Search

Background: In the long QT syndrome (LQTS) the clinical efficacy of beta-blocker treatment differs according to the genotype. We aimed to asses the effect of beta-blocker treatment in LQT1 and LQT2 patients. Patients and methods: 24-hour Holter ECG were recorded before and after beta-blocking therapy initiation in genotyped LQT1 (n=30, 8 males, mean age 21±17) and LQT2 patients (n=16, 8 males, mean age 19±15). QT duration was measured on consecutive 1-minute averaged QRS-T complexes leading to up to 1440 QT-RR pairs for each recording. Then, we computed subject- and condition-specific log/log QT/RR relationships which were used to calculate QT interval duration at RR=1000ms (QT1000=1000*). Results: Before treatment, coefficients were higher in LQT2 than in LQT1 patients (0.53±0.10 vs. 0.40±0.11, p<0.001) and QT1000 was longer in LQT2 than in LQT1 patients (521±38 vs. 481±39ms, p<0.01). Beta-blockers significantly prolonged the mean RR interval (RR = 827 ± 161 ms before treatment and 939±197ms on beta-blocker, p<0.0001). The coefficients were not significantly modified by beta-blockers (0.41±0.9 in LQT1 patients and 0.52±0.12 LQT2 patients). Beta-blocker treatment was associated with a prolongation of the QT1000 interval (from 481±39 to 498±43ms, p<0.01) in LQT1 patients but with a shortening in LQT2 patients (from 521±38 to 503±32ms, p<0.01). Conclusions: Our results confirm the elevated coefficient of the QT/RR relationship in LQTS patients. LQT2 patients showed higher coefficient and longer QT1000 when compared to LQT1 patients. The effect of beta-adrenergic blockade on QT1000 duration was gene-specific. Given the demonstrated efficacy of beta-blockers in LQT1 and 2 patients, our data suggest that QT1000 might be a poor predictor of outcome under anti-adrenergic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the long QT syndrome (LQTS) the effects of beta-blocker treatment on prevention of cardiac events differs according to the genotype. We aimed to assess the effect of beta-blocker treatment on QT/QTc duration in Type 1 LQTS (LQT1) and Type 2 LQTS (LQT2) patients., Methods: 24-hour digital Holter ECG were recorded before and after beta-blocking therapy initiation in LQT1 (n = 30) and LQT2 patients (n = 16). QT duration was measured on consecutive 1-minute averaged QRS-T complexes leading to up to 1440 edited QT-RR pairs for each recording. We computed subject- and treatment-specific log/log QT/RR relationships which were used to correct the QT intervals. The QT duration was also evaluated at predefined heart rates and after correction using Bazett and Fridericia coefficients., Results: At baseline, individual QT/RR coefficients were higher in LQT2 than in LQT1 patients (0.53 ± 0.10 vs. 0.40 ± 0.11, P < 0.001) and QT1000 was longer in LQT2 than in LQT1 patients (521 ± 38 vs. 481 ± 39 ms, P < 0.01). Beta-blockers significantly prolonged the mean RR interval (from 827 ± 161 to 939 ± 197 ms, P < 0.0001). The individual QT/RR coefficients were not significantly modified by beta-blockers. Beta-blocker treatment was associated with a prolongation of the QT1000 interval (from 481 ± 39 to 498 ± 43 ms, P < 0.01) in LQT1 patients but with a shortening in LQT2 patients (from 521 ± 38 to 503 ± 32 ms, P < 0.01)., Conclusions: The effect of beta-adrenergic blockade on QTc duration is different in LQT1 and LQT2 patients. Our data suggest that, in LQT1 patients, the well-known positive effect of beta-blockade might be associated with a prolongation of QTc duration. The mechanisms of beta-blockade protection may be different in LQT1 and in LQT2 patients., (©2013, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)