Search

Perioperative bleeding is a determinant of poor outcome in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), but there is a lack of adequate stratification of its severity. The ability of the European registry of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (E-CABG), Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding (UDPB), Study of Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO), Clopidogrel and Aspirin Optimal Dose Usage to Reduce Recurrent,Events Seventh Organization to Assess Strategies in Ischemic Syndromes (CURRENT-OASIS 7), Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q Wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE), and SafeTy and Efficacy of Enoxaparin in Percutaneous coronary intervention patients, an internationaL randomized Evaluation (STEEPLE) bleeding classifications to predict early mortality, stroke, acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 3, and deep sternal wound infection/mediastinitis was investigated in 3,730.patients from the prospective, multicentre E-CABG registry. Increasing grades of the E-CABG, UDPB, PLATO, and CURRENT-OASIS 7 classifications were associated with increasing risks of early mortality, had similar receiver-operating characteristic area under the curves (>0.7), and were predictive also when adjusted for EuroSCORE II. The E-CABG and UDPB classifications had satisfactory area under the curves (>0.6) in pre,dicting stroke, AKI stage 3, and deep sternal wound infection/mediastinitis even when adjusted for EuroSCORE II. The PLATO and CURRENT-OASIS 7 classifications had similar predictive ability for stroke and AKI stage 3 as confirmed by multivariate analysis adjusted for EuroSCORE II but showed inferior ability in predicting severe wound infection compared to the E-CABG and UDPB classifications. The STEEPLE and ESSENCE classifications had a poor ability of predicting all these adverse events. Decision curve analysis showed a benefit of the ECABG bleeding classification over the other classifications in predicting all adverse events. In conclusion, the E-CABG, UDPB, PLATO, and CURRENT-OASIS 7 bleeding classifications have a satisfactory ability in predicting adverse events after CABG. Decision curve analysis showed that the E-CABG bleeding classification had the best predictive performance. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

International audience; INTRODUCTION: This study was planned to investigate the impact of severe bleeding and blood transfusion on the development of stroke after coronary surgery.METHODS: This cohort study includes 2357 patients undergoing isolated CABG from the prospective European Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (E-CABG) registry. Severity of bleeding was categorized according to the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding (UDPB), E-CABG and PLATO definitions.RESULTS: Thirty patients (1.3%) suffered postoperative stroke. The amount of transfused red blood cell (RBC) (OR 1.10, 95%CI 1.03-1.18), preoperative use of unfractioned heparin (OR 4.49, 95%CI 1.91-10.60), emergency operation (OR 3.97, 95%CI 1.47-10.74), diseased ascending aorta (OR 4.62, 95%CI 1.37-15.65) and use of cardiopulmonary bypass (p = 0.043, OR 4.85, 95%CI 1.05-22.36) were independent predictors of postoperative stroke. Adjusted analysis showed that UDPB classes 3-4 (crude rate: 3.6% vs. 1.0%; adjusted OR 2.66, 95%CI 1.05-6.73), E-CABG bleeding grades 2-3 (crudes rate: 6.3% vs. 0.9%; adjusted OR 5.91, 95%CI 2.43-14.36), and PLATO life-threatening bleeding (crude rate: 2.5% vs. 0.6%, adjusted OR 3.70, 95%CI 1.59-8.64) were associated with an increased risk of stroke compared with no or moderate bleeding.CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding and blood transfusion are associated with an increased risk of stroke after CABG, which is highest in patients with severe bleeding.

The optimal timing of discontinuation of ticagrelor before cardiac surgery is controversial. Importance: The optimal timing of discontinuation of ticagrelor before cardiac surgery is controversial.Objective: To evaluate the safety of preoperative use of ticagrelor with or without aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared with aspirin alone.Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, multicenter clinical trial was performed at 15 European centers of cardiac surgery. Participants were patients with ACS undergoing isolated CABG from the European Multicenter Study on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (E-CABG) registry between January and September 2015.Exposures: Before surgery, patients received ticagrelor with or without aspirin or aspirin alone.Main Outcomes and Measures: Severe bleeding as defined by the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding (UDPB) and E-CABG bleeding classification criteria. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to adjust for differences in baseline and operative covariates.Results: Of 2482 patients from the E-CABG registry, the study cohort included 786 (31.7%) consecutive patients with ACS (mean [SD] age, 67.1 [9.3] years; range, 32-88 years), and 132 (16.8%) were female. One-to-one propensity score matching provided 215 pairs, whose baseline and operative covariates had a standardized difference of less than 10%. Preoperative use of ticagrelor was associated with a similar risk of bleeding according to the UDPB and E-CABG bleeding classifications, but the incidence of platelet transfusion was higher in the ticagrelor group (13.5% [29 of 215] vs 6.0% [13 of 215]). Compared with those receiving aspirin alone, continuing ticagrelor up to the time of surgery or discontinuing its use less than 2 days before surgery was associated with a higher risk of platelet transfusion (22.7% [5 of 22] vs 6.4% [12 of 187]) and E-CABG bleeding grades 2 and 3 (18.2% [4 of 22] vs 5.9% [11 of 187]) and tended to have an increased risk of UDPB grades 3 and 4 (22.7% [5 of 22] vs 9.6% [18 of 187]). Among patients in whom antiplatelet drug use was discontinued at least 2 days before surgery, the incidence of platelet transfusion was 12.4% (24 of 193) in the ticagrelor group and 3.6% (1 of 28) in the aspirin-alone group.Conclusions and Relevance: In propensity score-matched analyses among patients with ACS undergoing CABG, the use of preoperative ticagrelor with or without aspirin compared with aspirin alone was associated with more platelet transfusion but similar degree of bleeding; in patients receiving ticagrelor 1 day before or up until surgery, there was an increased rate of severe bleeding.

Objective: The authors aimed to validate the European Multicenter Study on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (E-CABG) classification of postoperative Complications in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).Design: Retrospective, observational study.Setting: University hospital.Participants: A total of 2,764 patients with severe coronary artery disease. Complete baseline, operative, and postoperative data were available for patients who underwent isolated CABG.Interventions: Isolated CABG.Measurements and Main Results: The E-CABG complication classification was used to stratify the severity and prognostic impact of adverse postoperative events. Primary outcome endpoints were 30-day, 90-day, and long-term all cause mortality. The secondary outcome endpoints was the length of intensive care unit stay. Both the E-CABG complication grades and additive score were predictive of 30-day (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.866, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.829-0.903; and 0.876; 95% CI 0.844-0.908, respectively) and 90-day (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.850, 95% CI 0.812-0.887; and 0.863, 95% CI 0.829-0.897, respectively) all-cause mortality. The complication grades were independent predictors of increased mortality at actuarial (log-rank: p < 0.0001) and adjusted analysis (p < 0.0001; grade 1: hazard ratio [HR] 1.757, 95% CI 1.111-2.778; grade 2: HR 2.704, 95% CI 1.664-4.394; grade 3: HR 5.081, 95% CI 3.148-8.201). When patients who died within 30 days were excluded from the analysis, this grading method still was associated with late mortality (p < 0.0001). The grading method (p < 0.0001) and the additive score (rho, 0.514; p < 0.0001) were predictive of the length of intensive care unit stay.Conclusions: The E-CABG postoperative complication classification seems to be a promising tool for stratifying the severity and prognostic impact of postoperative complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

International audience; BACKGROUND: Clinical evidence in coronary surgery is usually derived from retrospective, single institutional series. This may introduce significant biases in the analysis of critical issues in the treatment of these patients. In order to avoid such methodological limitations, we planned a European multicenter, prospective study on coronary artery bypass grafting, the E-CABG registry. DESIGN: The E-CABG registry is a multicenter study and its data are prospectively collected from 13 centers of cardiac surgery in university and community hospitals located in six European countries (England, Italy, Finland, France, Germany, Sweden). Data on major and minor immediate postoperative adverse events will be collected. Data on late all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization will be collected during a 10-year follow-up period. These investigators provided a score from 0 to 10 for any major postoperative adverse events and their rounded medians were used to stratify the severity of these complications in four grades. The sum of these scores for each complication/intervention occurring after coronary artery bypass grafting will be used as an additive score for further stratification of the prognostic importance of these events. DISCUSSION: The E-CABG registry is expected to provide valuable data for identification of risk factors and treatment strategies associated with suboptimal outcome. These information may improve the safety and durability of coronary artery bypass grafting. The proposed classification of postoperative complications may become a valuable research tool to stratify the impact of such complications on the outcome of these patients and evaluate the burden of resources needed for their treatment. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: NCT02319083