Search

Background: The positivity of anti-RNP autoantibodies as biological criteria for the diagnosis of mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) has recently divided the rheumatology community. Autoantigenicity of the U1-snRNP complex tends to generate multiple autoantibodies against RNP-A, -C and -70 KDa or Sm proteins. The aim of this study is to identify the most informative autoantibodies in clinical practice, in particular, to contribute to differential diagnosis between MCTD and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Sera from 74 patients positive for anti-RNP autoantibodies were selected over a period of one year of laboratory practice. Autoantibodies directed against extractable nuclear antigen, RNP proteins (A, C, 70 KDa) and 40 kDa fragments of RNP-70 KDa were investigated by using quantitative fluoroenzymatic assay and Western blot analysis. Results: Among the 74 patients, 40 patients were diagnosed with SLE, 20 with MCTD, six with another autoimmune disease, three with SARS-CoV-2 infection, three with cancer and two were healthy. No preferential clinical association of IgG or IgM autoantibodies directed against each of the RNP proteins was found between SLE and MCTD. In contrast, the proportion of autoantibodies directed against the RNP component within the U1-snRNP complex showed a significantly higher RNP index in patients with MCTD than in those with SLE ( p = 0.011), with good performance (sensitivity: 69.2%, specificity: 88.9%). Conclusions: The analysis of the proportion of the different autoantibodies directed against the U1-snRNP complex is more informative than the analysis of each autoantibody separately. A follow-up of patients could be informative about the interest of the RNP index as a predictor of disease evolution.

Background and Objectives: Patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) receiving extended dosing of rituximab (RTX) have exhibited no return of disease activity, which suggests that maintenance of deep depletion of circulating B cells is not necessary to maintain the efficacy of RTX in MS., Methods: This was a prospective monocentric observational study including all consecutive PwMS who started or continued RTX after 2019, when the medical staff decided to extend the dosing interval up to 24 months for all patients. Circulating B-cell subsets were monitored regularly and systematically in case of relapse. The first extended interval was analyzed., Results: We included 236 PwMS (81% with relapsing-remitting MS; mean [SD] age 43 [12] years; median [range] EDSS score 4 [0-8]; mean relapse rate during the year before RTX start 1.09 [0.99]; 41.5% with MRI activity). The median number of RTX infusions before extension was 4 (1-13). At the time of the analysis, the median delay in dosing was 17 months (8-39); the median proportion of circulating CD19 + B cells was 7% (0-25) of total lymphocytes and that of CD27 + memory B cells was 4% (0-16) of total B cells. The mean annual relapse rate did not differ before and after the extension: 0.03 (0.5) and 0.04 (0.15) ( p = 0.51). Similarly, annual relapse rates did not differ before and after extension in patients with EDSS score ≤3 (n = 79) or disease duration ≤5 years (n = 71) at RTX onset. During the "extended dosing" period, MRI demonstrated no lesion accrual in 228 of the 236 patients (97%). Five patients experienced clinical relapse, which was confirmed by MRI. In these patients, the level of B-cell subset reconstitution at the time of the relapse did not differ from that for patients with the same extension window., Discussion: The efficacy of RTX outlasted substantial reconstitution of circulating B cells in PwMS, which suggests that renewal of the immune system underlies the prolonged effect of RTX in MS. These findings suggest that extended interval dosing of RTX that leads to a significant reconstitution of circulating B cells is safe in PwMS, could reduce the risk of infection, and could improve vaccine efficacy., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

The fundamental role of cell adhesion molecules in mediating various biological processes as angiogenesis has been well-documented. CD146, an adhesion molecule of the immunoglobulin superfamily, and its soluble form, constitute major players in both physiological and pathological angiogenesis. A growing body of evidence shows soluble CD146 to be significantly elevated in the serum or interstitial fluid of patients with pathologies related to deregulated angiogenesis, as autoimmune diseases, obstetric and ocular pathologies, and cancers. To block the undesirable effects of this molecule, therapeutic antibodies have been developed. Herein, we review the multifaceted functions of CD146 in physiological and pathological angiogenesis and summarize the interest of using monoclonal antibodies for therapeutic purposes.

CD146 is a cell adhesion molecule expressed on endothelial cells, as well as on other cells such as mesenchymal stem cells and Th17 lymphocytes. This protein also exists in a soluble form, whereby it can be detected in biological fluids, including the serum or the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Some studies have highlighted the significance of CD146 and its soluble form in angiogenesis and inflammation, having been shown to contribute to the pathogenesis of many inflammatory autoimmune diseases, such as systemic sclerosis, mellitus diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases, and multiple sclerosis. In this review, we will focus on how CD146 and sCD146 contribute to the pathogenesis of the aforementioned autoimmune diseases and discuss the relevance of considering it as a biomarker in these pathologies.