Search

PurposeTo examine body weight change in women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) using antagonist protocol after up to three treatment cycles.MethodsA prospective cohort study among IVF patients treated between 2018 and 2019. Each patient underwent weight measurement three times during the treatment cycle: before treatment, at the beginning of the hormonal stimulation, and at the completion of the cycle, on the day of the pregnancy test. Data were also analyzed according to the body mass index (BMI) groups for normal weight, overweight, and obese patients. Finally, weight changes were recorded following altogether 519 treatment cycles, 240, 131, and 148 cycles, for normal weight, overweight, and obese patients, respectively.ResultsThe change in the patient's weight was clinically non-significant either during the waiting period or during gonadotropin administration, and overall, during the first, second, or third treatment cycles. The recorded mean total weight change of 0.26 ± 1.85, 0.4 ± 1.81, and 0.17 ± 1.7, after the first, second, or third treatment cycles, represent a change of 0.36%, 0.56%, and 0.23% of their initial weights, respectively. This change of less than 1% of the body weight falls short of the clinically significant weight gain of 5%–7%. Analyzing the data for the various BMI groups, the changes observed in body weight were under 1%, hence with no clinical significance.ConclusionThe findings of the study reject the myth that hormone therapy involves clinically significant weight gain, and this can lower the concerns of many patients who are candidates for treatment of assisted reproductive technology.

Abstract Objective Nowadays, patients attempting social/elective egg freezing has spread globally. Ovarian stimulation (OS) with high daily gonatotropin doses, are commonly offered to this group of patients, aiming to achieve the maximal oocytes cohort with minimum IVF cycle attempts. We aim to assess the IVF-ET outcome, and specifically the oocyte yield, of patients undergoing two successive IVF cycle attempts for elective egg freezing (EEF), and whether changing the daily gonadotropin dose in the second IVF cycle attempt, affect the outcome. Patients and methods All women admitted to our IVF unit for social/EEF, who underwent 2 consecutive IVF cycle attempts, with only those who used in the first attempt a starting daily gonadotropin dose of 300 IU were included. Ovarian stimulation characteristics, duration of OS, number of retrieved oocytes, number of mature oocytes were assessed and compared between the 1st and the 2nd IVF cycle attempts, and between the different daily gonadotropin doses and the oocyte yields in the 2nd cycle attempt (increase, decrease or no change). Main outcome measures Oocytes and mature oocytes yield in the 2nd as compared to the 1st IVF cycle attempt. Results A reduced oocyte yield in the 2nd cycle attempt was observed in those who highly responded in the 1st attempt, regardless the daily dose in the 2nd cycle attempt (whether it was increased, no change and decreased). Moreover, the proportion of patients with same or more oocytes in the 2nd IVF cycle attempt was significantly lower in patients with high peak E2 levels, compared to those with peak E2 levels 9175 pmol/L), those who achieved a lower oocytes yield in the 2nd IVF cycle attempt had lower basal Day-3 FSH/LH ratio (1.5 + 0.5 vs 1.8 + 0.8, p 9 oocytes and 61.8% of those with 9175 pmol/L) in the 1st attempt, and basal Day-3 FSH/LH ratio

This multi-center study evaluated a novel microscope system capable of quantitative phase microscopy (QPM) for label-free sperm-cell selection for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Seventy-three patients were enrolled in four in vitro fertilization (IVF) units, where senior embryologists were asked to select 11 apparently normal and 11 overtly abnormal sperm cells, in accordance with current clinical practice, using a micromanipulator and 60× bright field microscopy. Following sperm selection and imaging via QPM, the individual sperm cell was chemically stained per World Health Organization (WHO) 2021 protocols and imaged via bright field microscopy for subsequent manual measurements by embryologists who were blinded to the QPM measurements. A comparison of the two modalities resulted in mean differences of 0.18 µm (CI −0.442–0.808 µm, 95%, STD—0.32 µm) for head length, −0.26 µm (CI −0.86–0.33 µm, 95%, STD—0.29 µm) for head width, 0.17 (CI −0.12–0.478, 95%, STD—0.15) for length–width ratio and 5.7 for acrosome–head area ratio (CI −12.81–24.33, 95%, STD—9.6). The repeatability of the measurements was significantly higher in the QPM modality. Surprisingly, only 19% of the subjectively pre-selected normal cells were found to be normal according to the WHO2021 criteria. The measurements of cells imaged stain-free through QPM were found to be in good agreement with the measurements performed on the reference method of stained cells imaged through bright field microscopy. QPM is non-toxic and non-invasive and can improve the clinical effectiveness of ICSI by choosing sperm cells that meet the strict criteria of the WHO2021.