Search

Background: Comparative data regarding different regimens of oral mesalazine (mesalamine) for maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis are limited., Aim: To evaluate whether 3.0 g mesalazine once-daily (OD) is superior to the standard treatment of 0.5 g mesalazine three times daily (t.d.s.) and to prove the therapeutic equivalence of OD vs. t.d.s. dosing of total 1.5 g mesalazine for remission maintenance in patients with ulcerative colitis., Methods: A 1-year, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy study was undertaken in patients with endoscopically and histologically confirmed ulcerative colitis in remission. Patients were randomised to oral mesalazine 3.0 g OD, 1.5 g OD or 0.5 g t.d.s. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients still in clinical remission at the final visit, with clinical relapse being defined as CAI score >4 and an increase of ≥3 from baseline., Results: The primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 162/217 3.0 g OD patients (75%), 129/212 1.5 g OD patients (61%) and 150/218 0.5 g t.d.s. patients (69%) in the intention-to-treat population, and in 152/177 (86%), 121/182 (67%) and 144/185 (78%) in the per protocol population respectively; 3.0 g OD was superior to both low-dose regimens for the primary endpoint (i.e. P < 0.001, 3.0 g OD vs. 1.5 g OD; P = 0.024, 3.0 g OD vs. 0.5 g t.d.s.; superiority test, per protocol population). Safety analysis, including comprehensive renal monitoring, revealed no concern in any treatment group., Conclusion: Mesalazine 3.0 g once daily was the most effective dose for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis of the three regimens assessed, with no penalty in terms of safety., (© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Involvement of genetic factors in the aetiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been known for a long time. Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of polymorphisms in NOD2, ICAM-1 and CCR5 genes in Czech and Slovak patients with IBD in comparison with healthy controls. The frequency of well-known mutations (R702W, G908W and 1007fs in the NOD2 gene; K469E in the ICAM-1 gene, and Delta32 in the CCR5 gene) involved in IBD was tested in 45 patients with CD and 22 patients with UC. The allele frequency of these mutations was determined and genotype-phenotype correlation was specified. Isolated DNA was genotyped, and allele frequency was counted and statistically verified. Significant differences between the healthy control group and CD patients were observed in mutation 1007fs of the NOD2 gene (P = 0.0203). We also associated allele E469 of the ICAM-1 gene with CD (P = 0.0024). No significant association between other alleles and CD was found, and no gene variation was linked to UC. The number of mutations and mutated genes was higher among patients with CD than among patients with UC. Our results support previous findings about participation of mutations of NOD2 and ICAM-1 genes in IBD. We confirmed that both CD and UC are polygenic diseases with a genedosage effect. This observation strengthens the opinion that genetic factors play a more important role in CD than in UC.

Background: There are no comparative studies of coated mesalazine., Aim: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of Eudragit-L- and ethylcellulose-coated mesalazine tablets in patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis., Methods: A double-blind, double-dummy, randomized parallel group trial was performed across 18 centres in Australia, and 20 in Eastern Europe. Patients were treated with 3 g mesalazine for 8 weeks with the primary efficacy end point being clinical remission., Results: Of 215 patients, 69% achieved clinical remission in both treatment groups (P < 0.001; chi-square test) with no differences in frequency of adverse events. In the Australian cohort (n = 63), the Eudragit-L group had a higher remission rate (73% vs. 36%) and responded 13 days faster, compared with those in the European group (67% vs. 84%, and 2 days respectively). No clear reasons for differences in treatment responses were identified., Conclusions: Eudragit-L and ethylcellulose-coated mesalazine tablets are well tolerated and equally effective in achieving remission in mild-moderately active ulcerative colitis over 8 weeks.

Background: Mesalazine as the treatment standard for ulcerative colitis can be applied in different galenical preparations., Aim: A novel formulation of mesalazine pellets with delayed and prolonged release characteristics was compared with conventional Eudragit L-coated tablets. Furthermore, the effect of mesalazine dose escalation on nonresponders was evaluated in both treatment groups., Methods: A total of 233 patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis were randomized to receive either mesalazine (1.5 g/day in three doses) as pellets (n = 115) or tablets (n = 118) for 8 weeks. At insufficient response, the dose was increased to 3.0 g., Results: The clinical remission rate (clinical activity index < or = 4) for pellets was 67% vs. 68% for tablets which statistically proved to be not inferior (significance level alpha = 2.5%). In patients without dose increase, the remission rate was 47% (pellets) vs. 42% (tablets). Endoscopic improvement was observed in 80% (pellets) vs. 83% (tablets), and histological improvement in 48% (pellets) vs. 52% (tablets) of patients., Conclusions: Mesalazine pellets are as effective as tablets in the treatment of mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis. Dose escalation to 3.0 g/day is a valid option for nonresponders to a starting dose of 1.5 g/day.