Search

Aim: To investigate nursing/midwifery students, Clinical Mentors, Link Teachers and Head Nurses experiences within "Dedicated Education Unit" model in 6 European clinical placements and analyse the necessary elements for a powerful clinical learning environment. Design: A multi‐country, phenomenological, qualitative study. Methods: Focus group interviews were performed to identify the personal and organizational factors of importance for students and nurses/midwives. Results: Data analysis produced 4 main themes (1) Clinical placement organization, (2) students' clinical knowledge and skill acquisition, (3) students, and nurses/midwives' experiences within the DEU model and (4) factors for creating an effective learning environment. Conclusions: A close educational‐service collaboration, a realistic clinical placement planning, a focus on student learning process and an investment in professionals' education and development among others, are elements to set up a powerful clinical learning environment. Implications for the profession: It is considered advisable and urgent to improve the working conditions of nurses/midwives and the learning environments of students as a strategy to alleviate the global shortage of nurses and respond to the increasingly demanding health needs of the population. Impact: Due to the close relationship between students' learning and features of the clinical environment nurse educators seek innovative models which allow students to manage patient care and their transition to professional practice. To implement new learning strategies, identifying students, nurses and midwives perceptions and suggestions is a powerful information to evaluate implementation process and outcomes. Public Contribution: Our findings could help academic and clinical managers to meet the human and organizational requirements to create a successful learning environment in every student placement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) is frequently associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Numerous studies have investigated the prognostic significance of cardiovascular computed tomography (CT) parameters. This study aimed to investigate potential CT scan predictors of 24-hour mortality in APE and to evaluate the value of the inferior vena cava (IVC) reflux score calculated on CT scan in predicting mortality. Methods: This study was a single-center, retrospective study. Approval from the local ethics committee (decision no. 2023/76) was obtained before patients’ data scanning. Patients who were admitted to the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary education and research hospital in Turkey between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021, who were diagnosed with APE at CT scan in the ED and whose treatment was started, and who did not meet the exclusion criteria were included in the study. The relationship between CT scan findings and early and late mortality was evaluated. Results: The study population comprised 226 patients, meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 226 patients, a total of 39 (17.3%) patients died, 16 (7.1%) within the first 24 hours. In evaluating CT scan parameters, the inferior vena cava (IVC) reflux score showed a statistically significant difference between the groups with and without mortality (24-hour P=0.001; 30-day P=0.001). Patients who died within the first 24-hour and 30-day after admission showed a reflux grade 3 into IVC more often than survivors (24-hour odds ratio (OR): 14.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.64,58.1; P=0.001); 30-day (OR: 6.54, 95% CI: 2.51,16.98; P=0.001). However, other CT parameters were evaluated, and no statistical relationship was found between the groups with and without mortality. Conclusion: The cardiovascular CT scan findings may not be suitable for use as predictors of mortality. However, the IVC reflux score may be a good indicator of both early and late mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The scale and scope of medical tourism have expanded rapidly over the last few decades. Turkey is becoming an important player in this market because of its relatively better service quality and large comparative cost advantage.Methods: This paper compares cost, quality and effectiveness of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) in the USA and in Turkey. The data from Turkey were obtained from a hospital specializing in IVF services and the US data came from secondary sources. Package price offered by the dominant IVF-service provider to international patients in Turkey was used as a measure of cost for Turkey while IVF-specific service prices were used to estimate the cost for USA. To compare quality and effectiveness of IVF services, a number of general clinical quality indicators and IVF success rate were used.Results: Indicators of quality, cost and success rate in the Turkish hospital were found to be better than the corresponding indicators in US hospitals. The cost difference of IVF services between USA and Turkey is so significant that the overall cost of obtaining the service from Turkey remains lower even with additional expenses for travel and accommodation.Conclusions: Cost-effectiveness ratio of IVF treatment per successful clinical pregnancy was much lower in Turkey than in the USA. It appears that cost and quality are the two most important factors affecting demand for health care services by international patients in Turkey. Like other important players in the medical tourism market, Turkey should be able to take advantage of its success in IVF, a highly specialized niche market, to transform its health system into an important exporter of general health services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Clinical environment provides students with the opportunity to apply the knowledge and skills learned in the courses to real patients under the guidance of clinical nurses. Methods: The population of the study was 60 students enrolled in the course "Internal Medicine Nursing Internship Practice" in the 4th grade of a State University Health Sciences Faculty Nursing Department program, and the sample was 50 students who agreed to participate in the study. Results: The mean Nursing Profession Perception Scale total score was 91.50±9.547 before the internship and 91.80±8.164 after the internship. While the students' professional self-perception before the internship was 142.26±14.834, after the internship, it was 135.96+15.494, with a significant difference between the two measurements. Conclusions: As a result of this study, it was found that the internship practice did not cause a change in their perception of the profession, and did not contribute positively to their professional self-concept. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. The difficulty of accessing accurate information during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in many questions being asked to family physicians about vaccination. Objectives. The aim of this study was to determine the attitudes of Family Medicine (FM) residents in Ankara about the inactivated and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines being administered in Turkey. Material and methods. An anonymous online survey was distributed to FM residents between 22.05.2021–06.06.2021. Information on socio-demographic data and residents’ attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccines administered in Turkey were evaluated. Results. 11.1% of the participants were not vaccinated for the following reasons: having positive Anti-Spike antibody values, thinking that there had not been enough studies on vaccines, vaccine safety concerns, belief that innate immunity would be more protective, pregnancy, breastfeeding or not believing in the protection of the vaccine. While 12.2% of the participants recommended Sinovac-CoronaVac, 23.7% recommended Pfizer/BioNTech, and 63.3% stated that they would evaluate the patient and make recommendations. Most of the participants stated that they thought the Pfizer/BioNTech is more protective against new variants (70.4%), more effective and produces a higher antibody response (84.2%) and provides longer-term protection (74.8%). However, 74.1% of the participants stated that they thought Sinovac-CoronaVac is safer. Sinovac-CoronaVac was recommended to patients with a history of allergic reaction/anaphylaxis (69.8%), autoimmune diseases (60.4%), oncology/chemotherapy patients (49.6%), immunosuppressed patients (49.6) and lactating women (44.6%). Conclusions. In some case-basis recommendations, it was seen that the residents showed a traditionalist approach. Informing individuals based on scientific information on the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines by family physicians is crucial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Lifting The Burden (LTB) and European Headache Federation (EHF) have developed a set of headache service quality indicators, successfully tested in specialist headache centres. Their intended application includes all levels of care. Here we assess their implementation in primary care. Methods: We included 28 primary-care clinics in Germany (4), Turkey (4), Latvia (5) and Portugal (15). To implement the indicators, we interviewed 111 doctors, 92 nurses and medical assistants, 70 secretaries, 27 service managers and 493 patients, using the questionnaires developed by LTB and EHF. In addition, we evaluated 675 patients' records. Enquiries were in nine domains: diagnosis, individualized management, referral pathways, patient education and reassurance, convenience and comfort, patient satisfaction, equity and efficiency of headache care, outcome assessment and safety. Results: The principal finding was that Implementation proved feasible and practical in primary care. In the process, we identified significant quality deficits. Almost everywhere, histories of headache, especially temporal profiles, were captured and/or assessed inaccurately. A substantial proportion (20%) of patients received non-specific ICD codes such as R51 ("headache") rather than specific headache diagnoses. Headache-related disability and quality of life were not part of routine clinical enquiry. Headache diaries and calendars were not in use. Waiting times were long (e.g., about 60 min in Germany). Nevertheless, most patients (> 85%) expressed satisfaction with their care. Almost all the participating clinics provided equitable and easy access to treatment, and follow-up for most headache patients, without unnecessary barriers. Conclusions: The study demonstrated that headache service quality indicators can be used in primary care, proving both practical and fit for purpose. It also uncovered quality deficits leading to suboptimal treatment, often due to a lack of knowledge among the general practitioners. There were failures of process also. These findings signal the need for additional training in headache diagnosis and management in primary care, where most headache patients are necessarily treated. More generally, they underline the importance of headache service quality evaluation in primary care, not only to identify-quality failings but also to guide improvements. This study also demonstrated that patients' satisfaction is not, on its own, a good indicator of service quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]