Search

Background: The characteristics of bronchiectasis (BE) in Asia, including Japan, remain largely unknown. We aimed to provide insights into the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of BE, especially regarding nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infection and its poorly understood impact on prognosis. We also aimed to clarify the effect of long-term macrolide antibiotic use in patients with BE, who had no history of exacerbations., Methods: In this single-center, retrospective study, the medical records of patients who satisfied the BE criteria between January 1, 2012, and August 31, 2023, were reviewed. Severe exacerbations and mortality during the observation period were recorded. Baseline characteristics and overall survival of patients with and without NTM infection, and factors influencing the time to the first exacerbation and death were analyzed. Additionally, the effects of long-term macrolide antibiotic use in patients without a history of severe exacerbations were estimated., Results: In a cohort of 1044 patients with BE, the rate of severe exacerbation was 22.3%, with mortality rates of 3.2% over 3 years. Notably, the high prevalence of NTM infection (n = 410, 39.3%) in this cohort was distinctive. NTM infection was not associated with either the time to first severe exacerbation (p = 0.5676, adjusted hazard ratio = 1.11) or mortality (p = 0.4139, adjusted hazard ratio = 0.78). Compared with the NTM group, the non-NTM group had a higher proportion of elevated inflammatory markers, with significant differences in C-reactive protein levels (p = 0.0301) and blood neutrophil counts (p = 0.0273). Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization was more frequent in the non-NTM group (p = 0.0003). Among patients with non-NTM infection and without a history of exacerbation in the past 2 years, 38.2% received long-term macrolide antibiotics that did not invariably prolong the time to first severe exacerbation (p = 0.4517, IPW p = 0.3555)., Conclusions: This study highlights BE epidemiology in Japan, noting that the presence of NTM infection may not necessarily worsen the prognostic outcomes and advising caution in the casual use of macrolides for milder cases without a history of exacerbations., Clinical Trial Registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry Number: UMIN000054726 (Registered on 21 June 2024)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Pulmonary nocardiosis (PN) is a rare and opportunistic infection. This study aimed to analyze clinical, radiological, and microbiological features, treatment and outcome of PN in southern china., Methods: Clinical, laboratory, imaging, treatment and outcome data of PN patients at two tertiary hospitals from January 1, 2018, to January 1, 2024 were collected. Factors associated with clinical outcomes were determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis., Results: 67 PN patients including 53 with clinical improvement and 14 with treatment failure were enrolled. Bronchiectasis was the most common respiratory disease in patients with PN (31.3%). The major symptoms of PN were cough (89.6%) and sputum (79.1%). Lung nodules, bronchiectasis, consolidation, pleural involvement, mass, cavity, and lymph node enlargement were the frequent computed tomography findings of PN. Among the Nocardia species detected, N. farcinica was the most common pathogen. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (OR = 1.052, p = 0.010), concurrent bacterial infection (OR = 7.706, p = 0.016), and the use of carbapenems (OR = 9.345, p = 0.023) were independently associated with poor prognosis in patients with PN., Conclusions: This study provides important insights into the clinical features of PN in southern china. neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, concurrent bacterial infection, and the use of carbapenems were independently associated with poor prognosis in patients with PN., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Chronic airway inflammation is a central feature in the pathogenesis of bronchiectasis (BE), which can be caused by cystic fibrosis (CFBE; hereafter referred to as CF lung disease) and non-CF-related conditions (NCFBE). Inflammation in both CF lung disease and NCFBE is predominantly driven by neutrophils, which release proinflammatory cytokines and granule proteins, including neutrophil serine proteases (NSPs). NSPs include neutrophil elastase, proteinase 3 and cathepsin G. An imbalance between NSPs and their antiproteases has been observed in people with CF lung disease and people with NCFBE. While the role of the protease/antiprotease imbalance is well established in both CF lung disease and NCFBE, effective therapies targeting NSPs are lacking. In recent years, the introduction of CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy has immensely improved outcomes in many people with CF (pwCF). Despite this, evidence suggests that airway inflammation persists, even in pwCF treated with CFTR modulator therapy. In this review, we summarise current data on neutrophilic inflammation in CF lung disease to assess whether neutrophilic inflammation and high, uncontrolled NSP levels play similar roles in CF lung disease and in NCFBE. We discuss similarities between the neutrophilic inflammatory profiles of people with CF lung disease and NCFBE, potentially supporting a similar therapeutic approach. Additionally, we present evidence suggesting that neutrophilic inflammation persists in pwCF treated with CFTR modulator therapy, at levels similar to those in people with NCFBE. Collectively, these findings highlight the ongoing need for new treatment strategies targeting neutrophilic inflammation in CF lung disease., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M.A. Mall has received research grants paid to their institution from the German Research Foundation (DFG), German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF), German Innovation Fund and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; consultancy fees from Abbvie, Antabio, Arrowhead, Boehringer Ingelheim, Enterprise Therapeutics, Kither Biotec, Prieris, Recode, Santhera, Splisense and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; speaker fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals; and travel grants for participation in advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim and Vertex Pharmaceuticals. M.A. Mall is listed as inventor on an issued patent filed by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, describing the Scnn1b-transgenic mouse. M.A. Mall also reports advisory board participation for Abbvie, Antabio, Arrowhead, Boehringer Ingelheim, Enterprise Therapeutics, Kither Biotec, Pari and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and is a fellow of ERS. J.C. Davies has received research grants from the UK Cystic Fibrosis Trust, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Cystic Fibrosis Ireland, EPSRC and NIHR, has received fees for clinical trial leadership and/or advisory board participation and speaking roles from Abbvie, Algipharma, Arcturus, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eloxx, Enterprise Therapeutics, Genentech, LifeArc, Recode, Tavanta and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and is the Deputy Editor for the Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. J.C. Davies acknowledges funding from the National Institute of Health and Care Research through the Imperial Biomedical Research Centre and a Senior Investigator Award and grant funding from the Cystic Fibrosis Trust. S.H. Donaldson reports grants from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and the NIH; clinical trial contracts from AstraZeneca, Calithera and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; consulting fees from Chiesi USA, Inc., Polarean and 501 Ventures; and travel grants from Enterprise Therapeutics and Gilead Sciences. S.H. Donaldson also reported advisory board participation for Boehringer Ingelheim and data and safety monitoring board participation for Abbvie. R. Jain reports research grants from the CF Foundation, consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Insmed and Recode, and payment of honoraria for participation in the Vertex Innovation Awards review committee from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. R. Jain also reports advisory/data and safety monitoring board participation for Armata. J.D. Chalmers has received research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Grifols, Novartis, Insmed and Zambon, and has received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Insmed, Pfizer and Zambon. M. Shteinberg reports having received research grants paid to their institution from GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Trudell; travel grants from Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Rafa; speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Kamada, Novartis, Sanofi and Teva; and consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Kamada and Zambon. M. Shteinberg also reports data and safety monitoring board participation for Bonus Therapeutics, Israel and has unpaid roles in EMBARC, the Israel Pulmonology Society board and the Israel Society for TB and Mycobacterial Diseases., (Copyright ©The authors 2024.)

Novel treatments are needed to reduce inflammation, improve symptoms, address exacerbations, and slow disease progression in bronchiectasis. Cathepsin C (CatC) inhibition promises to achieve this through reduction of neutrophil-derived serine protease (including neutrophil elastase [NE] and proteinase 3 [PR3]) activation. Here, we present the phase I characterization of the novel CatC inhibitor, BI 1291583. Five phase I trials of BI 1291583 in healthy subjects are presented: a single-rising-dose study (NCT03414008) and two multiple-rising-dose studies (NCT03868540 and NCT04866160) assessing the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of BI 1291583; a food effect study (NCT03837964); and a drug-drug interaction study (NCT03890887) of BI 1291583 and itraconazole. BI 1291583 was safe and well tolerated across the doses tested in these trials. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in intensity, with no serious AEs, AEs of special interest or deaths reported in any trial. Drug-related skin exfoliation was not reported more frequently in subjects treated with BI 1291583 compared with placebo. BI 1291583 was readily absorbed, and pharmacokinetics were supra-proportional over the dose ranges assessed. Additionally, BI 1291583 inhibited CatC in a dose-dependent manner, inhibited downstream NE activity, and decreased PR3 levels. No food effect was observed. Co-administration of multiple doses of itraconazole increased BI 1291583 exposure approximately twofold. Due to these promising phase I results, a multinational phase II program of BI 1291583 in adults with bronchiectasis is ongoing (Airleaf™ [NCT05238675], Clairafly™ [NCT05865886], and Clairleaf™ [NCT05846230])., (© 2024 Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH and The Author(s). Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis is a chronic inflammatory airway disease that results in permanent lung damage and can correlate with considerable clinical and economic burden. There are gaps in knowledge surrounding bronchiectasis, for which there are no published US-based treatment guidelines or FDA-approved therapies. Given the current challenges and gaps in care, the authors of this article convened for an AJMC® roundtable in March 2024. This publication summarizes the main findings of that roundtable and situates them in a scholarly context. Panelists agreed that patients with unexplained chronic cough or fatigue, purulent sputum production, hemoptysis, or repeated infection should undergo CT scanning to assess the presence of bronchiectasis, which has been estimated to affect approximately 364,000 to 558,000 individuals at least 18 years of age. They noted that disease symptoms and treatment burden can considerably diminish patient health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and that an exacerbation uniformly signifies deteriorating health and substantially impacts disease progression, hospitalization rates, and mortality. Absent an FDA-approved therapy, panelists' top management priorities were preventing or reducing exacerbations and maintaining or improving HRQOL. Panelists concluded that providers are ill-equipped to change the course of this heterogenous disease and that there is a real need for options to manage symptoms, for US-based guidelines, and for more research into epidemiology, etiology, and treatment.

Bronchiectasis and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are intricately intertwined, with NTM capable of being both a cause and consequence of bronchiectatic disease. This narrative review focuses on the common ground of bronchiectasis and NTM pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) in terms of diagnostic approach, underlying risk factors and treatment strategies. NTM-PD diagnosis relies on a combination of clinical, radiological and microbiological criteria. Although their epidemiology is complicated by detection and reporting biases, the prevalence and pathogenicity of NTM species vary geographically, with Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium abscessus subspecies most frequently isolated in bronchiectasis-associated NTM-PD. Diagnosis of nodular bronchiectatic NTM-PD should prompt investigation of host factors, including disorders of mucociliary clearance, connective tissue diseases and immunodeficiencies, either genetic or acquired. Treatment of NTM-PD in bronchiectasis involves a multidisciplinary approach and considers the (sub)species involved, disease severity and comorbidities. Current guideline-based antimicrobial treatment of NTM-PD is considered long, cumbersome and unsatisfying in terms of outcomes. Novel treatment regimens and strategies are being explored, including rifampicin-free regimens and inclusion of clofazimine and inhaled antibiotics. Host-directed therapies, such as immunomodulators and cytokine-based therapies, might enhance antimycobacterial immune responses. Optimising supportive care, as well as pathogen- and host-directed strategies, is crucial, highlighting the need for personalised approaches tailored to individual patient needs. Further research is warranted to elucidate the complex interplay between host and mycobacterial factors, informing more effective management strategies., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: E. Van Braeckel is principal investigator for clinical trials sponsored by Insmed, Boehringer Ingelheim, Vertex, and F2G. Her institution received fees for consultancy and/or lectures by Insmed and Vertex. She is the chair of Belgian Respiratory Society working group on respiratory infections. C. Bosteels has no disclosures to declare., (Copyright ©The authors 2024.)

Background: Bronchiectasis is a condition characterized by abnormal and irreversible bronchial dilation resulting from lung tissue damage and can be categorized into two main groups: cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF bronchiectasis (NCFB). Both diseases are marked by recurrent infections, inflammatory exacerbations, and lung damage. Given that infections are the primary drivers of disease progression, characterization of the respiratory microbiome can shed light on compositional alterations and susceptibility to antimicrobial drugs in these cases compared to healthy individuals., Methods: To assess the microbiota in the two studied diseases, 35 subjects were recruited, comprising 10 NCFB and 13 CF patients and 12 healthy individuals. Nasopharyngeal swabs and induced sputum were collected, and total DNA was extracted. The DNA was then sequenced by the shotgun method and evaluated using the SqueezeMeta pipeline and R., Results: We observed reduced species diversity in both disease cohorts, along with distinct microbial compositions and profiles of antimicrobial resistance genes, compared to healthy individuals. The nasopharynx exhibited a consistent microbiota composition across all cohorts. Enrichment of members of the Burkholderiaceae family and an increased Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in the CF cohort emerged as key distinguishing factors compared to NCFB group. Staphylococcus aureus and Prevotella shahii also presented differential abundance in the CF and NCFB cohorts, respectively, in the lower respiratory tract. Considering antimicrobial resistance, a high number of genes related to antibiotic efflux were detected in both disease groups, which correlated with the patient's clinical data., Conclusions: Bronchiectasis is associated with reduced microbial diversity and a shift in microbial and resistome composition compared to healthy subjects. Despite some similarities, CF and NCFB present significant differences in microbiome composition and antimicrobial resistance profiles, suggesting the need for customized management strategies for each disease., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Bronchiectasis is a worldwide chronic lung disorder where exacerbations are common. It affects people of all ages, but especially Indigenous populations in high-income nations. Despite being a major contributor to chronic lung disease, there are no licensed therapies for bronchiectasis and there remain relatively few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in children and adults. Our RCT will address some of these unmet needs by evaluating whether the novel mucoactive agent, erdosteine, has a therapeutic role in children and adults with bronchiectasis.Our primary aim is to determine in children and adults aged 2-49 years with bronchiectasis whether regular erdosteine over a 12-month period reduces acute respiratory exacerbations compared with placebo. Our primary hypothesis is that people with bronchiectasis who regularly use erdosteine will have fewer exacerbations than those receiving placebo.Our secondary aims are to determine the effect of the trial medications on quality of life (QoL) and other clinical outcomes (exacerbation duration, time-to-next exacerbation, hospitalisations, lung function, adverse events). We will also assess the cost-effectiveness of the intervention., Methods and Analysis: We are undertaking an international multicentre, double-blind, placebo-RCT to evaluate whether 12 months of erdosteine is beneficial for children and adults with bronchiectasis. We will recruit 194 children and adults with bronchiectasis to a parallel, superiority RCT at eight sites across Australia, Malaysia and Philippines. Our primary endpoint is the rate of exacerbations over 12 months. Our main secondary outcomes are QoL, exacerbation duration, time-to-next exacerbation, hospitalisations and lung function., Ethics and Dissemination: The Human Research Ethics Committees (HREC) of Children's Health Queensland (for all Australian sites), University of Malaya Medical Centre (Malaysia) and St. Luke's Medical Centre (Philippines) approved the study. We will publish the results and share the outcomes with the academic and medical community, funding and relevant patient organisations., Trial Registration Number: ACTRN12621000315819., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features of Nocardia infections, antibiotic resistance profile, choice of antibiotics and treatment outcome, among others. In addition, the study compared the clinical and microbiological characteristics of nocardiosis in bronchiectasis patients and non-bronchiectasis patients., Methods: Detailed clinical data were collected from the medical records of 71 non-duplicate nocardiosis patients from 2017 to 2023 at a tertiary hospital in Zhengzhou, China. Nocardia isolates were identified to the species level using MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rRNA PCR sequencing. Clinical data were collected from medical records, and drug susceptibility was determined using the broth microdilution method., Results: Of the 71 cases of nocardiosis, 70 (98.6%) were diagnosed as pulmonary infections with common underlying diseases including bronchiectasis, tuberculosis, diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thirteen different strains were found in 71 isolates, the most common of which were N. farcinica (26.8%) and N. cyriacigeorgica (18.3%). All Nocardia strains were 100% susceptible to both TMP-SMX and linezolid, and different Nocardia species showed different patterns of drug susceptibility in vitro. Pulmonary nocardiosis is prone to comorbidities such as bronchiectasis, diabetes mellitus, COPD, etc., and Nocardia is also frequently accompanied by co-infection of the body with pathogens such as Mycobacterium and Aspergillus spp. Sixty-one patients underwent a detailed treatment regimen, of whom 32 (52.5%) received single or multi-drug therapy based on TMP-SMX. Bronchiectasis was associated with a higher frequency of Nocardia infections, and there were significant differences between the bronchiectasis and non-bronchiectasis groups in terms of age distribution, clinical characteristics, identification of Nocardia species, and antibiotic susceptibility (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: Our study contributes to the understanding of the species diversity of Nocardia isolates in Henan, China, and the clinical characteristics of patients with pulmonary nocardiosis infections. Clinical and microbiologic differences between patients with and without bronchiectasis. These findings will contribute to the early diagnosis and treatment of patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Chronic airway diseases have been associated with an increased risk of tuberculosis (TB); however, data in patients with bronchiectasis is limited. Statins have been shown to exhibit anti-inflammatory effects by modulating the inflammatory response. This study investigated whether statin treatment could reduce the risk of TB in patients with bronchiectasis., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide population database of patients with bronchiectasis who did or did not receive statin treatment. The defined daily dose (DDD) of statin, current or past statin user and statin exposure time were measured for the impact of statin use. The primary outcome was the incidence of new-onset TB. Considering of potential immortal time bias due to stain exposure time, Cox regression models with time-dependent covariates were employed to estimate HRs with 95% CIs for TB incidence among patients with bronchiectasis., Results: Patients with bronchiectasis receiving statin treatment had a decreased risk of TB. After adjusting for age, sex, income, comorbidities and Charlson Comorbidity Index, statin users had a 0.59-fold lower risk of TB incidence compared with non-statin users (95% CI 0.40 to 0.88; p=0.0087). Additionally, compared with non-statin users, statin treatment was a protective factor against TB in users with a cumulative DDD greater than 180 per year, with an HR of 0.32 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.87; p=0.0255)., Conclusions: Statin treatment demonstrated a dose-dependent protective effect and was associated with a reduced risk of TB in patients with bronchiectasis. These findings suggest that statins may play a role in lowering TB risk by modulating airway inflammation in this patient population., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria impose a considerable health-care burden and are associated with bronchiectasis exacerbation. This study investigated the clinical outcomes of adult patients with bronchiectasis following MDR bacterial infection., Methods: From the Chang Gung Research Database, we identified patients with bronchiectasis and MDR bacterial infection from 2008 to 2017. The control group comprised patients with bronchiectasis who did not have MDR bacterial infection and were propensity-score matched at a 1:2 ratio. The main outcomes were in-hospital and 3-year mortality., Results: In total, 554 patients with both bronchiectasis and MDR bacterial infection were identified. The types of MDR bacteria that most commonly affected the patients were MDR- Acinetobacter baumannii (38.6%) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (18.4%), Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamases (ESBL)- Klebsiella pneumoniae (17.8%), MDR-Pseudomonas (14.8%), and ESBL-E. coli (7.5%). Compared with the control group, the MDR group exhibited lower body mass index scores, higher rate of chronic bacterial colonization, a higher rate of previous exacerbations, and an increased use of antibiotics. Furthermore, the MDR group exhibited a higher rate of respiratory failure during hospitalization (MDR vs. control, 41.3% vs. 12.4%; p < 0.001). The MDR and control groups exhibited in-hospital mortality rates of 26.7% and 7.6%, respectively (p < 0.001); 3-year respiratory failure rates of 33.5% and 13.5%, respectively (p < 0.001); and 3-year mortality rates of 73.3% and 41.5%, respectively (p < 0.001). After adjustments were made for confounding factors, the infection with MDR and MDR bacteria species were determined to be independent risk factors affecting in-hospital and 3-year mortality., Conclusions: MDR bacteria were discovered in patients with more severe bronchiectasis and were independently associated with an increased risk of in-hospital and 3-year mortality. Given our findings, we recommend that clinicians identify patients at risk of MDR bacterial infection and follow the principle of antimicrobial stewardship to prevent the emergence of resistant bacteria among patients with bronchiectasis., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most commonly isolated pathogen in bronchiectasis and is associated with worse outcomes. Eradication treatment is recommended by guidelines, but the evidence base is limited. The expected success rate of eradication in clinical practice is not known., Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for studies investigating P. aeruginosa eradication treatment using antibiotics (systemic or inhaled) in patients with bronchiectasis. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients negative for P. aeruginosa at 12 months after eradication treatment. Cystic fibrosis was excluded., Results: Six observational studies including 289 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis found a 12-month P. aeruginosa eradication rate of 40% (95% CI 34-45%; p<0.00001), with no significant heterogeneity (I 2 =0%). Combined systemic and inhaled antibiotic treatment was associated with a higher eradication rate (48%, 95% CI 41-55%) than systemic antibiotics alone (27%, 13-45%)., Conclusion: Eradication treatment in bronchiectasis results in eradication of P. aeruginosa from sputum in ∼40% of cases at 12 months. Combined systemic and inhaled antibiotics achieve higher eradication rates than systemic antibiotics alone., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M. Shteinberg reports grants or contracts from GSK and Trudell pharma; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dexcel, Kamada, Synchrony Medical, Trumed, and Zambon; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Kamada; support for attending meetings or travel from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Kamada; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Bonus Biotherapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy groups with Israeli Pulmonology Society, Israeli Society for Tuberculosis and Mycobacterial Diseases, and EMBARC as unpaid management board member, and the European Respiratory Journal and Chest as an unpaid Editorial board member; and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or other services from Trudell Medical International. J.D. Chalmers reports grants or contracts from Grifols; consulting fees from Antabio, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GSK, Grifols, Insmed, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and Zambon; and leadership or fiduciary roles as Chair of European Respiratory Society (ERS) Bronchiectasis Guideline Task Force, Chief Editor of the European Respiratory Journal, and Chair of EMBARC Clinical Research Collaboration. All other authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2024.)

Aims: Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) is a chronic progressive respiratory disorder occurring at a rate ranging from 4.2 to 278.1 cases per 100,000 persons, depending on age, in the United States. For many patients with NCFB, the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) makes treatment more complicated and typically has worse outcomes. Management of NCFB can be challenging, warranting a better understanding of the burden of illness for NCFB, treatments applied, healthcare resources used, and subsequent treatment costs. Comparing patients diagnosed with exacerbated NCFB, with or without PA on antibiotic utilization, treatments, and healthcare resources utilization and costs was the purpose of this study., Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of commercial claims from IQVIA's PharMetrics Plus database (January 1,2006-December 31, 2020). Study patients with a diagnosis of NCFB were stratified into two groups based on the presence or absence of PA, then followed to identify demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, antibiotic treatment regimen prescribed, healthcare resources utilized, and costs of care., Results: The results showed that patients with exacerbated NCFB who were PA + had significantly more oral antibiotic fills per patient per year, more inpatient admissions with a longer length of stay, and more outpatient encounters than those who were PA - . For costs, PA + patients also had significantly greater total healthcare costs per patient when compared to those who were PA - ., Conclusion: Exacerbated NCFB with PA + was associated with increased antibiotic usage, greater resource utilization, and increased costs. The major contributor to the cost differences was the use of inpatient services. Treatment strategies aimed at reducing the need for inpatient treatment could lessen the disparities observed in patients with NCFB.

This study retrospectively analyzed the treatment outcomes of 110 patients with non-cavitary nodular bronchiectatic-type Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease who received intermittent or daily treatment with a three-drug oral antibiotic regimen (i.e., a macrolide, ethambutol, and rifampin) at a tertiary referral center in South Korea. Among these patients, 36 had sputum smear positivity. Of these 36 patients, intermittent treatment led to a lower culture conversion rate than daily treatment [50.0% (8/16) vs 85.0% (17/20), P = 0.034]., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Background: In Thailand, the incidence of community-acquired pseudomonal pneumonia among 60- to 65-year-olds ranges from 10.90% to 15.51%, with a mortality rate of up to 19.00%. Antipseudomonal agents should be selected as an empirical treatment for elderly patients at high risk for developing this infection. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors and develop a risk predictor for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in older adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP)., Methods: A retrospective data collection from an electronic database involved the elderly hospitalized patients with P. aeruginosa- and non-P. aeruginosa-causing CAP, admitted between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2021. Risk factors for P. aeruginosa infection were analysed using logistic regression, and the instrument was developed by scoring each risk factor based on the beta coefficient and evaluating discrimination and calibration using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) and observed versus predicted probability (E/O) ratio., Results: The inclusion criteria were met by 81 and 104 elderly patients diagnosed with CAP caused by P. aeruginosa and non-P. aeruginosa, respectively. Nasogastric (NG) tube feeding (odd ratios; OR = 40.68), bronchiectasis (B) (OR = 4.13), immunocompromised condition (I) (OR = 3.76), and other chronic respiratory illnesses (r) such as atelectasis, pulmonary fibrosis, and lung bleb (OR = 2.61) were the specific risk factors for infection with P. aeruginosa. The "60-B-r-I-NG" risk score was named after the 4 abbreviated risk variables and found to have good predicative capability (AuROC = 0.77) and accuracy comparable to or near true P. aeruginosa infection (E/O = 1). People who scored at least two should receive empirically antipseudomonal medication., Conclusions: NG tube feeding before admission, bronchiectasis, immunocompromisation, atelectasis, pulmonary fibrosis and lung bleb were risk factors for pseudomonal CAP in the elderly. The 60-B-r-I-NG was developed for predicting P. aeruginosa infection with a high degree of accuracy, equal to or comparable to the existing P. aeruginosa infection. Antipseudomonal agents may be started in patients who are at least 60 years old and have a score of at least 2 in order to lower mortality and promote the appropriate use of these medications., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Bronchiectasis is a long-term lung condition, with dilated bronchi, chronic inflammation, chronic infection and acute exacerbations. Recurrent exacerbations are associated with poorer clinical outcomes such as increased severity of lung disease, further exacerbations, hospitalisations, reduced quality of life and increased risk of death. Despite an increasing prevalence of bronchiectasis, there is a critical lack of high-quality studies into the disease and no treatments specifically approved for its treatment. This trial aims to establish whether inhaled dual bronchodilators (long acting beta agonist (LABA) and long acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)) taken as either a stand-alone therapy or in combination with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) reduce the number of exacerbations of bronchiectasis requiring treatment with antibiotics during a 12 month treatment period., Methods: This is a multicentre, pragmatic, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, incorporating an internal pilot and embedded economic evaluation. 600 adult patients (≥18 years) with CT confirmed bronchiectasis will be recruited and randomised to either inhaled dual therapy (LABA+LAMA), triple therapy (LABA+LAMA+ICS) or matched placebo, in a 2:2:1 ratio (respectively). The primary outcome is the number of protocol defined exacerbations requiring treatment with antibiotics during the 12 month treatment period., Ethics and Dissemination: Favourable ethical opinion was received from the North East-Newcastle and North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee (reference: 21/NE/0020). Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications, at national and international conferences, in the NIHR Health Technology Assessments journal and to participants and the public (using lay language)., Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN15988757., Competing Interests: Competing interests: ADS has received speakers fees or advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, GSK, Insmed, Novartis, Gilead and Zambon and has received grants from AstraZeneca, GSK, Novartis and the US COPD Foundation., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS) is a treatment option for patients with frequent exacerbations of bronchiectasis. A possible side effect of TIS is the development of chronic cough and bronchospasm, whereby the guidelines suggest a (in hospital) tolerance test with the first dose of TIS. However, data on respiratory adverse events are not consistent. In the present analysis from the BATTLE study (NCT02657473), we evaluated the added value of the tolerance test and aimed to observe the development of inhaled treatment related bronchial hyperreactivity., Methods: Fifty-seven patients from the BATTLE study were analyzed. Patients were randomized to receive TIS or placebo OD for 1 year. A tolerance test was performed with spirometry measurements before and after the first dose and with a bronchodilator in advance. Adverse events were strictly monitored., Results: Fifty-seven patients (100%) passed the tolerance test with no decrease in spirometry measurements or development of local intolerability. During the study treatment, a total of five TIS-treated patients (17.8%) withdrew due to airway hyperresponsiveness after a mean of 9.2 (SD13.9) weeks and one placebo-treated patient (3.5%) after 2 weeks (TIS vs. placebo; p = 0.66). The other TIS-related adverse events were not clinically significant., Conclusion: The use of inhaled medication is well tolerated in the heterogenous bronchiectasis population, without signs of airway hyperresponsiveness after the first dose of inhaled medication. From this observation, it can be concluded that there is no additional value for this advised tolerance test. However, closely monitoring on adverse effects during the first weeks after starting TIS is recommended., (© 2023 The Authors. The Clinical Respiratory Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Bronchiectasis is a common progressive respiratory disease with recognisable radiological abnormalities and a clinical syndrome of cough, sputum production and recurrent respiratory infections. Inflammatory cell infiltration into the lung, in particular neutrophils, is central to the pathophysiology of bronchiectasis. Herein we explore the roles and relationships between infection, inflammation and mucociliary clearance dysfunction in the establishment and progression of bronchiectasis. Microbial and host-mediated damage are important processes underpinning bronchiectasis and the relative contribution of proteases, cytokines and inflammatory mediators to the propagation of inflammation is presented. We also discuss the emerging concept of inflammatory endotypes, defined by the presence of neutrophilic and eosinophilic inflammation, and explore the role of inflammation as a treatable trait. Current treatment for bronchiectasis focuses on treatment of underlying causes, enhancing mucociliary clearance, controlling infection and preventing and treating complications. Data on airway clearance approaches via exercise and mucoactive drugs, pharmacotherapy with macrolides to decrease exacerbations and the usefulness of inhaled antibiotics and bronchodilators are discussed, finishing with a look to the future where new therapies targeting host-mediated immune dysfunction hold promise., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: J.D. Chalmers reports grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Grifols, Novartis and Insmed, outside the submitted work; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Insmed, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and Zambon, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S. Elborn holds a joint public–private grant from the European commission in the innovative medicines initiative with Novartis AG and Spexsis; he worked as a paid consultant for Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Viatris Inc.; and has been a paid speaker for many pharmaceutical companies over 30 years in respiratory medicine. Conflict of interest: C.M. Greene reports grants or contracts from NIH and Vertex, outside the submitted work; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Vertex, outside the submitted work; support for attending meetings and/or travel from European Respiratory Society, outside the submitted work; and was Head of ERS Assembly 3 2019–2022, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Introduction: The role of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) among patients with bronchiectasis remains controversial. There is limited evidence of using baseline eosinophil count (absolute and percentage) as a marker to predict the role of ICS among patients with bronchiectasis., Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in a major regional hospital and tertiary respiratory referral centre in Hong Kong, including 140 Chinese patients with noncystic fibrosis (CF) bronchiectasis, to investigate the exacerbation risks of bronchiectasis among ICS users and nonusers with different baseline eosinophil counts., Results: ICS user had significantly lower risk to develop bronchiectasis exacerbation with adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.461 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.225-0.945, p-value 0.035). Univariate logistic regression was performed for different cut-offs of blood eosinophil count (by percentage) from 2% to 4% (with a 0.5% grid each time). Baseline eosinophil 3.5% was found to be the best cut-off among all with adjusted OR of 0.138 (95% CI = 0.023-0.822, p-value = 0.030)., Conclusion: Baseline eosinophil count of 3.5% might serve as a marker to predict the benefits of ICS on exacerbation risk among patients with non-CF bronchiectasis., (© 2023 The Authors. The Clinical Respiratory Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Brensocatib is an oral, selective, reversible inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-1 (DPP-1), responsible for activating neutrophil serine proteases (NSPs) including neutrophil elastase (NE), proteinase 3 (PR3), and cathepsin G (CatG). In chronic inflammatory lung diseases such as non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE), neutrophils accumulate in the airways resulting in excess active NSPs that cause damaging inflammation and lung destruction., Methods: The 24-week WILLOW trial (NCT03218917) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial in patients with NCFBE conducted at 116 sites across 14 countries. In this trial, treatment with brensocatib was associated with improvements in clinical outcomes including time to first exacerbation, reduction in exacerbation frequency and a reduction in NE activity in sputum. An exploratory analysis of NE activity in white blood cell (WBC) extracts and NE, PR3 and CatG activity in sputum was conducted to further characterize brensocatib's effect and identify potential correlated effects., Results: NE, PR3 and CatG activities were reduced in sputum and NE activity was reduced in WBC extracts in a dose-dependent manner after four weeks of brensocatib treatment, with a return to baseline four weeks after the end of treatment. Brensocatib produced the greatest reduction in the sputum activity of CatG, followed by NE and then PR3. Positive correlations among the sputum NSPs were observed both at baseline and in response to treatment, with the strongest correlation among the sputum NSPs for NE and CatG., Conclusions: These results suggest a broad anti-inflammatory effect of brensocatib underlying its clinical efficacy observed in NCFBE patients., Trial Registration: The study was approved by the corresponding ethical review boards of all participating centers. The trial was approved by the Food and Drug Administration and registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03218917) on July 17, 2017 and approved by the European Medicines Agency and registered at the European Union Clinical trials Register (EudraCT No. 2017-002533-32). An independent, external data and safety monitoring committee (comprising physicians with pulmonary expertise, a statistician experienced in the evaluation of clinical safety, and experts in periodontal disease and dermatology) reviewed all adverse events., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Identifying risk factors for poor outcomes can help with risk stratification and targeting of treatment. Risk factors for mortality and exacerbations have been identified in bronchiectasis but have been almost exclusively studied in European and North American populations. This study investigated the risk factors for poor outcome in a large population of bronchiectasis patients enrolled in India., Methods: The European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (EMBARC) and Respiratory Research Network of India (EMBARC-India) registry is a prospective observational study of adults with computed tomography-confirmed bronchiectasis enrolled at 31 sites across India. Baseline characteristics of patients were used to investigate associations with key clinical outcomes: mortality, severe exacerbations requiring hospital admission, overall exacerbation frequency and decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s., Results: 1018 patients with at least 12-month follow-up data were enrolled in the follow-up study. Frequent exacerbations (≥3 per year) at baseline were associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 3.23, 95% CI 1.39-7.50), severe exacerbations (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.92-3.83), future exacerbations (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 3.08, 95% CI 2.36-4.01) and lung function decline. Coexisting COPD, dyspnoea and current cigarette smoking were similarly associated with a worse outcome across all end-points studied. Additional predictors of mortality and severe exacerbations were increasing age and cardiovascular comorbidity. Infection with Gram-negative pathogens (predominantly Klebsiella pneumoniae ) was independently associated with increased mortality (HR 3.13, 95% CI 1.62-6.06), while Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection was associated with severe exacerbations (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01-1.97) and overall exacerbation rate (IRR 1.47, 95% CI 1.13-1.91)., Conclusions: This study identifies risk factors for morbidity and mortality among bronchiectasis patients in India. Identification of these risk factors may support treatment approaches optimised to an Asian setting., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M. Loebinger reports grants from AstraZeneca, Insmed and Grifols, outside the submitted work. F. Blasi reports grants from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini and Pfizer; consulting fees from Novartis, Pfizer, Zambon, Vertex, Viatris, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Guidotti, Insmed and Menarini, outside the submitted work. A. Shoemark reports grants from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. E. Polverino reports grants from Chiesi, Zambon, Shionogi, Teva, CSL Boehring, Insmed and Grifols, outside the submitted work. T. Welte reports grants from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. M. Shteinberg reports grants from Trudell, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Kamada, Vertex, Teva, Actelion and Rafa, outside the submitted work. S. Aliberti reports grants from Insmed, Chiesi and Fisher & Paykel; consulting fees from McGraw Hill, Insmed, Zambon, AstraZeneca, CSL Behring, Grifols, Fondazione Charta, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Zcube, Menarini and GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. S. Limaye reports grants from Glenmark, supporting the present manuscript. J.D. Chalmers reports grants from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Insmed, GlaxoSmithKline and Gilead Sciences; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Insmed, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Chiesi, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer and Zambon, outside the submitted work. All other authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Rationale: Bronchiectasis and bronchiolitis are differential diagnoses of asthma; moreover, they are factors associated with worse asthma control., Objective: We determined clinical courses of bronchiectasis/bronchiolitis-complicated asthma by inflammatory subtypes as well as factors affecting them., Methods: We conducted a survey of refractory asthma with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis/bronchiolitis in Japan. Cases were classified into three groups, based on the latest fractional exhaled NO (FeNO) level (32 ppb for the threshold) and blood eosinophil counts (320/µL for the threshold): high (type 2-high) or low (type 2-low) FeNO and eosinophil and high FeNO or eosinophil (type 2-intermediate). Clinical courses in groups and factors affecting them were analysed., Results: In total, 216 cases from 81 facilities were reported, and 142 were stratified: 34, 40 and 68 into the type 2-high, -intermediate and -low groups, respectively. The frequency of bronchopneumonia and exacerbations requiring antibiotics and gram-negative bacteria detection rates were highest in the type 2-low group. Eighty-seven cases had paired latest and oldest available data of FeNO and eosinophil counts; they were analysed for inflammatory transition patterns. Among former type 2-high and -intermediate groups, 32% had recently transitioned to the -low group, to which relatively low FeNO in the past and oral corticosteroid use contributed. Lastly, in cases treated with moderate to high doses of inhaled corticosteroids, the frequencies of exacerbations requiring antibiotics were found to be higher in cases with more severe airway lesions and lower FeNO., Conclusions: Bronchiectasis/bronchiolitis-complicated refractory asthma is heterogeneous. In patients with sputum symptoms and low FeNO, airway colonisation of pathogenic bacteria and infectious episodes are common; thus, corticosteroids should be carefully used., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Use of long-term tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS) has been shown beneficial in cystic fibrosis (CF) and earlier findings also suggest a benefit in non-CF bronchiectasis. We investigated the efficacy and safety of maintenance TIS once daily (OD) in frequent exacerbating bronchiectasis patients chronically infected by different pathogens sensitive for tobramycin., Objective: The primary outcome was the frequency of exacerbations during the 12-month study period. Secondary outcomes were time to first exacerbation, change in lung function and quality of life (QoL), bacterial analysis and safety., Materials/patients: IN THIS MULTICENTER RCT PATIENTS AGED ≥ 18-YEAR-OLD WERE INCLUDED WITH CONFIRMED BRONCHIECTASIS AND ≥ 2 EXACERBATIONS IN THE PRECEDING YEAR. PATIENTS WERE ASSIGNED (1:1) TO RECEIVE TIS OR PLACEBO OD FOR 1-YEAR.: RESULTS: 58 patients were included of which 52 were analyzed in the mITT analysis. TIS reduced exacerbation frequency with a RR of 0.74 (95% CI 0.49-1.14) (p = 0.15). Within the TIS population a decrease in number of exacerbations was found (2; p = 0.00), which was also seen in the placebo-treated patients (1.5; p = 0.00). In the TIS-treated patients the QoL improved (LRTI-VAS p = 0.02 Leicester Cough p = 0.02) without additional safety concerns. No differences were found for the other secondary outcomes., Conclusion: Long-term TIS OD is a safe treatment modality and showed a non-significant reduced exacerbation frequency of 0.74 as compared to placebo in bronchiectasis patients chronically infected by tobramycin sensitive pathogens. TIS OD may be a potential therapeutic strategy in selected patients with bronchiectasis suffering from a high burden of disease., Trail Registration Number: The BATTLE study was registered at Clinical trials.gov number: NCT02657473 . Date: 13 august 2016., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Bronchiectasis is being diagnosed increasingly in children and adolescents. Recurrent respiratory exacerbations are common in children and adolescents with this chronic pulmonary disorder. Respiratory exacerbations are associated with an impaired quality of life, poorer long-term clinical outcomes, and substantial costs to the family and health systems. The 2021 European Respiratory Society (ERS) clinical practice guideline for the management of children and adolescents with bronchiectasis provided a definition of acute respiratory exacerbations for clinical use but to date there is no comparable universal definition for clinical research. Given the importance of exacerbations in the field, this ERS Task Force sought to obtain robust definitions of respiratory exacerbations for clinical research. The panel was a multidisciplinary team of specialists in paediatric and adult respiratory medicine, infectious disease, physiotherapy, primary care, nursing, radiology, methodology, patient advocacy, and parents of children and adolescents with bronchiectasis. We used a standardised process that included a systematic literature review, parent survey, and a Delphi approach involving 299 physicians (54 countries) caring for children and adolescents with bronchiectasis. Consensus was obtained for all four statements drafted by the panel as the disagreement rate was very low (range 3.6-7.2%). The panel unanimously endorsed the four consensus definitions for 1a) non-severe exacerbation and 1b) severe exacerbation as an outcome measure, 2) non-severe exacerbation for studies initiating treatment, and 3) resolution of a non-severe exacerbation for clinical trials involving children and adolescents with bronchiectasis. This ERS Task Force proposes using these internationally derived, consensus-based definitions of respiratory exacerbations for future clinical paediatric bronchiectasis research., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: E. Alexopoulou, L. Bell, A. Bush, C. Constant, R. Fortescue, B. Karadag, A.T. Hill, A. Kantar, V. Goyal, A. Zacharasiewicz, J. Boyd, A. Claydon, Z. Powell and C. Wilson have nothing to disclose. A.B. Chang reports grants from National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia, during the conduct of the study; is IDMC member for an unlicensed vaccine (GSK), is advisory member of study design for an unlicensed molecule for chronic cough (Merck), and is IDMC member for an unlicensed monoclonal antibody (AstraZeneca); and has received personal fees from being an author of two UpToDate chapters, outside the submitted work. K. Grimwood reports grants from Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, and Medical Research Futures Fund, during the conduct of the study. S. Aliberti reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Insmed, Fisher & Paykel and Chiesi, and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, MENARINI, Fondazione Charta, Grifols, Boehringer Ingelheim and Zambon, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©The authors 2022. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

Introduction: The efficacy of azithromycin to prevent exacerbation for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis remains controversial. We conduct this meta-analysis to explore the influence of azithromycin versus placebo for the treatment of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis., Methods: We have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through July 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of azithromycin versus placebo for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model., Results: Four RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for non-cystic-fibrosis bronchiectasis, azithromycin treatment was associated with improved free of exacerbation (odd ratios [OR] = 3.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.69-7.93; P = 0.001), reduced pulmonary exacerbations (OR = 0.27; 95% CI 0.13-0.59; P = 0.001) and number of pulmonary exacerbations (standard mean difference [SMD] =  - 0.87; 95% CI - 1.21 to - 0.54; P < 0.00001), but demonstrate no obvious impact on forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), score on St George's respiratory questionnaire, nausea or vomiting, adverse events., Conclusions: Azithromycin is effective to prevent exacerbation of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

BACKGROUND Bronchiectasis is a common respiratory disease complicated by periodic exacerbations. The association with different degrees of gastric acid suppression has not been well studied. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of 350 patients was conducted to investigate the association of different gastric acid suppressants with bronchiectasis exacerbation that required hospitalisation. Components of FACED (FEV 1 % predicted, age, chronic colonisation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa , radiological extent of the disease, and dyspnoea) were adjusted in multivariate analysis. RESULTS Among patients with exacerbation of bronchiectasis, 52 (14.9%) required hospitalisation. Prescription of a high-dose of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) was associated with increased risk of bronchiectasis exacerbation requiring hospitalisation (adjusted OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.01-7.59; P = 0.05). There was no significant association with use of a histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.32-5.06) or low-dose PPI (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.42-5.13). Nonetheless, patients prescribed a high dose of PPI required a significantly longer hospital stay for exacerbation (13.1 ± 1.4 days) than patients not prescribed a gastric acid suppressant (8.2 ± 2.6 days) or those on a low dose PPI (8.3 ± 1.3 days) and H2RA (6.50 ± 1.50 days). CONCLUSIONS Risk of bronchiectasis exacerbation requiring hospitalisation was increased among high-dose PPI users, but not those prescribed an H2RA or low-dose PPI.

Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection is seen in chronic pulmonary disease and is associated with exacerbations and poor long-term prognosis. However, evidence-based guidelines for the management and treatment of P. aeruginosa infection in chronic, non-cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary disease are lacking. The aim of this study is to investigate whether targeted antibiotic treatment against P. aeruginosa can reduce exacerbations and mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), non-CF bronchiectasis, and asthma., Methods: This study is an ongoing multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label trial. A total of 150 patients with COPD, non-CF bronchiectasis or asthma, and P. aeruginosa-positive lower respiratory tract samples will be randomly assigned with a 1:1 ratio to either no antibiotic treatment or anti-pseudomonal antibiotic treatment with intravenous beta-lactam and oral ciprofloxacin for 14 days. The primary outcome, analyzed with two co-primary endpoints, is (i) time to prednisolone and/or antibiotic requiring exacerbation or death, in the primary or secondary health sector, within days 20-365 from study allocation and (ii) days alive and without exacerbation within days 20-365 from the study allocation., Discussion: This trial will determine whether targeted antibiotics can benefit future patients with chronic, non-CF pulmonary disease and P. aeruginosa infection in terms of reduced morbidity and mortality, thus optimizing therapeutic approaches in this large group of chronic patients., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03262142 . Registered on August 25, 2017., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

We investigated the treatment outcomes of patients with cavitary nodular bronchiectatic (C-NB)-type Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease (PD) via outcome comparisons between the fibrocavitary (FC) and C-NB types treated with guideline-based therapy (GBT) composed of daily three-drug oral antibiotics and injectable aminoglycoside. Additionally, we analyzed whether treatment with oral antibiotics alone would result in acceptable outcomes for the C-NB type. From 2002 to 2019, patients with cavitary MAC-PD who received three-drug oral antibiotics with or without an injectable aminoglycoside for ≥1 year were retrospectively enrolled at a tertiary referral center in South Korea. We compared the rates of culture conversion at 12 months according to the radiological type and treatment regimen. The overall culture conversion rate at 12 months of 154 patients with cavitary MAC-PD who received GBT was 75.3%. Among them, the culture conversion rates of 114 patients with the C-NB type were higher than that of 40 patients with the FC-type (80.7% versus 60.0%, respectively; P =  0.009). Of 166 patients with the C-NB-type treated with oral medications with or without an injectable drug, 83.7% achieved culture conversion at 12 months. The conversion rates of those who received oral medications alone and those treated with oral medications and an injectable aminoglycoside were similar (90.4% versus 80.7%, respectively; P =  0.117). In conclusion, the culture conversion rates of the patients with C-NB type treated with GBT were significantly higher than those of patients with the FC type. Additionally, the C-NB type could be treated with oral medications alone.

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest JMSP has not conflict of interest JLLC has received honoraria during the last 3 years for lecturing, scientific advice, participation in clinical studies and writing for publications for (in alphabetical order): AstraZeneca, Bial, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Ferrer, Gebro, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Menarini, Megalabs, Novartis and Rovi. MAMG has received honoraria during the last 3 years for lecturing, scientific advice, participation in clinical studies and writing for publications for (in alphabetical order): AstraZeneca, Bial, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Menarini, Novartis, Philips, Rovi and Vitalaire.

Introduction: Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) brought a heavy healthcare burden worldwide. Macrolide maintenance therapy was proved to be helpful in reducing exacerbation of NCFB. However, the optimal dosing regimens of macrolides have not been determined, and its efficacy in Chinese NCFB population has not been validated. This protocol describes a head-to-head clinical trial designed to compare the efficacy of two dosing regimens of azithromycin in Chinese NCFB population., Methods and Analysis: This prospective, open-label and randomised controlled trial will be conducted in the First People's Hospital of Jiashan, China. Eligible patients with high-resolution CT defined NCFB will be randomly divided into three groups, which will receive either 250 mg daily azithromycin, or 500 mg three-times-weekly azithromycin or no treatment for 6 months. They will be followed up for another 6 months without treatment. The primary outcome is the mean rate of protocol-defined pulmonary exacerbation at 6 months., Ethics and Dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the First People's Hospital of Jiashan Ethics Committee. The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications., Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR2100052906., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Exacerbations have a negative impact on inflammatory diseases of the airways and, in patients with bronchiectasis, severe exacerbations are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Exacerbations are also associated with a decline in quality of life and lung function, greater local and systemic inflammation and clinically more severe forms of the disease. As a consequence, the majority of therapeutic clinical trials carried out in patients with bronchiectasis are aimed at preventing exacerbations, but there is a scarcity of scientific evidence on the best treatment once they occur. All of these elements, combined with the great heterogeneity of bronchiectasis and the influence of geographical and microbiological factors on its clinical presentations and aetiologies, mean that the recommendations of therapeutic guidelines vary. An international group of experts has now reached agreement on the definition of exacerbation in bronchiectasis for the inclusion of patients in clinical trials, although its validity in clinical practice has yet to be demonstrated.

Background: Tiotropium via the HandiHaler device is an established long-acting, anticholinergic bronchodilator that prevents exacerbations and improves lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We hypothesised that tiotropium would reduce pulmonary exacerbations and improve lung function in patients with stable bronchiectasis and airflow limitation, and assessed the effect of tiotropium on these outcomes., Methods: In a randomised, double-blind, two-period crossover trial, we recruited adult patients from three hospitals in New Zealand. Patients were excluded if they had a smoking history of >20 pack-years. Patients were assigned to either the tiotropium-placebo or placebo-tiotropium sequence in a 1:1 ratio, using randomly permuted blocks stratified by centre. Participants and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. Eligible patients received tiotropium 18 μg via HandiHaler daily for 6 months followed by 6 months of placebo, or vice versa , with a washout period of 4 weeks. The primary end-point was rate of event-based exacerbations during the 6-month period. Primary analyses were carried out in an intention-to-treat set., Results: 90 patients were randomly assigned and 85 completed both treatment cycles. The rate of exacerbations was 2.17 per year under the tiotropium treatment and 2.27 per year under placebo (rate ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.72-1.27; p=0.77). Tiotropium, compared with placebo, improved forced expiratory volume in 1 s by 58 mL (95% CI 23-92 mL; p=0.002). Adverse events were similar under both treatments., Conclusions: Tiotropium via HandiHaler over 6 months significantly improved lung function but not frequency of exacerbations. Further research is required to understand the clinical context and significance of these findings., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright ©The authors 2022.)

The development of resistome analysis, i.e. the comprehensive analysis of antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs), is enabling a better understanding of the mechanisms of antibiotic-resistance emergence. The respiratory microbiome is a dynamic and interactive network of bacteria, with a set of ARGs that could influence the response to antibiotics. Viruses such as bacteriophages, potential carriers of ARGs, may also form part of this respiratory resistome. Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) such as cystic fibrosis, severe asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchiectasis, managed with long-term antibiotic therapies, lead to multidrug resistance. Antibiotic susceptibility testing provides a partial view of the bacterial response to antibiotics in the complex lung environment. Assessing the ARG network would allow personalised, targeted therapeutic strategies and suitable antibiotic stewardship in CRDs, depending on individual resistome and microbiome signatures. This review summarises the influence of pulmonary antibiotic protocols on the respiratory microbiome, detailing the variable consequences according to antibiotic class and duration of treatment. The different resistome-profiling methods are explained to clarify their respective place in antibiotic-resistance analysis in the lungs. Finally, this review details current knowledge on the respiratory resistome related to therapeutic strategies and provides insight into the application of resistome analysis to counter the emergence of multidrug-resistant respiratory pathogens., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: P-R. Burgel reports grants or contracts from GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim and Vertex; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GSK and Insmed; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GSK, Insmed, Novartis, Pfizer, Vertex and Zambon, all outside the submitted work. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2022.)

Background: Globally, bronchiectasis (BE) unrelated to cystic fibrosis (CF) is recognized as a major cause of respiratory morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization. Children with BE regularly experience exacerbations of their condition resulting in frequent hospitalizations and decreased health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Guidelines for the treatment and management of BE call for regular exercise as a means of improving aerobic fitness and HR-QoL. Moreover, research in adults with BE has shown that exercise can reduce the frequency of exacerbations, a potent predictor of future lung function decline and respiratory morbidity. Yet, to date, the health benefits resulting from therapeutic exercise have not been investigated in children with BE. The BREATH, Bronchiectasis - Exercise as Therapy, trial will test the efficacy of a novel 8-week, play-based therapeutic exercise program to reduce the frequency of acute exacerbations over 12 months in children with BE (aged ≥ 4 and < 13 years). Secondary aims are to determine the cost-effectiveness of the intervention and assess the program's impact on aerobic fitness, fundamental movement skill (FMS) proficiency, habitual physical activity, HR-QoL, and lung function., Methods: This multi-center, observer-blinded, parallel-group (1:1 allocation), randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted at three sites. One hundred and seventy-four children ≥ 4 and < 13 years of age with BE will be randomized to a developmentally appropriate, play-based therapeutic exercise program (eight, 60-min weekly sessions, supplemented by a home-based program) or usual care. After completing the baseline assessments, the number of exacerbations and secondary outcomes will be assessed immediately post-intervention, after 6 months of follow-up, and after 12 months of follow-up. Monthly, parental contact and medical review will document acute respiratory exacerbations and parameters for cost-effectiveness outcomes., Discussion: The BREATH trial is the first fully powered RCT to test the effects of a therapeutic exercise on exacerbation frequency, fitness, movement competence, and HR-QoL in children with bronchiectasis. By implementing a developmentally appropriate, play-based exercise program tailored to the individual needs of children with bronchiectasis, the results have the potential for a major paradigm shift in the way in which therapeutic exercise is prescribed and implemented in children with chronic respiratory conditions. The exercise program can be readily translated. It does not require expensive equipment and can be delivered in a variety of settings, including the participant's home. The program has strong potential for translation to other pediatric patient groups with similar needs for exercise therapy, including those with obesity, childhood cancers, and neurological conditions such as cerebral palsy., Trial Registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR) ACTRN12619001008112., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Macrolide antibiotics are one of the most commonly used broad-spectrum antibiotics. They have an inhibitory effect on a variety of respiratory pathogens; besides, they have non-anti-infective effects, including anti-inflammatory, regulating airway secretion, immune regulation, and other effects. A growing number of studies have shown that the non-anti-infective effects of macrolides have important and potential value in the treatment of pediatric chronic airway diseases; the therapy was described as "long-term, low-dose usage"; unfortunately, there is no guideline or consensus that applies to children. To better carry out the mechanism and clinical research of non-anti-infective effect and promote its rational use in children, the authors summarize the evidence of the usage of long-term, low-dose macrolide antibiotic therapy (LLMAT) in the treatment of chronic airway diseases in children and the progress in recent years. IMPACT: This review summarizes the evidence (mostly in recent 5 years) of the usage of long-term, low-dose macrolide antibiotic therapy in the treatment of chronic airway diseases. The recent studies and guidelines support and enrich the point that long-term, low-dose macrolide antibiotic therapy has potential benefit for children with severe asthma, CF, non-CF bronchiectasis, and BO, which provides clinical references and is of clinical interest. Long-term, low-dose macrolide antibiotic therapy has good safety, and no serious events have been reported; however, potential cardiac side effects and macrolide resistance should be clinically noted., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Non-cystic fibrosis (non-CF) bronchiectasis is a chronic pulmonary disorder that causes destruction and permanent dilatation of the airways, resulting in excessive sputum production, repeated infection and inflammation. A need for high-quality and specialised care has been highlighted in recent years. N -acetylcysteine (NAC) is a widely used mucolytic agent in respiratory diseases that not only possesses a property to enhance secretion clearance, but also exhibits antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. However, the efficacy and safety of NAC are not well described in idiopathic or postinfective non-CF bronchiectasis., Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NAC in patients with idiopathic or postinfective non-CF bronchiectasis., Methods and Analysis: PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched from inception to 1 March 2022 for eligible randomised controlled trials that investigating the effects of NAC on exacerbations, health-related quality of life, lung functions, sputum volume and colour, inflammation markers, exercise capacity and adverse events in patients with idiopathic or postinfective non-CF bronchiectasis, with ongoing trials being identified by searches on the websites of Chinese Clinical Trial Registry and ClinicalTrials.gov. Two independent reviewers will identify eligible studies, two will fulfil the data extraction and three will perform the quality appraisal. To generate more accurate analyses, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation will be used to grade the evidence. χ 2 test and I 2 statistic will be used to assess heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression will be used to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. The potential publication bias will be examined using funnel plots., Ethics and Dissemination: No research ethics approval is required in this study because it is a systematic review. The results of this study are expected to be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences., Trial Registration Number: CRD42021239438., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Up to 50% of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in stable state may carry potentially pathogenic microorganisms (PPMs) in their airways. The presence of PPMs has been associated with increased symptoms, increased risk and severity of exacerbations, a faster decline in lung function and impairment in quality of life. Although some clinical trials have demonstrated a reduction in exacerbations in patients chronically treated with systemic antibiotics, particularly macrolides, the selection of patients was based on the previous frequency of exacerbations and not on the presence of PPMs in their airways. Therefore, unlike in bronchiectasis, there is a lack of evidence-based recommendations for assessment and treatment of the presence of PPMs in either single or repeated isolations in COPD. In this article, we propose that chronic bronchial infection (CBI) in COPD be defined as the isolation of the same PPM in at least three sputum samples separated by more than one month; we review the impact of CBI on the natural course of COPD and suggest a course of action in patients with a single isolation of a PPM or suspected CBI. Antibiotic treatment in stable COPD should be recommended based on four main criteria: a) the presence of comorbid bronchiectasis, b) the demonstration of a single or multiple isolation of the same PPM, c) the clinical impact of CBI on the patients, and d) the type of PPM, either Pseudomonas aeruginosa or non-pseudomonal PPM. These recommendations are derived from evidence generated in patients with bronchiectasis and, until new evidence specifically obtained in COPD is available, they may help in the management of these challenging patients with COPD. Existing evidence suggests that inhaled therapy is insufficient to manage patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, frequent exacerbations, and CBI. New studies must be conducted in this particularly demanding population., Competing Interests: Miguel Angel Martinez-Garcia has received fees from Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, Rovi, Bial, Zambon, Vitalaire, TEVA, Grifols and Novartis, consulting fees from Grifols, Zambon and TEVA, and research grants from TEVA, Zambon and Vitalaire. Marc Miravitlles has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Atrina Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cipla, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, Rovi, Bial, Sandoz, Zambon, CSL Behring, Grifols and Novartis, consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Bial, Gebro Pharma, Kamada, CSL Behring, Laboratorios Esteve, Ferrer, Johnson & Johnson, Mereo Biopharma, Palobiofarma SL, Verona Pharma, TEVA, Spin Therapeutics, pH Pharma, Novartis, Sanofi, ONO Pharma, Takeda, and Grifols and research grants from Grifols. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2022 Martinez-Garcia and Miravitlles.)

Background: Inhaled antibiotics have been incorporated into contemporary European and British guidelines for bronchiectasis, yet no inhaled antibiotics have been approved in the United States or Europe for the treatment of bronchiectasis not related to cystic fibrosis. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection is common in patients with bronchiectasis, contributing to a cycle of progressive inflammation, exacerbations, and airway remodelling., Objective: The aim of the current study was to identify and evaluate published studies of inhaled tobramycin solution or powder in patients with bronchiectasis and P. aeruginosa infection not associated with cystic fibrosis., Methods: A literature review was conducted utilising the PubMed and Cochrane databases. Studies published in the English language that reported safety and/or efficacy outcomes of inhaled tobramycin either alone or in combination with other antibiotics were included., Results: Seven clinical trials published between 1999 and 2021 were identified that met inclusion criteria. Inhaled tobramycin therapy was effective in reducing P. aeruginosa microbial density in the sputum of patients with bronchiectasis. Several studies demonstrated favourable impacts on hospitalisations, number and severity of exacerbations, and symptoms. Other studies were underpowered for these clinical outcomes or were exploratory in nature. Although tobramycin was generally well tolerated, some evidence of treatment-associated wheezing was reported., Conclusions: In patients with bronchiectasis and chronic P. aeruginosa infection, inhaled tobramycin was effective in reducing the density of bacteria in sputum, which may be associated with additional clinical benefits. Definitive phase 3 trials of inhaled tobramycin in patients with bronchiectasis are indicated to determine clinical efficacy and long-term safety., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Rationale: Bronchiectasis (abnormal dilatation of bronchi) is usually diagnosed by high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and radiological severity has been found to correspond with clinical outcome. A beneficial effect of macrolides maintenance treatment in frequent exacerbating bronchiectasis patients has been established in randomized trials. This study was undertaken to prospectively evaluate the effect of long-term azithromycin (AZM) on radiological features in patients with bronchiectasis., Methods: The BAT randomized controlled trial (2008-2010) investigated the effect of 1 year of AZM (250 mg OD) in bronchiectasis with frequent exacerbations. Chest (HR)CT-scans at baseline and after one year of study treatment were obtained and scored by two radiologists according to the Brody - and the Bhalla scoring system., Results: 77 (93%) patients conducted the BAT trial were evaluated in this post-hoc analysis. A significant improvement of the radiological features based on the Brody score was found after one year of AZM therapy as compared to placebo (p = 0.024), with a not significant improvement of the Bhalla score (p=0.071). Especially the consolidation (Bhalla) and parenchymal changes (Brody) sub scores significantly improved (both p=0.030), and even a radiological deterioration was seen on the Brody bronchiectasis sub score for the placebo treated patients (mean 14.5 (11.7) vs.15.7 (11.9))., Conclusions: The beneficial effect of long-term AZM treatment on radiological features was demonstrated in this randomized controlled trial. (HR)CT's can be used as an objective measure of treatment response in bronchiectasis., Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT00415350., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

While bronchiectasis is an old condition, it is only in the last decade that there have been major strides in our understanding of this disease and its treatment. Recent evidence has shown that the "vicious cycle" hypothesis remains valid. This, and the concept of "treatable traits," provide useful frameworks on which to base the management of this condition. In all recently diagnosed patients, a search should be undertaken for specific etiologies. A number of factors, including chronic infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, have been shown to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. While airway clearance strategies remain the mainstay of therapy, other treatments including nebulized hypertonic saline and inhaled antibiotic treatment are discussed. Greater emphasis is being placed on immune‑modulatory therapies, not just long‑term macrolide therapy but other more innovative strategies. The role of surgical lung resection in the management of this condition is also discussed.

Introduction: Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis is a respiratory health condition with many possible aetiologies, some of which are potentially reversible in childhood with early diagnosis and appropriate treatment. It is important to understand factors which contribute to progression or potential resolution of bronchiectasis. It is evident that respiratory exacerbations are a key feature of bronchiectasis disease progression. In this pilot study we document how the microbiota of the upper and lower airways presents during the course of an exacerbation and treatment., Methods: We recruited children (aged 1-15) undergoing antibiotic treatment for bronchiectasis exacerbations at Starship Children's Hospital and outpatient clinics. Sputum and nasal swabs were taken before and after antibiotic treatment. Sample DNA was extracted, then bacterial 16S rRNA genes amplified and sequenced via Illumina MiSeq., Results: Thirty patients were recruited into this study with 81 samples contributing to the final dataset, including 8 patients with complete sets of upper and lower airway samples at both (before and after antibiotics) timepoints. Changes in alpha-diversity over the course of an exacerbation and treatment were non-significant. However, sample composition did alter over the course of an exacerbation, with most notably a reduction in the relative abundance of amplicon sequence variants assigned to Haemophilus ., Discussion: Haemophilus has been associated with more severe symptoms in respiratory infections and a reduction in its relative abundance may represent a positive shift in a patient's microbiota. Current treatments for bronchiectasis may preserve bacterial diversity while altering microbiota composition., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Broderick, Regtien, Ainsworth, Taylor and Pillarisetti.)

Background: Bronchiectasis is a common but under-diagnosed chronic disorder characterised by permanent dilation of the airways arising from a cycle of recurrent infection and inflammation. Symptoms including chronic, persistent cough and productive phlegm are a significant burden for people with bronchiectasis, and the main aim of treatment is to reduce exacerbation frequency and improve quality of life. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy aims to break this infection cycle and is recommended by clinical guidelines for adults with three or more exacerbations a year, based on limited evidence. It is important to weigh the evidence for bacterial suppression against the prevention of antibiotic resistance and further evidence is required on the safety and efficacy of different regimens of intermittently administered antibiotic treatments for people with bronchiectasis., Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intermittent prophylactic antibiotics in the treatment of adults and children with bronchiectasis., Search Methods: We identified trials from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register, which contains studies identified through multiple electronic searches and handsearches of other sources. We also searched trial registries and reference lists of primary studies. We conducted searches on 6 September 2021, with no restriction on language of publication., Selection Criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of at least three months' duration comparing an intermittent regime of prophylactic antibiotics with placebo, usual care or an alternate intermittent regimen. Intermittent prophylactic administration was defined as repeated courses of antibiotics with on-treatment and off-treatment intervals of at least 14 days' duration. We included adults and children with a clinical diagnosis of bronchiectasis confirmed by high resolution computed tomography (HRCT), plain film chest radiograph, or bronchography and a documented history of recurrent chest infections. We excluded studies where participants received high dose antibiotics immediately prior to enrolment or those with a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), primary ciliary dyskinesia, hypogammaglobulinaemia, sarcoidosis, or a primary diagnosis of COPD. Our primary outcomes were exacerbation frequency and serious adverse events. We did not exclude studies on the basis of review outcomes., Data Collection and Analysis: We analysed dichotomous data as odds ratios (ORs) or relative risk (RRs) and continuous data as mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs). We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We conducted GRADE assessments for the following primary outcomes: exacerbation frequency; serious adverse events and secondary outcomes: antibiotic resistance; hospital admissions; health-related quality of life., Main Results: We included eight RCTs, with interventions ranging from 16 to 48 weeks, involving 2180 adults. All evaluated one of three types of antibiotics over two to six cycles of 28 days on/off treatment: aminoglycosides, ß-lactams or fluoroquinolones. Two studies also included 12 cycles of 14 days on/off treatment with fluoroquinolones. Participants had a mean age of 63.6 years, 65% were women and approximately 85% Caucasian. Baseline FEV 1 ranged from 55.5% to 62.6% predicted. None of the studies included children. Generally, there was a low risk of bias in the included studies. Antibiotic versus placebo: cycle of 14 days on/off. Ciprofloxacin reduced the frequency of exacerbations compared to placebo (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.93; I 2 = 65%; 2 studies, 469 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), with eight people (95% CI 6 to 28) needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome. The intervention increased the risk of antibiotic resistance more than twofold (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.35; I 2 = 0%; 2 studies, 624 participants; high-certainty evidence). Serious adverse events, lung function (FEV 1 ), health-related quality of life, and adverse effects did not differ between groups. Antibiotic versus placebo: cycle of 28 days on/off. Antibiotics did not reduce overall exacerbation frequency (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.02; I 2 = 0%; 8 studies, 1695 participants; high-certainty evidence) but there were fewer severe exacerbations (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.93; I 2 = 54%; 3 studies, 624 participants), though this should be interpreted with caution due to low event rates. The risk of antibiotic resistance was more than twofold higher based on a pooled analysis (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.42 to 3.42; I 2 = 0%; 3 studies, 685 participants; high-certainty evidence) and consistent with unpooled data from four further studies. Serious adverse events, time to first exacerbation, duration of exacerbation, respiratory-related hospital admissions, lung function, health-related quality of life and adverse effects did not differ between study groups. Antibiotic versus usual care. We did not find any studies that compared intermittent antibiotic regimens with usual care. Cycle of 14 days on/off versus cycle of 28 days on/off. Exacerbation frequency did not differ between the two treatment regimens (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.24; I 2 = 71%; 2 studies, 625 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) However, inconsistencies in the results from the two trials in this comparison indicate that the apparent aggregated similarities may not be reliable. There was no evidence of a difference in antibiotic resistance between groups (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.48; I 2 = 60%; 2 studies, 624 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Serious adverse events, adverse effects, lung function and health-related quality of life did not differ between the two antibiotic regimens., Authors' Conclusions: Overall, in adults who have frequent chest infections, long-term antibiotics given at 14-day on/off intervals slightly reduces the frequency of those infections and increases antibiotic resistance. Intermittent antibiotic regimens result in little to no difference in serious adverse events. The impact of intermittent antibiotic therapy on children with bronchiectasis is unknown due to an absence of evidence, and further research is needed to establish the potential risks and benefits., (Copyright © 2022 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Recurrent bacterial infection causes frequent bronchiectasis (BE) exacerbations. The effectiveness and safety of long-term administration of macrolides in BE remain controversial, especially in children who require minimal treatment to prevent exacerbation. We conducted this meta-analysis to determine the usefulness of long-term macrolide use in pediatric BE. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, Embase, KoreaMed, Igaku Chuo Zasshi, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which elucidated long-term macrolide treatment (≥ 4 weeks) in non-cystic fibrosis BE in children aged < 18 years. The primary outcome was frequency of acute exacerbation; secondary outcomes included changes in pulmonary function, sputum scores, and adverse events including bacterial resistance. We included four RCTs. Long-term macrolide treatment showed a significant decrease in the frequency of exacerbation (odds ratio [OR], 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.87), mean number of exacerbations per patient (mean difference, - 1.40; 95% CI, - 2.26 to - 0.54), and sputum purulence score (mean difference, - 0.78; 95% CI, - 1.32 to - 0.24). However, long-term macrolide treatment was accompanied by an increased carriage of azithromycin-resistant bacteria (OR, 7.13). Long-term macrolide administration prevents exacerbation of BE in children; however, there are risks of increasing antibiotic resistance. Benefits and risks should be weighed and determined on a patient-by-patient basis., (© 2021. The Author(s).)