Search

Purpose or objective: Oligoprogression (OPD) is defined as a condition where limited progression (1-3 metastases) is observed in patients undergoing systemic cancer treatment. Local treatment of OPD might delay systemic therapy line switch, which could be beneficial in patients experiencing prolonged global disease control with novel targeted or immune therapies. In this study we investigated the impact on outcome of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with OPD from metastatic lung cancer. Materials and methods: Data from a cohort of consecutive patients treated with Cyberknife and Linacbased SBRT between June 2015 and August 2021 were collected. All extracranial metastatic sites of OPD from lung cancer were included. Dose regimens consisted of 24 in 2 fractions, 30-51 Gy in 3 fractions, 30-55 Gy in 5 fractions, 52.5 Gy in 7 fractions and 44-56 Gy in 8 fractions. Dose was expressed as Biological Effective Dose for α/β=10 (BED10). Kaplan-Meyer method was used to calculate Overall Survival (OS), Local Control (LC) and Disease Progression-free Survival (DPFS) from the start date of SBRT to event. Results: Sixty-three patients, 34 female and 29 male were included. Median age was 75 years (range 25–83). All patients received concurrent systemic treatment before the start of the SBRT: 19 chemotherapy (CT) alone (30%), 26 CT plus immunotherapy (IT) or plus Tyrosin kinase inhibitors (TKI) (41%) and 18 IT/TKI alone (29%). SBRT was delivered to lung (n=29), mediastinal node (n=9), bone (n=7), adrenal gland (n=19), other visceral metastases (1) and other node metastases (n=4). A median BED10 of 104 (range 39-151) Gy10 was delivered. After a median follow up of 20 months (range 1-48), median overall survival was median OS was 23 months (figure 1). LC was 93% at 1 year and 87% at 2 years. DPFS was 7 months. At univariate analysis, age, type of systemic treatment, metastatic site receiving SBRT and BED were not significant prognostic factors for overall survival. Conclusion: SBRT in lung cancer patients for oligoprogression resulted in a long median OS of 23 months. One-year LC was 93%. Median DPFS was 7 months, translating into continuation of effective systemic treatment as other metastases grow slowly. SBRT could be useful to postpone the change of chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. More research is needed to select OPD patients eligible for SBRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Liposarcoma (LPS) is a malignant mesenchymal tumor and the most common soft tissue sarcoma. Four different subtypes are described: well differentiated (WD) LPS or atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT), dedifferentiated (DD) LPS, myxoid LPS, and pleomorphic LPS (PLS). The objective of the study was to investigate prognostic factors and clinical outcome of liposarcoma.Methods: We retrospectively examined the clinico-pathological features of a series of 307 patients affected by Liposarcoma at a mean follow-up of 69 months (range 6-257). ALT/WD LPS were analyzed separately. The influence of site, size, type of presentation, grading, histotype and local recurrence on local and systemic control and survival was assessed.Results: The statistical analysis indicated that only surgical margins represented a significant prognostic factor for local recurrence in ALT/WD LPS (P = 0.0007) and other subtypes of LPS (P = 0.0055). In myxoid, PLS and DD LPS, significant prognostic factors for metastasis free survival (MFS) were surgical margins (P = 0.0009), size of the tumor (P = 0.0358), histology (P = 0.0117) and local recurrence (P = 0.0015). In multivariate analysis, surgical margins (0.0180), size (0.0432) and local recurrence (0.0288) correlated independently with MFS. Margins (P = 0.0315), local recurrence (P = 0.0482) and metastases (P < 0.0001) were prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).Conclusion: Marginal surgery can be an accepted treatment for ALT/WD LPS. In other liposarcoma subtypes (Myxoid, DD, PLS) wide or radical surgery is recommended as the margins significantly influence local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). Local recurrence and metastases were significant prognostic factors for OS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Localised recurrent glioblastoma (recGBM) should be considered for local treatment. • An overview on the use of reirradiation or second surgery in recGBM is herein provided. • A simple and practical algorithm to choose surgery versus RT for recGBM is proposed. • Estimation of life expectancy, prognostic score systems and predictive factors, and expected toxicity are its keypoints. In case of circumscribed recurrent glioblastoma (rec-GBM), a second surgery (Re-S) and reirradiation (Re-RT) are local strategies to consider. The aim is to provide an algorithm to use in the daily clinical practice. The first step is to consider the life expectancy in order to establish whether the patient should be a candidate for active treatment. In case of a relatively good life expectancy (>3 months) and a confirmed circumscribed disease(i.e. without multiple lesions that are in different lobes/hemispheres), the next step is the assessment of the prognostic factors for local treatments. Based on the existing prognostic score systems, patients who should be excluded from local treatments may be identified; based on the validated prognostic factors, one or the other local treatment may be preferred. The last point is the estimation of expected toxicity, considering patient-related, tumor-related and treatment-related factors impacting on side effects. Lastly, patients with very good prognostic factors may be considered for receiving a combined treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]