Search

Background: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), first developed as an alternative to ankle arthrodesis, has become an increasingly popular management option for end-stage ankle arthritis. Prior studies have shown commercial insurance payers base their coverage criteria on limited and low level of evidence research. This study aims to quantify and describe the evidence insurance companies use to support TAA coverage policies. Methods: The top 11 national commercial health insurance payers for TAA were identified. A google search was performed to identify payer coverage policies. Policy documents were examined and cited references were classified by type of reference as well as reviewed for level of evidence (LOE). Specific coverage criteria for each individual payer were then extracted. Criteria were compared to assess for similarities among commercial payers. Finally, all references cited by each payer were examined to determine whether they mentioned the specific payer criteria. Results: Six of the 11 payers had accessible coverage policies. The majority of cited references were primary journal articles (145, 60.9%) and the majority of references cited (179, 75.2%) were level III or level IV evidence. We found significant homogeneity in coverage criteria among payers. In addition, cited sources inconsistently mentioned specific payer coverage criteria. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that commercial insurance payers rely on the relatively low level of currently available scientific evidence when formulating coverage policies for TAA use and adopt criteria that have not been thoroughly analyzed in the literature. More high level of evidence research is needed to help clinicians and insurance companies further refine indications for TAA so that patients who might benefit from the procedure are adequately covered. Level of Evidence: Level IV, review.

Background: Lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injuries are implicated in varus instability of the knee. Often, these accompany other ligamentous injuries including anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears, and injury to the anterolateral capsular complex (ALCC). Use of internal brace augmentation with anatomic repair is an alternative to reconstruction to improve patient outcomes and facilitate early range of motion and weight bearing. Indications: We present a case of an anatomic repair of a LCL and an ALCC injury with internal brace augmentation. Technique Description: A curvilinear incision centered over the lateral epicondyle is used. The avulsed LCL and biceps tendon was exposed and a placed #5 FiberWire was placed into the distal LCL, biceps tendon, and the popliteofibular ligament. A split was made in the iliotibial (IT) band and a second #5 FiberWire was placed proximally in the LCL/biceps tendon for additional fixation. A tunnel was made in the fibular head and tibia using a 2.4-mm beath pin and the two #5 FiberWires were passed to the anteromedial tibia. The FiberWires were fixed to the tibia using a 14-mm attachable button system (ABS) manhole cover for suspensory fixation. Repair and internal bracing of the anterolateral capsular complex was accomplished with 2 interlocked TightRopes and a #2 FiberTape. This fixation method achieved repair by compressing the anterolateral capsular complex onto its tibial origin. The suture devices also served to augment the repair and were fixed proximally to the femur using another 14-mm ABS manhole cover. The FiberTape was fixed to the anterolateral tibia distally with a 4.5 mm SwiveLock. The TightRopes were passed through a tunnel to the anterolateral tibia and secured using an ABS Dog Bone. The construct was tensioned in near full extension and gapping was matched fluoroscopically to the contralateral knee. Results: Patient was cleared for full return to sports 9 months postoperatively. At the final follow up visit, the patient had excellent strength, stability, and 135° range of motion on the operative knee. Patient had returned to exercise at home but was unable to return to sports due to COVID-19 restrictions. Conclusion: Anatomic repair of the LCL and the ALCC with internal brace augmentation can serve as an effective alternative to reconstruction and demonstrates excellent patient outcomes regarding restoring stability, ROM, and return to preoperative sports.