Search

Objectives: This study pertains to a secondary data analysis aimed at determining differences between oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFSs) and dentists handling dental extractions without an evident clinical indication., Study Design: A survey of 18 questions was conducted among 256 OMFSs in the Netherlands and a random sample of 800 dentists Respondents could answer the questions in writing or online. The data was collected in the period from November 2019 to January 2020, during which two reminders were sent. Analysis of the data took place via descriptive statistics and Chi Square test., Results: The response rate was 28.1% (n = 72) for OMFSs and 30.3% (n = 242) for dentists. In the past three years, 81.9% (n = 59) of the OMFSs and 68.0% (n = 164) of the dentists received a request for extraction without a clinical indication. The most common reasons were financial and severe dental fear (OMFSs: 64.9 and 50.9% vs dentists: 77.4 and 36.5%). Dentists were significantly more likely (75.6%, n = 114) than OMFS (60.7%, n = 34) to comply with their last extraction request without a clinical indication. Almost none of them regretted the extraction afterwards. As for the request itself, it was found that 17.5% (n = 10) of the OMFSs and 12.5% (n = 20) of the dentists did not check for patients' mental competency (p = 0.352)., Conclusions: Given that most of the interviewed dental professionals complied with non-dental extraction requests when such extractions are ethically and legally precarious, recommendations for handling such requests are greatly needed., Competing Interests: The authors whose names are listed certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript., (Copyright: © 2023 Broers et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Objectives: to explain the practice of wish-fulfilling medicine and how it relates to dentistry., Sources: Relevant papers, and reports from authoritative institutions were identified in Pubmed and Google Scholar., Results: Wish-fulfilling medicine refers to services provided by professionals using medical methods in a medical setting to address non-medical wishes of patients. Care-providers, medical industries, and health-insurance companies also contribute to wish-fulfilling in medicine and dentistry. Various concepts of health and illness compounded by blurred borders between health and illness offer an unstable foundation for wish-fulfilling medicine, and growing demands for these services where healthcare resources are limited can displace medically necessary treatments. Moreover, treatments without a medical or a dental necessity, can be harmful and bear the risk of futile or excessive treatments not in patients' long-term interest. Examples in dentistry are found in the field of cosmetic interventions, prosthodontics and orthodontics, where perceptions of small 'deviations' from normality prompt wishes or recommendations for intervention. Ethically, wish-fulfilling services confront the principles of the common morality if the autonomy of a patient is compromised, beneficence is unclear, harm is foreseeable, or distributive justice is compromised. Wish-fulfilling dental treatment can be restricted by legislation if it conflicts with safe, effective and efficient care, or if it interferes with patient's real needs or undermines established professional standards., Conclusions: The general understanding of wish-fulfilling medicine including its ethical and legal themes is relevant to dentistry., Clinical Relevance: Ethical considerations and legislation can guide a dentist to reflect critically on clinical decisions regarding wish-fulfilling dentistry., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To explore which organisational aspects are considered most important by patients when assessing a general dental practice, and which patients' characteristics influence their views on these aspects by a paper questionnaire., Participants: The questionnaire was handed out to a sample of 5,000 patients in the Netherlands., Results: The response rate was 63%. Six organisational aspects out of a list of 41 aspects were valued as most important by at least 50%. In decreasing order of importance, these were: accessibility by telephone; continuing education for general dental practitioners; Dutch-speaking general dental practitioners; in-office waiting times; information about treatments offered; and waiting lists. For four out of these six aspects, respondents' age and education significantly influenced their preferences., Conclusions: Aspects concerning the infrastructure of a general dental practice were chosen more often than aspects such as working to professional standards, working according to protocols and guidelines, quality assessment and guaranteed treatment outcomes. The findings will enable organisations to increase the transparency of health-care delivery systems to focus on those organisational aspects of dental practices that patients themselves consider most important. These findings can also assist general dental practitioners in adapting their organisational services to the preferences of patients or specific patient groups., (© 2013 FDI World Dental Federation.)

Background: Considering the changes in dental healthcare, such as the increasing assertiveness of patients, the introduction of new dental professionals, and regulated competition, it becomes more important that general dental practitioners (GDPs) take patients' views into account. The aim of the study was to compare patients' views on organizational aspects of general dental practices with those of GDPs and with GDPs' estimation of patients' views., Methods: In a survey study, patients and GDPs provided their views on organizational aspects of a general dental practice. In a second, separate survey, GDPs were invited to estimate patients' views on 22 organizational aspects of a general dental practice., Results: For 4 of the 22 aspects, patients and GDPs had the same views, and GDPs estimated patients' views reasonably well: 'Dutch-speaking GDP', 'guarantee on treatment', 'treatment by the same GDP', and 'reminder of routine oral examination'. For 2 aspects ('quality assessment' and 'accessibility for disabled patients') patients and GDPs had the same standards, although the GDPs underestimated the patients' standards. Patients had higher standards than GDPs for 7 aspects and lower standards than GDPs for 8 aspects., Conclusion: On most aspects GDPs and patient have different views, except for social desirable aspects. Given the increasing assertiveness of patients, it is startling the GDP's estimated only half of the patients' views correctly. The findings of the study can assist GDPs in adapting their organizational services to better meet the preferences of their patients and to improve the communication towards patients.

The dental profession is gradually becoming more aware of the importance of practitioner competence in dental ethics and law. Indicative of that awareness is the explicit attention paid by ever more dental school curricula to these disciplines through courses and other dedicated learning activities. Concurrently there is also increasing professional concern about reports of illegal and unethical behaviour by dental students and practitioners. This paper discusses the results of a survey among first and fifth year students enrolled in the three Dutch dental schools, examining their ethical and legal knowledge and perceptions. Students were presented with five ethical and five legal case vignettes and asked which of three courses of actions is correct, as well as which of those courses they would undertake themselves. The study shows that the knowledge level of students in the area of health law increases between the first and fifth year but their knowledge of ethics decreases. Even more remarkable is the finding that large numbers of students are not consistent, that is, the way they plan to behave does not coincide with what they say is the morally correct way to behave.

Background: It is not clear which closed drainage technique is preferred as initial therapy for mediastinitis as soon as it is detected after cardiac surgery. A comparison is made between a continuous irrigation system and vacuum drainage using redon catheters., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing cardiac surgery between January 1, 1989 and January 1, 1997 was made. Patients who developed a deep surgical site infection at the sternotomy site and who were treated with one of the two closed drainage techniques were included. Patient characteristics and procedure-related variables were analyzed. Also, variables related to the drainage procedure were included. Outcome parameters were treatment failure, total hospital stay, postoperative hospital stay and in-hospital mortality., Results: The study population consisted of 11,488 patients, of whom 102 developed a deep surgical site infection (0.89%). The final study population consisted of 60 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. From those, 29 were treated with continuous irrigation and 31 were treated with vacuum drainage. Both groups were comparable for patient characteristics and procedure-related variables. Treatment failure was more than three times as likely in the continuous irrigation group (relative risk: 3.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.3 to 7.7). Also, postoperative (p = 0.03) and total hospital stay (p = 0.03) were significantly longer in the group treated with continuous irrigation (mean prolongation of 14 and 13 days, respectively). After correcting for confounding, using multivariate analysis, the treatment method employed was found to be an independent and statistically significant variable associated with treatment failure (p = 0.04)., Conclusions: Closed drainage using vacuum-drainage system is the initial therapy of choice for patients with mediastinitis after cardiac surgery, because it is associated with significantly less treatment failure and a shorter stay in hospital.

Objective: Fifteen collaborating centers in eight countries present their pooled experience with the new Bicarbon bileaflet valve., Methods: Between 4/90 and 4/96, 1351 patients, 806 males and 545 females, aged 10 to 83, mean 58.4 +/- 12.4, underwent valve implantation., Operations: aortic valve replacement (AVR), 726; mitral valve replacement (MVR), 475; double valve replacement (DVR), 150. Additional procedures: CABG, 211; TV repair, 64; other, 152., Results: Mortality: 67 early (seven valve related) and 56 late (40 valve related). Valve thrombosis: six obstructive, three non-obstructive; embolism: nine major cerebral, 37 other. Major bleeding: 29. Hemolysis: two clinically significant. Non-structural dysfunction: 24 paravalvular leaks, one leaflet interference. No structural failure! Endocarditis: 24. Reoperation 48: 22 non-structural dysfunctions, 14 endocarditis, seven thrombosis and embolism, five other. Estimated 5-year freedom from valve-related deaths is 97.2% for AVR and 92.4% for MVR; 4-year freedom from valve related deaths for DVR is 90.5%. Mean calculated NYHA improvement is 1.24., Conclusions: The Bicarbon mechanical prosthesis is well designed, durable, has good hemodynamic features and an acceptably low incidence of complications.