Search

* Context.--A relevant portion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients develop severe disease with negative outcomes. Several biomarkers have been proposed to predict COVID-19 severity, but no definite interpretative criteria have been established to date for stratifying risk. Objective.--To evaluate 6 serum biomarkers (C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, D-dimer, albumin, ferritin, and cardiac troponin T) for predicting COVID-19 severity and to define related cutoffs able to aid clinicians in risk stratification of hospitalized patients. Design.--A retrospective study of 427 COVID-19 patients was performed. Patients were divided into groups based on their clinical outcome: nonsurvivors versus survivors and patients admitted to an intensive care unit versus others. Receiver operating characteristic curves and likelihood ratios were employed to define predictive cutoffs for evaluated markers. Results.--Marker concentrations at peak were significantly different between groups for both selected outcomes. At univariate logistic regression analysis, all parameters were significantly associated with higher odds of death and intensive care. At the multivariate analysis, high concentrations of lactate dehydrogenase and low concentrations of albumin in serum remained significantly associated with higher odds of death, whereas only low lactate dehydrogenase activities remained associated with lower odds of intensive care admission. The best cutoffs for death prediction were greater than 731 U/L for lactate dehydrogenase and 18 g/L or lower for albumin, whereas a lactate dehydrogenase activity lower than 425 U/L was associated with a negative likelihood ratio of 0.10 for intensive treatment. Conclusions.--Our study identifies which biochemistry tests represent major predictors of COVID-19 severity and defines the best cutoffs for their use. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0389-SA, At the end of 2019, an outbreak of atypical pneumonia of unknown cause was detected in Wuhan, the capital of the province of Hubei, China. (1) The etiologic agent of [...]

It is unclear if mild-to-moderate dehydration independently affects mood without confounders like heat exposure or exercise. This study examined the acute effect of cellular dehydration on mood. Forty-nine adults (55 % female, age 39 (sd 8) years) were assigned to counterbalanced, crossover trials. Intracellular dehydration was induced with 2-h (0·1 ml/kg per min) 3 % hypertonic saline (HYPER) infusion or 0·9 % isotonic saline (ISO) as a control. Plasma osmolality increased in HYPER (pre 285 (sd 3), post 305 (sd 4) mmol/kg; P < 0·05) but remained unchanged in ISO (pre 285 (sd 3), post 288 (sd 3) mmol/kg; P > 0·05). Mood was assessed with the short version of the Profile of Mood States Questionnaire (POMS). The POMS sub-scale (confusion-bewilderment, depression-dejection, fatigue-inertia) increased in HYPER compared with ISO (P < 0·05). Total mood disturbance score (TMD) assessed by POMS increased from 10·3 (sd 0·9) to 16·6 (sd 1·7) in HYPER (P < 0·01), but not in ISO (P > 0·05). When TMD was stratified by sex, the increase in the HYPER trial was significant in females (P < 0·01) but not in males (P > 0·05). Following infusion, thirst and copeptin (surrogate for vasopressin) were also higher in females than in males (21·3 (sd 2·0), 14·1 (sd 1·4) pmol/l; P < 0·01) during HYPER. In conclusion, cellular dehydration acutely degraded specific aspects of mood mainly in women. The mechanisms underlying sex differences may be related to elevated thirst and vasopressin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Junglee NA, Di Felice U, Dolci A, Fortes MB, Jibani MM, Lemmey AB, Walsh NP, Macdonald JH. Exercising in a hot environment with muscle damage: effects on acute kidney injury biomarkers and kidney function. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 305: F813-F820, 2013. First published July 3, 2013; doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00091.2013.--Unaccustomed strenuous physical exertion in hot environments can result in heat stroke and acute kidney injury (AKI). Both exercise-induced muscle damage and AKI are associated with the release of interleukin- 6, but whether muscle damage causes AKI in the heat is unknown. We hypothesized that muscle-damaging exercise, before exercise in the heat, would increase kidney stress. Ten healthy euhydrated men underwent a randomized, crossover trial involving both a 60-min downhill muscle-damaging run (exercise-induced muscle damage; EIMD), and an exercise intensity-matched non-muscle-damaging flat run (CON), in random order separated by 2 wk. Both treatments were followed by heat stress elicited by a 40-min run at 33°C. Urine and blood were sampled at baseline, after treatment, and after subjects ran in the heat. By design, EIMD induced higher plasma creatine kinase and interleukin-6 than CON. EIMD elevated kidney injury biomarkers (e.g., urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) after a run in the heat: EIMD-CON, mean difference [95% CI]: 12 [5, 19] ng/ml) and reduced kidney function (e.g., plasma creatinine after a run in the heat: EIMD-CON, mean difference [95% CI]: 0.2 [0.1, 0.3] mg/dl), where CI is the confidence interval. Plasma interleukin-6 was positively correlated with plasma NGAL (r 0.9, P 0.001). Moreover, following EIMD, 5 of 10 participants met AKIN criteria for AKI. Thus for the first time we demonstrate that muscle-damaging exercise before running in the heat results in a greater inflammatory state and kidney stress compared with non-muscle-damaging exercise. Muscle damage should therefore be considered a risk factor for AKI when performing exercise in hot environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The water content of ingested beverages enters the body water pool at a rate dictated by the rates of gastric emptying and intestinal absorption. Water is subsequently lost from the body by various routes, primarily urine in the absence of sweating. The post-ingestion diuretic response following prior hypohydration is influenced by several characteristics of the drink, including primarily volume, energy density, electrolyte content, and the presence of diuretic agents. Objective: This study investigated the effects of 13 different commonly-consumed drinks on urine output and fluid balance when ingested in a euhydrated state, with a view to establishing a Hydration Index (HI; i.e. volume of urine produced after drinking expressed relative to a standard treatment [still water]). Design: Each subject (n = 72, euhydrated and fasted males) ingested 1 L of still water or one of three other commercially- available beverages over a period of 30 minutes. Urine output was then collected for the subsequent 4 h. HI was corrected for water content of drinks and was calculated as the amount of water retained at 2 h after ingestion, relative to that observed following ingestion of still water. Results: Total urine masses (mean (SD)) over 4 h were smaller than the still water control (1337(330) g) after oral rehydration solution (ORS, 1038(333) g, P=0.004), full-fat milk (1052(267) g, P=0.006) and skimmed milk (1049(334) g, P=0.005). Cumulative urine output at 4h after ingestion of cola, diet cola, tea, cold tea, coffee, lager, orange juice, sparkling water and a sports drink were not different from the response to water ingestion. The mean HI at 2 h was 1.53(0.74) for ORS, 1.32(0.51) for full-fat milk, and 1.44(0.54) for skimmed milk. Conclusions: An HI may be a useful measure to identify the short-term hydration potential of different beverages when ingested in a euhydrated state. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of procalcitonin (PCT) as a tool to assist clinicians in using antibiotics in intensive care patients has been postulated. Here we evaluate the efficacy of procalcitonin determination in helping clinicians in the decision to start or discontinue an antibiotic treatment in patients admitted to infectious disease wards. A retrospective observational single centre study was conducted in two infectious disease wards. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was carried out and receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC) were used to assess the accuracy of PCT and C-reactive protein (CRP) in separating patients undergoing antibiotic treatment or otherwise. In all, 164 patients were analysed of whom 99 (60.4%) were not on antibiotic treatment at the time of PCT determination, whereas 65 (39.6%) took antibiotics. Regarding the accuracy of PCT and CRP in determining a subsequent antibiotic prescription in patients without an ongoing antibiotic treatment, no statistically significant difference between the two markers was detected [AUC, 0.75; confidence interval (CI) 95%: 0.66-0.84; vs 0.69; CI 95%: 0.59-0.79 for PCT and CRP, respectively; p=0.32]. Conversely, in patients with an ongoing antibiotic treatment a statistically significant difference between PCT and CRP AUC in their ability to determine an antibiotic interruption was observed [0.77 (CI 95%: 0.65-0.89) vs 0.59 (CI 95%: 0.45-0.73) (p=0.03)]. PCT determination appeared to be more helpful than CRP in determining discontinuation of an antibiotic treatment in non-intensive care patients. However, PCT should supplement and not supplant a careful clinical evaluation.