Search

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Surgery is the property of CMA Impact Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: The consolidation of acute care surgery (ACS) services at 3 of 6 hospitals in a Canadian health region sought to alleviate a relative shortage of surgeons able to take emergency call. We examined how this affected patient access and outcomes. Methods: Using the generalized linear model and statistical process control, we analyzed ACS-related episodes that occurred between 39 months prior to and 17 months after the model's implementation (n = 14 713). Results: Time to surgery increased after the consolidation. Wait times increased primarily for patients presenting at nonreferral hospitals who were likely to require transfer to a referral hospital. Although ACS teams enabled referral hospitals to handle a much higher volume of patients without increasing within-hospital wait times, overall system wait times were lengthened by the growing frequency of patient transfers. Wait times for inpatient admission were difficult to interpret because there was a trend toward admitting patients directly to the ACS service, bypassing the emergency department (ED). For patients who did go through the ED, wait times for inpatient admission increased after the consolidation; however, this trend was cancelled out by the apparently zero waits of patients who bypassed the ED. Regionalization showed no impact on length of stay, readmissions, mortality or complications. Conclusion: Consolidation enabled the region to ensure adequate surgical coverage without harming patients. The need to transfer patients who presented at nonreferral hospitals led to longer waits. Contexte : Le regroupement des services chirurgicaux d'urgence (SCU) dans 3 hôpitaux sur 6 d'une région sanitaire canadienne visait à contrer une relative pénurie de chirurgiens capables d'effectuer les interventions d'urgence. Nous en avons analysé l'impact sur l'accessibilité des services et sur les résultats chez les patients. Méthodes : À l'aide du modèle linéaire généralisé et d'un contrôle statistique des procédés, nous avons analysé les cas adressés aux SCU entre 39 mois précédant et 17 mois suivant l'entrée en vigueur du regroupement des services (n = 14 713). Résultats : L'intervalle avant l'intervention chirurgicale s'est allongé après le regroupement des services. Les temps d'attente ont principalement augmenté pour les patients qui consultaient dans un hôpital de premier recours d'où ils étaient susceptibles d'être réorientés vers un hôpital de référence. Même si les équipes des SCU ont permis aux hôpitaux de référence de gérer un volume beaucoup plus important de patients sans augmentation du temps d'attente à l'hôpital même, le temps d'attente dans son ensemble s'est prolongé à l'échelle du système en raison de l'accroissement du nombre de transferts. Les temps d'attente pour les hospitalisations ont été difficiles à interpréter parce qu'on avait tendance à admettre les patients directement aux SCU, en contournant les services d'urgences. Pour les patients qui passaient par les urgences, les temps d'attente pour une hospitalisation ont augmenté après le regroupement; toutefois, cette tendance a été compensée par l'attente pour ainsi dire nulle des patients qui contournaient les services d'urgence. La régionalisation n'a exercé aucun impact sur la durée du séjour, les réadmissions, la mortalité ou les complications. Conclusion : Le regroupement a permis à la région d'assurer une couverture chirurgicale adéquate sans nuire aux patients. La nécessité de réorienter des patients vers les hôpitaux de référence a contribué à prolonger les temps d'attente. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Goals This work aimed to determine the benefits and risks of prophylactic feeding tubes for adult patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who receive combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy with curative intent and to make recommendations on the use of prophylactic feeding tubes and the provision of adequate nutrition to this patient population. Methods A national multidisciplinary panel conducted a systematic review of the evidence and formulated recommendations to guide clinical decision-making. The draft evidence summary and recommendations were distributed to clinicians across Canada for their input. Main Results No randomized controlled trials have directly addressed this question. Evidence from studies in the target population was limited to seven descriptive studies: two with control groups (one prospective, one retrospective) and five without control groups. Results from ten controlled studies in patients treated with radiotherapy alone were also reviewed. Conclusions The available evidence was insufficient to draw definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of prophylactic feeding tubes in the target patient population or to support an evidence-based practice guideline. After review of the evidence, of guidelines from other groups, and of current clinical practice in Canada, the multidisciplinary panel made consensus-based recommendations regarding comprehensive interdisciplinary clinical care before, during, and after cancer treatment. The recommendations are based on the expert opinion of the panel members and on their understanding of best clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Rural Medicine (Joule Inc.) is the property of CMA Impact Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: In addition to possibly prolonged suffering and anxiety, extended waits for children's surgery beyond critical developmental periods has potential for lifelong impact. The goal of this study was to determine the duration of waits for surgery for children and youth at Canadian pédiatrie academic health sciences centres, based on the clinically derived access targets (i.e., maximum acceptable waiting periods for completion of specific types of surgery) used in the Canadian Paedi- atric Surgical Wait Times project. Methods: We prospectively applied standardized wait-time targets for surgery, created by nominal-group consensus expert panels, to pédiatrie patients at children's health sciences centres across Canada with decision-to-treat dates of Sept. 1, 2007 or later. From Jan. 1 to Dec. 30, 2009, patients' actual wait times were compared with their target wait times to determine the percentage of patients receiving surgery after the target waiting period. Results: Overall, 27% of pédiatrie patients from across Canada (17411 of 64012) received their surgery after their standardized target waiting period. Dentistry, ophthalmology, plastic surgery and cancer surgery showed the highest percentages of surgeries completed past target. Interpretation: Many children wait too long for surgery in Canada. Specific attention is required, in particular, in dentistry, ophthalmology, plastic surgery and cancer care, to address children's wait times for surgery. Improved access may be realized with use of national wait-time targets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author reflects on the health care delivery system and health care policy trends in Canada. He cites the death of actress Natasha Richardson while on transit to hospital from an accident in which she sustained head injury. He argues that the countries health delivery system is poor and criticizes politicians and policy makers for their neglect of the countries medical policy.

The author reflects on the need of funding for the "Canadian Journal of Surgery" in Canada. He asserts that the journal's editorial staff have increased the number of papers for publication and expanded the pages for several articles, which costs more money for the journal to be published. He adds that they have conducted meetings to come up with ways to decrease costs and increase revenue. He suggests that they have planned to increase subscription rates and that it is worth the money.