare system (n=21,727; 908-day median follow-up). Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between mPAP and outcomes of all-cause mortality and hospitalization, adjusted for clinical covariates. When treating mPAP as a continuous variable, the mortality hazard increased beginning at 19 mm Hg (hazard ratio [HR]=1.183; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.004-1.393) relative to 10 mm Hg. Therefore, patients were stratified into 3 groups: (1) referent (≤18 mm Hg; n=4,207); (2) borderline PH (19-24 mm Hg; n=5,030); and (3) PH (≥25 mm Hg; n=12,490). The adjusted mortality hazard was increased for borderline PH (HR=1.23; 95% CI, 1.12-1.36; P<0.0001) and PH (HR=2.16; 95% CI, 1.96-2.38; P<0.0001) compared with the referent group. The adjusted hazard for hospitalization was also increased in borderline PH (HR=1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12; P=0.0149) and PH (HR=1.15; 95% CI, 1.09-1.22; P<0.0001). The borderline PH cohort remained at increased risk for mortality after excluding the following high-risk subgroups: (1) patients with pulmonary artery wedge pressure >15 mm Hg; (2) pulmonary vascular resistance ≥3.0 Wood units; or (3) inpatient status at the time of right heart catheterization., Conclusions: These data illustrate a continuum of risk according to mPAP level and that borderline PH is associated with increased mortality and hospitalization. Future investigations are needed to test the generalizability of our findings to other populations and study the effect of treatment on outcome in borderline PH., (© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Systemic sclerosis is a rare autoimmune disorder with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations and a multitude of autoantibodies that are associated with it. In the past several years, advances in serologic testing have led to research indicating important prognostic and phenotypic associations with certain subsets of autoantibodies. In particular, anti-RNA polymerase III (anti-RNAP III) has been associated with diffuse cutaneous disease, scleroderma renal crisis, a temporal relationship with malignancy, myositis, synovitis, joint contractures, and gastric antral vascular ectasia. However, anti-RNAP III has not been associated with systemic sclerosis sine scleroderma. We describe a patient with an atypical presentation of anti-RNAP III positive systemic sclerosis sine scleroderma who presented without the typical features of anti-RNAP III disease. Instead, she presented with critical digital ischemia, pulmonary arterial hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease, interstitial lung disease, and no clinically detectable sclerodactyly.

PH occurs alone or in association with many disorders. Many patients with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) findings suggesting PH never receive additional evaluation. Patient characteristics and echocardiographic data associated with increased recognition of PH have not been fully evaluated. We evaluated TTE reports at the Cincinnati Veterans Affairs Medical Center from 2005 to 2006 retrospectively for findings highly indicative of PH: Estimated systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) ≥40 mmHg, increased right atrial or right ventricular (RV) size, or reduced RV function. Only patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% and no known diagnosis of PH were included. Patient characteristics, TTE findings, provider recognition rates, and subsequent referral for additional evaluation were assessed. A total of 227 of 3,960 (5.7%) TTE reports revealed findings indicating possible PH. Providers acknowledged possible PH in 53 (23.4%) reports. Recognized PH was predicted by increased RV size (odds ratio (OR) = 5.07, P < 0.001), increased right atrial dimension (OR = 6.45, P < 0.001), decreased RV function (OR = 8.86, P < 0.001), and increased PAP (OR = 1.04 corresponding to each unit increase of PAP, P < 0.01). Patients with comorbid obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), interstitial lung disease, and dyspnea were also more likely to be recognized (OR = 3.63, P = 0.021; OR = 10.98, P = 0.004; OR = 2.39, P = 0.007, respectively). The 12-month mortality rate for recognized patients, 11.3% (7/53), was lower than for unrecognized patients, 25.3% (44/174; P = 0.03). Providers recognized less than one in four patients with echocardiographic evidence suggesting PH. Echocardiography reports revealing higher PAP and right heart dilation and dysfunction are associated with increased acknowledgement of possible PH.

Receptor-mediated airway smooth muscle (ASM) contraction via G(alphaq), and relaxation via G(alphas), underlie the bronchospastic features of asthma and its treatment. Asthma models show increased ASM G(alphai) expression, considered the basis for the proasthmatic phenotypes of enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity to contraction mediated by M(3)-muscarinic receptors and diminished relaxation mediated by beta(2)-adrenergic receptors (beta(2)ARs). A causal effect between G(i) expression and phenotype has not been established, nor have mechanisms whereby G(i) modulates G(q)/G(s) signaling. To delineate isolated effects of altered G(i), transgenic mice were generated overexpressing G(alphai2) or a G(alphai2) peptide inhibitor in ASM. Unexpectedly, G(alphai2) overexpression decreased contractility to methacholine, while G(alphai2) inhibition enhanced contraction. These opposite phenotypes resulted from different crosstalk loci within the G(q) signaling network: decreased phospholipase C and increased PKCalpha, respectively. G(alphai2) overexpression decreased beta(2)AR-mediated airway relaxation, while G(alphai2) inhibition increased this response, consistent with physiologically relevant coupling of this receptor to both G(s) and G(i). IL-13 transgenic mice (a model of asthma), which developed increased ASM G(alphai), displayed marked increases in airway hyperresponsiveness when G(alphai) function was inhibited. Increased G(alphai) in asthma is therefore a double-edged sword: a compensatory event mitigating against bronchial hyperreactivity, but a mechanism that evokes beta-agonist resistance. By selective intervention within these multipronged signaling modules, advantageous G(s)/G(q) activities could provide new asthma therapies.