Search

Audrey Debaillon Vesque,1 Marie Decraecker,1 Jean-Frédéric Blanc1,2 1Department of Oncology, CHU Bordeaux, Hospital Haut Leveque, Pessac 33604 France; 2INSERM U1053, BaRITOn, University Victor Segalen, Bordeaux, FranceCorrespondence: Jean-Frédéric Blanc Email jean-frederic.blanc@chu-bordeaux.frAbstract: Management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma is challenging. With an increasing number of options for the first and second-line treatment, understanding and developing optimal systemic treatment strategies are crucial. In second line, two tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and one monoclonal antibody have been approved after sorafenib by both the European Medicines Agency and the Food and Drug Administration based on the results of phase 3 trials: cabozantinib, regorafenib and ramucirumab. Cabozantinib has demonstrated an improved overall survival and progression-free survival in the phase 3 CELESTIAL study in second and third line, in patients in good general condition (performance status 0– 1) and with a normal liver function Child-Pugh class A. Analysis of subgroups has shown that even elderly patients over 65 years, or patients with high baseline alpha-fetoprotein ≥ 400 ng/mL benefit from cabozantinib. The choice in second-line between the three drugs should be based on factors such as previous tolerance of sorafenib, safety profile of drugs and quality of life. In this review, we will analyze clinical data available on cabozantinib, clarifying the choice between the different possible treatments. However, the upcoming of a new standard in first line with the combination atezolizumab and bevacizumab will change the game and will warrant further investigations to define the accurate subsequent sequence of TKIs. Cabozantinib is also actually tested in first-line in combination with atezolizumab, results of the phase 3 COSMIC trial are eagerly awaited.Keywords: advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, cabozantinib, MET, alpha-fetoprotein, AFP, tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Objectives: Non-invasive subtyping of hepatocellular adenomas (HCA) remains challenging for several subtypes, thus carrying different levels of risks and management. The goal of this study is to devise a multivariable diagnostic model based on basic clinical features (age and sex) combined with MRI-radiomics and to evaluate its diagnostic performance., Methods: This single-center retrospective case-control study included all consecutive patients with HCA identified within the pathological database from our institution from January 2003 to April 2018 with MRI examination (T2, T1-no injection/injection-arterial-portal); volumes of interest were manually delineated in adenomas and 38 textural features were extracted (LIFEx, v5.10). Qualitative (i.e., visual on MRI) and automatic (computer-assisted) analysis were compared. The prognostic scores of a multivariable diagnostic model based on basic clinical features (age and sex) combined with MRI-radiomics (tumor volume and texture features) were assessed using a cross-validated Random Forest algorithm., Results: Via visual MR-analysis, HCA subgroups could be classified with balanced accuracies of 80.8 % (I-HCA or ß-I-HCA, the two being indistinguishable), 81.8 % (H-HCA) and 74.4 % (sh-HCA or ß-HCA also indistinguishable). Using a model including age, sex, volume and texture variables, HCA subgroups were predicted (multivariate classification) with an averaged balanced accuracy of 58.6 %, best=73.8 % (sh-HCA) and 71.9 % (ß-HCA). I-HCA and ß-I-HCA could be also distinguished (binary classification) with a balanced accuracy of 73 %., Conclusion: Multiple HCA subtyping could be improved using machine-learning algorithms including two clinical features, i.e., age and sex, combined with MRI-radiomics. Future HCA studies enrolling more patients will further test the validity of the model., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an inflammation-associated cancer arising from viral or non-viral etiologies including steatotic liver diseases (SLDs). Expansion of immunosuppressive myeloid cells is a hallmark of inflammation and cancer, but their heterogeneity in HCC is not fully resolved and might underlie immunotherapy resistance. Here, we present a high-resolution atlas of innate immune cells from patients with HCC that unravels an SLD-associated contexture characterized by influx of inflammatory and immunosuppressive myeloid cells, including a discrete population of THBS1 + regulatory myeloid (M reg ) cells expressing monocyte- and neutrophil-affiliated genes. THBS1 + M reg cells expand in SLD-associated HCC, populate fibrotic lesions, and are associated with poor prognosis. THBS1 + M reg cells are CD163 + but distinguished from macrophages by high expression of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (TREM1), which contributes to their immunosuppressive activity and promotes HCC tumor growth in vivo. Our data support myeloid subset-targeted immunotherapies to treat HCC., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests M.D. is co-founder, chief scientific officer, and employee of Inotrem SA, a French company that develops TREM1 inhibitors., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common neoplasms worldwide and the third most common cause of cancer-related death. Several liver-targeted intra-arterial therapies are available for unresectable HCC, including selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) and trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Those two are the most used treatment modalities in localized non-operable HCC. TACE is the treatment option for patients with stage B, according to the BCLC staging system. In contrast, SIRT does not have an official role in the treatment algorithm, but recent studies showed promising outcomes in patients treated with SIRT. Although TACE is globally a safe procedure, it might provoke several vascular complications such as spasms, inflammatory constriction, and, in severe cases, occlusion, dissection, or collateralization. Hence, it is acclaimed that those complications could restrain the targeted response of the radio-embolization when we use it as second-line therapy post TACE. In this study, we will assess the efficacity of SIRT using Yttrium 90 Microspheres post incomplete or failure response to TACE. In our retrospective study, we had 23 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Furthermore, those patients have been followed radiologically and biologically. Then, we evaluated the therapeutic effect according to the mRECIST criteria, in addition to the personalized dose analysis. We found 8 patients were treated with TheraSphere ® , with a median tumor absorbed dose of 445 Gy, while 15 received SIR-Spheres ® treatment with a mean tumor dose of 268 Gy. After radiological analysis, 56.5% of the patients had a complete response, and 17.3% showed partial response, whereas 13% had stable disease and 13% had progressive disease. For patients treated with SIRT after an incomplete response or failure to TACE, we found an objective response rate of 73.8%. Despite the known vascular complications of TACE, SIRT can give a favorable response.

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) are characterized by frequent cell cycle pathways aberrations. This study evaluated safety and efficacy of abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, as monotherapy or in combination with PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitor LY3023414 or TGFβ inhibitor galunisertib versus standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy in patients with pretreated metastatic PDAC., Methods: This Phase 2 open-label study enrolled patients with metastatic PDAC who progressed after 1-2 prior therapies. Patients were enrolled in a safety lead-in (abemaciclib plus galunisertib) followed by a 2-stage randomized design. Stage 1 randomization was planned 1:1:1:1 for abemaciclib, abemaciclib plus LY3023414, abemaciclib plus galunisertib, or SOC gemcitabine or capecitabine. Advancing to Stage 2 required a disease control rate (DCR) difference ≥0 in abemaciclib-containing arms versus SOC. Primary objectives for Stages 1 and 2 were DCR and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. Secondary objectives included response rate, overall survival, safety, and pharmacokinetics., Results: One hundred and six patients were enrolled. Abemaciclib plus galunisertib did not advance to Stage 1 for reasons unrelated to safety or efficacy. Stage 1 DCR was 15.2% with abemaciclib monotherapy, 12.1% with abemaciclib plus LY3023414, and 36.4% with SOC. Median PFS was 1.7 months (95% CI: 1.4-1.8), 1.8 months (95% CI: 1.3-1.9), and 3.3 months (95% CI: 1.1-5.7), respectively. No arms advanced to Stage 2. No new safety signals were identified., Conclusion: In patients with pretreated metastatic PDAC, abemaciclib-based therapy did not improve DCRs or PFS compared with SOC chemotherapy. No treatment arms advanced to Stage 2. Abemaciclib remains investigational in patients with PDAC., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background & Aims: Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) are rare, benign, liver tumours classified at the clinicopathological, genetic, and proteomic levels. The β-catenin-activated (b-HCA) subtypes harbour several mutation types in the β-catenin gene ( CTNNB1 ) associated with different risks of malignant transformation or bleeding. Glutamine synthetase is a surrogate marker of β-catenin pathway activation associated with the risk of malignant transformation. Recently, we revealed an overexpression of glutamine synthetase in the rims of exon 3 S45-mutated b-HCA and exon 7/8-mutated b-HCA compared with the rest of the tumour. A difference in vascularisation was found in this rim shown by diffuse CD34 staining only at the tumour centre. Here, we aimed to characterise this tumour heterogeneity to better understand its physiopathological involvement., Methods: Using mass spectrometry imaging, genetic, and proteomic analyses combined with laser capture microdissection, we compared the tumour centre with the tumour rim and with adjacent non-tumoural tissue., Results: The tumour rim harboured the same mutation as the tumour centre, meaning both parts belong to the same tumour. Mass spectrometry imaging showed different spectral profiles between the rim and the tumour centre. Proteomic profiling revealed the significant differential expression of 40 proteins at the rim compared with the tumour centre. The majority of these proteins were associated with metabolism, with an expression profile comparable with a normal perivenous hepatocyte expression profile., Conclusions: The difference in phenotype between the tumour centres and tumour rims of exon 3 S45-mutated b-HCA and exon 7/8-mutated b-HCA does not depend on CTNNB1 mutational status. In a context of sinusoidal arterial pathology, tumour heterogeneity at the rim harbours perivenous characteristics and could be caused by a functional peripheral venous drainage., Impact and Implications: Tumour heterogeneity was revealed in β-catenin-mutated hepatocellular adenomas (b-HCAs) via the differential expression of glutamine synthase at tumour rims. The combination of several spatial approaches (mass spectrometry imaging, genetic, and proteomic analyses) after laser capture microdissection allowed identification of a potential role for peripheral venous drainage underlying this difference. Through this study, we were able to illustrate that beyond a mutational context, many factors can downstream regulate gene expression and contribute to different clinicopathological phenotypes. We believe that the combinations of spatial analyses that we used could be inspiring for all researchers wanting to access heterogeneity information of liver tumours., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background & Aims: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is recommended for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma devoid of macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread but not eligible for curative therapies. We compared the efficacy and safety of the combination of a single TACE and external conformal radiotherapy (CRT) vs . classical TACE., Methods: TACERTE was an open-labelled, randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation rate to two or three TACE (arm A) or one TACE + CRT (arm B). Participants had a mean age of 70 years, and 86% were male. The aetiology was alcohol in 85%. The primary endpoint was liver progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population. The typical CRT schedule was 54 Gy in 18 sessions of 3 Gy., Results: Of the 120 participants randomised, 64 were in arm A and 56 in arm B; 100 participants underwent the planned schedule and defined the 'per-protocol' group. In intention-to-treat participants, the liver PFS at 12 and 18 months were 59% and 19% in arm A and 61% and 36% in arm B (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69; 95% CI 0.40-1.18; p  = 0.17), respectively. In the per-protocol population, treated liver PFS tended to be better in arm B (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.34-1.06; p  = 0.081) than in arm A. Liver-related grade III-IV adverse events were more frequent in arm B than in arm A. Median overall survival reached 30 months (95% CI 23-35) in arm A and 22 months (95% CI 15.7-26.2) in arm B., Conclusions: Although TACE + CRT tended to improve local control, this first Western randomised controlled trial showed that the combined strategy failed to increase PFS or overall survival and led more frequently to liver-related adverse effects., Impact and Implications: Hepatocellular carcinoma is frequently treated by arterial embolisation of the tumour and more recently by external radiotherapy. We tried to determine whether combination of the two treatments (irradiation after embolisation) might produce interesting results. Our results in this prospective randomised study were not able to demonstrate a beneficial effect of combining embolisation and irradiation in these patients. On the contrary, we observed more adverse effects with the combined treatment., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01300143., Competing Interests: CF, LC, IA, XM, ER, CP, LM, FO, YT, JG, HR, JE, AR, PH, JFB, ENK, DA, AGP, EF-P, and HA did not receive any grants or funding. P Merle reports grants or funding from Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD, Eisai, Bayer, and Ipsen. P Mathurin reports grants or funding from Ipsen, Eisai, Abbvie, Sanofi, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, Evive Biotech, Novo Nordisk, Bayer Healthcare, Surrozen, and Intercept. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (© 2023 The Authors.)

The standard of care of first-line systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is currently changing with the results of the IMbrave150 trial which are demonstrating superiority of the atezolizumab-bevacizumab combination over sorafenib, modifying this line of treatment for the first time in over 10 years. Recently, other immunotherapy-based combinations (durvalumab-tremelimumab, lenvatinib-pembrolizumab, cabozantinib-atezolizumab, and camrelizumab-rivoceranib) reported results in phase III studies, and might challenge this new standard of care. This revolution will lead to a considerable change in practice, and highlight challenges for future drug development. In this review, we will, firstly, describe results of the different combinations, and discuss the difficulties in selecting the first-line treatment. We will then present the different recommendations about second-line treatment following the first-line immunotherapy-based combination, discussing the rationale for the differences in existing recommendations. We will finally discuss the challenges for future drug development in advanced HCC.

Introduction: Tislelizumab (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody) showed preliminary antitumor activity and tolerability in patients with advanced solid tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab in patients with previously treated advanced HCC., Methods: The multiregional phase 2 study RATIONALE-208 examined single-agent tislelizumab (200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks) in patients with advanced HCC with Child-Pugh A, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C, and who had received one or more prior lines of systemic therapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), radiologically confirmed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 by the Independent Review Committee. Safety was assessed in patients who received ≥1 dose of tislelizumab., Results: Between April 9, 2018, and February 27, 2019, 249 eligible patients were enrolled and treated. After a median study follow-up of 12.7 months, ORR was 13% ( n = 32/249; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9-18), including five complete and 27 partial responses. The number of prior lines of therapy did not impact ORR (one prior line, 13% [95% CI, 8-20]; two or more prior lines, 13% [95% CI, 7-20]). Median duration of response was not reached. The disease control rate was 53%, and median overall survival was 13.2 months. Of the 249 total patients, grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 38 (15%) patients; the most common was liver transaminase elevations in 10 (4%) patients. Treatment-related adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 13 (5%) patients or dose delay in 46 (19%) patients. No deaths were attributed to the treatment per investigator assessment., Conclusion: Tislelizumab demonstrated durable objective responses, regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy, and acceptable tolerability in patients with previously treated advanced HCC., Competing Interests: Zhenggang Ren reports consulting support from AstraZeneca, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., and Merck. Michel Ducreux reports research support to the institution from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Merck, Keocyt, and Bayer and receives consulting support from AMGEN, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Bayer, BeiGene, Ltd., Hutchinson, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Keocyt, and Celgene. Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa reports research support to the institution from Arcus, Agios, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BioNTech, BMS, Celgene, Flatiron, Genentech/Ltd./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Genoscience, Incyte, Polaris, Puma, QED, Sillajen, and Yiviva and receives consulting support from Agios, Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Autem, Bayer, BeiGene, Ltd., Berry Genomics, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Exelixis, Flatiron, Genentech Ltd./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Genoscience, Helio, Incyte, Ipsen, Legend Biotech, Merck, MINA, QED, Redhill, Sillajen, Surface Oncology, Therabionics, Twoxar, Vector, and Yiviva. Philippe Merle reports grants from Ipsen and Genosciences and receives advisory board fees from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., BMS, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Eisai, MSD, Ipsen, Lilly, and Genosciences. Weijia Fang, Zhiwei Li, Julien Edeline, Lihua Wu, Sheng Hu, Tao Zhang, Jean-Frédéric Blanc, Hongming Pan, Chia-Jui Yen, Albert Tran, Guoliang Shao, Mohamed Bouattour, Yajin Chen, Jinlin Hou, Yuxian Bai, Ming-Mo Hou, and Zhiqiang Meng declare no competing interests. Eric Assenat reports research support to the institution from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. and Bayer and receives consulting support from AMGEN, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Ipsen, Bayer, AstraZeneca, and Boston. Lorenza Rimassa reports receiving consulting support from Amgen, ArQule, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Eisai, Exelixis, Genenta, Hengrui, Incyte, Ipsen, IQVIA, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Sanofi, Servier, Taiho Oncology, and Zymeworks; lecture fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, Eisai, Gilead, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck Serono, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., and Sanofi; travel expenses from AstraZeneca; and institutional research funding from Agios, ARMO BioSciences, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Ltd., Eisai, Exelixis, Fibrogen, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., and Zymeworks. Paul Ross reports grants from Bayer and Sanofi. Tim Meyer is supported by the NIHR ULCH Biomedical Research Centre. David Tougeron reports receiving consulting support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, MSD, Sanofi, Servier, and Merck Serono and institutional research funding from AstraZeneca, MSD, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., and Ipsen. John Wu reports employment with BeiGene, Ltd. Vincent Li reports employment and stocks with BeiGene, Ltd. Sandra Chica-Duque reports employment with BeiGene, Ltd., and her immediate family member reports a relationship with Turning Point Therapeutics. Ann-Lii Cheng reports and receives consulting support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Eisai, Ono Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Genentech Ltd./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., MSD, BeiGene, Ltd., Exelixis Ltd., Ipsen Innovation, and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., (Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the capabilities of radiomics using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data in the assessment of treatment response to 90 yttrium transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by comparison with predictions based on European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria., Patients and Methods: Twenty-two patients with HCC (19 men, 3 women; mean age: 66.7 ± 9.8 [SD]; age range: 37-82 years) who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI 4 ± 1 weeks before and 4 ± 4 weeks after TARE, were enrolled in this retrospective study. Regions of interest were placed manually along the contours of the treated tumor on each axial slice of arterial and portal phase images using the ITK-SNAP post-processing software. For each MRI, the Pyradiomics Python package was used to extract 107 radiomics features on both arterial and portal phases, and resulting delta-features were computed. The Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction was used to select statistically different features between responders and non-responders (i.e., those with progressive or stable disease) at 6-month follow-up, according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Finally, for each selected feature, univariable logistic regression with leave-one-out cross validation procedure was used to perform receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and compare radiomics parameters with MRI variables., Results: According to mRECIST, 14 patients (14/22; 64%) were non-responders and 8 (8/22; 36%) were responders. Four radiomics parameters (long run emphasis, minor axis length, surface area, and gray level non-uniformity on arterial phase images) were the only predictors of early response. ROC curve analysis showed that long run emphasis was the best parameter for predicting early response, with 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 68-100) and 100% specificity (95% CI: 78-100). EASL morphologic criteria yielded 75% sensitivity (95% CI: 41-96%) and 93% specificity (95% CI: 69-100%)., Conclusion: Radiomics allows identify marked differences between responders and non-responders, and could aid in the prediction of early treatment response following TARE in patients with HCC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial or personal relationships that could be viewed as influencing the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Société française de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Backgrounds and Aims: Even if no systemic treatment is currently validated for unresectable hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and platinum-based chemotherapy are frequently used in clinical practice. Our study aims to describe the effectiveness of first-line systemic treatments in patients with cHCC-CCA., Patients and Methods: Patients with histological diagnosis of unresectable or metastatic cHCC-CCA confirmed by a centralized review (WHO classification 2019) and who received systemic treatment from 2009 to 2020 were included retrospectively in 11 centers. The outcomes of patients with cHCC-CCA were compared with patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by sorafenib ( n = 117) and with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA, n = 94) treated mainly by platinum-based chemotherapy using a frailty Cox model. The efficacy of TKIs and platinum-based chemotherapies in patients with cHCC-CCA was assessed using a doubly robust estimator., Results: A total of 83 patients with cHCC-CCA were included and were predominantly male (72%) with underlying cirrhosis (55%). 67% of patients had extrahepatic metastases and 31% macrovascular tumor invasion. cHCC-CCAs were more often developed on cirrhosis (55.4%) than iCCA (26.6%) but less frequently than HCC (80.2%) ( p < 0.001). Both HCC (36.8% and cHCC-CCA (66.2%) had less frequent extrahepatic metastases than iCCA (81%) ( p < 0.001). Unadjusted overall survival (OS) was better in iCCA (13 months) compared to cHCC-CCA (12 months) and HCC (11 months) ( p = 0.130). In multivariable analysis, after adjustment by a Cox frailty model, patients with cHCC-CCA had the same survival as HCC and iCCA (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.37-1.22, p = 0.189 and HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.43-1.02, p = 0.064, respectively). ALBI score (HR = 2.15; 95% CI: 1.23-3.76; p = 0.009), ascites (HR = 3.45, 95% CI: 1.31-9.03, p = 0.013), and tobacco use (HR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.08-4.87, p = 0.032) were independently associated with OS in patients with cHCC-CCA. Among patients with cHCC-CCA, 25 patients treated with TKI were compared with 54 patients who received platinum-based chemotherapies. Patients treated with TKI had a median OS of 8.3 months compared to 11.9 months for patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy ( p = 0.86). After a robust doubly adjustment on tumor number and size, vascular invasion, ALBI, MELD, and cirrhosis, the type of treatment did not impact OS (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.27-3.15, p = 0.88) or progression-free survival (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.44-3.49, p = 0.67)., Conclusions: First-line systemic treatments with TKIs or platinum-based chemotherapies have similar efficacy in patients with unresectable/metastatic cHCC-CCA. The ALBI score predicts OS., Competing Interests: E.G. received travel and congress fees from Bayer, Gilead, and Ipsen; M.B. received consulting fees from Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, Roche, Eisai, Sirtex, Servier, MSD, and AstraZeneca; M.R. received honoraria from Servier, GE Healthcare, Ipsen, Canon-Toshiba, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Guerbet, and Sirtex; A.Z. received consulting and advisory board fees from Amgen, Lilly, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Baxter, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Havas Life, Alira Health, and Zymeworks; D.T. received consulting fees from Amgen, Merck, Novartis, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Roche, Bayer, Servier, and Ipsen; J.E. received consulting fees from MSD, Eisai, BMS, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Roche, Ipsen, Basilea, Merck Serono, Incyte, and Servier and also received travel fees from Amgen and research funding (institutional) from BMS, Beigene; J.-F.B. received consulting fees from Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, Eisai, MSD, Roche, and AstraZeneca; J.-C.N. received research grants from Ipsen and Bayer; and E.T. received research support from Gilead and speaker fees from Abbvie. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Deregulation of FGF19-FGFR4 signaling is found in several cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), nominating it for therapeutic targeting. FGF401 is a potent, selective FGFR4 inhibitor with antitumor activity in preclinical models. This study was designed to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), characterize PK/PD, and evaluate the safety and efficacy of FGF401 alone and combined with the anti-PD-1 antibody, spartalizumab., Methods: Patients with HCC or other FGFR4/KLB expressing tumors were enrolled. Dose-escalation was guided by a Bayesian model. Phase 2 dose-expansion enrolled patients with HCC from Asian countries (group1), non-Asian countries (group2), and patients with other solid tumors expressing FGFR4 and KLB (group3). FGF401 and spartalizumab combination was evaluated in patients with HCC., Results: Seventy-four patients were treated in the phase I with single-agent FGF401 at 50 to 150 mg. FGF401 displayed favorable PK characteristics and no food effect when dosed with low-fat meals. The RP2D was established as 120 mg qd. Six of 70 patients experienced grade 3 dose-limiting toxicities: increase in transaminases (n = 4) or blood bilirubin (n = 2). In phase 2, 30 patients in group 1, 36 in group 2, and 20 in group 3 received FGF401. In total, 8 patients experienced objective responses (1 CR, 7 PR; 4 each in phase I and phase II, respectively). Frequent adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (73.8%), increased AST (47.5%), and ALT (43.8%). Increase in levels of C4, total bile acid, and circulating FGF19, confirmed effective FGFR4 inhibition. Twelve patients received FGF401 plus spartalizumab. RP2D was established as FGF401 120 mg qd and spartalizumab 300 mg Q3W; 2 patients reported PR., Conclusions: At biologically active doses, FGF401 alone or combined with spartalizumab was safe in patients with FGFR4/KLB-positive tumors including HCC. Preliminary clinical efficacy was observed. Further clinical evaluation of FGF401 using a refined biomarker strategy is warranted., Trial Registration: NCT02325739 ., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Oncogene activation leads to replication stress and promotes genomic instability. Here we combine optical mapping and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to explore in depth the nature of structural variants (SV) induced by replication stress in cyclin-activated hepatocellular carcinomas (CCN-HCC). In addition to classical tandem duplications, CCN-HCC displayed frequent intra-chromosomal and interchromosomal templated insertion cycles (TIC), likely resulting from template switching events. Template switching preferentially involves active topologically associated domains that are proximal to one another within the 3D genome. Template sizes depend on the type of cyclin activation and are coordinated within each TIC. Replication stress induced continuous accumulation of SVs during CCN-HCC progression, fostering the acquisition of new driver alterations and large-scale copy-number changes at TIC borders. Together, this analysis sheds light on the mechanisms, dynamics, and consequences of SV accumulation in tumors with oncogene-induced replication stress., Significance: Optical mapping and whole-genome sequencing integration unravels a unique signature of replication stress-induced structural variants that drive genomic evolution and the acquisition of driver events in CCN-HCC., (©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.)

The systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma is changing rapidly. Three main classes of treatment are now available. Historically, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (sorafenib and lenvatinib as first-line; regorafenib and cabozantinib as second-line) were the first to show an improvement in overall survival (OS). Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) antibodies can be used in first-line (bevacizumab) or second-line (ramucirumab) combination therapy. More recently, immuno-oncology (IO) has profoundly changed therapeutic algorithms, and the combination of atezolizumab-bevacizumab is now the first-line standard of care. Therefore, the place of TKIs needs to be redefined. The objective of this review was to define the place of TKIs in the therapeutic algorithm at the time of IO treatment in first-line therapy, with a special focus on lenvatinib that exhibits one of the higher anti-tumoral activity among TKI in HCC. We will discuss the place of lenvatinib in first line (especially if there is a contra-indication to IO) but also after failure of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. New opportunities for lenvatinib will also be presented, including the use at an earlier stage of the disease and combination with IOs.

Introduction: Cabozantinib, an inhibitor of MET, AXL, and VEGF receptors, significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this exploratory analysis, outcomes were evaluated according to plasma biomarker levels., Methods: Baseline plasma levels were evaluated for MET, AXL, VEGFR2, HGF, GAS6, VEGF-A, PlGF, IL-8, EPO, ANG2, IGF-1, VEGF-C, and c-KIT for 674/707 randomized patients; and Week 4 levels were evaluated for MET, AXL, VEGFR2, HGF, GAS6, VEGF-A, PlGF, IL-8, and EPO for 614 patients. OS and PFS were analyzed by baseline levels as dichotomized or continuous variables and by on-treatment changes at Week 4 as continuous variables; biomarkers were considered potentially prognostic if p < 0.05 and predictive if p < 0.05 for the interaction between treatment and the biomarker. Multivariable analyses adjusting for clinical covariates were also performed., Results: In the placebo group, high levels of MET, HGF, GAS6, IL-8, and ANG2 and low levels of IGF-1 were associated with shorter OS in univariate and multivariable analyses; these associations were also observed for MET, IL-8, and ANG2 in the cabozantinib group. Hazard ratios for OS and PFS favored cabozantinib over the placebo at low and high baseline levels for all biomarkers. No baseline biomarkers were predictive of a treatment benefit. Cabozantinib promoted pharmacodynamic changes in several biomarkers, including increases in VEGF-A, PlGF, AXL, and GAS6 levels and decreases in VEGFR2 and HGF levels; these changes were not associated with OS or PFS., Conclusion: Cabozantinib improved OS and PFS versus placebo at high and low baseline concentrations for all biomarkers analyzed. Low baseline levels of MET, HGF, GAS6, IL-8, and ANG2 and high levels of IGF-1 were identified as potential favorable prognostic biomarkers for survival in previously treated advanced HCC. Although cabozantinib promoted pharmacodynamic changes in several biomarkers, these changes were not associated with survival., Competing Interests: G.K.A.-A. reports research grants from Acta Biologica, Agios, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beigene, Berry Genomics, BMS, Casi, Celgene, Exelixis, Genentech/Roche, Halozyme, Incyte, MabVax, Puma, QED, Sillajen, and Yiviva and consulting fees from Agios, AstraZeneca, Autem, Bayer, Beigene, Berry Genomics, Celgene, CytomX, Debio, Eisai, Lilly, Exelixis, Flatiron, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, Helio, Incyte, Ipsen, Loxo, Merck, MINA, Polaris, QED, Redhill, Silenseed, Sillajen, Sobi, Therabionics, Twoxar, Vector, and Yiviva. J.-F.B. reports personal fees from Ipsen, Bayer, Eisai, Roche, AstraZeneca, and BMS. Y.-W.C. reports payment to employer from Exelixis for statistical analysis during the conduct of the study. A.L.C. reports grant and nonfinancial support from Exelixis during the conduct of the study, including support of the parent study and funding of editorial support; honoraria and advisory/consulting fees from AstraZeneca, BMS, Exelixis, Ipsen, Bayer, and Merck; honoraria, advisory/consulting fees, and speaker bureau fees from Eisai, Novartis, and Ono Pharmaceutical; honoraria, advisory/consulting fees, and travel and accommodation expenses from Genentech/Roche and IQVIA; speaker bureau fees and travel and accommodation expenses from Bayer Yakuhin; and speaker bureau fees from Amgen Taiwan; A.L.C. is an editorial board member of Liver Cancer. A.E.-K. reports personal fees and nonfinancial publication support from Exelixis during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Genentech/Roche, BMS, Eisai, and Merck; grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca; personal fees from Bayer, Gilead, QED, Agenus, ABL Bio, Pieris, Cytomx, and EMD Serono; and grants from Astex. R.K.K. reports research funding grants to institution for conduct of clinical trials from Exelixis; research funding grants to institution for conduct of clinical trials and Steering Committee membership from Agios, AstraZeneca, BMS, and Merck; research funding grants to institution for conduct of clinical trials from Bayer, Lilly, EMD Serono, Novartis, QED, and Taiho; IDMC membership and advisory board fees from Genentech/Roche; personal fees for travel support and advisory board participation from Ipsen; and advisory board fees from Gilead and Exact Sciences. H.Y.L. reports no conflicts of interest. P. McAdam reports payment to employer from Exelixis for statistical analysis during the conduct of the study. P. Merle reports advisory board fees from Roche, Bayer, Lilly, Merck, Eisai, and AstraZeneca and grants and advisory board fees from Ipsen and Genosciences. T.M. reports consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Eisai, Ipsen, and Roche and research grants from BTG and Bayer. J.-W.P. reports grants from Ipsen-Exelixis, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, and Merck and personal fees from Ipsen-Exelixis, Genentech/Roche, Bayer, Eisai, and AstraZeneca. L.R. reports grants to institution for the CELESTIAL trial, medical writing assistance, and nonfinancial support from Exelixis during the conduct of the study; consulting/advisory role fees from Amgen, ArQule, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Eisai, Exelixis, Genenta, Hengrui, Incyte, Ipsen, IQVIA, Lilly, Merck, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, and Zymework; honoraria/lecture fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, Eisai, Gilead, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck Serono, Roche, and Sanofi; travel expenses from Ipsen; and research funding grants to institution from Agios, ARMO BioSciences, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Eisai, Exelixis, Fibrogen, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, and Zymeworks. B.-Y.R. has nothing to disclose. E.W. reports employment and stock ownership from Exelixis., (Copyright © 2021 by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Purpose: In REFLECT, lenvatinib demonstrated an effect on overall survival (OS) by confirmation of noninferiority to sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. This analysis assessed correlations between serum or tissue biomarkers and efficacy outcomes from REFLECT., Experimental Design: Serum biomarkers (VEGF, ANG2, FGF19, FGF21, and FGF23) were measured by ELISA. Gene expression in tumor tissues was measured by the nCounter PanCancer Pathways Panel. Pharmacodynamic changes in serum biomarker levels from baseline, and associations of clinical outcomes with baseline biomarker levels, were evaluated., Results: Four hundred and seven patients were included in the serum analysis set (lenvatinib n = 279, sorafenib n = 128); 58 patients were included in the gene-expression analysis set (lenvatinib n = 34, sorafenib n = 24). Both treatments were associated with increases in VEGF; only lenvatinib was associated with increases in FGF19 and FGF23 at all time points. Lenvatinib-treated responders had greater increases in FGF19 and FGF23 versus nonresponders at cycle 4, day 1 (FGF19: 55.2% vs. 18.3%, P = 0.014; FGF23: 48.4% vs. 16.4%, P = 0.0022, respectively). Higher baseline VEGF, ANG2, and FGF21 correlated with shorter OS in both treatment groups. OS was longer for lenvatinib than sorafenib [median, 10.9 vs. 6.8 months, respectively; HR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.33-0.85; P- interaction = 0.0397] with higher baseline FGF21. In tumor tissue biomarker analysis, VEGF/FGF-enriched groups showed improved OS with lenvatinib versus the intermediate VEGF/FGF group (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-0.91; P = 0.0253)., Conclusions: Higher baseline levels of VEGF, FGF21, and ANG2 may be prognostic for shorter OS. Higher baseline FGF21 may be predictive for longer OS with lenvatinib compared with sorafenib, but this needs confirmation., (©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Introduction: Baseline liver function among patients starting treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) impacts survival and could impact efficacy outcomes and safety profiles of treatments. This post hoc analysis of the phase 3 REFLECT study examined the efficacy and safety outcomes for lenvatinib and for sorafenib in patients with uHCC, assessed by Child-Pugh score (CPS) and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade., Methods: Efficacy and safety were assessed in patient cohorts from REFLECT according to study entry baseline ALBI grade and CPS., Results: Lenvatinib treatment generally provided survival benefits in all groups. Median overall survival (OS) among patients with an ALBI grade of 1 was consistently higher than among patients with an ALBI grade of 2 for both the lenvatinib and sorafenib arms (lenvatinib: 17.4 vs. 8.6 months; sorafenib: 14.6 vs. 7.7 months, respectively). Median OS among patients with a CPS of 5 was consistently higher than among patients with a CPS of 6 (lenvatinib: 15.3 vs. 9.4 months; sorafenib: 14.2 vs. 7.9 months, respectively). Progression-free survival and objective response rates for these ALBI grades and CPS demonstrated similar patterns. Among patients who received lenvatinib and experienced a treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse event leading to withdrawal, 6.6% had an ALBI grade of 1, while 13.3% had an ALBI grade of 2, and 7.9% had a CPS of 5, while 12.1% had a CPS of 6., Conclusions: Better liver function at baseline, as measured by ALBI grade or CPS, may be prognostic for better survival outcomes in patients with uHCC undergoing treatment with lenvatinib or sorafenib., Competing Interests: A.V. has provided a speaker, consultancy, and advisory role for Roche, Bayer, Sanofi, BMS, Lilly, Novartis, Eisai, AstraZeneca, Merck, Incyte, Medac, Ipsen, Servier, PierreFabre, MSD, BTG, and Janssen. C.F. serves on speakers' bureaus and advisory boards for Bayer and Eisai. M.S. has received honoraria from advisory board participation from Bayer, Eisai, Exelixis, and Genentech. B.D. has received personal fees and nonfinancial support for consultation from Ipsen, Sanofi, and Bayer; and personal fees from Roche, Eisai, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, MSD, and Incyte. A.B. has served on speakers' bureau for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Lilly, Amgen, Eisai, Johnson & Johnson, and AbbVie. S.L.C. has acted as an advisor to AstraZeneca, Eisai, Ipsen, and MSD. J.F.B. has received honoraria from Bayer, Ipsen, Eisai, Roche, BMS, AstraZeneca, and Eli Lilly. T.T. is an employee of and has stock/other ownership with Eisai. M.R. is an employee of Eisai. H.J.L. has nothing to disclose. D.H.P. has received honoraria from Eisai and research funding and honoraria from Bayer, BMS, Roche, AstraZeneca, Sirtex, and BTG. Y.T. has nothing to disclose. M.K. has received honoraria from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Eisai, Bayer, Lilly Japan, EA Pharma, and Bristol Myers Squibb Japan; served in a consulting/advisory role for Merck Sharp & Dohme, Eisai, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Roche; and received research funding (inst) from Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, AbbVie, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Gilead Sciences, EA Pharma, and Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma. M.K. is the Editor-in-Chief of Liver Cancer., (Copyright © 2021 by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: This Phase 1b/2 study evaluated tepotinib, a highly selective MET inhibitor, in US/European patients with sorafenib pretreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) with MET overexpression., Methods: Eligible adults had aHCC, progression after ≥4 weeks of sorafenib, and, for Phase 2 only, MET overexpression. Tepotinib was administered once daily at 300 or 500 mg in Phase 1b ('3 + 3' design), and at the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) in Phase 2. Primary endpoints were dose-liming toxicities (DLTs; Phase 1b) and 12-week investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS; Phase 2)., Results: In Phase 1b (n = 17), no DLTs occurred and the RP2D was confirmed as 500 mg. In Phase 2 (n = 49), the primary endpoint was met: 12-week PFS was 63.3% (90% CI: 50.5-74.7), which was significantly greater than the predefined null hypothesis of ≤15% (one-sided binomial exact test: P < 0.0001). Median time to progression was 4 months. In Phase 2, 28.6% of patients had treatment-related Grade ≥3 adverse events, including peripheral oedema and lipase increase (both 6.1%)., Conclusions: Tepotinib was generally well tolerated and the RP2D (500 mg) showed promising efficacy and, therefore, a positive benefit-risk balance in sorafenib pretreated aHCC with MET overexpression., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02115373., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver tumor and among the deadliest cancers worldwide. Advanced HCC overall survival is meager and has not improved over the last decade despite approval of several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKi) for first and second-line treatments. The recent approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has revolutionized HCC palliative care. Unfortunately, the majority of HCC patients fail to respond to these therapies. Here, we elaborate on the immune landscapes of the normal and cirrhotic livers and of the unique HCC tumor microenvironment. We describe the molecular and immunological classifications of HCC, discuss the role of specific immune cell subsets in this cancer, with a focus on myeloid cells and pathways in anti-tumor immunity, tumor promotion and immune evasion. We also describe the challenges and opportunities of immunotherapies in HCC and discuss new avenues based on harnessing the anti-tumor activity of myeloid, NK and γδ T cells, vaccines, chimeric antigen receptors (CAR)-T or -NK cells, oncolytic viruses, and combination therapies., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Giraud, Chalopin, Blanc and Saleh.)

Purpose: To compare the reliability and accuracy of the pre-treatment dosimetry predictions using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) versus 99m Tc-labeled macroaggregated albumin (MAA) SPECT/CT for perfused volume segmentation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using 90 Y-glass microspheres., Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients (8 men, 7 women) with a mean age of 68.3±10.5 (SD) years (range: 47-82 years) who underwent a total of 17 SIRT procedures using 90 Y-glass microspheres for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were retrospectively included. Pre-treatment dosimetry data were calculated from 99m Tc-MAA SPECT/CT using either CBCT or 99m Tc-MAA SPECT/CT to segment the perfused volumes. Post-treatment dosimetry data were calculated using 90 Y imaging (SPECT/CT or PET/CT). The whole liver, non-tumoral liver, and tumor volumes were segmented on CT or MRI data. The mean absorbed doses of the tumor (D T ), non-tumoral liver, perfused liver (D PL ) and perfused non-tumoral liver were calculated. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were investigated by calculating Lin's concordant correlation coefficients (ρ c values). The differences (biases) between pre- and post-treatment dosimetry data were assessed using the modified Bland-Altman method (for non-normally distributed variables), and systematic bias was evaluated using Passing-Bablok regression., Results: The intra- and interobserver reliabilities were good-to-excellent (ρ c : 0.80-0.99) for all measures using both methods. Compared with 90Y imaging, the median differences were 5.8Gy (IQR: -12.7; 16.1) and 5.6Gy (IQR: -13.6; 10.2) for D PL -CBCT and D PL - 99m Tc-MAA SPECT/CT, respectively. The median differences were 1.6Gy (IQR: -29; 7.53) and 9.8Gy (IQR: -28.4; 19.9) for D T -CBCT and D T - 99m Tc-MAA SPECT/CT respectively. Passing-Bablok regression analysis showed that both CBCT and 99m Tc-MAA SPECT/CT had proportional biases and thus tendencies to overestimate D T and D PL at higher post-treatment doses., Conclusion: CBCT may be a reliable segmentation method, but it does not significantly increase the accuracy of dose prediction compared with that of 99m Tc-MAA SPECT/CT. At higher doses both methods tend to overestimate the doses to tumors and perfused livers., (Copyright © 2020 Soci showét showé françaises de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The phase III CELESTIAL study demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with previously treated, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We analyzed outcomes by baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and on-treatment AFP changes., Patients and Methods: Serum AFP was measured every 8 weeks by blinded, centralized testing. Outcomes were analyzed by baseline AFP bifurcated at 400 ng/mL and by on-treatment AFP response (≥20% decrease from baseline at Week 8). The optimal cutoff for change in AFP at Week 8 was evaluated using maximally selected rank statistics., Results: Median OS for cabozantinib versus placebo was 13.9 versus 10.3 months [HR, 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62-1.04] for patients with baseline AFP <400 ng/mL, and 8.5 versus 5.2 months (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.54-0.94) for patients with baseline AFP ≥400 ng/mL. Week 8 AFP response rate was 50% for cabozantinib versus 13% for placebo. In the cabozantinib arm, median OS for patients with and without AFP response was 16.1 versus 9.1 months (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.45-0.84). AFP response was independently associated with longer OS. The optimal cutoff for association with OS in the cabozantinib arm was ≤0% change in AFP at Week 8 [AFP control; HR 0.50 (95% CI, 0.35-0.71)]. HRs for PFS were consistent with those for OS., Conclusions: Cabozantinib improved outcomes versus placebo across a range of baseline AFP levels. On-treatment AFP response and control rates were higher with cabozantinib than placebo, and were associated with longer OS and PFS with cabozantinib., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Symptoms of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represent a substantial burden for the patient and are important endpoints to assess when evaluating treatment. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated in subjects with advanced HCC and baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥400 ng/mL treated with second-line ramucirumab., Patients and Methods: Patients with AFP≥400 ng/mL enrolled in the REACH or REACH-2 phase 3 studies were used in this analysis. Eligible patients had advanced HCC, Child-Pugh A, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1 and prior sorafenib. Patients received ramucirumab 8 mg/kg or placebo once every 2 weeks. Disease-related symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Symptom Index (FHSI)-8 and EuroQoL-5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) instruments, respectively. Time to deterioration (TTD) (≥3-point decrease in FHSI-8 total score;≥0.06-point decrease in EQ-5D score, from randomisation to first date of deterioration) was determined using Kaplan-Meier estimation and the Cox proportional hazards model. Both separate and pooled analyses for REACH AFP≥400 ng/mL and REACH-2 patients were conducted., Results: In the pooled population with AFP ≥400 ng/mL (n=542; ramucirumab, n=316; placebo, n=226), median TTD in FHSI-8 total score was prolonged with ramucirumab relative to placebo (3.3 vs 1.9 months; HR 0.725; (95% CI 0.559 to 0.941); p=0.0152), including significant differences in back pain (0.668; (0.497 to 0.899); p=0.0044), weight loss (0.699; (0.505 to 0.969); p=0.0231) and pain (0.769; (0.588 to 1.005); p=0.0248) symptoms. TTD in EQ-5D score was not significantly different between ramucirumab and placebo groups (median 2.9 vs 1.9 months). Results in the individual trials were consistent with these findings., Conclusions: Ramucirumab in second-line treatment of advanced HCC demonstrates consistent benefit in the delay of deterioration in disease-related symptoms with no worsening of HRQoL. Taken with previously demonstrated ramucirumab-driven survival benefits in this setting, these data may inform patient-clinician discussions about the benefit-risk profile of this therapy., Trial Registration Number: NCT01140347; NCT02435433, NCT02435433., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AXZ: Consulting or advisory role: Eisai, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Exelixis, Eli Lilly and Company; Research funding: Eli Lilly and Company, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Merck. RN: None. PRG: Consulting/advisory boards and personal fees: AstraZeneca, Bayer Schering Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Eli Lilly and Company MSD, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sirtex Medical, Sillajen. RSF: Consulting: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, Merck, Novartis, Roche/Genentech. JML: Consulting: Eli Lilly and Company, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Celsion Corporation, Exelixis, Merck, Ipsen, Glycotest, Navigant, Leerink Swann, Midatech, Fortress Biotech, Sprink Pharmaceuticals, Nucleix, CanFite. Research funding; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ipsen. J-FB: Personal and consulting fees: Eli Lilly and Company, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Onxeo, during the conduct of the study. TO: Advisory role: Eli Lilly and Company, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Dainippon Simitomo Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Nano Carrier, Zeria Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo. Research grant: Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis Pharma K.K., Kowa K.K., Takeda Bio Development Center Limited, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Dainippon Simitomo Pharma, Pfizer Jana, Bayer Yakuhin, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Yakuruto Honsha, Ono Pharmaceutical, Eisaid, AstraZeneca K.K., Merck Serono, OncoTherapy Science, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Shizuoka Industry, Baxter, Nano Carrier, Zeria Pharmaceutical, Glaxo Smith Kline K.K., Nobelpharma. Honoraria/personal fees: Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis Pharma K.K., Dainippon Simitomo Pharma, Pfizer Jana, Bayer Yakuhin, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Yakuruto Honsha., Ono Pharmaceutical, Eisai Co, AstraZeneca K.K., Merck Serono, Baxter, Nobelpharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Nipponchemofa, EA Pharma, FUJIFILM RI Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Nippon Kayaku, Daiichi Sankyo, Celgene, K.K., MSD, K.K., Teijin Pharma. IC: Advisory board: Sanofi Oncology, Eli Lilly and Company, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Bayer, Roche, Merck Serono, Five Prime Therapeutics; Astra-Zeneca, Oncologie International, Pierre Fabre; Research funding: Eli-Lilly and Company, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi Oncology, Merck-Serono. Honorarium: Eli Lilly and Company. DC: Consultant for Eli Lilly and Company, during the conduct of the study; outside the submitted work. Consultant for Abbvie; BMS; Pfizer; Novartis; Bioverativ; Ipsen; FACIT.org, president. AG, JG, LB, PBA; CW: Employee and minor shareholder of Eli Lilly and Company. YH is a former employee of Eli Lilly and Company. MK: Consulting or advisory role: Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical. Personal fees/Honoraria: Bayer, Eisai, MSD. Research funding: Abbvie, Astellas Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, EA Pharma, Eisai, Gilead, Medico’s Hirata, Otsuka, Takeda, Taiho Pharmaceutical., (© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Until recently, 10% of hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) remained unclassified (UHCA). Among the UHCAs, the sonic hedgehog HCA (shHCA) was defined by focal deletions that fuse the promoter of Inhibin beta E chain with GLI1. Prostaglandin D2 synthase was proposed as immunomarker. In parallel, our previous work using proteomic analysis showed that most UHCAs constitute a homogeneous subtype associated with overexpression of argininosuccinate synthase (ASS1). To clarify the use of ASS1 in the HCA classification and avoid misinterpretations of the immunohistochemical staining, the aims of this work were to study (1) the link between shHCA and ASS1 overexpression and (2) the clinical relevance of ASS1 overexpression for diagnosis. Molecular, proteomic, and immunohistochemical analyses were performed in UHCA cases of the Bordeaux series. The clinico-pathological features, including ASS1 immunohistochemical labeling, were analyzed on a large international series of 67 cases. ASS1 overexpression and the shHCA subgroup were superimposed in 15 cases studied by molecular analysis, establishing ASS1 overexpression as a hallmark of shHCA. Moreover, the ASS1 immunomarker was better than prostaglandin D2 synthase and only found positive in 7 of 22 shHCAs. Of the 67 UHCA cases, 58 (85.3%) overexpressed ASS1, four cases were ASS1 negative, and in five cases ASS1 was noncontributory. Proteomic analysis performed in the case of doubtful interpretation of ASS1 overexpression, especially on biopsies, can be a support to interpret such cases. ASS1 overexpression is a specific hallmark of shHCA known to be at high risk of bleeding. Therefore, ASS1 is an additional tool for HCA classification and clinical diagnosis., (© 2020 The Authors. Hepatology Communications published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

NAPOLI-1 (NCT01494506) was a phase III study of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy. This post hoc analysis of NAPOLI-1 aimed to develop a predictive nomogram for overall survival (OS) at 6 and 12 months. Analyses were derived from all patients in NAPOLI-1 randomized to receive nal-IRI+5-FU/LV, nal-IRI monotherapy, or 5-FU/LV combination therapy. OS was associated with baseline factors using univariate and multivariable Cox analyses. A predictive nomogram was derived and validated using a concordance index and calibration plots. The univariate analyses identified 21 independent factors that contributed to OS, with eight factors significantly associated with OS. The Karnofsky Performance Score contributed the largest number of points (100), followed by presence of liver metastasis (98) and randomization to nal-IRI+5-FU/LV (96). The other baseline factors showing effects were albumin (g/dL), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (U/mL), disease stage at diagnosis, and body mass index (kg/m 2 ). The nomogram was used to predict the 6- and 12-month survival probability. The mean absolute errors between the observed and predicted probabilities for OS at 3, 6, and 9 months were 0.07, 0.08, and 0.07, respectively. This nomogram, based on NAPOLI-1, provides additional insight to aid decision-making for patients with mPDAC after previous gemcitabine-based therapy., Competing Interests: L.-T.C.: Consulting/Advisory Role: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Five Prime Therapeutics; Lilly; Merrimack; MSD; Novartis; Ono Pharmaceutical; PharmaEngine; Syncope, Taiwan; TTY Biopharm. Research Funding: GlaxoSmithKline (Inst); Merck Serono (Inst); Novartis (Inst); Polaris (Inst); TTY Biopharm (Inst). Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: anti-alpha-enolase (ENO-1) monoclonal antibody to HuniLife Technology, Taiwan. T.M.: Nothing to disclose. J.-F.B.: Honoraria: Baxalta/Shire; Bayer Schering Pharma; Gilead Sciences. Consulting/Advisory Role: Baxalta/Shire; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Novartis; Onxeo. Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bayer Schering Pharma. B.M.: Employed at Ipsen; Stock and Other Ownership Interests with Bristol-Myers Squibb. F.A.d.J.: Employed at Servier; Stock and Other Ownership Interests with Shire. B.B.: Employed at Ipsen and Merrimack. T.B.-S.: Consulting/Advisory Role: AbbVie. Other Relationship (DSMB): Exelixis; Silajen, Armo and Merck. J.T.S.: Consulting/Advisory Role: Baxalta; Celgene; Lilly; Shire. Research Funding: 4SC; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Celgene. Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene; Roche; Shire. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa-Vec) is a vaccinia virus-based oncolytic immunotherapy designed to preferentially replicate in and destroy tumor cells while stimulating anti-tumor immunity by expressing GM-CSF. An earlier randomized Phase IIa trial in predominantly sorafenib-naïve hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit. This randomized, open-label Phase IIb trial investigated whether Pexa-Vec plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) improved OS over BSC alone in HCC patients who failed sorafenib therapy (TRAVERSE). 129 patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to Pexa-Vec plus BSC vs. BSC alone. Pexa-Vec was given as a single intravenous (IV) infusion followed by up to 5 IT injections. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (RR), time to progression (TTP) and safety. A high drop-out rate in the control arm (63%) confounded assessment of response-based endpoints. Median OS (ITT) for Pexa-Vec plus BSC vs. BSC alone was 4.2 and 4.4 months, respectively (HR, 1.19, 95% CI: 0.78-1.80; p = .428). There was no difference between the two treatment arms in RR or TTP. Pexa-Vec was generally well-tolerated. The most frequent Grade 3 included pyrexia (8%) and hypotension (8%). Induction of immune responses to vaccinia antigens and HCC associated antigens were observed. Despite a tolerable safety profile and induction of T cell responses, Pexa-Vec did not improve OS as second-line therapy after sorafenib failure. The true potential of oncolytic viruses may lie in the treatment of patients with earlier disease stages which should be addressed in future studies. ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT01387555.

The French "cancer plan" has created a framework for good practice in the course of care for cancer patients. Decisions must be made in a multidisciplinary team meeting (MDM) and an individualized care plan (ICP) is to be established for each patient. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer with complex treatments that warrant a dedicated meeting. Cancer coordination centers (3C) ensure the organization and the functioning of MDMs. Multidisciplinary, standardized and systematic assessment of HCC patients allows for personalized management and orients them toward treatment that is either curative (transplantation, surgical resection, ablathermy) or palliative (chemoembolization, radiotherapy, systemic treatment, supportive care). MDMs bring together all the professionals treating the disease, and who are tasked with producing an enforceable document effective that justifies decisions and is often an essential step towardinclusion of patients in a clinical trial. It must be carried out according to a systematic schema in an approach applied from initial diagnosis to treatment outset and throughout the treatment. Numerous advances in HCC treatments have rendered their management complex, with the possibility of liver transplantation, twhose access is regulated by the Biomedicine Agency requiring the submission of MDM reports. MDMs must meet specific quality criteria to ensure effective management based on general guidelines and yet specifically tailored to each patient., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sorafenib remains one major first-line therapeutic options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC), with modest efficacy. We investigated the addition of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) to sorafenib in aHCC patients., Methods: Our multicentre phase II trial randomised aHCC first-line patients to sorafenib (400 mg BID) or sorafenib-GEMOX every 2 weeks (1000 mg/m 2 gemcitabine; 100 mg/m 2 oxaliplatin). Primary endpoint was the 4-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate., Results: Ninety-four patients were randomised (sorafenib-GEMOX: n = 48; sorafenib: n = 46). Median age was 64 years, PS 0 (69%) or 1 (31%), 63% patients had cirrhosis, 29% portal vein thrombosis and 70% extra-hepatic disease. Median duration of sorafenib treatment was 4 months (1-51); median number of GEMOX cycles was 7 (1-16). The 4-month PFS rates were 64% and 61% in the sorafenib-GEMOX and sorafenib arms, respectively; median PFS and OS were 6.2 (95% CI: 3.8-6.8) and 13.5 (7.5-16.2) months, and 4.6 (3.9-6.2) months and 14.8 (12.2-22.2), respectively. The ORR/DCR were 9%/70% and 15%/77% in the sorafenib-GEMOX and sorafenib alone arms, respectively. Main toxicities were (sorafenib-GEMOX/sorafenib) neutropenia (23%/0), thrombocytopenia (33%/0), diarrhoea (18%/9), peripheral neuropathy (5%/0) and hand-foot syndrome (5%/18)., Conclusions: Addition of GEMOX had an inpact on ORR and was well-tolerated as frontline systemic therapy. The benefit on PFS seems moderate; no subsequent study was planned.

Background & Aims: Management of patients with cirrhosis includes endoscopic screening and surveillance to detect esophageal varices (EV) and prevent bleeding. However, the Baveno VI guidelines recommend avoiding endoscopies for patients with liver stiffness measurements below 20 kPa and platelet counts above 150,000 (favorable Baveno VI status) and endoscopic assessment of patients with higher levels of liver stiffness and platelet counts (unfavorable Baveno VI status). We aimed to validate the Baveno VI guidelines, evaluating outcomes of patients in the ANRS-CO12 CirVir cohort with compensated cirrhosis associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, with or without a sustained response to antiviral therapy., Methods: We performed an ancillary study using data from 891 patients in the ANRS CO12 CirVir cohort, treated at 35 centers in France, with HCV or HBV infection and biopsy-proven cirrhosis, Child-Pugh A scores, no previous complications, and no hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent an endoscopic procedure and had interpretable liver stiffness measurements and platelet counts. Progression of portal hypertension (PHT) was defined as the onset of varices needing treatment (VNT) or PHT-related bleeding. An sustained response to antiviral therapy was defined as undetectable level of HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction assay (<50 IU/mL) 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR) or an undetectable level of HBV DNA. The primary aims were to validate the Baveno VI guidelines for screening and surveillance of EV in patients with compensated cirrhosis and to study the effects of an SVR on the progression of PHT., Results: A total of 200 patients achieved an SVR (22.4%) (94 patients with HCV infection, 98 patients with HBV infection, and 8 patients with both); 80 of these patients had favorable Baveno VI status and none had VNT. Progression of PHT was studied in 548 patients; during a follow-up period of 61.2 months (interquartile range, 39.5-80.6 months), 105 of these patients (19.1%) had progression of PHT. Lack of an SVR and grade 1 EV were independently associated with progression of PHT. At the time of PHT progression, all patients had unfavorable Baveno VI status. Achieving favorable Baveno VI status after an SVR was associated with the absence of PHT progression. Favorable Baveno VI status and SVR were independently associated with survival., Conclusions: In an analysis of data from a large cohort of patients with HBV- or HCV-associated cirrhosis in France, we validated the Baveno VI guidelines on screening and surveillance of PHT, even for patients who achieved a sustained response to antiviral therapy., (Copyright © 2019 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cyclins A2 and E1 regulate the cell cycle by promoting S phase entry and progression. Here, we identify a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) subgroup exhibiting cyclin activation through various mechanisms including hepatitis B virus (HBV) and adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV2) insertions, enhancer hijacking and recurrent CCNA2 fusions. Cyclin A2 or E1 alterations define a homogenous entity of aggressive HCC, mostly developed in non-cirrhotic patients, characterized by a transcriptional activation of E2F and ATR pathways and a high frequency of RB1 and PTEN inactivation. Cyclin-driven HCC display a unique signature of structural rearrangements with hundreds of tandem duplications and templated insertions frequently activating TERT promoter. These rearrangements, strongly enriched in early-replicated active chromatin regions, are consistent with a break-induced replication mechanism. Pan-cancer analysis reveals a similar signature in BRCA1-mutated breast and ovarian cancers. Together, this analysis reveals a new poor prognosis HCC entity and a rearrangement signature related to replication stress.

Background & Aims: Retrospective studies have found an unexpectedly high incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-associated cirrhosis who received direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents. We analyzed data from the ANRS CO12 CirVir cohort to compare the incidence of HCC in patients with cirrhosis who received DAA therapy vs patients treated with interferon (IFN)., Methods: Data were collected from 1270 patients with compensated biopsy-proven HCV-associated cirrhosis recruited from 2006 through 2012 at 35 centers in France. For descriptive purpose, patients were classified as follows: patients who received DAA treatment (DAA group, n = 336), patients who achieved a sustained virologic response (SVR) following an IFN-based regimen (SVR-IFN group, n = 495), or patients who never received DAA treatment and never had an SVR following IFN therapy (non-SVR group, n = 439). The patients were included in HCC surveillance programs based on ultrasound examination every 6 months, and clinical and biological data were recorded. To account for confounding by indication due to differences in patient characteristics at treatment initiation, we constructed a time-dependent Cox regression model weighted by the inverse probability of treatment and censoring (IPTCW) to assess the treatment effects of DAA on time until HCC., Results: Compared with patients in the SVR-IFN group, patients in the DAA group were older, higher proportions had diabetes or portal hypertension, and liver function was more severely impaired. The crude 3-year cumulative incidences of HCC were 5.9% in the DAA group, 3.1% in the SVR-IFN group, and 12.7% in the non-SVR group (overall P < .001; unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] for HCC 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-3.84; P = .030 for the DAA group vs the SVR-IFN group). HCC characteristics were similar among groups. Among patients with HCC, the DAA group received less-frequent HCC screening than the other 2 groups (P = .002). After Cox analyses weighted by the IPTCW, we found no statistically significant increase in risk of HCC associated with DAA use (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.46-1.73; P = .73)., Conclusions: Analysis of data from the ANRS CO12 CirVir cohort reveals that the apparent increase in HCC incidence observed in patients with cirrhosis treated with DAAs compared with patients who achieved SVR following an IFN therapy can be explained by patient characteristics (age, diabetes, reduced liver function) and lower screening intensity., (Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Refametinib, an oral MEK inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in combination with sorafenib in patients with RAS -mutated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Two phase II studies evaluated the efficacy of refametinib monotherapy and refametinib plus sorafenib in patients with RAS -mutant unresectable or metastatic HCC. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients with RAS mutations of cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) determined by beads, emulsion, amplification, and magnetics technology received twice-daily refametinib 50 mg ± sorafenib 400 mg. Potential biomarkers were assessed in ctDNA via next-generation sequencing (NGS). Results: Of 1,318 patients screened, 59 (4.4%) had a RAS mutation, of whom 16 received refametinib and 16 received refametinib plus sorafenib. With refametinib monotherapy, the objective response rate (ORR) was 0%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 56.3%, overall survival (OS) was 5.8 months, and progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.9 months. With refametinib plus sorafenib, the ORR was 6.3%, the DCR was 43.8%, OS was 12.7 months, and PFS was 1.5 months. In both studies, time to progression was 2.8 months. Treatment-emergent toxicities included fatigue, hypertension, and acneiform rash. Twenty-seven patients had ctDNA samples available for NGS. The most frequently detected mutations were in TERT (63.0%), TP53 (48.1%), and β-catenin ( CTNNB1 ; 37.0%). Conclusions: Prospective testing for RAS family mutations using ctDNA was a feasible, noninvasive approach for large-scale mutational testing in patients with HCC. A median OS of 12.7 months with refametinib plus sorafenib in this small population of RAS -mutant patients may indicate a synergistic effect between sorafenib and refametinib-this preliminary finding should be further explored. Clin Cancer Res; 24(19); 4650-61. ©2018 AACR ., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background & Aims: Semi-annual surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is recommended for patients with cirrhosis. We aimed to determine how compliance with HCC surveillance guidelines affects survival times of patients with hepatitis C virus- or hepatitis B virus-associated compensated cirrhosis who developed HCC., Methods: We collected data from the prospective ANRS CO12 CirVir study, from March 2006 through June 2012, on 1671 patients with biopsy-proven viral cirrhosis and no previous liver complications who were undergoing surveillance for HCC at 35 centers in France. Only 216 patients who developed HCC during the follow-up period were included in the analysis. Patients were considered to be compliant with surveillance guidelines if the time between their last surveillance image evaluation and diagnosis of HCC were fewer than 7 months and noncompliant if this time was 7 months or longer., Results: HCC was detected in 216 patients, at a median follow-up time of 59.7 months. Of these patients, 140 (80.5%) were Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A, 135 (69.9%) received first-line curative treatment (15 underwent transplantation, 29 underwent resection, 89 received percutaneous ablation, and 2 received resection and percutaneous ablation), and 129 (60.0%) were compliant with surveillance guidelines. Seventy-nine of the patients with HCC died; 49 deaths were associated with tumor progression. After lead-time adjustment, overall survival (OS) time was longer in patients compliant with surveillance guidelines (median OS time, 53.2 months) than noncompliant patients (median OS time, 25.4 months) (P = .0107); this difference remained significant even when we changed lead time assumptions. In multivariate analysis adjusted for a propensity score, compliance with HCC surveillance guidelines was associated with low tumor burden, allocation of curative treatment, and increased OS time compared with noncompliance (hazard ratio for OS, 2.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-4.14; P = .0150)., Conclusions: In an analysis of data from the ANRS CO12 CirVir cohort, we associated compliance with HCC surveillance guidelines (fewer than 7 months between image evaluations) with early diagnosis, allocation of curative treatment, and longer adjusted OS of patients with hepatitis C virus- or hepatitis B virus-associated compensated cirrhosis and a diagnosis of HCC., (Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Post-hoc analyses of AFP response and progression and their relationship with objective measures of response and survival were performed in patients from REACH., Methods: Serum AFP was measured at baseline and every 3 cycles (2 weeks/cycle). Associations between AFP and radiographic progression and efficacy end points were analysed., Results: Median percent AFP increase from baseline was smaller in the ramucirumab than in the placebo arm throughout treatment. Time to AFP progression (HR 0.621; P < 0.0001) and to radiographic progression (HR 0.613; P < 0.0001) favoured ramucirumab. Association between AFP and radiographic progression was shown at 6 (OR 6.44, 95% CI 4.03, 10.29; P < 0.0001) and 12 weeks (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.47, 3.53; P = 0.0002). AFP response was higher with ramucirumab compared with placebo (P < 0.0001). More patients in the ramucirumab arm experienced tumour shrinkage and AFP response compared with placebo. Survival was longer in patients with AFP response (13.6 months) than in patients without (6.2 months), irrespective of treatment (HR 0.457, P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Treatment with ramucirumab prolonged time to AFP progression, slowed AFP increase and was more likely to induce AFP response. Similar benefits in radiographic progression and response correlated with AFP changes.

Genomic alterations driving tumorigenesis result from the interaction of environmental exposures and endogenous cellular processes. With a diversity of risk factors, liver cancer is an ideal model to study these interactions. Here, we analyze the whole genomes of 44 new and 264 published liver cancers and we identify 10 mutational and 6 structural rearrangement signatures showing distinct relationships with environmental exposures, replication, transcription, and driver genes. The liver cancer-specific signature 16, associated with alcohol, displays a unique feature of transcription-coupled damage and is the main source of CTNNB1 mutations. Flood of insertions/deletions (indels) are identified in very highly expressed hepato-specific genes, likely resulting from replication-transcription collisions. Reconstruction of sub-clonal architecture reveals mutational signature evolution during tumor development exemplified by the vanishing of aflatoxin B1 signature in African migrants. Finally, chromosome duplications occur late and may represent rate-limiting events in tumorigenesis. These findings shed new light on the natural history of liver cancers.

Lessons Learned: Trebananib leveraging anti-angiogenic mechanism that is distinct from the classic sorafenib anti-vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition did not demonstrate improved progression-free survival at 4 months in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).In support of previously reported high Ang-2 levels' association with poor outcome in HCC for patients, trebananib treatment with lower baseline Ang-2 at study entry was associated with improved overall survival to 22 months and may suggest future studies to be performed within the context of low baseline Ang-2., Background: Ang-1 and Ang-2 are angiopoietins thought to promote neovascularization via activation of the Tie-2 angiopoietin receptor. Trebananib sequesters Ang-1 and Ang-2, preventing interaction with the Tie-2 receptor. Trebananib plus sorafenib combination has acceptable toxicity. Elevated Ang-2 levels are associated with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Methods: Patients with HCC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≤2, and Childs-Pugh A received IV trebananib at 10 mg/kg or 15 mg/kg weekly plus sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily. The study was planned for ≥78% progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 4 months relative to 62% for sorafenib historical control (power = 80% α = 0.20). Secondary endpoints included safety, tolerability, overall survival (OS), and multiple biomarkers, including serum Ang-2., Results: Thirty patients were enrolled sequentially in each of the two nonrandomized cohorts. Demographics were comparable between the two arms and the historical controls. PFS rates at 4 months were 57% and 54% on the 10 mg/kg and 15 mg/kg trebananib cohorts, respectively. Median OS was 17 and 11 months, respectively. Grade 3 and above events noted in ≥10% of patients included fatigue, hypertension, diarrhea, liver failure, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, dyspnea, and hypophosphatemia. One death was due to hepatic failure. Serum Ang-2 dichotomized at the median was associated with improved OS in both cohorts., Conclusion: There was no improvement in PFS rate at 4 months in either cohort, when compared with sorafenib historical control., (© AlphaMedPress; the data published online to support this summary is the property of the authors.)

Background: In the NAPOLI-1 Phase 3 trial, nal-IRI+5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) significantly improved median overall survival (6.1 vs 4.2 months, P=0.012) and progression-free survival (3.1 vs 1.5 months, P=0.0001) vs 5-FU/LV alone in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy. This analysis evaluated between treatment differences in quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease progression or toxicity (Q-TWiST)., Methods: Overall survival was partitioned into time with grade ⩾3 toxicity (TOX), disease progression (REL), and time without disease progression symptoms or grade ⩾3 toxicity (TWiST). Mean Q-TWiST was calculated by weighting time spent by a utility of 1.0 for TWiST and 0.5 for TOX and REL. In threshold analyses, utility for TOX and REL were varied from 0.0 to 1.0., Results: Patients in nal-IRI+5-FU/LV (n=117) vs 5-FU/LV (n=119) had significantly more mean time in TWiST (3.4 vs 2.4 months) and TOX (1.0 vs 0.3 months) but similar REL (2.5 vs 2.7 months). In the base case, nal-IRI+5-FU/LV patients had 1.3 months (95% CI, 0.4-2.1; 5.1 vs 3.9) greater Q-TWiST (threshold analyses range: 0.9-1.6 months)., Conclusions: Within NAPOLI-1, nal-IRI+5-FU/LV resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful gains in quality-adjusted survival vs 5-FU/LV alone.

Background & Aims: To compare treatment failure and survival associated with ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for early-stage HCC in Child-Pugh A cirrhosis patients., Methods: 122 cirrhotic patients (RFA: 61; TACE: 61) were well matched according to cirrhosis severity; tumor size and serum alpha-fetoprotein. TACE was performed in case of inconspicuous nodule on US or nodule with "at risk location". Treatment failure was defined as local tumor progression (LTP) and primary treatment failure (failing to obtain complete response after two treatment session). Treatment failure and overall survival (OS) were compared after coarsened exact matching. Cox proportional model to assess independent predictive factors was performed., Results: No significant difference was seen for baseline characteristics between the two groups. Mean tumor size was 3cm in both group with 41% HCC>3cm. Treatment failure rates after TACE was 42.6% (14 primary treatment failures and 12 LTP) and 9.8% after RFA (no primary treatment failure and 6 LTP) P < 0.001. TACE was the only predictive factor of treatment failure (Hazard ratio: 5.573). The 4-years OS after RFA and TACE were 54.1% and 31.5% (P = 0.042), respectively., Conclusion: For Child-Pugh A patients with early-stage HCC, alternative treatment as supra-selective TACE to RFA regarded as too challenging using common US guidance decrease significantly the local tumor control and overall survival. Efforts to improve feasibility of RFA especially for inconspicuous target have to be made.

Aim: To compare the performances of the Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) nomogram and others systems (BCLC, HKLC, CLIP, NIACE) for survival prediction in a large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) French cohort., Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from 01/2007 to 12/2013 in five French centers. Newly diagnosed HCC patients were analyzed. The discriminatory ability, homogeneity ability, prognostic stratification ability Akaike information criterion (AIC) and C-index were compared among scoring systems., Results: The cohort included 1102 patients, mostly men, median age 68 [60-74] years with cirrhosis (81%), child-Pugh A (73%), alcohol-related (41%), HCV-related (27%). HCC were multinodular (59%) and vascular invasion was present in 41% of cases. At time of HCC diagnosis BCLC stages were A (17%), B (16%), C (60%) and D (7%). First line HCC treatment was curative in 23.5%, palliative in 59.5%, BSC in 17% of our population. Median OS was 10.8 mo [4.9-28.0]. Each system distinguished different survival prognosis groups ( P < 0.0001). The nomogram had the highest discriminatory ability, the highest C-index value. NIACE score had the lowest AIC value. The nomogram distinguished sixteen different prognosis groups. By classifying unifocal large HCC into tumor burden 1, the nomogram was less powerful., Conclusion: In this French cohort, the BCLC nomogram and the NIACE score provided the best prognostic information, but the NIACE could even help treatment strategies., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Background & Aims: Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) are benign liver tumors that can be assigned to molecular subtypes based on inactivating mutations in hepatocyte nuclear factor 1A, activating mutations in β-catenin, or activation of inflammatory signaling pathways. We aimed to update the classification system for HCA and associate the subtypes with disease risk factors and complications., Methods: We analyzed expression levels of 20 genes and sequenced exon regions of 8 genes (HNF1A, IL6ST, CTNNB1, FRK, STAT3, GNAS, JAK1, and TERT) in 607 samples of 533 HCAs from 411 patients, collected from 28 centers mainly in France from 2000 and 2014. We performed gene expression profile, RNA sequence, whole-exome and genome sequence, and immunohistochemical analyses of select samples. Molecular data were associated with risk factors, histopathology, bleeding, and malignant transformation., Results: Symptomatic bleeding occurred in 14% of the patients (85% of cases were female, median age, 38 years); 7% of the nodules were borderline between HCA and hepatocellular carcinoma, and 3% of patients developed hepatocellular carcinoma from HCA. Based on molecular features, we classified HCA into 8 subgroups. One new subgroup, composed of previously unclassified HCA, represented 4% of HCAs overall and was associated with obesity and bleeding. These tumors were characterized by activation of sonic hedgehog signaling, due to focal deletions that fuse the promoter of INHBE with GLI1. Analysis of genetic heterogeneity among multiple HCAs, from different patients, revealed a molecular subtype field effect; multiple tumors had different mutations that deregulated similar pathways. Specific molecular subtypes of HCA associated with various HCA risk factors, including imbalances in estrogen or androgen hormones. Specific molecular subgroup of HCA with β-catenin and sonic hedgehog activation associated with malignant transformation and bleeding, respectively., Conclusions: Using sequencing and gene expression analyses, we identified a subgroup of HCA characterized by fusion of the INHBE and GLI1 genes and activation of sonic hedgehog pathway. Molecular subtypes of HCAs associated with different patients' risk factors for HCA, disease progression, and pathology features of tumors. This classification system might be used to select treatment strategies for patients with HCA., (Copyright © 2017 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: We performed a prospective study to investigate the effects of a sustained viral response (SVR) on outcomes of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and compensated cirrhosis., Methods: We collected data from 1323 patients included in the prospective Agence Nationale pour la Recherche sur le SIDA et les hépatites virales (ANRS) viral cirrhosis (CirVir) cohort, recruited from 35 clinical centers in France from 2006 through 2012. All patients had HCV infection and biopsy-proven cirrhosis, were Child-Pugh class A, and had no prior liver complications. All patients received anti-HCV treatment before or after inclusion (with interferon then with direct antiviral agents) and underwent an ultrasound examination every 6 months, as well as endoscopic evaluations. SVR was considered as a time-dependent covariate; its effect on outcome was assessed by the Cox proportional hazard regression method. We used a propensity score to minimize confounding by indication of treatment and capacity to achieve SVR., Results: After a median follow-up period of 58.2 months, 668 patients (50.5%) achieved SVR. SVR was associated with a decreased incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (hazard ratio [HR] compared with patients without an SVR, 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.43; P < .001) and hepatic decompensation (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.17-0.39; P < .001). Patients with SVRs also had a lower risk of cardiovascular events (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25-0.69; P = .001) and bacterial infections (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29-0.68; P < .001). Metabolic features were associated with a higher risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with SVRs, but not in patients with viremia. SVR affected overall mortality (HR, 0.27 compared with patients without SVR; 95% CI, 0.18-0.42; P < .001) and death from liver-related and non-liver-related causes. Similar results were obtained in a propensity score-matched population., Conclusions: We confirmed a reduction in critical events, liver-related or not, in a prospective study of patients with HCV infection and compensated cirrhosis included in the CirVir cohort who achieved an SVR. We found an SVR to reduce overall mortality and risk of death from liver-related and non-liver-related causes. A longer follow-up evaluation is required to accurately describe and assess specific risk factors for complications in this population., (Copyright © 2017 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) are composed of four molecular subgroups: mutations inactivating the HNF1A gene; the inflammatory phenotype with mutations of different genes leading to STAT3 activation; the activation of β-catenin by mutations in exon 3; among β-HCA, half display both inflammatory and β-catenin-activated phenotypes; and the unclassified tumors. The identification of these subtypes by MRI and immunohistochemistry on tissue is considered as a major criterion to manage patients. Of particular relevance is the identification of the β-catenin-mutated group due to its high risk of malignant transformation. In spite of this progress, the classification has not gained recognition among surgeons. It is hoped that by working as a multidisciplinary team, including surgeons, radiologists, pathologists and molecular biologists, patients will be managed more rationally. In this article, we will present known and new data, well accepted and that which is still controversial. The progress made in the field of HCA in the last 12 years, whether in epidemiology, diagnosis (clinical, pathology, imaging) or management, is related in one way or another to molecular advances., Competing Interests: Financial & competing interests disclosure The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending or royalties. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.