1. Primary Pain Palliation and Local Tumor Control in Bone Metastases Treated With Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound
- Author
-
Alessandro Napoli, Federica Ciolina, Claudia Marsecano, Giulia Brachetti, Gaia Cartocci, Fulvio Zaccagna, Michele Anzidei, Beatrice Cavallo Marincola, Luca Marchetti, Enrico Cortesi, Carlo Catalano, Napoli A., Anzidei M., Marincola B.C., Brachetti G., Ciolina F., Cartocci G., Marsecano C., Zaccagna F., Marchetti L., Cortesi E., and Catalano C.
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Pain ,cancer oncology ,high-intensity focused ultrasound ,pain palliation ,oncology ,bone metastases ,cancer ,mrgfus ,mr-guided interventional radiology ,Bone Neoplasms ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional ,Medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Adverse effect ,Pathological ,bone metastase ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Palliative Care ,Interventional radiology ,Increased Bone Density ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Institutional review board ,High-intensity focused ultrasound ,Clinical trial ,Treatment Outcome ,High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation ,Female ,Radiology ,business - Abstract
Objectives: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy in painmanagement of magnetic resonance (MR)Yguided focused ultrasound for theprimary treatment of painful bone metastases and to assess its potential for localcontrol of bone metastases.Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, single-arm research studywith approval from the institutional review board. Eighteen consecutive patients(female, 8; male, 10; mean [SD] age, 62.7 [11.5] years) with painful bone me-tastases were enrolled. The patients were examined clinically for pain severityand pain interference in accordance with the Brief Pain Inventory-Quality ofLife criteria before and at each follow-up visit. Computed tomography andMR imaging were performed before and at 1 and 3 months after the mag-netic resonanceYguided focused ultrasound treatment. The nonperfused volume(NPV) was calculated to correlate the extension of the ablated pathological tis-sue in the responder and nonresponder patients.Results: No treatment-related adverse events were recorded during the study.The evaluation of pain palliation revealed a statistically significant differencebetween baseline and follow-up values for pain severity and pain interference(P = 0.001, both evaluations). In the evaluation of local tumor control, we ob-served increased bone density with restoration of cortical borders in 5 of the18 patients (27.7%). In accordance with the MD Anderson criteria, completeand partial responses were obtained in 2 of the 18 patients (11.1%) and 4 of the18 patients (22.2%), respectively. Nonperfused volume values ranged between20% and 93%. Mean NPV values remained substantially stable after the treat-ment (P = 0.08). There was no difference in the NPV values between the re-sponder and nonresponder patients (46.7% [24.2%] [25%Y90%] versus 45%[24.9%] [20%Y93%]; P = 0.7).Conclusions: Magnetic resonanceYguided focused ultrasound can be safelyand effectively used as the primary treatment of pain palliation in patientswith bone metastases and has a potential role in local tumor control.Key Words: MRgFUS, high-intensity focused ultrasound, bone metastases,pain palliation, MR-guided interventional radiology, cancer, oncology(Invest Radiol 2013;48: 00Y00)
- Published
- 2013