Search

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (P-NETs) are highly heterogeneous with wide spectrum of biological behaviors and growth patterns. Here, we aimed to assess the impact of tumor grading on P-NETs prognosis and survival outcomes.Patients with P-NET were recruited to determine correlations between grades and clinicopathological factors, survival outcomes and prognostic factors.A total of 152 patients with P-NETs were enrolled. G1 P-NET were associated with significantly lower rates of perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node involvement and distant metastasis. The pancreatic head was the most common location of P-NETs. The 1-year, 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates of the patients were 94.4%, 89.1% and 78.8%, respectively. Majority of pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (P-NEC) were unresectable (90.9%), and P-NECs patients had poor survival rates (1-year, 20% and no 5-year). Male sex, tumor size ≥2.5 cm, perineural invasion, lymph node invasion, metastasis, and advanced stage were significantly associated with poorer survival outcomes. Tumor grade and sex were independent survival predictors. Moreover, tumor grade was the most powerful prognostic factor.Tumor grade, sex, perineural invasion, tumor size, lymph node involvement, metastasis, and stage are survival predictors for patients with P-NETs. Tumor grade is the most powerful independent prognostic factor.

Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) in ampullary cancer has never been studied. This study aimed to clarify the feasibility and justification of RPD in ampullary cancer in terms of surgical risks, and oncological and survival outcomes. A propensity score-matching comparison of RPD and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) based on seven factors commonly used to predict the survival outcomes in ampullary cancer patients. A total of 147 patients were enrolled, of which 101 and 46 underwent RPD and OPD, respectively. After propensity score-matching with a 2:1 ratio, 88 and 44 patients in the RPD and OPD groups were included. The operation time was of no significant difference after matching. The median intraoperative blood loss was much less in those who underwent RPD, both before (median, 120 c.c. vs. 320 c.c. P P

The study of robotic pancreaticouodenectomy (RPD) focusing on delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is seldom reported. This study explored the incidence of DGE in RPD with extracorporeal hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy involving downward positioning of the stomach. Patients with periampullary lesions undergoing RPD or open pancreaticouodenectomy (OPD) were included for comparison. A variety of clinical factors were evaluated for the risk of developing DGE. There were 409 (68.2%) RPD and 191 (31.8%) OPD in this study. DGE occurred in 7.7% of patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy, with 4.4% in RPD and 14.7% in OPD, p 200 c.c. was the other factor related to DGE (11.2% vs. 4.4% in those with blood loss ≤ 200 c.c.). None of the postoperative complications was significantly associated with DGE. Hospital stay was significantly longer in the group with DGE (median, 37 vs. 20 days in the group without DGE). After multivariate analysis by binary logistic regression, compared with OPD, RPD was the only independent factor associated with a lower incidence of DGE. RPD with extracorporeal hand-sewn antecolic, antiperistaltic, and inframesocolic gastrojejunostomy via a small umbilical wound involving careful downward positioning of the stomach was associated with a low incidence of DGE and presented as the most powerful independent predictor of this condition.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy, so‐called “Whipple operation,” is a time‐consuming and technically demanding complex operation. Traditionally, this procedure has been performed most usually by open approach, which results in a large and painful wound. With the introduction of laparoscopic and robotic surgery, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has emerged as a worldwide trend to improve wound cosmesis and to minimize wound pain. Although MIS for pancreaticoduodenectomy has also been attempted at some centers, the role of MIS, either robotic or laparoscopic approach, has not been well‐established for complex pancreaticoduodenectomy. Given that laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy has been limited by its technical complexity and the high level of advanced laparoscopic skills required for pancreatic reconstruction, a robotic surgical system is introduced to overcome several limitations related to the laparoscopic approach. Providing high‐quality three‐dimensional (3‐D) vision, high optical magnification, articulation of robotic instruments, greater precision with suture targeting, and elimination of surgeon tremor, robotic surgical systems innovatively perform more delicate and complex procedures involving extensive dissection and suturing techniques such as pancreaticoduodenectomy. Although associated with longer operative time, robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) has been claimed to have the benefits of less delayed gastric emptying, less blood loss, shorter length of postoperative stay, and lower wound infection rate, as compared with the traditional open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). Moreover, RPD seems to be not only technically feasible but also justified without compromising the survival outcomes for pancreatic head and ampullary adenocarcinomas. Therefore, RPD could be recommended not only to surgeons but also to patients in terms of surgical feasibility, surgical outcomes, and patient satisfaction., Robotic approach allows surgeons to perform more complicated and delicate procedures such as pancreaticoduodenectomy involving extensive dissection and restoration of digestive tract continuity for the pancreas, bile duct, and gastrointestinal tract. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy has been reported as associated with less blood loss, less delayed gastric emptying, shorter length of postoperative stay, and lower wound infection rate, but longer operative time, as compared with the traditional open pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Theoretically, pancreas transplant alone in uremic (PTAU) patients could also be one of the options for those waiting for both pancreas and kidney grafts, but it has never been reported. There were 160 cases of pancreas transplant in this study, including 16% PTAU. The 5-year patient survival was 66.2% after PTAU, 94.5% after SPK, 95.8% after PAK, and 95.4% after PTA. Rejection of pancreas graft was significantly lower in PTAU group (3.8%), followed by 16.7% in pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK), 29.8% in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant (SPK) and 37.0% in pancreas transplant alone (PTA). Fasting blood sugar and serum HbA1c levels after PTAU were not significantly different from those by other subgroups. The 5-year death-censored pancreas graft survival was 100% after PTAU and PAK, and 97.0% after SPK and 77.9% after PTA. However, the 5-year death-uncensored pancreas graft survival was 67.0% after PTAU, 100% after PAK, 91.3% after SPK, and 74.0% after PTA. The superior graft survival in the PTAU group was achieved only if deaths with a functioning graft were censored. In conclusion, given the inferior patient survival outcome, PTAU is still not recommended unless SPK and PAK is not available. Although PTAU could be a treatment option for patients with diabetes complicated by end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in terms of surgical risks, endocrine function, and immunological and graft survival outcomes, modification of the organ allocation policies to prioritize SPK transplant in eligible patients should be the prime goal.

Theoretically, pancreas before kidney transplant (PBK) could also be one of the options for those waiting for both pancreas and kidney grafts, but it has never been reported. This study is to clarify the justification and feasibility of PBK. There were 160 cases of pancreas transplant in this study, including 26 (16%) PBK. Rejection (3.8%) of pancreas graft was significantly lower in PBK group, followed by 16.7% in pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK), 29.8% in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant (SPK) and 37.0% in pancreas transplant alone (PTA). There was no chronic rejection in PBK and PAK groups. Fasting blood sugar and serum HbA1c levels after PBK were not significantly different from those by other subgroups. The serum C-peptide levels were significantly higher in PBK group than those by other subgroups. The 5-year pancreas graft survival was 100% for PBK and PAK, 97.0% for SPK and 77.9% for PTA. In conclusion, PBK could be a treatment option for patients with diabetes complicated by end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in terms of surgical risks, endocrine function, and immunological and graft survival outcomes. However, given the inferior patient survival outcome, PBK is still not recommended unless SPK and PAK is not available.

Background Though nowadays a palliative pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) can be performed safely with relatively low mortality and acceptable morbidity rates in experienced centers, there have been no studies on the routine use of a palliative PD or on the advantages of performing surgical resection as a debulking procedure. Furthermore, the impact of resection margins on survival outcomes has been a matter of controversy. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the role of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) in pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinomas with positive resection margins. Methods Patients undergoing RPDs and open pancreaticoduodenectomies (OPDs) were included in this study. Based on the resection margins, the patients were divided into the R0, R1, and R2 PD groups. Surgical risks and survival outcomes were analyzed. Results There were 348 pancreaticoduodenectomies, including 29 (8.3%) palliative and 319 (91.7%) curative. Primary tumor origin, tumor sizes, perineural invasions, and abnormal serum CEA levels were factors leading to palliative resection. The multivariate analysis showed that only pancreatic head adenocarcinomas and abnormal serum CEA levels (> 5 ng/mL) were independent predictors. The surgical risks between curative and palliative PD were similar. There were no significant differences in the surgical risks and other surgical parameters between palliative RPDs and OPDs. For curative resection, RPDs resulted in less blood loss, greater harvested lymph nodes yield, less postoperative complications, less delayed gastric emptying, and shorter hospital stays than OPDs. The survival outcome was significantly better following R0 resection in overall periampullary adenocarcinomas, whereas a significant survival difference was shown only between the R0 and R2 resections for pancreatic head adenocarcinomas. Conclusion Compared with R0 PDs, palliative R1 PDs could benefit patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinomas when considering survival outcomes without increasing surgical risks. RPD can be considered for curative purposes and as an alternative for palliative management.

Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in ampullary cancer patients was measured to clarify the correlation between cfDNA and clinicopathological factors and the impact of cfDNA on survival outcomes. Patients with ampullary cancer undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy were included. Correlations between cfDNA and clinicopathological and prognostic factors were determined. The cfDNA levels in patients ranged from 1282 to 21,674 copies/mL, with a median of 6687 copies/mL. The cfDNA level was significantly higher in patients with lymph node involvement, lymphovascular invasion, abnormal serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, and stage II and III cancer. Poor prognostic factors for ampullary cancer included high cfDNA &gt, 6687 copies/mL, lymph node involvement, abnormal serum CEA &gt, 5 ng/mL, and advanced stage II and III cancer. The 1- and 5-year survival rates were 92.0% and 66.5%, respectively, for patients with low cfDNA &lt, 6687 copies/mL and 84.0% and 49.9%, respectively, for patients with high cfDNA &gt, 6687 copies/mL (p &lt, 0.001). After multivariate analysis, only the cfDNA level and stage were independent prognostic factors of ampullary cancer. Thus, the cfDNA level could act as a surrogate marker of both disease extent and biological aggressiveness of ampullary cancer. Moreover, cfDNA plays a significant role in the prognosis of resectable ampullary cancer.

Summary Background/objective This study is to assess immunological and graft survival outcomes after pancreas transplant at a single institute in Asia. Methods Patients undergoing pancreas transplant with enteric drainage were included. Clinical data and outcomes were evaluated and compared between each subgroup. Results There were 165 cases of pancreas transplant, including 38 (23 %) simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK), 24 (15 %) pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK), 75 (46 %) pancreas transplant alone (PTA), and 28 (17 %) pancreas before kidney transplant (PBK). The overall surgical complication rate was 46.1 %, with highest (62.5 %) in PAK and lowest (32.0 %) in PTA, P = 0.008. The late complications included 32.7 % infection and 3.6 % malignancy. Overall rejection of pancreas graft was 24.8 % including 18.2 % acute and 9.7 % chronic rejection. Rejection was highest in PTA group (36.0 %) and lowest in PBK (3.6 %). There were 56 cases (33.9 %) with graft loss in total, with highest graft loss rate in PTA (38.7 %). The 1-year, 5-year and 10-year pancreas graft survivals for total patients were 98.0 %, 87.7 % and 70.9 % respectively. Conclusions Enteric drainage in pancreas transplant could be applied safely not only in SPK but also in other subgroups. Enteric drainage itself would not compromise the immunological and graft survival outcomes.

Choledochal cyst is a relatively rare congenital disease. The current standard treatment of choice for choledochal cyst is complete excision with Roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy due to possible associated complications if left untreated, such as cholangitis, pancreatitis, cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and biliary malignancy. Traditionally, the resection for choledochal cyst is carried out with open surgery because of complex dissection and bilioenteric reconstruction. Recently, minimal invasive approach has gain wide interest, especially with the use of robotic surgical systems which can facilitate complex minimal access procedures. Herein, we present a case of robotic assisted excision of type I choledochal cyst in a young lady with complete intracorporeal reconstruction of Roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy. Robotic-assisted surgery can be safely applied to the resection of type I choledochal cyst and also provide a complex suturing technique for reconstruction with Roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy. Although the total operating time for robot-assisted resection of choledochal cysts and hepaticojejunostomy is relatively long for this initial experience, the young lady and family are pleased with the cosmetic results.

BACKGROUND: Pancreas transplantation remains the best long-term treatment option to achieve physiological euglycemia and insulin independence in patients with labile diabetes mellitus (DM). It is widely accepted as an optimal procedure for type 1 DM (T1DM), but its application in type 2 DM (T2DM) is not unanimously acknowledged. METHODS: In total, 146 diabetes patients undergoing pancreas transplantation were included in this study. Clinical data and outcomes were compared between the T1DM and T2DM groups. RESULTS: Majority (93%) of the pancreas transplantations in T2DM were for uremic recipients. Complications occurred in 106 (73%) patients, including 70 (48%) with early complications before discharge and 79 (54%) with late complications during follow-up period. Overall, rejection of pancreas graft occurred in 37 (25%) patients. Total rejection rate in T2DM recipients was significantly lower than that in T1DM. The short- and long-term outcomes for endocrine function in terms of fasting blood sugar and hemoglobin A1c levels and graft survival rates are comparable between the T2DM and T1DM groups. CONCLUSIONS: T2DM is not inferior to T1DM after pancreas transplantation in terms of surgical risks, immunological and endocrine outcomes, and graft survival rates. Therefore, pancreas transplantation could be an effective option to treat selected uremic T2DM patients without significant insulin resistance.

Pancreas transplantation is currently the most effective and curative treatment for complicated type 1 diabetes mellitus, providing durable and physiological insulin-independent euglycemia, preventing worsening or ameliorating of diabetic complications, and improving quality of life. Currently, more than 31 000 pancreas transplantation procedures have been performed, mainly in the United States. Pancreas transplantation is still an uncommon procedure in Asia, mainly performed in Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. The first pancreas (simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation) transplantation was successfully initiated at Taipei Veterans General Hospital on September 19, 2003, and we are the first team to be qualified to perform human pancreas procurement and transplantation by Taiwan Department of Health on August 31, 2007. The technique success rate in our pancreas transplantation is 97%, with 1-year pancreas graft survival rate of 95.8%, 5-year pancreas graft survival rate of 89.9%, and 10-year pancreas graft survival rate of 65.9%.

Summary: Background/Objective: There are no reports available on patient satisfaction and quality-of-life after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). This study aimed to evaluate not only surgical outcomes but also patient satisfaction after RPD. Methods: Prospectively collected data for RPD were analyzed for surgical outcomes. Questionnaires were sent to patients to assess patient satisfaction regarding RPD. Results: The study included 105 patients who underwent RPD, with 44 (41.9%) patients presenting with associated surgical complications. There were no significant differences between the without and with complication groups in median console time (390 min. Vs. 373 min.), blood loss (100 mL vs. 100 mL), and harvested lymph node number (14 vs. 15). There was no surgical mortality in this study. Major complications ≥ Clavien–Dindo III occurred in 7.6% of the total 105 RPD patients. The most common complication was chyle leakage (18.1%), followed by postoperative pancreatic fistula (5.7%), intra-abdominal abscess (4.8%), delayed gastric emptying (3.8%), and post pancreatectomy hemorrhage (3.8%). Almost all of the patients responded to this RPD-related survey with “fair” to “excellent” grades for all items, except 1 (

The aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes after Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) and pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) for pancreatic-enteric reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy.Data of patients undergoing Blumgart PJ and PG were retrieved from prospectively-collected database. Matched patients in each surgical groups were included based on the Callery risk scoring system for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) (grades B and C). Surgical parameters and risks were compared between these two groups.A total of 206 patients undergoing PD were included. Blumgart PJ was associated with shorter postoperative hospital stay (median (range) 25 (10-99) vs. 27 (10-97) days, P = 0.022). There was no surgical mortality in the Blumgart PJ group, but a 4.9% perioperative mortality in the PG, P = 0.030. The CR-POPF by Blumgrt PG is significantly lower than that by PG for overall patients (7% vs. 20%, P = 0.007), especially for those in intermediate fistula risk zone (6% vs. 21%, P =0.048) and high fistula risk zone (14% vs. 47%, P=0.038).Blumgart PJ is superior to PG in terms of pancreatic leakage and surgical mortality. Blumgart PJ can be recommended for pancreatic reconstruction after PD for all pancreatic remnant subtypes.

Pancreatic groove cancer is very rare and can be indistinguishable from groove pancreatitis. This study is to clarify the characteristics, clinical features, managements, and survival outcomes of this rare tumor. Brief descriptions were made for each case of pancreatic groove cancer encountered at our institute. Individualized data of pancreatic groove cancer cases described in the literature were extracted and added to our database to expand the study sample size for a more complete analysis. A total of 33 patients with pancreatic groove cancer were included for analysis, including 4 cases from our institute. The median tumor size was 2.7 cm. The most common symptom was nausea or vomiting (89%), followed by jaundice (67%). Duodenal stenosis was noted by endoscopy in 96% of patients. The histopathological examination revealed well differentiated tumor in 43%. Perineural invasion was noted in 90%, and lymphovascular invasion and lymph node involvement in 83%. Overall 1-year survival rate was 93.3%, and 3- or 5-year survival rate was 62.2%, with a median survival of 11.0 months. Survival outcome for the well-differentiated tumors was better than those of the moderate/poorly differentiated ones. Early involvement of duodenum causing vomiting is often the initial presentation, but obstructive jaundice does not always happen until the disease progresses. Tumor differentiation is a prognostic factor for survival outcome. The possibility of pancreatic groove cancer should be carefully excluded before making the diagnosis of groove pancreatitis for any questionable case.

Background Gallbladder metastasis from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is extremely rare. The purpose of this study is to clarify the characteristics of metastatic RCC to gallbladder. Methods The pooled data for analysis were collected from the case of metastatic RCC to gallbladder encountered by our institution along with sporadic cases reported in literature from 1991 to 2015. Results A total of 50 cases of metastatic RCC to gallbladder were recruited for study. Fifty-seven percentage of the primary RCC was from the right kidney and 43% from the left. The median interval between diagnoses of primary and metastatic RCC to gallbladder was 36 months, with the longest duration up to 324 months. Most (70%) were asymptomatic. The size of metastatic RCC to gallbladder ranged from 0.8 cm to 9 cm, with median of 2.6 cm. Majority (91%) of the metastatic RCCs presented as a polypoid mass with narrow stalk, and 82% were hypervascular lesion. The overall 1 year, 3 year and 5 year survival rate was 91.5%, 76.2% and 59.3% respectively, with a median of 26.5 months. Number of the metastatic site, timing of gallbladder metastasis, symptom, tumor size and operation type of cholecystectomy seemed to have no impact on survival. Conclusions Metastatic RCC to the gallbladder should be taken into account for a gallbladder polypoid mass with narrow hypervascular stalk during the diagnosis and/or follow-up of primary RCC. Gallbladder metastasis from RCC is not necessarily to be an advanced stage with poor outcome, and cholecystectomy is recommended whenever possible.

This study sought to identify the learning curves of console time (CT) for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP). Perioperative outcomes were compared between the early group of surgeries performed early in the learning curve and the late group of surgeries performed after the learning curve. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a technically demanding and challenging procedure carrying a high morbidity. Data for RDP and RPD were prospectively collected for analysis. The learning curve was assessed by cumulative sum (CUSUM). Based on CUSUM analyses, patients were divided into the early group and the late group. There were 70 RDP and 61 RPD cases. It required 37 cases to overcome the learning curve for RDP and 20 cases for RPD. The median console time was significantly shorter in the late group for both RDP (112 minutes vs 225 minutes, P