Search

Background Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of infant hospitalization in the United States. Preterm infants and those with select comorbidities are at highest risk of RSV-related complications. However, morbidity due to RSV infection is not confined to high-risk infants. We estimated the burden of medically attended (MA) RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) among infants in the United States. Methods We analyzed commercial (MarketScan Commercial [MSC], Optum Clinformatics [OC]), and Medicaid (MarketScan Medicaid [MSM]) insurance claims data for infants born between April 2016 and February 2020. Using both specific and sensitive definitions of MA RSV LRTI, we estimated the burden of MA RSV LRTI during infants’ first RSV season, stratified by gestational age, comorbidity status, and highest level of medical care associated with the MA RSV LRTI diagnosis. Results According to the specific definition 75.0% (MSC), 78.6% (MSM), and 79.6% (OC) of MA RSV LRTI events during infants’ first RSV season occurred among term infants without known comorbidities. Conclusions Term infants without known comorbidities account for up to 80% of the MA RSV LRTI burden in the United States during infants’ first RSV season. Future prevention efforts should consider all infants.

A retrospective, observational analysis of administrative claims data from the IBM MarketScan Databases assessed adherence and persistence among GLP-1 RA naive adult patients with T2D newly initiating dulaglutide (DU) or oral semaglutide (OS) between Sept 2019 and Nov 2020. Patients had continuous enrollment in the 6-mo pre-index period and 6-mo follow-up periods. The DU patients were propensity-score matched 1:1 to OS patients (6,166 pairs) . The median age was 54 years at index date, and 48% were female. At pre-index, mean aDCSI was 0.6 and 10% of patients had ASCVD. Most patients used oral anti-hyperglycemic medication (87%) ; a smaller proportion used insulin (15%) . The most common prescribing provider was primary care (62%) . More DU patients were adherent (proportion days covered [PDC] ≥80%) (65% vs. 50%, p During the 6-mo follow-up period, DU patients had significantly higher adherence and persistence compared to OS patients. Disclosure R. Paczkowski: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. M. Hoog: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company, Stock/Shareholder; Abbott, Eli Lilly and Company. J. Peleshok: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly and Company. M. Yu: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company, Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. A. Huang: None. B. Limone: None. J. Manjelievskaia: Employee; IBM Watson Health, Other Relationship; Eli Lilly and Company. Funding Eli Lilly and Company

Objectives To describe current psoriatic arthritis treatment and costs by provider specialty using real-world claims data. Study design Observational, retrospective cohort study of patients in the IBM MarketScan Commercial and supplemental Medicare databases. Methods Eligible patients had newly diagnosed psoriatic arthritis with 12 months of continuous enrollment pre- and post index date for their initial claim. Patients were assigned to 1 of 5 provider specialty cohorts. During the 1-year follow-up period, we collected psoriatic arthritis treatment agent and regimen type and total annual medical and health care costs. We used multivariate regression models to determine the conditional associations of provider specialty with costs. Results A total of 2132 patients with incident psoriatic arthritis qualified. Most providers were rheumatologists (n = 1365; 64%). Rheumatologists commonly prescribed oral small molecules (methotrexate, 56.3% of prescriptions; sulfasalazine, 8.6%; apremilast, 7.0%) as the index therapy, whereas 23.8% of prescriptions were for tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, 14.2%; etanercept, 7.9%; and infliximab, 1.7%). Compared with other specialists, dermatologists prescribed biologics and other specialty drugs more frequently-adalimumab (32.7%), apremilast (14.3%), etanercept (11.6%), and ustekinumab (8.8%)-and methotrexate less frequently (30.6%). The greatest unadjusted median health care costs were observed among dermatologists ($45,548) compared with rheumatologists ($30,411), primary care physicians ($29,927), rheumatologists/dermatologists ($27,393), and other specialists ($27,774). However, after adjusting for patient-level factors, multivariate regression analyses found that provider specialty was not associated with higher health care costs. Conclusions In patients with newly diagnosed psoriatic arthritis, physician specialty was associated with different medication choices but not costs.

Background Adverse health impacts of cystic fibrosis (CF) can be present in children before respiratory complications are observed. Children with CF show progressive health decline, with increasing lung function decline in adolescence. This study aims to quantify the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs attributable to CF by comparing children with CF with the general pediatric population. Methods This retrospective, cross‐sectional, observational study compared HCRU and costs among children with CF in the US with demographically similar children without CF (comparison group) over a 12‐month period using administrative claims data spanning 2010–2017. Analyses were conducted by insurance type (commercially insured [COM] and Medicaid insured [MED]) and stratified by age (

Introduction Ivacaftor was first approved in 2012 for the treatment of a select population of individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF), a rare, life-shortening genetic disease. Reductions in healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) associated with ivacaftor have been observed during limited follow-up and for selected outcomes in real-world studies. This study aimed to further describe the long-term impact of ivacaftor treatment on multiple measures of HCRU among people with CF (pwCF). Methods This retrospective study used US commercial and Medicaid claims data from 2011–2018. We included pwCF ≥ 6 years of age with ≥ 1 claim for ivacaftor and 12 months of continuous health plan enrollment before ivacaftor initiation (“pre-ivacaftor” period) who also had 36 months of continuous enrollment and persistent ivacaftor use (i.e., no gap ≥ 90 days between refills) following initiation (“post-ivacaftor” period). We compared comorbidities occurring pre-ivacaftor versus the last 12 months post-ivacaftor. HCRU outcomes included medication use, inpatient admissions, and outpatient office visits. We compared medication use pre-ivacaftor versus the last 12 months post-ivacaftor and inpatient admissions and outpatient office visits pre-ivacaftor versus the post-ivacaftor period annualized across 36 months. Results Seventy-nine pwCF met all criteria, including persistent ivacaftor use during the post-ivacaftor period. Ivacaftor treatment was associated with a significant reduction in pneumonia prevalence (10.1% vs. 26.6%; p

Background RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is the leading cause of infant hospitalization. Most studies of RSV have focused on infants with underlying comorbidities, including prematurity. The purpose of this analysis is to describe the burden of RSV LRTI across all medical settings and in all infants experiencing their first RSV season. Methods Using de-identified claims data from two commercial (MarketScan Commercial, MSC; Optum Clinformatics, OC) and one public (MarketScan Medicaid, MSM) insurance database, we estimated the prevalence of MA RSV LRTI among infants born between April 1, 2016 and June 30, 2019 in their first RSV season. Estimates were made by gestational age, presence/absence of comorbidities, and setting (inpatient, emergency department and outpatient). Due to limited laboratory testing, we defined MA RSV LRTI using two sets of ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes: a specific definition (identifying RSV explicitly) and a sensitive definition that included unspecified bronchiolitis. The first specific diagnosis triggered a search for another MA RSV LRTI diagnosis (either specific or sensitive) within the next 7 days. In the sensitive analysis, the first diagnosis was allowed to meet the sensitive definition. Setting was recorded as the highest level of care attached to a MA RSV LRTI diagnosis within this 7-day period. Results Using the specific (sensitive) definitions, 4.2% (12.2%), 6.8% (16.8%), and 2.7% (7.2%) of newborns had an MA RSV LRTI diagnosis during their first respiratory season across the MSC, MSM, and OC datasets (Table 1). Term infants without comorbidities accounted for 77% (83%), 79% (86%), and 80 (81%) of all MA RSV LRTI, and 21% (10%), 19% (10%), and 21% (10%) of all infants with MA RSV LRTI had an inpatient hospital stay (Table 2). Term infants without comorbidities accounted for 69% (68%), 67% (79%), and 73% (73%) of all MA RSV LRTI inpatients (Table 2). Conclusion In commercial and public claims data, during their first RSV season, term infants without comorbidities accounted for a sizable majority of inpatient, emergency room, and outpatient encounters for RSV LRTI in the US. To address the burden of RSV LRTI, future RSV prevention efforts should target all infants. Funding Sanofi Pasteur, AstraZeneca Disclosures Jason Gantenberg, MPH, Sanofi Pasteur (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support) Nicole Zimmerman, MS, IBM Watson Health (Employee, Nicole Zimmerman is an employee of IBM, which was compensated by Sanofi to complete this work.)Sanofi (Other Financial or Material Support, Nicole Zimmerman is an employee of IBM, which was compensated by Sanofi to complete this work.) Andrew R. Zullo, PharmD, PhD, ScM, Sanofi Pasteur (Grant/Research Support, Research Grant or Support) Brendan Limone, PharmD, PharmD, Sanofi Pasteur (Other Financial or Material Support, IBM was contracted by Sanofi to perform analysis) Clarisse Demont, n/a, Sanofi Pasteur (Employee, Shareholder) Sandra S. Chaves, MD, MSc, Sanofi Pasteur (Employee) William V. La Via, MD, AstraZeneca (Shareholder)Sanofi Pasteur (Employee) Christopher Nelson, PhD, Epidemiology, Sanofi Pasteur (Employee) Christopher Rizzo, MD, Sanofi (Employee) David A. Savitz, PhD, Sanofi Pasteur (Grant/Research Support) Robertus Van Aalst, MSc, Sanofi Pasteur (Employee, Shareholder)

ObjectiveTo examine the effects of belimumab initiation on healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) and costs in SLE.MethodsThis retrospective observational cohort study used healthcare administrative claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database to identify patients with SLE billing codes who received ≥1 intravenous belimumab infusion between March 2011 and December 2015. The first belimumab administration was the ‘index date’. During the 6-month postindex period, nine belimumab infusions were recommended: three during the initiation period and six during the maintenance period. HCRU and cost data for inpatient admissions, emergency department visits, physician office visits, hospital-based outpatient visits, laboratory services, other outpatient services and outpatient pharmacy prescriptions were compared in the 6-month pre/postindex periods.ResultsOf the 1879 patients with SLE included, 43% received ≥3 intravenous initiation administrations. An average of 5.3 (SD: 2.4) of the nine recommended belimumab administrations were received within 6 months. In the 6-month preindex versus postindex periods, significant reductions were noted for inpatient hospitalisations (18% vs 9%, pConclusionsIn this study of real-world intravenous belimumab for SLE, adherence to recommended infusion schedules was low. Outpatient healthcare and associated costs were higher in the 6 months after belimumab was initiated, although inpatient costs were lower. Reasons for non-adherence with belimumab and implications should be investigated.

Prior research has shown that rates of persistence and compliance with osteoporosis therapies are associated with significantly fewer vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures. A number of studies have examined medication-taking behavior with oral bisphosphonates and teriparatide, and these 1-year persistence rates have ranged from 39.9% to 56.7%. Limited real-world data are available regarding persistence and compliance rates with newer therapies such as denosumab, a RANK ligand inhibitor administered every 6 months as a subcutaneous injection. To assess persistence and compliance rates over 1 year with newly initiated osteoporosis therapies, including denosumab, alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, raloxifene, and teriparatide, within a cohort of commercially insured women. Health insurance claims data derived from Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare Supplemental and Coordination of Benefits databases (2010-2013) were used to conduct this retrospective cohort study. Adult females aged 18 years and older newly initiated on denosumab, raloxifene, teriparatide, or oral bisphosphonates (alendronate, ibandronate, or risedronate) between January 1, 2012, and March 31, 2012, were identified for inclusion. The date of the first qualifying osteoporosis prescription claim was defined as the index date. Patients were required to have at least 24 months of pre-index and at least 12 months of post-index continuous enrollment with medical and pharmacy benefits. Outcomes of patients initiating zoledronic acid (administered intravenously once yearly) were not assessed because a 12-month follow-up period would be insufficient for tracking persistence and compliance for this medication. Patients with Paget's disease of the bone, osteogenesis imperfecta, hypercalcemia, malignant cancer and metastasis, human immunodeficiency virus, and patients receiving preventive treatment for risk of breast cancer or denosumab in the pre-index period were excluded from the study. A subcohort of women aged 50 years and older at high risk for fracture (indicated by 1 or more of the following: aged ≥ 70 years, a pre-index fracture, or pre-index use of osteoporosis therapy that was discontinued at least 3 months prior to index) was analyzed separately. Propensity score weighting was used to adjust for differences in baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Persistence, indicated by continuous use of the index therapy without a gap of 60 days or more; medication coverage ratio (MCR), the proportion of days covered by the index therapy; and compliance, defined as an MCR ≥ 0.80, were assessed during the 12-month follow-up. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of persistence and compliance for the treatment groups of interest.10,863 female patients newly initiating osteoporosis medications (mean [SD] age: 66.2 [11.5] years) were identified. In the pre-index period, 35.8% of patients had a diagnosis of osteoporosis, while 11.5% had a diagnosis of osteopenia. Pre-index osteoporosis treatment was identified in 29.1% of patients, and 13.6% had an osteoporosis-related fracture in the pre-index period. Propensity score weight-adjusted 12-month persistence with the index medication varied from 28.9% to 35.1% for oral bisphosphonate users, 42.0% for raloxifene users, 59.1% for teriparatide users, and 68.3% for denosumab users (P less than 0.0001). The adjusted mean [SD] MCR was highest among patients treated with denosumab (0.83 [0.21]), followed by teriparatide (0.67 [0.31]), raloxifene, (0.57 [0.34]), ibandronate (0.54 [0.32]), alendronate (0.51 [0.33]), and risedronate (0.46 [0.33]; P less than 0.0001). The odds of being persistent and compliant across treatments favored denosumab (OR = 1.59 to 5.56, P less than 0.05 for persistence; OR = 2.44 to 7.69, P less than 0.0001 for compliance). Results were similar in the subcohort of women aged 50 years and older at high risk for fracture (n = 6,187; mean [SD] age: 71.9 [10.9] years). The odds of being persistent and compliant across treatments also favored denosumab (OR = 1.62 to 5.75, P less than 0.0001 for persistence; OR = 2.36 to 7.25, P less than 0.0001 for compliance).In a U.S. setting, rates of persistence and compliance over 12 months were higher among women initiating denosumab compared with those initiating other osteoporosis therapies.