Search

Introduction and Objectives: there is insufficient data regarding bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis to support recommendations for empiric antibiotic treatments, particularly in Latin America. This study aimed to evaluate bacterial infection's clinical impact and microbiological characteristics, intending to serve as a platform to revise current practices., Materials and Methods: multicenter prospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis and bacterial infections from Argentina and Uruguay. Patient and infection-related information were collected, focusing on microbiology, antibiotic susceptibility patterns, and outcomes., Results: 472 patients were included. Spontaneous bacterial infections and urinary tract infections (UTIs) were registered in 187 (39.6%) and 116 (24.6%) patients, respectively, representing the most common infections. Of the 256 culture-positive infections, 103 (40.2%) were caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (reaching 50% for UTI), and 181 (70.7%) received adequate initial antibiotic treatment. The coverage of cefepime and ceftriaxone was over 70% for the empirical treatment of community-acquired spontaneous infections, but ceftazidime´s coverage was only 40%. For all UTI cases and for healthcare-associated or nosocomial spontaneous bacterial infections, the lower-spectrum antibiotics that covered at least 70% of the isolations were imipenem and meropenem. During hospitalization, a second bacterial infection was diagnosed in 9.8% of patients, 23.9% required at least one organ support, and 19.5% died., Conclusions: short-term mortality of bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis is very high, and a high percentage were caused by multidrug-resistant organisms, particularly in UTIs. The information provided might serve to adapt recommendations, particularly related to empirical antibiotic treatment in Argentina and Uruguay. The study was registered in Clinical Trials (NCT03919032)., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interests None., (Copyright © 2023 Fundación Clínica Médica Sur, A.C. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: As utilization of veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) in treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS) continues to expand, clinical variables that guide clinicians in early recognition of myocardial recovery and therefore, improved survival, after VA-ECLS are critical. There remains a paucity of literature on early postinitiation blood pressure measurements that predict improved outcomes., Objectives: The objective of this study is to help identify early blood pressure variables associated with improved outcomes in VA-ECLS., Methods: The authors queried the ELSO (Extracorporeal Life Support Organization) registry for cardiogenic shock patients treated with VA-ECLS or venovenous arterial ECLS between 2009 and 2020. Their inclusion criteria included treatment with VA-ECLS or venovenous arterial ECLS; absence of pre-existing durable right, left, or biventricular assist devices; no pre-ECLS cardiac arrest; and no surgical or percutaneously placed left ventricular venting devices during their ECLS runs. Their primary outcome of interest was the survival to discharge during index hospitalization., Results: A total of 2,400 CS patients met the authors' inclusion criteria and had complete documentation of blood pressures. Actual mortality during index hospitalization in their cohort was 49.5% and survivors were younger and more likely to be Caucasian, intubated for >30 hours pre-ECLS initiation, and had a favorable baseline SAVE (Survival After Veno-arterial ECMO) score (P < 0.05 for all). Multivariable regression analyses adjusting for SAVE score, age, ECLS flow at 4 hours, and race showed that every 10-mm Hg increase in baseline systolic blood pressure (HR: 0.92 [95% CI: 0.89-0.95]; P < 0.001), and baseline pulse pressure (HR: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.84-0.91]; P < 0.001) at 24 hours was associated with a statistically significant reduction in mortality., Conclusions: Early (within 24 hours) improvements in pulse pressure and systolic blood pressure from baseline are associated with improved survival to discharge among CS patients treated with VA-ECLS., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Although there is a substantial published experience of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the H1N1 pandemic, less is known about the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with other subtypes of the influenza A virus. We hypothesized that the severity of illness and survival of patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation would differ for those with H1N1 influenza A compared with other subtypes of influenza A., Design Setting Patients: Retrospective study of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-supported adults (> 18 yr) with influenza A viral infection reported to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry between 2009 and 2019. We describe the frequency and compare characteristics and factors associated with in-hospital survival using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis., Main Outcomes and Measures: Of 2,461 patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for influenza A, 445 had H1N1, and 2,004 had other subtypes of influenza A. H1N1 was the predominant subtype between 2009 and 2011. H1N1 patients were younger, with more severe illness at extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation and higher reported extracorporeal membrane oxygenation complications than those with other influenza A subtypes. Patient characteristics including younger age and higher weight and patient management characteristics including longer ventilation duration before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were associated with worse survival. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation complications were associated with reduced survival. There was no difference in survival to hospital discharge according to influenza subtype after adjusting for other characteristics., Conclusions: Patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for H1N1 were younger, with more severe illness than those supported for other influenza A subtypes. Survival to hospital discharge was associated with patient characteristics, management characteristics, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation complications but was not impacted by the specific influenza A subtype., Competing Interests: Dr. Tonna is supported by a Career Development Award from the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23 HL141596). Dr. Tonna received speaker fees and travel compensation from LivaNova and Philips Healthcare, unrelated to this work. Dr. Barbaro reports grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01 HL153519-ASCEND; K12 HL138039-TACTICAL; R01 HD01543-Pediatric Implantable Artificial Lung) outside the submitted work; he also discloses that he is the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Chair. Dr. Alexander reports grants from the National Institutes of Health (1R13HD104432-01 Pediatric Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Anticoagulation CollaborativE) outside the submitted work. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.)

Background & Aims: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems and it may have heavily impacted patients with liver cancer (LC). Herein, we evaluated whether the schedule of LC screening or procedures has been interrupted or delayed because of the COVID-19 pandemic., Methods: An international survey evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical practice and clinical trials from March 2020 to June 2020, as the first phase of a multicentre, international, and observational project. The focus was on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, cared for around the world during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave., Results: Ninety-one centres expressed interest to participate and 76 were included in the analysis, from Europe, South America, North America, Asia, and Africa (73.7%, 17.1%, 5.3%, 2.6%, and 1.3% per continent, respectively). Eighty-seven percent of the centres modified their clinical practice: 40.8% the diagnostic procedures, 80.9% the screening programme, 50% cancelled curative and/or palliative treatments for LC, and 41.7% modified the liver transplantation programme. Forty-five out of 69 (65.2%) centres in which clinical trials were running modified their treatments in that setting, but 58.1% were able to recruit new patients. The phone call service was modified in 51.4% of centres which had this service before the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 19/37)., Conclusions: The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had a tremendous impact on the routine care of patients with liver cancer. Modifications in screening, diagnostic, and treatment algorithms may have significantly impaired the outcome of patients. Ongoing data collection and future analyses will report the benefits and disadvantages of the strategies implemented, aiding future decision-making., Lay Summary: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems globally. Herein, we assessed the impact of the first wave pandemic on patients with liver cancer and found that routine care for these patients has been majorly disrupted, which could have a significant impact on outcomes., Competing Interests: SM.-M.: Speaker fees from Bayer and travel funding from 10.13039/100004326Bayer and 10.13039/501100014382Eisai. V.S.: Travel grants from 10.13039/100004326Bayer. A.F.: Lecture fees from Bayer, Gilead and MSD; consultancy fees from Bayer, AstraZeneca, Roche and Guerbert. J-C.N.: Received research grant from 10.13039/100004326Bayer for Inserm UMR1138. L.R.: Reports receiving consulting fees from Amgen, ArQule, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, Celgene, Eisai, Exelixis, Hengrui, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Sanofi; lectures fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Eisai, Gilead, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Roche, Sanofi; travel fees from Ipsen; and institutional research funding from Agios, ARMO BioSciences, 10.13039/100004325AstraZeneca, BeiGene, 10.13039/501100003769Eisai, 10.13039/100010544Exelixis, 10.13039/100006591Fibrogen, Incyte, 10.13039/501100014382Ipsen, 10.13039/100004312Lilly, 10.13039/100007054MSD, 10.13039/100004337Roche. B.S.: Reports consultancy fees from Adaptimmune, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, BTG, Eli Lilly, Ipsen, Novartis, Merck, Roche, Sirtex Medical, Terumo; and research grants from 10.13039/100002491BMS and Sirtex Medical. J. Bruix: Consultancy: AbbVie, ArQule, Astra, Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, Kowa, Lilly, Medimune, Novartis, Onxeo, Polaris, Quirem, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Sirtex, Terumo/Grants: 10.13039/100004326Bayer and 10.13039/501100014382Ipsen. M.S.Z.: Received speaker fees and travel grants from 10.13039/100004326Bayer and 10.13039/100014869BTG, 10.13039/100007054MSD. M.B.: Consultant and Advisory Board for: Bayer Pharma, Ipsen, BMS, Eisai, Roche, AstraZeneca, Sirtex Medical. D.J.P.: Received lecture fees from ViiV Healthcare and Bayer Healthcare and travel expenses from BMS and Bayer Healthcare; consulting fees for Mina Therapeutics, EISAI, Roche, and AstraZeneca; received research funding (to institution) from MSD and BMS. T.M.: Consultancy: Eisai, Roche, BTG, Ipsen, Bayer, Adaptimmune. Research funding: Bayer, BTG. H.W.: Served as speaker for Bayer, Eisai, and Ipsen, and as a consultant for Bayer, Eisai, Lilly, BMS, Roche, and Ipsen. B.M.: Consultancy: Bayer-Shering Pharma /Speaker fees: Eisai, MSDG. C. Consultancy fees from Bayer, Ipsen. P.R.G.: Bayer, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, Adaptimmune, Sirtex, Lilly Ipsen, Roche, Eisai. M.R.A.S.: Has received Research grants, advisory board or speaker fees for 10.13039/100006483AbbVie, 10.13039/100004326Bayer, Biolab, Intercept, 10.13039/501100014382Ipsen, 10.13039/100008799Gilead, 10.13039/100009947MSD, 10.13039/100004336Novartis, and 10.13039/100004337Roche. J.T.: Has received research grants from 10.13039/100004337Roche and 10.13039/501100014382Ipsen. He has received speaker and consulting honoraria from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bayer Healthcare, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Eisai, Ipsen, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dome, Lilly Imclone, and Roche. J. Bridgewater: Consultancy Bayer, BMS, Incyte, Taiho, Roche, MSD and Merck Serono. Research funding from Incyte. G.C.: Consultancy fees from Bayer, Ipsen. A.L.: Consultancy CAScination, Advisory Board Neuwave and Histosonics. H.T.: Speaker fees from AbbVie, Gilead, MSD, and Bayer. R.V.: Research grant from 10.13039/100006483Abbvie. A.M.M.P.: Speaker honorarium from Bayer, BMS, Boston Scientific and EISAI. Consulting honorarium from Bayer, AstraZeneca and EISAI. Advisory honorarium from Bayer, AstraZeneca and EISAI. Grants from 10.13039/100004326Bayer and 10.13039/100008497Boston Scientific. M.D.: Has received consulting and training fees from Bayer and Eisai. B.B.: Reports Consultancy for GenMab (paid to Institution); Advisory Boards for Roche (paid to Institution), Eisai Europe Limited (paid to Institution), research grant from 10.13039/100006436Celgene Ltd (paid to Institution), Speakers Bureau for Eisai Europe Limited (paid to Institution), Travel and registration for Congress from Bayer. L.d.F.: Lectures fees from BMS, Roche and Bayer. B.M.M.: Advisory/Speaker: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Merck, Roche, Sanoffi Genzyme, Taiho. Expert Testimony: Eisai, Roche. Travel: Eisai, Merck. Research: Sillajen (Individual); AstraZeneca, H3/Eisai, Galera, GSK, Exelixis (Institution). M.S.: Travel/ accommodation/meeting expenses: Bayer. Eisai. Speaker fees: Bayer. C.R.L.: Travel grants from 10.13039/100004326Bayer. M.R-G.: Reports grants from Intercept, grants from 10.13039/100005564Gilead-Sciences, personal fees from Shionogi, personal fees from Alfa-Wasserman, personal fees from Prosciento, personal fees from Kaleido, personal fees from Novonrdisk, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from BMS, personal fees from Allergan, personal fees from Boehriger-Ingelheim, personal fees from Zydus, personal fees from Intercept Pharma, personal fees from Gilead-Sciences, outside the submitted work. F.P.: Disclosures: Received speaker honoraria from Bayer, Roche, LKM-Biotoscana, RAFFO. Research Grants from INC Argentinean 10.13039/100013137National Institute of Corrections, 10.13039/100004337Roche. V.M.: Lectures sponsored by Bayer. G.B.: Advisory board Eli-Lilly and Incyte. M. Vergara: Travel grants from 10.13039/100004326Bayer, 10.13039/100008799Gilead, 10.13039/100009947MSD and 10.13039/100006483Abbvie. Lectures sponsored by Gilead, Abbvie, Intercept, and MSD. M.L.: Lectures and educational presentations: Abbvie. Travel/accommodation, meeting expenses covered by Bayer, Gilead, Abbvie. M.I.: Received speaker honoraria from Bayer, Gilead Sciences, BMS, Janssen, Ipsen, MSD, BTG-Boston Scientific, AbbVie, EISAI, and was consultant for BTG-Boston Scientific, Bayer, and Guerbet. M.R.: Consultancy: Bayer-Schering Pharma, BMS, Roche, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Lilly, BTG/Paid conferences: Bayer-Schering Pharma, BMS, Gilead, Lilly/Research Grants: 10.13039/100004326Bayer-Schering Pharma, 10.13039/501100014382Ipsen. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (© 2021 The Authors.)

Objectives: To describe the use of inhaled or endotracheally instilled tranexamic acid in critically ill pediatric patients for the treatment of pulmonary hemorrhage, which can be severe, life-threatening, and include potentially high-risk management procedures., Design: Retrospective observational study from 2011-2018 with patients followed until hospital discharge., Setting: Free-standing children's hospital with an annual ICU volume of more than 3,500 yearly admissions., Patients: Pediatric patients, ages 0 to 18 years, admitted to an ICU and who received at least one dose of inhaled or endotracheally instilled tranexamic acid were included., Interventions: Inhaled or endotracheally instilled tranexamic acid., Measurements and Main Results: This study described the efficacy and adverse effects of patients who received inhaled or endotracheally instilled tranexamic acid. A total of 19 patients met inclusion criteria; median age was 72 months (11-187 mo), most patients were female (11, 58%), and almost half our patients (8, 42%) had congenital heart disease. Nine of 19 encounters (47%) had diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, four (21%) had pulmonary hemorrhage related to major aortopulmonary collateral arteries, two (11%) had mucosal airway bleeding, two (11%) were iatrogenic, one had a pulmonary embolism, and one patient did not have their etiology of pulmonary hemorrhage determined. Cessation of pulmonary hemorrhage was achieved in 18 of 19 patients (95%) with inhaled tranexamic acid with no major adverse events recorded., Conclusions and Relevance: We demonstrate that inhaled tranexamic acid may be safely used to treat pulmonary hemorrhage from varied etiologies in critically ill pediatric patients. Prospective studies are required in this vulnerable population to determine optimal dosing and delivery strategies, as well as to define any differential effect according to etiology., Competing Interests: The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.)

False smut (Ustilaginoidea virens) and kernel smut (Neovossia horrida) are diseases of rice (Oryza sativa) that reduce both grain yield and quality. Susceptible rice cultivars are in widespread use on production acreage in the United States, and the effects from crop management practices on smut control are poorly understood. We studied the long-term effects of crop rotation, soil tillage, and fertility level on rice smut severity. The highest levels of false smut observed in this study were on cultivars grown in rotation with soybean, on traditionally tilled soils, with high fertilizer treatments. The highest levels of kernel smut were observed in a rice-soybean rotation with winter wheat grown between summer crops. These rotations are commonly used in rice-growing regions of the southern United States. Using combinations of crop rotation, soil tillage, and fertility rate, several alternative crop-management practices were identified that provided effective control of smuts in susceptible rice cultivars. The most effective method for controlling both false smut and kernel smut was in 3-year rotations of rice, soybean, and corn. Regardless of rotation order or tillage and fertility treatments within the rotations, rotating out of rice for 2 years was the most effective approach for smut control.

False smut (Ustilaginoidea virens) is an important emerging disease of rice (Oryza sativa) in the southern United States, where all major rice cultivars and hybrids are susceptible to the disease. False smut susceptibility was evaluated in traditional paddy-rice fields and under furrow-irrigated conditions to determine the effects of alternative agricultural practices on the severity of this disease. Highly effective false smut suppression was observed in furrow-irrigated rice, where the disease was nearly eliminated in susceptible rice entries. False smut suppression was observed for two hybrids and one conventional rice cultivar, demonstrating that suppression was not limited to specific germplasm sources. Kernel smut severity was also monitored, but no effect on this disease was observed from the irrigation treatments. Therefore, suppression of disease severity in nonflooded rice appears to be a phenomenon unique to the rice-false smut pathosystem, which can be exploited to achieve effective field resistance to this disease.

False smut (Ustilaginoidea virens) and kernel smut (Neovossia horrida) are diseases of rice (Oryza sativa) that reduce both grain yield and quality. False smut is an emerging disease worldwide that is rapidly gaining in importance, whereas kernel smut has historically been a chronic minor disease with sporadic outbreaks that cause considerable losses. Highly effective disease control was obtained for susceptible cultivars by employing conservation tillage (69% reduction in false smut), continuous rice cropping (88% reduction in false smut), and moderate nitrogen fertility rates (34 and 60% reductions in false smut and kernel smut, respectively). Combining these treatments nearly eliminated smuts from cultivars that were fully susceptible under conventional cultivation practices. Furthermore, using a nursery designed to promote smut diseases, two rice hybrids were identified that possessed kernel smut resistance under the most favorable disease conditions. The genetic basis of the resistance is unknown. However, the utility for disease control is great because hybrids occupy significant portions of production rice acreage.

A 3-year field trial near Kunia, Oahu, Hawaii, was conducted to evaluate four nematicide treatments for efficacy against Rotylenchulus reniformis in drip-irrigated pineapple (Ananas comosus L. (Merr.)). The treatments were (A) preplant fumigation with 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) (336 liter/ ha) and postplant drip application of fenamiphos (3.4 kg/ha) with restricted irrigation, (B) preplant 1,3-D only, weekly irrigation, (C) 1,3-D fenamiphos, weekly irrigation, and (D) postplant fenamiphos only, weekly irrigation. Fenamiphos was applied at 3-month intervals for 1 year after planting in three treatments. Although nematode populations increased in all treatments 1 year after planting, no differences in fruit yield were detected among treatments in the first (plant crop) harvest 19 months after planting. In the second (ratoon) crop (33 months after planting) significant yield differences, larger fruit size, and greater root biomass were obtained in the dual nematicide treatments. Root biomass increased continuously throughout the crop cycle, was greatest near the drip line, and showed a shallow depth distribution (30-40 cm). Rotylenchulus reniformis populations and fenamiphos concentrations were negatively correlated in soil profiles taken 13 months after planting. In the absence of postplant fenamiphos applications, nematode numbers were positively correlated with root biomass.