Ma Y, Mora Pinzon MC, Buckingham WR, Bersch AJ, Powell WR, LeCaire TJ, Ennis GE, Deming Y, Jonaitis EM, Chin NA, Clark LR, Edwards DF, Walaszek A, Okonkwo OC, Zuelsdorff M, Chappell RJ, Johnson SC, Asthana S, Gleason CE, Kind AJ, Bendlin BB, and Carlsson CM
Introduction: Understanding how a research sample compares to the population from which it is drawn can help inform future recruitment planning. We compared the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (WADRC) participant sample to the Wisconsin state population (WI-pop) on key demographic, social exposome, and vascular risk measures., Methods: The WADRC sample included 930 participants. Population statistics were estimated using several national and state data sources. We compared WADRC to WI-pop for two age groups, 45-64 years and ≥65 years, separately., Results: Compared to WI-pop, WADRC participants were older and included more women, more Black and American Indian individuals, and fewer Hispanic and Asian individuals. WADRC participants had higher levels of educational attainment, consisted of smaller proportions living in rural areas and disadvantaged neighborhoods, and showed lower vascular risks. Greater differences between WADRC and WI-pop were found for most metrics in the ≥65 group compared to the 45-64 group., Discussion: The findings revealed opportunities to increase enrollment from the Hispanic/Latino and Asian American populations, to include participants from a broader range of educational backgrounds, and to enroll more residents from rural areas and disadvantaged neighborhoods, which may lead to a broader distribution of cardiovascular risk factors. Expanding sociodemographic and health profiles represented in the participant candidate pool for study selection and including those who are underrepresented in research may potentially reduce selection bias but not eliminate it. Statistical approaches can be applied to address bias and generalize findings from a study sample to its target population by adjusting for their differences in the joint distribution of covariates. Although research centers have different regional populations and specific recruitment focuses for scientific reasons, evaluating their participant characteristics may help plan engagement efforts to improve the inclusion of underrepresented groups and collaboratively support generalizable research nationwide., Highlights: We compared the characteristics of Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (WADRC) participants with the Wisconsin population.Metrics of comparison included demographics, social exposomes, and vascular risks.WADRC participants are different from the Wisconsin population.We explored the implications and causes of the differences.We discussed strategies for engaging and recruiting underrepresented groups., Competing Interests: Drs. Yue Ma, W. Ryan Powell, Yuetiva Deming, Lindsay Clark, and Dorothy Edwards receive grant support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr. Maria Mora Pinzon receives grant support from the National Institute on Aging (NIA) R00AG076966, and the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center P30‐AG062715. She also serves on an advisory board for the Rand Corporation, and as consultant for education and research initiatives for the American College of Preventive Medicine and Arizona State University. Dr. Tamara LeCaire received grant support from the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Wisconsin Partnership Program (WPP). Dr. Erin Jonaitis receives grant support from the NIH. She also serves on the Data Safety Monitoring Board for a grant funded by the NIA K01AG073587. Dr. Nathaniel Chin consulted for NewAmsterdam and serves as a volunteer member of the Medical and Science Board of the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Association and the Alzheimer's ‘s Foundation of America. Dr. Art Walaszek has received grant support from the NIH and the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health WPP. He also receives royalties from American Psychiatric Association Publishing for his books, Behavioral & Psychological Symptoms of Dementia and Late‐Life Depression & Anxiety. Dr. Ozioma Okonkwo receives grant support from the NIH. He also serves as the treasurer for the International Neuropsychological Society. Dr. Sterling Johnson receives grant support from the NIH. He also serves as a consultant for Enigma Biomedical and Alzpath. Dr. Sanjay Asthana receives grant support from the NIH. He also receives royalty as an editor of a textbook entitled, Hazzard's Geriatrics and Gerontology; McGraw Hill, Publisher. Dr. Carey Gleason receives grant support from the NIH. She also serves on the advisory boards for the ACE Trial, the Standard University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, and University of New Mexico. Dr. Amy Kind receives grant support from the NIH. She has also received travel fund from the Alzheimer's Association. Dr. Babara Bendlin has served on scientific advisory boards and/or as a consultant for Weston Family Foundation, New Amsterdam, Cognito Therapeutics, and Merry Life Biomedical. She has received support from the NIA (R01AG062285, P30AG062715, R01AG037639, R01AG054059, RF1AG057784, R01AG070973, R01AG070883, and R01AG059312). Dr. Cynthia Carlsson receives grant support from the NIH, Department of Veterans Affairs, NIH/Lilly, NIH/Eisai, NIH/Cognition Therapeutics, and research medication support from Amarin Corporation. Andrew Bersch, Drs. William Buckingham, Gilda Ennis, Megan Zuelsdorff, and Richard Chappell, declare no conflicts of interest. Author disclosures are available in the Supporting Information., (© 2025 The Author(s). Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)