10 results on '"Callizo-Romero, Carmen"'
Search Results
2. Does time extend asymmetrically towards the past and the future? Across-cultural study
- Author
-
Callizo-Romero, Carmen, Tutnjevi, Slavica, Pandza, Maja, Ouellet, Marc, Kranjec, Alexander, Ili, Sladjana, Gu, Yan, Gksun, Tilbe, Chahboun, Sobh, Casasanto, Daniel, and Santiago, Julio
- Abstract
Is the human representation of time symmetrical or asymmetrical toward the past and the future? Some studies suggestthat we perceive the future as being closer, more attended and more valued than the past (indicating a future asymmetry).By contrast, asymmetries toward the past have been found in past-focused cultures. Yet, available evidence is still limitedand mixed. In the present work we searched for asymmetry in several temporal tasks (temporal distance, time discounting,temporal depth, and self-continuity) in a set of cultures that vary widely in their temporal focus (American, Spanish,Turkish, Chinese, Moroccan, Serbian, Bosniak and Croatian; total N=1075). The results supported an overall asymmetrytoward the future in all tasks, although it failed to be significant in most cultures when considered on their own. However,only self-continuity showed variations that can be explained by the contrast between past-focused versus future-focusedcultures.
- Published
- 2020
3. Time conceptualization across cultures and religions
- Author
-
Callizo Romero, Carmen, Santiago De Torres, Julio Ramón, and Universidad de Granada. Programa de Doctorado en Psicología
- Abstract
In the present doctoral dissertation we examined, through six empirical studies, how people from different cultures (American, Spanish, Serbian, Bosniak, Croatian, Moroccan, Turkish, and Chinese) and religions or religious attitudes (mainly Christian, Muslim, and non-believers) think about time. In particular, we studied the role of temporal focus (i.e., attention paid to the past versus the future) and religiosity —factors that vary cross-culturally— on five dimensions of temporal thought: where we place the past and future, whether in front or behind (spatialization); the distance we perceive to past and future events; the similarity of our current self to our past- and future- self (selfcontinuity); the economic valuation of past and future events (discounting); and how far we place the horizon when contemplating the past and future (depth)., En la presente tesis doctoral examinamos, a través de seis estudios empíricos, cómo las personas de diferentes culturas (estadounidenses, españoles, serbios, bosniacos, croatas, marroquíes, turcos y chinos) y religiones o actitudes religiosas (principalmente cristianos, musulmanes, agnósticos y ateos) piensan sobre el tiempo. En particular, estudiamos el rol del foco temporal (es decir, la atención prestada al pasado y al futuro) y la religiosidad — factores que varían interculturalmente— sobre cinco dimensiones del pensamiento temporal: dónde situamos el pasado y el futuro, si delante o detrás (espacialización); la distancia que percibimos hacia eventos pasados y futuros; la similaridad de nuestro yo actual con el yo pasado y futuro (auto-continuidad); la valoración económica de eventos pasados y futuros (descuento); y cuán lejos situamos el horizonte al contemplar el pasado y el futuro (profundidad)., Tesis Univ. Granada.
- Published
- 2023
4. Does time extend asymmetrically into the past and the future? a multitask crosscultural study
- Author
-
Göksun, Tilbe (ORCID 0000-0002-0190-7988 & YÖK ID 47278), Callizo-Romero, Carmen; Tutnjevic, Slavica; Pandza, Maja; Ouellet, Marc; Kranjec, Alexander; Ilic, Sladjana; Gu, Yan; Chahboun, Sobh; Casasanto, Daniel; Santiago, Julio, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Department of Psychology, Göksun, Tilbe (ORCID 0000-0002-0190-7988 & YÖK ID 47278), Callizo-Romero, Carmen; Tutnjevic, Slavica; Pandza, Maja; Ouellet, Marc; Kranjec, Alexander; Ilic, Sladjana; Gu, Yan; Chahboun, Sobh; Casasanto, Daniel; Santiago, Julio, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, and Department of Psychology
- Abstract
Does temporal thought extend asymmetrically into the past and the future? Do asymmetries depend on cultural differences in temporal focus? Some studies suggest that people in Western (arguably future-focused) cultures perceive the future as being closer, more valued, and deeper than the past (a future asymmetry), while the opposite is shown in East Asian (arguably past-focused) cultures. The proposed explanations of these findings predict a negative relationship between past and future: the more we delve into the future, the less we delve into the past. Here, we report findings that pose a significant challenge to this view. We presented several tasks previously used to measure temporal asymmetry (self-continuity, time discounting, temporal distance, and temporal depth) and two measures of temporal focus to American, Spanish, Serbian, Bosniak, Croatian, Moroccan, Turkish, and Chinese participants (total N = 1,075). There was an overall future asymmetry in all tasks except for temporal distance, but the asymmetry only varied with cultural temporal focus in time discounting. Past and future held a positive (instead of negative) relation in the mind: the more we delve into the future, the more we delve into the past. Finally, the findings suggest that temporal thought has a complex underlying structure., Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity; Predoctoral Contract
- Published
- 2022
5. Temporal focus and time spatialization across cultures
- Author
-
Göksun, Tilbe (ORCID 0000-0002-0190-7988 & YÖK ID 47278), Callizo-Romero, Carmen; Tutnjevic, Slavica; Pandza, Maja; Ouellet, Marc; Kranjec, Alexander; Ilic, Sladjana; Gu, Yan; Chahboun, Sobh; Casasanto, Daniel; Santiago, Julio, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Department of Psychology, Göksun, Tilbe (ORCID 0000-0002-0190-7988 & YÖK ID 47278), Callizo-Romero, Carmen; Tutnjevic, Slavica; Pandza, Maja; Ouellet, Marc; Kranjec, Alexander; Ilic, Sladjana; Gu, Yan; Chahboun, Sobh; Casasanto, Daniel; Santiago, Julio, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, and Department of Psychology
- Abstract
The temporal focus hypothesis (TFH) proposes that whether the past or the future is conceptualized as being located in front depends on temporal focus: the balance of attention paid to the past (tradition) and the future (progress). How general is the TFH, and to what extent can cultures and subcultures be placed on a single line relating time spatialization and temporal focus in spite of stark differences in language, religion, history, and economic development? Data from 10 Western (sub)cultural groups (N= 1198,) were used to derive a linear model relating aggregated temporal focus and proportion of future-in-front responses. This model then successfully fitted 10 independently collected (sub)cultural groups in China and Vietnam (N= 899). Further analysis of the whole data set (N= 2,097) showed that the group-level relation arose at the individual level and allowed precise quantification of its influence. Finally, in an effort to apply the model to all relevant published data sets, we included recent data from Britain and South Africa: The former, but not the latter, fitted the model well. Temporal focus is a central factor that shapes how people around the world think of time in spatial terms., Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity
- Published
- 2020
6. GUTIÉRREZ LOMBARDO, Raúl y SANMARTÍN ESPLUGUES, José (Eds.) (2014): La filosofía desde la ciencia. México: Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano
- Author
-
Callizo Romero, Carmen María
- Subjects
1(05) ,Reseñas bibliográficas - Published
- 2019
7. GUTIÉRREZ LOMBARDO, Raúl y SANMARTÍN ESPLUGUES, José (Eds.) (2014): La filosofía desde la ciencia. México: Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano
- Author
-
Callizo Romero, Carmen María, primary
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. La filosofía desde la ciencia.
- Author
-
Callizo Romero, Carmen María
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Does time extend asymmetrically into the past and the future? A multitask crosscultural study
- Author
-
Carmen Callizo-Romero, Slavica Tutnjević, Maja Pandza, Marc Ouellet, Alexander Kranjec, Sladjana Ilić, Yan Gu, Tilbe Göksun, Sobh Chahboun, Daniel Casasanto, Julio Santiago, Göksun, Tilbe (ORCID 0000-0002-0190-7988 & YÖK ID 47278), Callizo-Romero, Carmen, Tutnjevic, Slavica, Pandza, Maja, Ouellet, Marc, Kranjec, Alexander, Ilic, Sladjana, Gu, Yan, Chahboun, Sobh, Casasanto, Daniel, Santiago, Julio, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, and Department of Psychology
- Subjects
time discounting ,Linguistics and Language ,temporal distance ,temporal focus ,Cross-cultural studies ,temporal depth ,Self-continuity ,Temporal asymmetry ,Temporal depth ,Temporal distance ,Time discounting ,Temporal focus ,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology ,temporal asymmetry ,Linguistics ,Language and linguistics ,Psychology, experimental ,cross-cultural studies ,self-continuity ,Language and Linguistics - Abstract
Does temporal thought extend asymmetrically into the past and the future? Do asymmetries depend on cultural differences in temporal focus? Some studies suggest that people in Western (arguably future-focused) cultures perceive the future as being closer, more valued, and deeper than the past (a future asymmetry), while the opposite is shown in East Asian (arguably past-focused) cultures. The proposed explanations of these findings predict a negative relationship between past and future: the more we delve into the future, the less we delve into the past. Here, we report findings that pose a significant challenge to this view. We presented several tasks previously used to measure temporal asymmetry (self-continuity, time discounting, temporal distance, and temporal depth) and two measures of temporal focus to American, Spanish, Serbian, Bosniak, Croatian, Moroccan, Turkish, and Chinese participants (total N = 1,075). There was an overall future asymmetry in all tasks except for temporal distance, but the asymmetry only varied with cultural temporal focus in time discounting. Past and future held a positive (instead of negative) relation in the mind: the more we delve into the future, the more we delve into the past. Finally, the findings suggest that temporal thought has a complex underlying structure., Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity; Predoctoral Contract
- Published
- 2022
10. TEMPORAL FOCUS AND TIME SPATIALIZATION ACROSS CULTURES
- Author
-
Sobh Chahboun, Maja Pandza, Alexander Kranjec, Sladjana Ilic, Daniel Casasanto, Carmen Callizo-Romero, Tilbe Göksun, Slavica Tutnjević, Yan Gu, Julio Santiago, Marc Ouellet, Göksun, Tilbe (ORCID 0000-0002-0190-7988 & YÖK ID 47278), Callizo-Romero, Carmen, Tutnjevic, Slavica, Pandza, Maja, Ouellet, Marc, Kranjec, Alexander, Ilic, Sladjana, Gu, Yan, Chahboun, Sobh, Casasanto, Daniel, Santiago, Julio, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, and Department of Psychology
- Subjects
Adult ,Relation (database) ,Concept Formation ,Culture ,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology ,Space (commercial competition) ,temporal focus hypothesis ,cross-cultural ,individual and group level ,050105 experimental psychology ,Time ,Cross-cultural differences ,Space ,Temporal focus ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) ,Developmental and Educational Psychology ,Regional science ,Psychology ,Humans ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Focus (computing) ,05 social sciences ,Cultural group selection ,Linear model ,Spatialization ,Data set ,Space Perception ,Spite ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
The temporal focus hypothesis (TFH) proposes that whether the past or the future is conceptualized as being located in front depends on temporal focus: the balance of attention paid to the past (tradition) and the future (progress). How general is the TFH, and to what extent can cultures and subcultures be placed on a single line relating time spatialization and temporal focus in spite of stark differences in language, religion, history, and economic development? Data from 10 Western (sub)cultural groups (N= 1198,) were used to derive a linear model relating aggregated temporal focus and proportion of future-in-front responses. This model then successfully fitted 10 independently collected (sub)cultural groups in China and Vietnam (N= 899). Further analysis of the whole data set (N= 2,097) showed that the group-level relation arose at the individual level and allowed precise quantification of its influence. Finally, in an effort to apply the model to all relevant published data sets, we included recent data from Britain and South Africa: The former, but not the latter, fitted the model well. Temporal focus is a central factor that shapes how people around the world think of time in spatial terms., Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.