Search

Extensive studies have been conducted on the impacts of plastic film residue on crop productivity in dryland agriculture. However, the relevant results were inconsistent or even opposite, which was most probably affected by both the size and concentration of residual films. To clarify this issue, a three-year (2019–2021) field experiment was conducted to examine plastic residue landfill effects on maize productivity using three sizes (0.4 × 0.4 cm2 (small), 4 × 4 cm2 (medium), and 10 × 10 cm2 (large)) under the low and high addition concentrations in an irrigated maize field. The data indicated that medium-sized residues significantly reduced maize yield by 7.3% and 13.8% in low and high addition levels respectively, relative to non-landfill group (CK) (p < 0.05). Large and small-sized residues under low level had no significant impact on yield (p > 0.05), while high amounts of small residues turned to positively influence yield. This trend was closely correlated with soil temperature, soil moisture, key enzyme activities, macroaggregate proportion, soil organic carbon and total nitrogen contents. Structural equation modelling and relative importance analyses demonstrated soil hydrothermal (27.4%), soil nitrogen (22.0%), and physical properties (21.1%) as primary drivers. A general trend was that the sizes of residues showed evidently greater impacts than their addition levels. Moreover, medium residues showed negative effects, while large and small ones had neutral or positive effects. For the first time, our findings confirmed the size- and concentration-dependent effects of plastic residues on crop productivity and provided a novel insight into plastic film pollution assessment & management in agricultural ecosystems. • Medium plastic residues evidently reduced maize yield across the concentrations. • Large and small plastic ones turned to neutrally and positively affect maize yield. • Soil hydrothermal and nutrient status were affected by residue size & concentration. • Residue size showed greater impacts on maize productivity than its concentration. • This study filled knowledge gap in understanding plastic residue production effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Plastic film residuals are increasingly remaining in cultivated lands. However, it is a critical issue how residual plastic type and thickness affect soil properties and crop yield. To address this issue, in situ landfill was conducted using thick polyethylene (PEt1), thin polyethylene (PEt2), thick biodegradable (BIOt1), thin biodegradable (BIOt2) residues, and CK (control) with no residues landfill in a semiarid maize field. The findings demonstrated that the impact of various treatments on soil characteristics and maize yield varied considerably. Soil water content decreased by 24.82% in PEt1 and 25.43% in PEt2, compared to BIOt1 and BIOt2, respectively. BIOt2 treatment increased soil bulk density by 1.31 g cm−3 and lowered soil porosity by 51.11%, respectively; it also elevated the silt/clay proportion by 49.42% relative to CK. In contrast, microaggregate composition in PEt2 was higher (43.02%). Moreover, BIOt2 lowered soil nitrate (NO 3 −) and ammonium (NH 4 +) content. Compared with other treatments, BIOt2 resulted in significantly higher soil total nitrogen (STN) and lower SOC/STN. Finally, BIOt2 exhibited the lowest water use efficiency (WUE) (20.57 kg ha−1 mm−1) and yield (6896 kg ha−1) among all the treatments. Therefore, BIO film residues exhibited detrimental impacts on soil quality and maize productivity compared to PE film ones. Considering film thickness, thin residual films more evidently influenced soil quality and maize productivity than thick film ones. [Display omitted] • BIO enhanced soil bulk density and lowered porosity, while thick PE residues didn't. • BIO significantly reduced SOC/STN, but thick PE residues exhibited a minor effect. • Relative to thick PE and CK, BIO residue lowered soil inorganic nitrogen. • WUE and yield decreased under BIO residues, while thick PE ones had a slight effect. • Thick PE and thin BIO residues had the least and most harmful impact, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]