13 results on '"Bassinet C"'
Search Results
2. RENEB inter-laboratory comparison 2021 : inter-assay comparison of eight dosimetry assays
- Author
-
Port, M, Barquinero, J-F, Endesfelder, D, Moquet, J, Oestreicher, U, Terzoudi, G, Trompier, F, Vral, Anne, Abe, Y, Ainsbury, L, Alkebsi, L, Amundson, S A, Badie, C, Baeyens, Ans, Balajee, A S, Balazs, K, Barnard, S, Bassinet, C, Beaton-Green, L A, Beinke, C, Bobyk, L, Brochard, P, Brzoska, K, Bucher, M, Ciesielski, B, Cuceu, C, Discher, M, D Oca, M C, Dominguez, I, Doucha-Senf, S, Dumitrescu, A, Duy, P N, Finot, F, Garty, G, Ghandhi, S A, Gregoire, E, Goh, V S T, Guclu, I, Hadjiiska, L, Hargitai, R, Hristova, R, Ishii, K, Kis, E, Juniewicz, M, Kriehuber, R, Lacombe, J, Lee, Y, Lopez Riego, M, Lumniczky, K, Mai, T T, Maltar-Strmecki, N, Marrale, M, Martinez, J S, Marciniak, A, Maznyk, N, McKeever, S W S, Meher, P K, Milanova, M, Miura, T, Monteiro Gil, O, Montoro, A, Moreno Domene, M, Mrozik, A, Nakayama, R, O'Brien, G, Oskamp, D, Ostheim, P, Pajic, J, Pastor, N, Patrono, C, Pujol-Canadell, M, Prieto Rodriguez, M J, Repin, M, Romanyukha, A, RoSSler, U, Sabatier, L, Sakai, A, Scherthan, H, Schule, S, Seong, K M, Sevriukova, O, Sholom, S, Sommer, S, Suto, Y, Sypko, T, Szatmari, T, Takahashi-Sugai, M, Takebayashi, K, Testa, A, Testard, I, Tichy, A, Triantopoulou, S, Tsuyama, N, Unverricht-Yeboah, M, Valente, M, Van Hoey, O, Wilkins, R C, Wojcik, A, Wojewodzka, M, Younghyun, Lee, Zafiropoulos, D, and Abend, M
- Subjects
Medicine and Health Sciences - Abstract
Tools for radiation exposure reconstruction are required to support the medical management of radiation victims in radiological or nuclear incidents. Different biological and physical dosimetry assays can be used for various exposure scenarios to estimate the dose of ionizing radiation a person has absorbed. Regular validation of the techniques through inter-laboratory comparisons (ILC) is essential to guarantee high quality results. In the current RENEB inter-laboratory comparison, the performance quality of established cytogenetic assays [dicentric chromosome assay (DCA), cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay (CBMN), stable chromosomal translocation assay (FISH) and premature chromosome condensation assay (PCC)] was tested in comparison to molecular biological assays [gamma-H2AX foci (gH2AX), gene expression (GE)] and physical dosimetry-based assays [electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), optically or thermally stimulated luminescence (LUM)]. Three blinded coded samples (e.g., blood, enamel or mobiles) were exposed to 0, 1.2 or 3.5 Gy X-ray reference doses (240 kVp, 1 Gy/min). These doses roughly correspond to clinically relevant groups of unexposed to low exposed (0-1 Gy), moderately exposed (1-2 Gy, no severe acute health effects expected) and highly exposed individuals (>2 Gy, requiring early intensive medical care). In the frame of the current RENEB inter-laboratory comparison, samples were sent to 86 specialized teams in 46 organizations from 27 nations for dose estimation and identification of three clinically relevant groups. The time for sending early crude reports and more precise reports was documented for each laboratory and assay where possible. The quality of dose estimates was analyzed with three different levels of granularity, 1. by calculating the frequency of correctly reported clinically relevant dose categories, 2. by determining the number of dose estimates within the uncertainty intervals recommended for triage dosimetry (±0.5 Gy or ±1.0 Gy for doses 2.5 Gy), and 3. by calculating the absolute difference (AD) of estimated doses relative to the reference doses. In total, 554 dose estimates were submitted within the 6-week period given before the exercise was closed. For samples processed with the highest priority, earliest dose estimates/categories were reported within 5-10 h of receipt for GE, gH2AX, LUM, EPR, 2-3 days for DCA, CBMN and within 6-7 days for the FISH assay. For the unirradiated control sample, the categorization in the correct clinically relevant group (0-1 Gy) as well as the allocation to the triage uncertainty interval was, with the exception of a few outliers, successfully performed for all assays. For the 3.5 Gy sample the percentage of correct classifications to the clinically relevant group (≥2 Gy) was between 89-100% for all assays, with the exception of gH2AX. For the 1.2 Gy sample, an exact allocation to the clinically relevant group was more difficult and 0-50% or 0-48% of the estimates were wrongly classified into the lowest or highest dose categories, respectively. For the irradiated samples, the correct allocation to the triage uncertainty intervals varied considerably between assays for the 1.2 Gy (29-76%) and 3.5 Gy (17-100%) samples. While a systematic shift towards higher doses was observed for the cytogenetic-based assays, extreme outliers exceeding the reference doses 2-6 fold were observed for EPR, FISH and GE assays. These outliers were related to a particular material examined (tooth enamel for EPR assay, reported as kerma in enamel, but when converted into the proper quantity, i.e. to kerma in air, expected dose estimates could be recalculated in most cases), the level of experience of the teams (FISH) and methodological uncertainties (GE). This was the first RENEB ILC where everything, from blood sampling to irradiation and shipment of the samples, was organized and realized at the same institution, for several biological and physical retrospective dosimetry assays. Almost all assays appeared comparably applicable for the identification of unexposed and highly exposed individuals and the allocation of medical relevant groups, with the latter requiring medical support for the acute radiation scenario simulated in this exercise. However, extreme outliers or a systematic shift of dose estimates have been observed for some assays. Possible reasons will be discussed in the assay specific papers of this special issue. In summary, this ILC clearly demonstrates the need to conduct regular exercises to identify research needs, but also to identify technical problems and to optimize the design of future ILCs.
- Published
- 2023
3. Diamond dosimeter for small beam stereotactic radiotherapy
- Author
-
Marsolat, F., Tromson, D., Tranchant, N., Pomorski, M., Lazaro-Ponthus, D., Bassinet, C., Huet, C., Derreumaux, S., Chea, M., Boisserie, G., Alvarez, J., and Bergonzo, P.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. The 2019-2020 EURADOS WG10 and RENEB Field Test of Retrospective Dosimetry Methods in a Small-Scale Incident Involving Ionizing Radiation
- Author
-
Waldner, L., Bernhardsson, C., Woda, C., Trompier, F., Van Hoey, O., Kulka, U., Oestreicher, U., Bassinet, C., Rääf, C., Discher, M., Endesfelder, D., Eakins, J. S., Gregoire, E., Wójcik, Andrzej, Ristic, Y., Kim, H., Lee, J., Yu, H., Kim, M. C., Abend, M., Ainsbury, E., Waldner, L., Bernhardsson, C., Woda, C., Trompier, F., Van Hoey, O., Kulka, U., Oestreicher, U., Bassinet, C., Rääf, C., Discher, M., Endesfelder, D., Eakins, J. S., Gregoire, E., Wójcik, Andrzej, Ristic, Y., Kim, H., Lee, J., Yu, H., Kim, M. C., Abend, M., and Ainsbury, E.
- Abstract
With the use of ionizing radiation comes the risk of accidents and malevolent misuse. When unplanned exposures occur, there are several methods which can be used to retrospectively reconstruct individual radiation exposures; biological methods include analysis of aberrations and damage of chromosomes and DNA, while physical methods rely on luminescence (TL/OSL) or EPR signals. To ensure the quality and dependability of these methods, they should be evaluated under realistic exposure conditions. In 2019, EURADOS Working Group 10 and RENEB organized a field test with the purpose of evaluating retrospective dosimetry methods as carried out in potential real-life exposure scenarios. A 1.36 TBq Ir-192 source was used to irradiate anthropomorphic phantoms in different geometries at doses of several Gy in an outdoor open-air geometry. Materials intended for accident dosimetry (including mobile phones and blood) were placed on the phantoms together with reference dosimeters (LiF, NaCl, glass). The objective was to estimate radiation exposures received by individuals as measured using blood and fortuitous materials, and to evaluate these methods by comparing the estimated doses to reference measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. Herein we describe the overall planning, goals, execution and preliminary outcomes of the 2019 field test. Such field tests are essential for the development of new and existing methods. The outputs from this field test include useful experience in terms of planning and execution of future exercises, with respect to time management, radiation protection, and reference dosimetry to be considered to obtain relevant data for analysis.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. RENEB accident simulation exercise
- Author
-
Brzozowska, B., Ainsbury, E., Baert, A.E., Beaton-Green, L., Barrios, L., Barquinero, J.F., Bassinet, C., Beinke, C., Benedek, A., Beukes, P., Bortolin, E., Buraczewska, I., Burbidge, C.I., de Amicis, A., de Angelis, C., Della Monaca, S., Depuydt, J., de Sanctis, S., Dobos, K., Domene, M.M., Domínguez, I., Facco, E., Fattibene, P., Frenzel, M., Monteiro Gil, O., Gonon, G., Gregoire, E., Gruel, G., Hadjidekova, V., Hatzi, V.I., Hristova, R., Jaworska, A., Kis, E., Kowalska, M., Kulka, U., Lista, F., Lumniczky, K., Martínez-López, W., Meschini, R., Mörtl, S., Moquet, J., Noditi, M., Oestreicher, U., Orta Vázquez, M.L., Palma, V., Pantelias, G., Montoro Pastor, A., Patrono, C., Piqueret-Stephan, L., Quattrini, M.C., Regalbuto, E., Ricoul, M., Roch-Lefevre, S., Roy, L., Sabatier, L., Sarchiapone, L., Sebastià, N., Sommer, S., Sun, M., Suto, Y., Terzoudi, G., Trompier, F., Vral, A., Wilkins, R., Zafiropoulos, D., Wieser, A., Woda, C., Wojcik, A., Istituto Superiore di Sanita` (ISS), Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS), National center for public health [Hungary], Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Public Health England [London], Universiteit Gent = Ghent University [Belgium] (UGENT), Helmholtz-Zentrum München (HZM), Stockholm University, University of Warsaw (UW), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Universität Ulm - Ulm University [Ulm, Allemagne], Seventh Framework Programme, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz - Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe = University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Universiteit Gent = Ghent University (UGENT), and Helmholtz Zentrum München = German Research Center for Environmental Health
- Subjects
RENEB network ,Safety Management ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Radiobiology ,Biology and Life Sciences ,Disaster Planning ,Reneb Network ,Accident Simulation ,Radiobiological Event ,Europe ,radiobiological event ,Radiation Monitoring ,Medicine and Health Sciences ,accident simulation ,Triage ,Radioactive Hazard Release - Abstract
International audience; Purpose: The RENEB accident exercise was carried out in order to train the RENEB participants in coordinating and managing potentially large data sets that would be generated in case of a major radiological event. Materials and methods: Each participant was offered the possibility to activate the network by sending an alerting email about a simulated radiation emergency. The same participant had to collect, compile and report capacity, triage categorization and exposure scenario results obtained from all other participants. The exercise was performed over 27 weeks and involved the network consisting of 28 institutes: 21 RENEB members, four candidates and three non-RENEB partners. Results: The duration of a single exercise never exceeded 10 days, while the response from the assisting laboratories never came later than within half a day. During each week of the exercise, around 4500 samples were reported by all service laboratories (SL) to be examined and 54 scenarios were coherently estimated by all laboratories (the standard deviation from the mean of all SL answers for a given scenario category and a set of data was not larger than 3 patient codes). Conclusions: Each participant received training in both the role of a reference laboratory (activating the network) and of a service laboratory (responding to an activation request). The procedures in the case of radiological event were successfully established and tested. © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
- Published
- 2017
6. Overview of physical dosimetry methods for triage application integrated in the new European network RENEB
- Author
-
Trompier, F., Burbidge, C., Bassinet, C., Baumann, M., Bortolin, E., De Angelis, C., Eakins, J., Della Monaca, S., Fattibene, P., Quattrini, M.C., Tanner, R., Wieser, A., Woda, C., Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), and Istituto Superiore di Sanita` (ISS)
- Subjects
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy ,Optically Stimulated Luminescence ,Dosimetry ,Retrospective Dosimetry ,Quality Assurance, Health Care ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy ,Reproducibility of Results ,Equipment Design ,Radiation Exposure ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Equipment Failure Analysis ,Europe ,Systems Integration ,Humans ,Biological Assay ,Thermoluminescent Dosimetry ,Lymphocytes ,Triage - Abstract
International audience; Purpose In the EC-funded project RENEB (Realizing the European Network in Biodosimetry), physical methods applied to fortuitous dosimetric materials are used to complement biological dosimetry, to increase dose assessment capacity for large-scale radiation/nuclear accidents. This paper describes the work performed to implement Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) dosimetry techniques. Materials and methods OSL is applied to electronic components and EPR to touch-screen glass from mobile phones. To implement these new approaches, several blind tests and inter-laboratory comparisons (ILC) were organized for each assay. Results OSL systems have shown good performances. EPR systems also show good performance in controlled conditions, but ILC have also demonstrated that post-irradiation exposure to sunlight increases the complexity of the EPR signal analysis. Conclusions Physically-based dosimetry techniques present high capacity, new possibilities for accident dosimetry, especially in the case of large-scale events. Some of the techniques applied can be considered as operational (e.g. OSL on Surface Mounting Devices [SMD]) and provide a large increase of measurement capacity for existing networks. Other techniques and devices currently undergoing validation or development in Europe could lead to considerable increases in the capacity of the RENEB accident dosimetry network. © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor and Francis Group.
- Published
- 2017
7. Realising the European network of biodosimetry : RENEB-status quo
- Author
-
Kulka, U., Ainsbury, L., Atkinson, M., Barnard, S., Smith, R., Barquinero, J. F., Barrios, L., Bassinet, C., Beinke, C., Cucu, A., Darroudi, F., Fattibene, P., Bortolin, E., Della Monaca, S., Gil, O., Gregoire, E., Hadjidekova, V., Haghdoost, Siamak, Hatzi, V., Hempel, W., Herranz, R., Jaworska, A., Lindholm, C., Lumniczky, K., M'kacher, R., Moertl, S., Montoro, A., Moquet, J., Moreno, M., Noditi, M., Ogbazghi, A., Oestreicher, U., Palitti, F., Pantelias, G., Popescu, I., Prieto, M. J., Roch-Lefevre, S., Roessler, U., Romm, H., Rothkamm, K., Sabatier, L., Sebastia, N., Sommer, S., Terzoudi, G., Testa, A., Thierens, H., Trompier, F., Turai, I., Vandevoorde, C., Vaz, P., Voisin, P., Vral, A., Ugletveit, F., Wieser, A., Woda, C., Wojcik, Andrzej, Kulka, U., Ainsbury, L., Atkinson, M., Barnard, S., Smith, R., Barquinero, J. F., Barrios, L., Bassinet, C., Beinke, C., Cucu, A., Darroudi, F., Fattibene, P., Bortolin, E., Della Monaca, S., Gil, O., Gregoire, E., Hadjidekova, V., Haghdoost, Siamak, Hatzi, V., Hempel, W., Herranz, R., Jaworska, A., Lindholm, C., Lumniczky, K., M'kacher, R., Moertl, S., Montoro, A., Moquet, J., Moreno, M., Noditi, M., Ogbazghi, A., Oestreicher, U., Palitti, F., Pantelias, G., Popescu, I., Prieto, M. J., Roch-Lefevre, S., Roessler, U., Romm, H., Rothkamm, K., Sabatier, L., Sebastia, N., Sommer, S., Terzoudi, G., Testa, A., Thierens, H., Trompier, F., Turai, I., Vandevoorde, C., Vaz, P., Voisin, P., Vral, A., Ugletveit, F., Wieser, A., Woda, C., and Wojcik, Andrzej
- Abstract
Creating a sustainable network in biological and retrospective dosimetry that involves a large number of experienced laboratories throughout the European Union (EU) will significantly improve the accident and emergency response capabilities in case of a large-scale radiological emergency. A well-organised cooperative action involving EU laboratories will offer the best chance for fast and trustworthy dose assessments that are urgently needed in an emergency situation. To this end, the EC supports the establishment of a European network in biological dosimetry (RENEB). The RENEB project started in January 2012 involving cooperation of 23 organisations from 16 European countries. The purpose of RENEB is to increase the biodosimetry capacities in case of large-scale radiological emergency scenarios. The progress of the project since its inception is presented, comprising the consolidation process of the network with its operational platform, intercomparison exercises, training activities, proceedings in quality assurance and horizon scanning for new methods and partners. Additionally, the benefit of the network for the radiation research community as a whole is addressed.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Retrospective radiation dosimetry using OSL of electronic components: results of an inter-laboratory comparison
- Author
-
Bassinet, C, Woda, C, Bortolin, E, Della Monaca, S, Fattibene, P, Quattrini, M, Bulanek, B, Ekendahl, D, Burbidge, C, Cauwels, V, Kouroukla, E, Geber Bergstrand, T, Mrozik, A, Marczewska, B, Bilski, B, Sholom, S, Mckeever, S, Smith, R, Veronese, I, Galli, A, Panzeri, L, Martini, M, Quattrini, MC, Burbidge, CI, McKeever, SWS, Smith, RW, GALLI, ANNA, PANZERI, LAURA, MARTINI, MARCO, Bassinet, C, Woda, C, Bortolin, E, Della Monaca, S, Fattibene, P, Quattrini, M, Bulanek, B, Ekendahl, D, Burbidge, C, Cauwels, V, Kouroukla, E, Geber Bergstrand, T, Mrozik, A, Marczewska, B, Bilski, B, Sholom, S, Mckeever, S, Smith, R, Veronese, I, Galli, A, Panzeri, L, Martini, M, Quattrini, MC, Burbidge, CI, McKeever, SWS, Smith, RW, GALLI, ANNA, PANZERI, LAURA, and MARTINI, MARCO
- Abstract
In the framework of the EU-FP7 MULTIBIODOSE project, two protocols using OSL of resistors removed from the circuit board of mobile phones were developed with the aim to use the resistors as fortuitous dosimeters in the event of a large scale radiological accident. This paper presents the results of an interlaboratory comparison carried out under the umbrella of EURADOS. The two aims of this exercise were the validation of the MULTIBIODOSE protocols by a large number of laboratories and the dissemination of the method with the objective of preparing the basis for a network that could increase Europe's response capacity in the case of a mass casualty radiological emergency. Twelve institutes from eleven European countries and one institute from the USA, with various degrees of expertise in OSL dosimetry, took part in the OSL inter-laboratory comparison. Generally, a good agreement within uncertainties was observed between estimated and nominal doses.
- Published
- 2014
9. MR compatible detectors assessment for a 0.35 T MR-linac commissioning.
- Author
-
Chea M, Croisé M, Huet C, Bassinet C, Benadjaoud MA, and Jenny C
- Subjects
- Humans, Monte Carlo Method, Phantoms, Imaging, Calibration, Radiometry methods, Particle Accelerators
- Abstract
Purpose: To assess a large panel of MR compatible detectors on the full range of measurements required for a 0.35 T MR-linac commissioning by using a specific statistical method represented as a continuum of comparison with the Monte Carlo (MC) TPS calculations. This study also describes the commissioning tests and the secondary MC dose calculation validation., Material and Methods: Plans were created on the Viewray TPS to generate MC reference data. Absolute dose points, PDD, profiles and output factors were extracted and compared to measurements performed with ten different detectors: PTW 31010, 31021, 31022, Markus 34045 and Exradin A28 MR ionization chambers, SN Edge shielded diode, PTW 60019 microdiamond, PTW 60023 unshielded diode, EBT3 radiochromic films and LiF µcubes. Three commissioning steps consisted in comparison between calculated and measured dose: the beam model validation, the output calibration verification in four different phantoms and the commissioning tests recommended by the IAEA-TECDOC-1583., Main Results: The symmetry for the high resolution detectors was higher than the TPS data of about 1%. The angular responses of the PTW 60023 and the SN Edge were - 6.6 and - 11.9% compared to the PTW 31010 at 60°. The X/Y-left and the Y-right penumbras measured by the high resolution detectors were in good agreement with the TPS values except for the PTW 60023 for large field sizes. For the 0.84 × 0.83 cm
2 field size, the mean deviation to the TPS of the uncorrected OF was - 1.7 ± 1.6% against - 4.0 ± 0.6% for the corrected OF whereas we found - 4.8 ± 0.8% for passive dosimeters. The mean absolute dose deviations to the TPS in different phantoms were 0 ± 0.4%, - 1.2 ± 0.6% and 0.5 ± 1.1% for the PTW 31010, PTW 31021 and Exradin A28 MR respectively., Conclusions: The magnetic field effects on the measurements are considerably reduced at low magnetic field. The PTW 31010 ionization chamber can be used with confidence in different phantoms for commissioning and QA tests requiring absolute dose verifications. For relative measurements, the PTW 60019 presented the best agreement for the full range of field size. For the profile assessment, shielded diodes had a behaviour similar to the PTW 60019 and 60023 while the ionization chambers were the most suitable detectors for the symmetry. The output correction factors published by the IAEA TRS 483 seem to be applicable at low magnetic field pending the publication of new MR specific values., (© 2024. The Author(s).)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Mobile phone screen protector glass: A TL investigation of the intrinsic background signal.
- Author
-
Bassinet C, Discher M, Ristic Y, and Woda C
- Subjects
- Glass chemistry, Hydrofluoric Acid, Radiation, Ionizing, Cell Phone, Thermoluminescent Dosimetry methods
- Abstract
Screen protector glasses are often used to protect the display screen surface of mobile phones against physical damage. Their dosimetric properties were recently studied by thermoluminescence with the aim of using these items as potential emergency dosimeters in the event of a radiological accident. They are sensitive to ionizing radiation and they could be easily removed and replaced without destroying the phone in case of a dose assessment. However, an intrinsic background signal that partially overlaps with the radiation-induced TL signal is observed. The reconstructed dose could be overestimated if not properly taken into account. The homogeneity of this confounding signal on the surface of several screen protectors was estimated and a chemical treatment with hydrofluoric acid (HF 40%) was tested to minimize its contribution. For most of the samples studied, the intrinsic background signal remained a serious issue for dose reconstruction. Additionally, the TL signals were measured in the red detector range using two different models of red-sensitive photomultiplier tubes. The homogeneity of the intrinsic background signal on the surface of screen protectors was examined and the results of the reduction of this signal by the chemical HF treatment were discussed., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Bassinet, Discher, Ristic and Woda.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Salivary Dysfunctions and Consequences After Radioiodine Treatment for Thyroid Cancer: Protocol for a Self-Controlled Study (START Study).
- Author
-
Baudin C, Lussey-Lepoutre C, Bressand A, Buffet C, Menegaux F, Soret M, Broggio D, Bassinet C, Huet C, Armengol G, Leenhardt L, and Bernier MO
- Abstract
Background: Following radioiodine (
131 I) therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer, the salivary glands may become inflamed, leading to dysfunctions and decreases in patients' nutritional status and quality of life. The incidence of these dysfunctions after131 I-therapy is poorly known, and no clinical or genetic factors have been identified to date to define at-risk patients, which would allow the delivered activity to be adapted to the expected risk of salivary dysfunctions., Objective: The aims of this study are to estimate the incidence of salivary dysfunctions, and consequences on the quality of life and nutritional status for patients after131 I-therapy; to characterize at-risk patients of developing posttreatment dysfunctions using clinical, biomolecular, and biochemical factors; and to validate a dosimetric method to calculate the dose received at the salivary gland level for analyzing the dose-response relationship between absorbed doses to salivary glands and salivary dysfunctions., Methods: This prospective study aims to include patients for whom131 I-therapy is indicated as part of the treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer in a Paris hospital (40 and 80 patients in the 1.1 GBq and 3.7 GBq groups, respectively). The follow-up is based on three scheduled visits: at inclusion (T0, immediately before131 I-therapy), and at 6 months (T6) and 18 months (T18) posttreatment. For each visit, questionnaires on salivary dysfunctions (validated French tool), quality of life (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Survey), and nutritional status (visual analog scale) are administered by a trained clinical research associate. At T0 and T6, saliva samples and individual measurements of the salivary flow, without and with salivary glands stimulation, are performed. External thermoluminescent dosimeters are positioned on the skin opposite the salivary glands and at the sternal fork immediately before131 I administration and removed after 5 days. From the doses recorded by the dosimeters, an estimation of the dose received at the salivary glands will be carried out using physical and computational phantoms. Genetic and epigenetic analyses will be performed to search for potential biomarkers of the predisposition to develop salivary dysfunctions after131 I-therapy., Results: A total of 139 patients (99 women, 71.2%; mean age 47.4, SD 14.3 years) were enrolled in the study between September 2020 and April 2021 (45 and 94 patients in the 1.1 GBq and 3.7G Bq groups, respectively). T6 follow-up is complete and T18 follow-up is currently underway. Statistical analyses will assess the links between salivary dysfunctions and absorbed doses to the salivary glands, accounting for associated factors. Moreover, impacts on the patients' quality of life will be analyzed., Conclusions: To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the risk of salivary dysfunctions (using both objective and subjective indicators) in relation to organ (salivary glands) doses, based on individual dosimeter records and dose reconstructions. The results will allow the identification of patients at risk of salivary dysfunctions and will permit clinicians to propose a more adapted follow-up and/or countermeasures to adverse effects., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04876287; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04876287., International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/35565., (©Clémence Baudin, Charlotte Lussey-Lepoutre, Alice Bressand, Camille Buffet, Fabrice Menegaux, Marine Soret, David Broggio, Céline Bassinet, Christelle Huet, Gemma Armengol, Laurence Leenhardt, Marie-Odile Bernier. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 22.07.2022.)- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Radiation-induced damage analysed by luminescence methods in retrospective dosimetry and emergency response.
- Author
-
Woda C, Bassinet C, Trompier F, Bortolin E, Della Monaca S, and Fattibene P
- Subjects
- Humans, Triage, Emergency Medicine methods, Luminescence, Radiation Effects, Radioactive Hazard Release, Radiometry methods
- Abstract
The increasing risk of a mass casualty scenario following a large scale radiological accident or attack necessitates the development of appropriate dosimetric tools for emergency response. Luminescence dosimetry has been reliably applied for dose reconstruction in contaminated settlements for several decades and recent research into new materials carried close to the human body opens the possibility of estimating individual doses for accident and emergency dosimetry using the same technique. This paper reviews the luminescence research into materials useful for accident dosimetry and applications in retrospective dosimetry. The properties of the materials are critically discussed with regard to the requirements for population triage. It is concluded that electronic components found within portable electronic devices, such as e.g. mobile phones, are at present the most promising material to function as a fortuitous dosimeter in an emergency response.
- Published
- 2009
13. Radiation-induced signals analysed by EPR spectrometry applied to fortuitous dosimetry.
- Author
-
Trompier F, Bassinet C, Wieser A, De Angelis C, Viscomi D, and Fattibene P
- Subjects
- Humans, Radioactive Hazard Release, Triage, Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy, Radiometry methods
- Abstract
Dosimetry based on the detection by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy of ionizing radiation-induced radicals is an established method for the retrospective dosimetry of past exposures and the dosimetry of potentially exposed persons in radiological emergencies. The dose is estimated by measuring the physical damage induced in materials contained in objects placed on or next to the potentially exposed person. The aim of this paper is to survey the current literature about methodologies and materials that have been proposed for EPR dosimetry, in order to identify those that could be suitable for population triage according to criteria such as ubiquity, non invasiveness and easy sample collection, presence of a post-irradiation EPR signal, negligible background signal, linearity of dose-response relationship, minimum detection limit and post-irradiation signal stability. The paper will survey the features of sugar, plastics, glass, clothing tissues, and solid biological tissues (nails, hair and calcified tissues).
- Published
- 2009
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.