1. Ontological and Temporal Complications of the Social Sciences' Approach to the Intersubjectivity in the IR Field: The Example of Constructivism and Phenomenology's Proposal.
- Author
-
Ozigci, Yunus Emre
- Subjects
SOCIAL sciences ,INTERSUBJECTIVITY ,CONSTRUCTIVISM (Philosophy) ,ONTOLOGY ,PHILOSOPHY - Abstract
As international relations are directly related to societies and social/sociopsychological dynamics, the main axes of the IR theorising refer to social sciences to the point of making the IR studies a branch of them. However, they also differ fundamentally from them since they constitute a purely intersubjective field, including their "actors". Social sciences, while also operating in intersubjectivity, have their independently present and accessible actors, therefore a certain anchor in the objectivity. Social sciences theorise and build explicative narratives of genetic nature for phenomena and events, which are independently assessable on that ontological ground. The IR theorising, by importing social sciences' theoretical grounds and genetic approaches into their purely intersubjective sphere without being validly able to produce a similar anchor, bring serious ontological and temporal complications into their study of IR phenomena and events. These complications are amplified by a particular branch of the IR theorising, the constructivism, as it also theorises-thereforenarrates the IR intersubjectivity itself on social sciences' grounds and through their genetic approach, which are exogenous to IR. On the other hand, the IR phenomena and events may be studied in their pre-theoretical, immediate, postgenetic, intersubjective appearance/givenness on their own ontological and temporal grounds. Phenomenology, with contributions from the phenomenological ontology, already provides such an attempt with fundamental notions and tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF