Search

Aim: To describe the epidemiological and clinical data of impaired functional outcome secondary to anterior resection of the rectum and to identify the predictive factors of major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) Methods: This retrospective study considered patients operated on for rectal tumors in surgical department in our hospital, between January 1st,2009 and December 31st, 2021. The primary outcome measure was the development of a major LARS immediately or after stoma closure. In order to identify independent predictors of major LARS, patients were divided into two groups: the "Major LARS" group and the "No Major LARS" group, and then we carried out a descriptive study, followed by an analytical study with logistic regression., Results: We enrolled 42 patients operated for rectal tumor and had an anterior resection. Half of our patients developed LARS of which 14 developed major LARS. The median time to onset of LARS symptoms was 9 [2 -24] months. At the end of this study, 2 factors were retained: age (OR=2.48; CI95% [1.2- 5.10], p=0.012) and pT3T4 stage (OR=5.95; CI95% [1.07- 33.33], p=0.041) as independent predictive factors of a major LARS. Neoadjuvant therapy was also a risk factor for major LARS in our study with a statistically significant difference (p=0.025) between the two groups "Major LARS" and "No major LARS"., Conclusion: LARS should be appropriately considered in the management of rectal cancer. Based on our results and data from the literature, age and mesorectal invasion were found to be independent predictors of major LARS.

Cancer and/or major surgery are two factors that predispose to post-operative thrombosis. The annual incidence of venous thromboembolic disease (VTED) in cancer patients was estimated at 0.5%-20%. Surgery increases the risk of VTED by 29% in the absence of thromboprophylaxis. Enoxaparin is a low molecular weight heparin that is safe and effective. Branded Enoxaparin and biosimilar Enoxaparin are two enoxaparin treatments. This study aimed to compare Branded Enoxaparin with biosimilar Enoxaparin in patients operated on for digestive cancer regarding the prevention of postoperative thrombosis event, to compare the tolerance of the two treatments and to identify independent predictive factors of thromboembolic incident. A randomized controlled trial conducted in a single-centre, surgical department B of Charles Nicolle Hospital, over a 5-year period from October 12th, 2015, to July 08th, 2020. We included all patients over 18 who had cancer of the digestive tract newly diagnosed, operable and whatever its nature, site, or stage, operated on in emergency or elective surgery. The primary endpoint was any asymptomatic thromboembolic event, demonstrated by systematic US Doppler of the lower limbs on postoperative day 7 to day 10. The sonographer was unaware of the prescribed treatment (Branded Enoxaparin [BE] or biosimilar Enoxaparin [BSE]). Of one hundred sixty-eight enrolled patients, six patients (4.1%) had subclinical venous thrombosis. Among those who had subclinical thrombosis, four patients (5.6%) were in the Branded Enoxaparin group and two patients (2.7%) in the Biosimilar Enoxaparin group without statistically significant difference (p = 0.435). Analysis of the difference in means using Student's t test demonstrated the equivalence of the two treatments. Our study allowed us to conclude that there was no statistically significant difference between Branded Enoxaparin and Biosimilar Enoxaparin regarding the occurrence of thromboembolic accidents postoperatively. BE and BSE are equivalent. Trial registration. Trial registration: The trial was registered on CLINICALTRIALS.GOV under the number NCT02444572., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Dziri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Endogenous hyperinsulinism is an abnormal clinical condition that involves excessive insulin secretion, related in 55% of cases to insulinoma. Other causes are possible such as islet cell hyperplasia, nesidioblastosis or antibodies to insulin or to the insulin receptor. Differentiation between these diseases may be difficult despite the use of several morphological examinations. We report six patients operated on for endogenous hyperinsulinism from 1 st January 2000 to 31 st December 2015. Endogenous hyperinsulinism was caused by insulinoma in three cases, endocrine cells hyperplasia in two cases and no pathological lesions were found in the last case. All patients typically presented with adrenergic and neuroglycopenic symptoms with a low blood glucose level concomitant with high insulin and C-peptide levels. Computed tomography showed insulinoma in one case out of two. MRI was carried out four times and succeeded to locate the lesion in the two cases of insulinoma. Endoscopic ultrasound showed one insulinoma and provided false positive findings three times out of four. Intra operative ultrasound succeeded to localize the insulinoma in two cases but was false positive in two cases. Procedures were one duodenopancreatectomy, two left splenopancreatectomy and two enucleations. For the sixth case, no lesion was radiologically objectified. Hence, a left blind pancreatectomy was practised but the pathological examination showed normal pancreatic tissue. Our work showed that even if morphological examinations are suggestive of insulinoma, other causes of endogenous hyperinsulinism must be considered and therefore invasive explorations should be carried out., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

The prevalence of pancreatic cystic echinococcosis (PCE) in the world is low ranging between 0.2% and 0.6%. The diagnosis of PCE is easy when it is associated to other location such as liver, it became difficult when PCE was isolated simulating other diagnosis such as pseudocyst, a choledochal cyst, serous or mucinous cystadenoma and cystadenocarcinoma. This systematic review aimed to provide evidence-based answer to the following questions: (I) what are the efficient tools to affirm the diagnosis of isolated PCE and (II) what are the best therapeutic strategy for the PCE? An electronic search was performed by two authors (W Dougaz, I Bouasker). Medline, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Cochrane collaboration were consulted. The keywords used were "cyst", "echinococcosis", "hydatid cyst" and "pancreas". All abstracts were analyzed followed by extraction of the full text by the same two authors (W Dougaz, I Bouasker), all divergences were resolved by discussion with C Dziri. Recommendations were based on Oxford's classification: (I) what are the efficient tools to affirm the diagnosis of PCE? -ultrasound remains the cornerstone of diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reproduces the ultrasound defined features of CE better than computed tomography (CT). MRI with heavily T2-weighted series is preferable to CT. Pancreatic duct MRI should be promising to identify a fistula between PCE and pancreatic duct (level of evidence 3-recommendation B); (II) what are the best therapeutic strategy for the PCE? -surgery is the main treatment of PCE. Open approach is validated. The decision depends of the location of PCE: head versus body and/or tail of the pancreas (level of evidence 5-recommendation D): for the head of the pancreas, the tendency is toward conservative surgery. For body and/or tail of the pancreas, the tendency is toward radical surgery. Medical treatment (albendazole) should be prescribed 1 week before surgery and 2 months during postoperative period (level II evidence and grade C recommendation)., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.