Search

Background With the population ages, the mental health of the elderly has become a hot topic of concern for the whole society. Previous studies have shown that mental health problems in the elderly are closely related to well-being, while personality traits have a greater impact on subjective well-being. However, the internal relationship between the two in the elderly population is still unclear. Objective To explore the relationship between subjective well-being and personality traits of the elderly. Methods From July to August 2022, 511 elderly people in Lincun, Tangxia Town, Dongguan City, Guangdong Province were selected as the subjects by using cluster sampling method, conduct a site survey by using the questionnaire survey. The subjective well-being and personality traits of the elderly were evaluated by the Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness (MUNSH) and the China Big Five Personality Scale (CBF-PI-15) respectively. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between subjective well-being and personality traits of the elderly, canonical correlation analysis was used to construct a standardized canonical correlation model, canonical structure analysis, and canonical redundancy analysis. Results The total score of MUNSH in the elderly was (39.72±7.74) , and the scores of MUNSH in each dimension were positive experience (9.48±3.24) , positive emotion (8.61±2.24) , negative experience (1.44±2.31) , and negative emotion (0.93±1.80) from high to low. The scores of CBF-PI-15 in each dimension of the elderly were agreeableness (14.04±2.60) , extroversion (11.77±4.05) , conscientiousness (10.75±3.57) , openness (7.20±3.90) and neuroticism (6.34±3.22) . Pearson correlation analysis showed that subjective well-being was positively correlated with conscientiousness (r=0.334) and openness (r=0.219) (P

Background The reported outcome level of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has received attention. There are few mature outcome scales with Chinese cultural characteristics for patients with IBD, and the developed scales need strict evaluation. Objective To analyze and evaluate the measurement properties of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Scale〔PROISCD-IBD (V1.0) 〕, to provide basis for scientific evaluation of reported outcomes in patients with IBD. Methods From October 2020 to January 2022, PROISCD-IBD (V1.0) was used to detect 274 IBD patients who were treated in the Outpatient and Inpatient Departments of Gastroenterology in the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University and the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University. PROISCD IBD (V1.0) consisted of 1 commonality module and 1 IBD specific module (TIBD) . The commonality module had 30 items, which were divided into 4 domains of physical health (PHD) , mental health (MHD) , social health (SHD) , and spiritual/belief health (SBD) . TIBD covered four aspects of digestive system symptoms (DSS) , extraintestinal symptom (EXS) , special psychological symptoms (SPP) , and treatment side effects (TSE) . Cronbach's α coefficient and split-half coefficient were used to test the reliability. Correlation coefficient method, exploratory factor analysis and structural equation model were used to analyze the structural validity. Clinical validity of each domain was analyzed using t test. Results The Cronbach's α coefficients of PHD, MHD, SHD, SBD and TIBD of PROISCD-IBD (V1.0) were 0.732, 0.838, 0.781, 0.673 and 0.884, respectively. Cronbach's α coefficient of total scale was 0.932. The half-score coefficients of PHD, MHD, SHD, SBD and TIBD were 0.669, 0.859, 0.610, 0.494 and 0.795, respectively, and the half-score reliability of the total scale was 0.879. Correlation analysis showed that the phase coefficients of PHD, MHD, SHD and SBD scores and commonality module score were all >0.6 (P

Background The quality of life of patients with nephrotic syndrome requires a lot of focus, and improvements. A relevant scale can be used to measure it, but there is no nephrotic syndrome-specific quality of scale. Objective To develop a Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases-Nephrotic Syndrome〔QLICD-NS (V2.0) 〕 combined with QLICD-GM (V2.0), then verify it using the classical test theory. Methods From 2017 to 2021, an item pool was established according to literature review and the results of a semi-structured questionnaire, then the items were screened in accordance with a pre-test and importance score rated by physicians and patients, after that, the draft of the QLICD-NS (V2.0) was developed. The draft version was tested using onsite interview and questionnaire survey in nephrotic syndrome patients treated in Department of Nephrology, the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University from March to November 2021. The first measurement was conducted on the day of admission, the second measurement was conducted with some of the patients, and the third measurement was conducted on the day of discharge. The coefficient of variation, correlation coefficient and Cronbach's α, factor analysis and classical test theory were used to evaluate QLICD-NS (V2.0) . Results The QLICD-NS (V2.0) contains 15 items, belonging to three domains of clinical symptoms, adverse drug reactions and psychological effects. The Cronbach's α measuring the split-half reliability was greater than 0.7 for the scale and each of the three domains. With the Chinese version of SF-36 as the calibration standard, the domains of the QLICD-NS (V2.0) were highly correlated with their counterpart domains of the Chinese version of SF-36. The standardized response mean was greater than 0.80 for all domains and items (except for the cognition and social support items), indicating that the responsiveness of the QLICD-NS (V2.0) was good. Scanning the QR code in the text can obtain the detailed evaluation of the scale. Conclusion The QLICD-NS (V2.0) compiled by us includes 15 items, and has proven with good reliability, validity and responsiveness.

Scale assessment for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has been widely implemented in clinical practice, how to choose an appropriate assessment tool is very important. In view of this, we used literature research methodology to search patient-reported outcomes and disease-specific health-related quality of life instruments for IBS, summarized their main contents and psychometric properties, then put forward recommendations on the selection of the instruments. A total of 37 commonly used instruments for IBS were retrieved, which have proven to have good reliability, validity and responsiveness, and can be better applied in clinical practice. We suggest medical professionals and researchers choose an assessment instrument for IBS according to the purpose and content of their research.

ObjectiveTo analyze the quality of life and related factors in patients with depression， and to provide evidence for formulating the corresponding measures to improve the patients' quality of life.MethodsA total of 117 inpatients who met the International Classification of Diseases， tenth edition（ICD-10） for depression were selected in Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang， Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University and Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital from November 19， 2018 to September 7， 2019. The values of patients' clinical objective indicators consisted of routine blood test， routine urine examination， blood biochemical tests and blood gas analysis were collected by reviewing their medical records， and all subjects were assessed using Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases-Depression V2.0 ［QLICD-DE（V2.0）］. Simple correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between the QLICD-DE （V2.0） scores and various clinical objective indicators， and multiple linear regression was adopted to further screen factors affecting quality of life of patients with depression.ResultsSimple correlation analysis suggested that QLICD-DE （V2.0） total score was positively correlated with total protein and platelet distribution width in patients with depression （r=0.198， 0.281， P

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a common and frequent disease with a long and incurable course, and the quality of life of patients is severely reduced. This study was to develop and validate a quality of life scale for patients with CHD based on the Chinese context. Methods: The scale QLICD-CHD (V2.0) was developed based on the QLICD-CHD (V1.0), using a programmed decision procedures. Based on the data measuring QoL 3 times before and after treatments from 189 patients with CHD, the psychometric properties of the scale were evaluated with respect to validity, reliability and responsiveness employing correlation analysis, multi-trait scaling analysis, structural equation modeling, t-test and also G-study and D-study of generalizability theory analysis. The SF-36 scale was used as the criterion to evaluate the criterion-related validity. Paired t tests were conducted to evaluate the responsiveness on each domain/facet as well as the total of the scale, with Standardized Response Mean (SRM) being calculated. Results: The QLICD-CHD (V2.0) has been developed with 42 items in 4 domains. The Cronbach's α of the general module, the specific module and the total scale were 0.91, 0.92 and 0.91 respectively. The overall score and the test-retest reliability coefficients in all domains are higher than 0.60, except for the specific module. Correlation and factor analysis confirmed good construct validity and criterion-related validity. After treatments, the overall score and score of all domains have statistically significant changes (P< 0.01). The SRM of domain-level score ranges from 0.27 to 0.50. Generalizability Theory further confirm the reliability of the scale through more accurate variance component studies. Conclusion: The QLICD-CHD (V2.0) could be used as a useful instrument in assessing QoL for patients with CHD, with good psychometric properties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is difficult to cure, so more attention should be paid to improving patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This paper focuses on identifying factors that affect HRQoL.Patients and Methods: Overall, 189 in-patients with coronary heart disease were investigated at the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University between 2015 and 2016. The scale Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases-Coronary heart disease (QLICD-CHD V2.0) was used to evaluate HRQoL and collect demographic information. Medical records were applied to collect patients' clinical indicators. A simple correlation analysis, Student's t-test, and a one-way analysis of variance were first performed to filter factors that might associate with HRQoL, and multiple linear regression was applied to finally identify related factors.Results: Findings from multiple linear regression showed that the total score was related to family economy, treatment, indirect bilirubin, and albumin with regression coefficient B=5.209, − 6.615, 0.378, and 0.548, respectively. The physical functions were related to treatment, albumin, globular proteins, chloride, and red blood cell count with B=− 9.031, 1.000, 0.612, 1.320, and 5.161, respectively. The psychological function was in association with family economy, clinical course, serum phosphorus, and percentage of lymphocyte population with B=7.487, 6.411, − 16.458, and 0.090, respectively. The social function was associated with family economy, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, and platelet distribution width with B=7.391, 1.331, − 0.060, and − 0.929, respectively. The special module was in association with treatment, indirect bilirubin, and serum calcium with B=− 7.791, 0.414, and 23.017, respectively.Conclusion: Clinical indicators including albumin, globular proteins, chloride, red blood cell count, serum phosphorus, percentage of lymphocyte population, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, platelet distribution width, indirect bilirubin, and serum calcium, as well as socio-demographic factors including the family economy, clinical course, and treatment, may affect coronary heart disease patients' HRQoL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and validate the breast cancer scale among the system of quality-of-life instruments for cancer patients (QLICP-BR V2.0). Methods: Programmed decision procedures and theories on instrument development were applied to develop QLICP-BR V2.0. A total of 246 breast cancer inpatients were investigated using QLICP-BR V2.0 from hospital admission until discharge. The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the QLICP-BR V2.0 scale were evaluated by using the classical test theory combined with the generalizability theory (GT), including correlation analysis, multi-trait scaling analysis, factor analyses, t -tests, and also multivariate generalizability theory analysis. Results: The test–retest reliability of the total scale is 0.79, the Cronbach coefficient is 0.85, and the intra-class correlations coefficient is 0.88. The item–domain correlation analysis showed that the correlation coefficient between items and their own domain is greater than that with other domains except of item GSO4. The exploratory factor analysis showed that three principal components are obtained in the specific module. The outcome of the factor analysis coincides substantially with our theoretical conception. The score difference of each domain of the scale and the total scale before and after treatment is statistically significant (P < 0.05), with the standardized response mean of the total scale being 0.61. According to GT, the generalization coefficient of the scores in the 5 domains is between 0.626 and 0.768, and the reliability index is between 0.557 and 0.695. Conclusion: QLICP-BR V2.0 exhibited reasonable degrees of validity, reliability, and responsiveness according to classical test and the generalizability theory. The number of items in the scale is appropriate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Quality of life (QOL) in patients with Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major global concern in respiratory care with the specific instruments used rarely being developed using a modular approach. This paper is aimed to develop the COPD scale of the system of QOL Instruments for Chronic Diseases (QLICD-COPD) by the modular approach based on Classical Test Theory and Generalizability Theory (GT). 114 inpatients with COPD were used to provide the data measuring QOL three times before and after treatments. The psychometric properties of the scale were evaluated with respect to validity, reliability and responsiveness employing correlation analysis, factor analyses, multi-trait scaling analysis, and also GT analysis. The Results showed that Multi-trait scaling analysis, correlation and factor analyses confirmed good construct validity and criterion-related validity with almost all correlation coefficients or factor loadings being above 0.40. The internal consistency α and test-retest reliability coefficients (Pearson r and Intra-class correlations ICC) for all domains except for the social domain were larger than 0.70, ranging between 0.70–0.86 with r = 0.85 for the overall. The overall score and scores for physical and the specific domains had statistically significant changes after treatments with moderate effect size SRM (standardized response mean) ranging from 0.32 to 0.44. All G-coefficients and index of dependability were all greater than 0.80 exception of social domain (0.546 and 0.500 respectively), confirming the reliability of the scale further. It concluded that the QLICD-COPD has good validity, reliability, and moderate responsiveness, and can be used as the QOL instrument for patients with COPD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the breast cancer scale QLICP-BR (V2.0) among the Quality of Life Instruments system for cancer patients (QLICP), which consist of the general module of 32 items classifying into 4 domains and the specific module of 10 items. Methods: According to the scoring rule of QLICP-BR (V2.0), the scores of each domain and the overall scale were calculated. The MCIDs of this scale were established by anchor-based and distribution-based methods. The anchor method used the Q29 item in the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale as anchors and defined the treatment effectiveness of the anchor-based method using criteria A (one level improvement after treatment) and B (at least one level improvement after treatment), while methods of effect size (ES), standard error of measurement (SEM), and reliability change index (RCI) were used in distribution-based methods. Results: Using the anchor-based method, according to standard A, the MCIDs of the physical domain (PHD), psychological domain (PSD), social domain (SOD), common symptoms and side effect domain (SSD), core/general module (CGD), specific domain (SPD), and the total score (TOT) were 16.24, 11.37, 11.31, 12.07, 11.49, 10.69, and 11.23 respectively; according to standard B, the MCIDs of PHD, PSD, SOD, SSD, CGD, SPD, and TOT were 18.88, 15.14, 14.10, 14.50, 13.93, 12.17, and 14.23 respectively. In the distribution-based MCID study, when ES = 0.8, the MCID values of each domain and the total score of the scale were 9.14, 10.34, 8.34, 10.54, 6.79, 9.73, and 6.96 respectively. The MCIDs calculated when a SEM of 1.96 was used as the intermediary index were 8.38, 11.04, 8.67, 10.00, 7.44, 9.83, and 7.81. The MCIDs calculated when a RCI of 1.96 was used as the intermediary index were 11.84, 15.61, 12.27, 14.14, 10.52, 13.90, and 11.05. Additionally, the MCID value calculated by the two standards of the anchor method was similar to 0.8 ES, 1.96 SEM, and 1.96 RCI. Conclusion: Using the anchor-based method, 0.8ES, 1.96SEM, and 1.96RCI have a better effect on the minimal clinically important difference of breast cancer scale and were recommended to be the preferred methods for establishing MCID. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. The proportion of aging in China is increasing, which needs more healthcare recourses. To analyze the risk factors of the direct medical economic burden of aging in China and provide the strategies to control the cost of treatment, the information was collected based on Guangdong Province's regular health expenditure accounting data collection plan. Methods. The multiple linear regression models were used to explore the risk factors of inpatient expenses of the elderly in Guangdong province. Results. The results revealed that hospital day, age, male patients, and patients who suffer from malignant tumors are key factors to increase the direct medical economic burden of aging. Moreover, the medical insurance for urban employees can reduce the medical economic burden, comparing with the medical insurance for urban residents. Conclusions. The basic medical insurance system and the serious illness insurance system should be improved. While striving to speed up the development of regional economy, the government should pay attention to the construction of basic medical institutions in economically backward areas, increase the allocation of health human resources, and facilitate the masses to seek medical treatment nearby. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The development of the minimum clinical important difference (MCID) can make it easier for researchers or doctors to judge the significance of research results and the effect of intervention measures, and improve the evaluation system of efficacy. This paper is aimed to calculate the MCID based on anchor and to develop MCID for esophageal cancer scale (QLICP-ES).Methods: The item Q29 (How do you evaluate your overall health in the past week with 7 grades answers from 1 very poor to 7 excellent)of EORTC QLQ-C30 was used as the subjective anchor to calculate the score difference between each domain at discharge and admission. MCID was established according to two standards, "one grade difference"(A) and "at least one grade difference"(B), and developed by three methods: anchor-based method, ROC curve method and multiple linear regression models. In terms of anchor-based method, the mean of the absolute value of the difference before and after treatments is MCID. The point with the best sensitivity and specificity-Yorden index at the ROC curve is MCID for ROC curve method. In contrast, the predicted mean value based on a multiple linear regression model and the parameters of each factor is MCID.Results: Most of the correlation coefficients of Q29 and various domains of the QLICP-ES were higher than 0.30. The rank of MCID values determined by different methods and standards were as follows: standard B > standard A, anchor-based method > ROC curve method > multiple linear regression models. The recommended MCID values of physical domain, psychological domain, social domain, common symptom and side-effects domain, the specific domain and the overall of the QLICP-ES were 7.8, 9.7, 4.7, 3.6, 4.3, 2.3 and 2.9, respectively.Conclusion: Different methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and also different definitions and standards can be adopted according to research purposes and methods. A lot of different MCID values were presented in this paper so that it can be easy and convenient to select by users. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Quality of life is an important outcome indicator to evaluate whether treatment is successful or not. Chronic gastritis leads to ongoing deterioration of subjectively perceived quality of life. There are several generic measures, but they are not developed particularly to assess chronic gastritis problems. The Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases—Chronic Gastritis (QLICD-CG V2.0) questionnaire is a 39-item, multi-dimensional, self-report instrument to assess chronic gastritis patients’ perception of their health related quality of life in four domains. The instrument was developed in China. The current study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the QLICD-CG V2.0. 194 patients with chronic gastritis were enrolled from 4 hospitals in China. The QLICD-CG V2.0 was administered to patients by trained research assistants. In addition, their demographic characteristics were also recorded. The psychometric testing included construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, test-retest, and responsiveness. The results showed good internal consistency and acceptable floor and ceiling effects (Cronbach’s alpha range from 0.80 to 0.93). CFA showed that the instrument structure has a reasonable fitness (RMSEA = 0.063, 95%CI = [0.057 0.079], CFI = 0.93, GFI = 0.95, SRMR = 0.028). The convergent validity was considered appropriate, with 38 of the 39 items correlated stronger with their assigned scale than a competing scale, except for GPS1. Known groups comparisons showed that the QLICD-CG V2.0 discriminated well between subgroups on the basis of gender, marriage status, and economy status, thus providing evidence of discriminative validity. Convergent validity testing revealed that the QLICD-CG V2.0 domain scores correlated significantly with SF-36 dimension scores, which ranged from 0.21 to 0.58. Test-retest coefficients were satisfactory. A majority of intraclass correlation coefficients were above 0.70, except the psychological domain (0.60) and the items of social support/security (0.61). Responsiveness was tested on 157 patients. Significant differences were found on all QLICD-CG V2.0 domains, between baseline responses and after a treatment, except for the items of appetite and sleep. Robust sensitivity to change was observed. The QLICD-CG V2.0 appears to be a valid and reliable instrument to measure QOL in chronic gastritis patients. Scores were reproducible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu) scale, a leukemia-specific instrument for determining the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with leukemia, had been developed and validated, but there have been no reports on the development of a simplified Chinese version of this scale. This is a new exploration to analyze the reliability of the HRQOL measurement using multivariate generalizability theory (MGT). This study aimed to develop a Chinese version of the FACT-Leu scale and evaluate its reliability using MGT to provide evidence to support the revision and improvement of this scale.Methods: The Chinese version of the FACT-Leu scale was developed by four steps: forward translation, backward translation, cultural adaptation and pilot-testing. The HRQOL was measured for eligible inpatients with leukemia using this scale to provide data. A single-facet multivariate Generalizability Study (G-study) design was demonstrated to estimate the variance-covariance components and then several Decision Studies (D-studies) with varying numbers of items were analyzed to obtain reliability coefficients and to understand how much the measurement reliability could be vary as the number of items in MGT changes.Results: One-hundred and one eligible inpatients diagnosed with leukemia were recruited and completed the HRQOL measurement at the time of admission to the hospital. In the G-study, the variation component of the patient-item interaction was largest while the variation component of the item was the smallest for the four of five domains, except for the leukemia-specific (LEUS) domain. In the D-study, at the level of domain, the generalizability coefficients (G) and the indexes of dependability (Ф) for four of the five domains were approximately equal to or greater than 0.80 except for the Emotional Well-being (EWB) domain (>0.70 but <0.80). For the overall scale, the composite G and composite Ф coefficients were greater than 0.90. Based on the G coefficient and Ф coefficient, two decision options for revising this scale considering the number of items were obtained: one is a 37-item version while the other is a 45-item version.Conclusion: The Chinese version of the FACT-Leu scale has good reliability as a whole based on the results of MGT and the implementation of MGT could lead to more informed decisions in complex questionnaire design and improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Context: Quality of life (QOL) for patients is now a worldwide concern, but there are few specific instruments developed by modular approach to measure outcomes in chronic diseases. Objectives: This study aimed to develop and validate the System of Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases—General Module (QLICD-GM). Methods: Based on the World Health Organization’s definition of QOL and programmed decision procedures, the QLICD-GM was developed using focus group discussions, pilot tests of 201 cases, and field tests of 620 cases representing seven different chronic diseases. The number of items in the final version was reduced to 30 from a 73-item pool, and the psychometric properties of the scale were evaluated by indicators, such as validity and reliability coefficients, standardized response mean, and statistical methods of correlational analysis, t-tests, and structural equation modeling. Results: Correlational and structural equation model analyses confirmed good construct validity with root mean square error of approximation of 0.0606, nonnormed fit index of 0.941, and comparative fit index of 0.947. Test-retest reliability coefficients for all domains and facets were higher than 0.70, with a range of 0.71–0.92, and the internal consistency alphas for most domains and facets were higher than 0.65 (ranging from 0.52 to 0.89). All domains and overall scores of the QLICD-GM had a statistically significant change after treatment, with moderate effect size. Conclusion: The QLICD-GM has good validity, reliability, and better responsiveness compared with the SF-36® Health Survey and can be used as the general module for chronic diseases. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Quality of life (QOL) for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) is now concerned worldwide with the specific instruments being seldom and no one developed by the modular approach.Objectives: This paper is aimed to develop the CHD scale of the system of Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases (QLICD-CHD) by the modular approach and validate it by both classical test theory and Generalizability Theory.Methods: The QLICD-CHD was developed based on programmed decision procedures with multiple nominal and focus group discussions, in-depth interview, pre-testing and quantitative statistical procedures. 146 inpatients with CHD were used to provide the data measuring QOL three times before and after treatments. The psychometric properties of the scale were evaluated with respect to validity, reliability and responsiveness employing correlation analysis, factor analyses, multi-trait scaling analysis, t-tests and also G studies and D studies of Genralizability Theory analysis.Results: Multi-trait scaling analysis, correlation and factor analyses confirmed good construct validity and criterion-related validity when using SF-36 as a criterion. The internal consistency α and test-retest reliability coefficients (Pearson r and Intra-class correlations ICC) for the overall instrument and all domains were higher than 0.70 and 0.80 respectively; The overall and all domains except for social domain had statistically significant changes after treatments with moderate effect size SRM (standardized response mea) ranging from 0.32 to 0.67. G-coefficients and index of dependability (Ф coefficients) confirmed the reliability of the scale further with more exact variance components.Conclusions: The QLICD-CHD has good validity, reliability, and moderate responsiveness and some highlights, and can be used as the quality of life instrument for patients with CHD. However, in order to obtain better reliability, the numbers of items for social domain should be increased or the items' quality, not quantity, should be improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The assessment of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) has been applied as a significant outcome indicator for patients with chronic diseases. No HRQOL study, however, has looked at HRQOL in patients with chronic gastritis and peptic ulcers. This paper focuses on comparing HRQOL in patients with chronic gastritis and peptic ulcers and examining the factors that influence the HRQOL of such patients. Results can be used for making decisions in clinical trials as well as aiding individual management and preventive care of these diseases.Methods: The Chinese version of the SF-36 (CSF-36) was administered twice to 244 patients with chronic gastritis and peptic ulcers. Mean scores across the two disease groups were compared using t-tests, change over time was analyzed with paired samples t-tests, and factors predicting HRQOL were investigated using the univariate general linear model.Results: The mean domain scores of patients with chronic gastritis were lower than those for patients with peptic ulcers, with the exception of physical functioning. Both groups had lower HRQOL compared with population norms. Mean domain scores increased after treatment in both groups. HRQOL in patients with these two chronic diseases differed by age, education level, marriage, income, and gender, but their explanatory power was relatively low.Conclusion: Quality of life of patients with chronic gastritis was lower than that of patients with peptic ulcers, which was lower than population norms. Quality of life in both patients groups was associated with socio-demographic risk factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]