Search

Your search keyword '"Anderson, Ivy"' showing total 16 results
Start Over Author "Anderson, Ivy" Search Limiters Full Text
16 results on '"Anderson, Ivy"'

1. Negotiating with scholarly journal publishers: A toolkit from the University of California

Author

UC Publisher Strategy and Negotiation Task Force, Anderson, Ivy, MacKie-Mason, Jeffrey, Amin, Kemi, Antelman, Kristin, Grandstaff, Tiffany, Houghton, Sarah, Nusbaum, Jessica, Ong, Nga, Schneider, Rich, Setzer, Dawn, Steel, Virginia, Waibel, Günter, Watters Westbrook, Danielle, and Willmott, Mathew

Abstract

A North American framework for creating transformative change in the scholarly publishing industry based on initial insights from the University of California’s 2018-19 negotiations with Elsevier.

Published
2019

2. Pay It Forward: Investigating a Sustainable Model of Open Access Article Processing Charges for Large North American Research Institutions [Final Report]

Author

Smith, MacKenzie, Anderson, Ivy, Bjork, Bo-Christer, McCabe, Mark, Solomon, David, Tananbaum, Greg, Tenopir, Carol, and Willmott, Matthew

Subjects
open access, scholarly publishing, scholarly communication
Abstract

Pay It Forward is a major study conducted by the University of California, Davis, and the California Digital Library, on behalf of the University of California Libraries, and with collaborating libraries at Harvard University, Ohio State University, and the University of British Columbia addressed the financial ramifications for the types of research institutions whose affiliated scholars generate a preponderance of the scholarly literature. The project focused on large, research-intensive universities in North America and defined sustainability as costing those institutions roughly no more than, and ideally considerably less than, current journal subscription costs for comparable journals today, with a rate of growth that will be possible for these institutions to support over time. The project sheds new light on the financial viability of the article processing charge business model to create open access at a much larger scale.

Published
2016

3. Pay It Forward: Investigating a Sustainable Model of Open Access Article Processing Charges for Large North American Research Institutions [Bibliography]

Author

Smith, MacKenzie, Anderson, Ivy, Bjork, Bo-Christer, McCabe, Mark, Tananbaum, Greg, Tenopir, Carol, and Willmott, Matthew

Subjects
open access, scholarly publishing, scholarly communication
Abstract

Pay It Forward is a major study conducted by the University of California, Davis, and the California Digital Library, on behalf of the University of California Libraries, and with collaborating libraries at Harvard University, Ohio State University, and the University of British Columbia addressed the financial ramifications for the types of research institutions whose affiliated scholars generate a preponderance of the scholarly literature. The project focused on large, research-intensive universities in North America and defined sustainability as costing those institutions roughly no more than, and ideally considerably less than, current journal subscription costs for comparable journals today, with a rate of growth that will be possible for these institutions to support over time. The project sheds new light on the financial viability of the article processing charge business model to create open access at a much larger scale.

Published
2016

4. Who Decides?

Author

Anderson, Ivy, DeSart, Mel, Cheng Ean, Lee, Gaillard, Remi, Gibbons, Susan, Huftalen, Adam, Lippincott, Joan, Mele, Salvatore, Schimmer, Ralf, Stine, Deborah, and Vaughan, John

Abstract

Tied to [the] question of who should decide the future of open access, who should have the power to make changes to scholarly publishing practices? Do these powers flow from publishers, institutions, tenure committees, funding agencies, authors, or all of the above? All of the above? None of the above? What are the pros, cons, and consequences of different institutions and interest groups developing and implementing their own solutions (even the one-off variety)? Is federal oversight needed? Global coordination (through an organization like UNESCO)?, Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings, 2016

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Report from the 'Who Decides?' Workgroup

Author

Anderson, Ivy, DeSart, Mel, Ean, Lee Cheng, Gaillard, Remi, Gibbons, Susan, Huftalen, Adam, Lippincott, Joan, Mele, Salvatore, Schimmer, Ralf, Stine, Deborah, and Vaughan, John

Abstract

Who decides the future of open access, or, rather, who has the power to make decisions that can affect the future of open access? We believe that large scale, transformative, and inclusive progress on these questions can transpire when several entities, each with different complementary powers, convene to collaborate on win-win solutions. We offer three examples of such possible scenarios: the way scholars are evaluated, the way some innovations in scholarly publishing can be nurtured, and the way global cooperation can transform existing journals to open access.OSI2016 Workgroup QuestionTied to [the] question of who should decide the future of open access, who should have the power to make changes to scholarly publishing practices? Do these powers flow from publishers, institutions, tenure committees, funding agencies, authors, or all of the above? All of the above? None of the above? What are the pros, cons, and consequences of different institutions and interest groups developing and implementing their own solutions (even the one-off variety)? Is federal oversight needed? Global coordination (through an organization like UNESCO)?

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

11. Librarians as publishers.

Author

McMillan, Gail and Anderson, Ivy

Subjects
*LIBRARIANS, *ELECTRONIC publishing, *ACADEMIC libraries
Abstract

Provides insights on the role of librarians as electronic publishers. Queries and analogies on digital library services and electronic publishing; Comments on the role from colleagues; Responsibilities of academic libraries as publishers. INSET: Editors' introduction, by Ivy Anderson and Ann Schaffner..

Published
2000

12. The open archives initiative.

Author

Luce, Richard E. and Anderson, Ivy

Subjects
*ARCHIVES, *ACADEMIC libraries
Abstract

Focuses on the cooperation among college libraries in the United States to establish paths toward interoperable self-archiving systems. Background of the open archives initiative; Steps involved in taking the initiative; Opportunities created by the initiative in creating a forum to discuss and solve technical matters of interoerability.

Published
2000

13. Scholarly communication and academic/research librarians.

Author

Anderson, Ivy and Mcmillan, Gail

Subjects
*SCHOLARLY communication, *ACADEMIC libraries, *RESEARCH libraries
Abstract

Presents a series of articles highlighting issues pertinent to scholarly communication and academic/research librarians in the United States. Proposals to revamp the scholarly communication system; PubMedCentral proposal from the National Institutes of Health; Technical and legal developments; Role of digital libraries and other emerging genres.

Published
2000

14. A variety of strategies and funding approaches are required to accelerate the transition to open access. But in all, authors are key

Author

Samberg, Rachael G., Schneider, Richard A., Anderson, Ivy, MacKie-Mason, Jeff, Samberg, Rachael G., Schneider, Richard A., Anderson, Ivy, and MacKie-Mason, Jeff

Abstract

More than two decades of work towards liberating scholarly publishing from paywalled constraints has left many within the scholarly community exploring ways to accelerate the transition to open access. Not all institutions or author communities will agree upon which strategies or funding approaches to undertake, and nor do they need to. But whichever strategy is pursued, having university faculty lead the charge represents the most effective way forward. Rachael G. Samberg, Richard A. Schneider, Ivy Anderson and Jeff MacKie-Mason share the University of California’s range of open access policy and advocacy materials, and highlight some potential next steps that may be of use to faculty and author communities.

15. Letters to the Editor.

Author

Anderson, Ivy

Abstract

A letter to the editor is presented in which the letter writer thanks the staff of the 2013 Charleston Conference held in Charleston, South Carolina for helping her after she injured her ankle.

Published
2013

16. Recent developments in electronic resource management

Author

Kasprowski, Rafal, Anderson, Ivy, Weir, Barbara, and Fons, Ted

Abstract

The management of electronic resources relies increasingly on the effective uses of technology and the ability to integrate the processes involved and standardize the ways in which they are performed. Topics of interest in this field include licensing, resource administration, user authentication, resource sharing, and usage data collection. Recently attempts have been made to integrate these functions into single packages (electronic resource management systems), as open‐source and usage‐data standards are being developed. The session on electronic resources management organized by SIG‐LT will provide insight into the challenges of this branch of librarianship and present its recent progresses.

Published
2005
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results