Search

Your search keyword '"van de Post J."' showing total 4 results
Start Over Author "van de Post J." Search Limiters Available in Library Collection
4 results on '"van de Post J."'

1. External validation of prognostic models to predict stillbirth using International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications (IPPIC) Network database: individual participant data meta-analysis

Author

Allotey, J, Whittle, R, Snell, K, Smuk, M, Townsend, R, von Dadelszen, P, Heazell, A, Magee, L, Smith, G, Sandall, J, Thilaganathan, B, Zamora, J, Riley, R, Khalil, A, Thangaratinam, S, Coomarasamy, A, Kwong, A, Savitri, A, Salvesen, K, Bhattacharya, S, Uiterwaal, C, Staff, A, Andersen, L, Olive, E, Redman, C, Sletner, L, Daskalakis, G, Macleod, M, Abdollahain, M, Ramirez, J, Masse, J, Audibert, F, Magnus, P, Jenum, A, Baschat, A, Ohkuchi, A, Mcauliffe, F, West, J, Askie, L, Mone, F, Farrar, D, Zimmerman, P, Smits, L, Riddell, C, Kingdom, J, van de Post, J, Illanes, S, Holzman, C, van Kuijk, S, Carbillon, L, Villa, P, Eskild, A, Chappell, L, Prefumo, F, Velauthar, L, Seed, P, van Oostwaard, M, Verlohren, S, Poston, L, Ferrazzi, E, Vinter, C, Nagata, C, Brown, M, Vollebregt, K, Takeda, S, Langenveld, J, Widmer, M, Saito, S, Haavaldsen, C, Carroli, G, Olsen, J, Wolf, H, Zavaleta, N, Eisensee, I, Vergani, P, Lumbiganon, P, Makrides, M, Facchinetti, F, Sequeira, E, Gibson, R, Ferrazzani, S, Frusca, T, Norman, J, Figueiro, E, Lapaire, O, Laivuori, H, Lykke, J, Conde-Agudelo, A, Galindo, A, Mbah, A, Betran, A, Herraiz, I, Trogstad, L, Steegers, E, Salim, R, Huang, T, Adank, A, Zhang, J, Meschino, W, Browne, J, Allen, R, Costa, F, Klipstein-Grobusch Browne, K, Crowther, C, Jorgensen, J, Forest, J, Rumbold, A, Mol, B, Giguere, Y, Kenny, L, Ganzevoort, W, Odibo, A, Myers, J, Yeo, S, Goffinet, F, Mccowan, L, Pajkrt, E, Teede, H, Haddad, B, Dekker, G, Kleinrouweler, E, Lecarpentier, E, Roberts, C, Groen, H, Skrastad, R, Heinonen, S, Eero, K, Anggraini, D, Souka, A, Cecatti, J, Monterio, I, Pillalis, A, Souza, R, Hawkins, L, Gabbay-Benziv, R, Crovetto, F, Figuera, F, Jorgensen, L, Dodds, J, Patel, M, Aviram, A, Papageorghiou, A, Khan, K, Allotey J., Whittle R., Snell K. I. E., Smuk M., Townsend R., von Dadelszen P., Heazell A. E. P., Magee L., Smith G. C. S., Sandall J., Thilaganathan B., Zamora J., Riley R. D., Khalil A., Thangaratinam S., Coomarasamy A., Kwong A., Savitri A. I., Salvesen K. A., Bhattacharya S., Uiterwaal C. S. P. M., Staff A. C., Andersen L. B., Olive E. L., Redman C., Sletner L., Daskalakis G., Macleod M., Abdollahain M., Ramirez J. A., Masse J., Audibert F., Magnus P. M., Jenum A. K., Baschat A., Ohkuchi A., McAuliffe F. M., West J., Askie L. M., Mone F., Farrar D., Zimmerman P. A., Smits L. J. M., Riddell C., Kingdom J. C., van de Post J., Illanes S. E., Holzman C., van Kuijk S. M. J., Carbillon L., Villa P. M., Eskild A., Chappell L., Prefumo F., Velauthar L., Seed P., van Oostwaard M., Verlohren S., Poston L., Ferrazzi E., Vinter C. A., Nagata C., Brown M., Vollebregt K. C., Takeda S., Langenveld J., Widmer M., Saito S., Haavaldsen C., Carroli G., Olsen J., Wolf H., Zavaleta N., Eisensee I., Vergani P., Lumbiganon P., Makrides M., Facchinetti F., Sequeira E., Gibson R., Ferrazzani S., Frusca T., Norman J. E., Figueiro E. A., Lapaire O., Laivuori H., Lykke J. A., Conde-Agudelo A., Galindo A., Mbah A., Betran A. P., Herraiz I., Trogstad L., Smith G. G. S., Steegers E. A. P., Salim R., Huang T., Adank A., Zhang J., Meschino W. S., Browne J. L., Allen R. E., Costa F. D. S., Klipstein-Grobusch Browne K., Crowther C. A., Jorgensen J. S., Forest J. -C., Rumbold A. R., Mol B. W., Giguere Y., Kenny L. C., Ganzevoort W., Odibo A. O., Myers J., Yeo S. A., Goffinet F., McCowan L., Pajkrt E., Teede H. J., Haddad B. G., Dekker G., Kleinrouweler E. C., LeCarpentier E., Roberts C. T., Groen H., Skrastad R. B., Heinonen S., Eero K., Anggraini D., Souka A., Cecatti J. G., Monterio I., Pillalis A., Souza R., Hawkins L. A., Gabbay-Benziv R., Crovetto F., Figuera F., Jorgensen L., Dodds J., Patel M., Aviram A., Papageorghiou A., Khan K., Allotey, J, Whittle, R, Snell, K, Smuk, M, Townsend, R, von Dadelszen, P, Heazell, A, Magee, L, Smith, G, Sandall, J, Thilaganathan, B, Zamora, J, Riley, R, Khalil, A, Thangaratinam, S, Coomarasamy, A, Kwong, A, Savitri, A, Salvesen, K, Bhattacharya, S, Uiterwaal, C, Staff, A, Andersen, L, Olive, E, Redman, C, Sletner, L, Daskalakis, G, Macleod, M, Abdollahain, M, Ramirez, J, Masse, J, Audibert, F, Magnus, P, Jenum, A, Baschat, A, Ohkuchi, A, Mcauliffe, F, West, J, Askie, L, Mone, F, Farrar, D, Zimmerman, P, Smits, L, Riddell, C, Kingdom, J, van de Post, J, Illanes, S, Holzman, C, van Kuijk, S, Carbillon, L, Villa, P, Eskild, A, Chappell, L, Prefumo, F, Velauthar, L, Seed, P, van Oostwaard, M, Verlohren, S, Poston, L, Ferrazzi, E, Vinter, C, Nagata, C, Brown, M, Vollebregt, K, Takeda, S, Langenveld, J, Widmer, M, Saito, S, Haavaldsen, C, Carroli, G, Olsen, J, Wolf, H, Zavaleta, N, Eisensee, I, Vergani, P, Lumbiganon, P, Makrides, M, Facchinetti, F, Sequeira, E, Gibson, R, Ferrazzani, S, Frusca, T, Norman, J, Figueiro, E, Lapaire, O, Laivuori, H, Lykke, J, Conde-Agudelo, A, Galindo, A, Mbah, A, Betran, A, Herraiz, I, Trogstad, L, Steegers, E, Salim, R, Huang, T, Adank, A, Zhang, J, Meschino, W, Browne, J, Allen, R, Costa, F, Klipstein-Grobusch Browne, K, Crowther, C, Jorgensen, J, Forest, J, Rumbold, A, Mol, B, Giguere, Y, Kenny, L, Ganzevoort, W, Odibo, A, Myers, J, Yeo, S, Goffinet, F, Mccowan, L, Pajkrt, E, Teede, H, Haddad, B, Dekker, G, Kleinrouweler, E, Lecarpentier, E, Roberts, C, Groen, H, Skrastad, R, Heinonen, S, Eero, K, Anggraini, D, Souka, A, Cecatti, J, Monterio, I, Pillalis, A, Souza, R, Hawkins, L, Gabbay-Benziv, R, Crovetto, F, Figuera, F, Jorgensen, L, Dodds, J, Patel, M, Aviram, A, Papageorghiou, A, Khan, K, Allotey J., Whittle R., Snell K. I. E., Smuk M., Townsend R., von Dadelszen P., Heazell A. E. P., Magee L., Smith G. C. S., Sandall J., Thilaganathan B., Zamora J., Riley R. D., Khalil A., Thangaratinam S., Coomarasamy A., Kwong A., Savitri A. I., Salvesen K. A., Bhattacharya S., Uiterwaal C. S. P. M., Staff A. C., Andersen L. B., Olive E. L., Redman C., Sletner L., Daskalakis G., Macleod M., Abdollahain M., Ramirez J. A., Masse J., Audibert F., Magnus P. M., Jenum A. K., Baschat A., Ohkuchi A., McAuliffe F. M., West J., Askie L. M., Mone F., Farrar D., Zimmerman P. A., Smits L. J. M., Riddell C., Kingdom J. C., van de Post J., Illanes S. E., Holzman C., van Kuijk S. M. J., Carbillon L., Villa P. M., Eskild A., Chappell L., Prefumo F., Velauthar L., Seed P., van Oostwaard M., Verlohren S., Poston L., Ferrazzi E., Vinter C. A., Nagata C., Brown M., Vollebregt K. C., Takeda S., Langenveld J., Widmer M., Saito S., Haavaldsen C., Carroli G., Olsen J., Wolf H., Zavaleta N., Eisensee I., Vergani P., Lumbiganon P., Makrides M., Facchinetti F., Sequeira E., Gibson R., Ferrazzani S., Frusca T., Norman J. E., Figueiro E. A., Lapaire O., Laivuori H., Lykke J. A., Conde-Agudelo A., Galindo A., Mbah A., Betran A. P., Herraiz I., Trogstad L., Smith G. G. S., Steegers E. A. P., Salim R., Huang T., Adank A., Zhang J., Meschino W. S., Browne J. L., Allen R. E., Costa F. D. S., Klipstein-Grobusch Browne K., Crowther C. A., Jorgensen J. S., Forest J. -C., Rumbold A. R., Mol B. W., Giguere Y., Kenny L. C., Ganzevoort W., Odibo A. O., Myers J., Yeo S. A., Goffinet F., McCowan L., Pajkrt E., Teede H. J., Haddad B. G., Dekker G., Kleinrouweler E. C., LeCarpentier E., Roberts C. T., Groen H., Skrastad R. B., Heinonen S., Eero K., Anggraini D., Souka A., Cecatti J. G., Monterio I., Pillalis A., Souza R., Hawkins L. A., Gabbay-Benziv R., Crovetto F., Figuera F., Jorgensen L., Dodds J., Patel M., Aviram A., Papageorghiou A., and Khan K.

Abstract

Objective: Stillbirth is a potentially preventable complication of pregnancy. Identifying women at high risk of stillbirth can guide decisions on the need for closer surveillance and timing of delivery in order to prevent fetal death. Prognostic models have been developed to predict the risk of stillbirth, but none has yet been validated externally. In this study, we externally validated published prediction models for stillbirth using individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis to assess their predictive performance. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, DH-DATA and AMED databases were searched from inception to December 2020 to identify studies reporting stillbirth prediction models. Studies that developed or updated prediction models for stillbirth for use at any time during pregnancy were included. IPD from cohorts within the International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications (IPPIC) Network were used to validate externally the identified prediction models whose individual variables were available in the IPD. The risk of bias of the models and cohorts was assessed using the Prediction study Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST). The discriminative performance of the models was evaluated using the C-statistic, and calibration was assessed using calibration plots, calibration slope and calibration-in-the-large. Performance measures were estimated separately in each cohort, as well as summarized across cohorts using random-effects meta-analysis. Clinical utility was assessed using net benefit. Results: Seventeen studies reporting the development of 40 prognostic models for stillbirth were identified. None of the models had been previously validated externally, and the full model equation was reported for only one-fifth (20%, 8/40) of the models. External validation was possible for three of these models, using IPD from 19 cohorts (491 201 pregnant women) within the IPPIC Network database. Based on evaluation of the model development studies, all three models had an overa

Published
2022

2. External validation of prognostic models to predict stillbirth using International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications (IPPIC) Network database: individual participant data meta-analysis

Author

Allotey, J., Whittle, R., Snell, K. I. E., Smuk, M., Townsend, R., von Dadelszen, P., Heazell, A. E. P., Magee, L., Smith, G. C. S., Sandall, J., Thilaganathan, B., Zamora, J., Riley, R. D., Khalil, A., Thangaratinam, S., Coomarasamy, A., Kwong, A., Savitri, A. I., Salvesen, K. A., Bhattacharya, S., Uiterwaal, C. S. P. M., Staff, A. C., Andersen, L. B., Olive, E. L., Redman, C., Sletner, L., Daskalakis, G., Macleod, M., Abdollahain, M., Ramirez, J. A., Masse, J., Audibert, F., Magnus, P. M., Jenum, A. K., Baschat, A., Ohkuchi, A., Mcauliffe, F. M., West, J., Askie, L. M., Mone, F., Farrar, D., Zimmerman, P. A., Smits, L. J. M., Riddell, C., Kingdom, J. C., van de Post, J., Illanes, S. E., Holzman, C., van Kuijk, S. M. J., Carbillon, L., Villa, P. M., Eskild, A., Chappell, L., Prefumo, F., Velauthar, L., Seed, P., van Oostwaard, M., Verlohren, S., Poston, L., Ferrazzi, E., Vinter, C. A., Nagata, C., Brown, M., Vollebregt, K. C., Takeda, S., Langenveld, J., Widmer, M., Saito, S., Haavaldsen, C., Carroli, G., Olsen, J., Wolf, H., Zavaleta, N., Eisensee, I., Vergani, P., Lumbiganon, P., Makrides, M., Facchinetti, F., Sequeira, E., Gibson, R., Ferrazzani, S., Frusca, T., Norman, J. E., Figueiro, E. A., Lapaire, O., Laivuori, H., Lykke, J. A., Conde-Agudelo, A., Galindo, A., Mbah, A., Betran, A. P., Herraiz, I., Trogstad, L., Smith, G. G. S., Steegers, E. A. P., Salim, R., Huang, T., Adank, A., Zhang, J., Meschino, W. S., Browne, J. L., Allen, R. E., Costa, F. D. S., Klipstein-Grobusch Browne, K., Crowther, C. A., Jorgensen, J. S., Forest, J. -C., Rumbold, A. R., Mol, B. W., Giguere, Y., Kenny, L. C., Ganzevoort, W., Odibo, A. O., Myers, J., Yeo, S. A., Goffinet, F., Mccowan, L., Pajkrt, E., Teede, H. J., Haddad, B. G., Dekker, G., Kleinrouweler, E. C., Lecarpentier, E., Roberts, C. T., Groen, H., Skrastad, R. B., Heinonen, S., Eero, K., Anggraini, D., Souka, A., Cecatti, J. G., Monterio, I., Pillalis, A., Souza, R., Hawkins, L. A., Gabbay-Benziv, R., Crovetto, F., Figuera, F., Jorgensen, L., Dodds, J., Patel, M., Aviram, A., Papageorghiou, A., Khan, K., Clinicum, HUS Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, HUS Children and Adolescents, Lastentautien yksikkö, Children's Hospital, Allotey, J, Whittle, R, Snell, K, Smuk, M, Townsend, R, von Dadelszen, P, Heazell, A, Magee, L, Smith, G, Sandall, J, Thilaganathan, B, Zamora, J, Riley, R, Khalil, A, Thangaratinam, S, Coomarasamy, A, Kwong, A, Savitri, A, Salvesen, K, Bhattacharya, S, Uiterwaal, C, Staff, A, Andersen, L, Olive, E, Redman, C, Sletner, L, Daskalakis, G, Macleod, M, Abdollahain, M, Ramirez, J, Masse, J, Audibert, F, Magnus, P, Jenum, A, Baschat, A, Ohkuchi, A, Mcauliffe, F, West, J, Askie, L, Mone, F, Farrar, D, Zimmerman, P, Smits, L, Riddell, C, Kingdom, J, van de Post, J, Illanes, S, Holzman, C, van Kuijk, S, Carbillon, L, Villa, P, Eskild, A, Chappell, L, Prefumo, F, Velauthar, L, Seed, P, van Oostwaard, M, Verlohren, S, Poston, L, Ferrazzi, E, Vinter, C, Nagata, C, Brown, M, Vollebregt, K, Takeda, S, Langenveld, J, Widmer, M, Saito, S, Haavaldsen, C, Carroli, G, Olsen, J, Wolf, H, Zavaleta, N, Eisensee, I, Vergani, P, Lumbiganon, P, Makrides, M, Facchinetti, F, Sequeira, E, Gibson, R, Ferrazzani, S, Frusca, T, Norman, J, Figueiro, E, Lapaire, O, Laivuori, H, Lykke, J, Conde-Agudelo, A, Galindo, A, Mbah, A, Betran, A, Herraiz, I, Trogstad, L, Steegers, E, Salim, R, Huang, T, Adank, A, Zhang, J, Meschino, W, Browne, J, Allen, R, Costa, F, Klipstein-Grobusch Browne, K, Crowther, C, Jorgensen, J, Forest, J, Rumbold, A, Mol, B, Giguere, Y, Kenny, L, Ganzevoort, W, Odibo, A, Myers, J, Yeo, S, Goffinet, F, Mccowan, L, Pajkrt, E, Teede, H, Haddad, B, Dekker, G, Kleinrouweler, E, Lecarpentier, E, Roberts, C, Groen, H, Skrastad, R, Heinonen, S, Eero, K, Anggraini, D, Souka, A, Cecatti, J, Monterio, I, Pillalis, A, Souza, R, Hawkins, L, Gabbay-Benziv, R, Crovetto, F, Figuera, F, Jorgensen, L, Dodds, J, Patel, M, Aviram, A, Papageorghiou, A, Khan, K, Tampere University, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, APH - Quality of Care, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development (AR&D), APH - Personalized Medicine, APH - Digital Health, and Obstetrics and gynaecology

Subjects
Calibration (statistics), Perinatal Death, Overfitting, Cohort Studies, Fetal Development, 0302 clinical medicine, Discriminative model, 3123 Gynaecology and paediatrics, Models, Pregnancy, GROWTH RESTRICTION, Statistics, Medicine, Prenatal, 030212 general & internal medicine, Ultrasonography, RISK, 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine, PRETERM, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, LOW-DOSE ASPIRIN, DIAGNOSIS TRIPOD, Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Medicine, Statistical, Stillbirth, Prognosis, Pregnancy Complication, external validation, individual participant data, intrauterine death, prediction model, stillbirth, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Models, Statistical, Pregnancy Complications, Regression Analysis, Risk Assessment, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, 3. Good health, PREECLAMPSIA, Meta-analysis, Human, Cohort study, Prognosi, MEDLINE, Regression Analysi, WEEKS GESTATION, 03 medical and health sciences, VELOCIMETRY, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, RECURRENCE, business.industry, Infant, Newborn, R1, HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS, Reproductive Medicine, Sample size determination, Cohort Studie, RG, business, RA, Predictive modelling
Abstract

Objective Stillbirth is a potentially preventable complication of pregnancy. Identifying women at high risk of stillbirth can guide decisions on the need for closer surveillance and timing of delivery in order to prevent fetal death. Prognostic models have been developed to predict the risk of stillbirth, but none has yet been validated externally. In this study, we externally validated published prediction models for stillbirth using individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis to assess their predictive performance. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, DH-DATA and AMED databases were searched from inception to December 2020 to identify studies reporting stillbirth prediction models. Studies that developed or updated prediction models for stillbirth for use at any time during pregnancy were included. IPD from cohorts within the International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications (IPPIC) Network were used to validate externally the identified prediction models whose individual variables were available in the IPD. The risk of bias of the models and cohorts was assessed using the Prediction study Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST). The discriminative performance of the models was evaluated using the C-statistic, and calibration was assessed using calibration plots, calibration slope and calibration-in-the-large. Performance measures were estimated separately in each cohort, as well as summarized across cohorts using random-effects meta-analysis. Clinical utility was assessed using net benefit. Results Seventeen studies reporting the development of 40 prognostic models for stillbirth were identified. None of the models had been previously validated externally, and the full model equation was reported for only one-fifth (20%, 8/40) of the models. External validation was possible for three of these models, using IPD from 19 cohorts (491 201 pregnant women) within the IPPIC Network database. Based on evaluation of the model development studies, all three models had an overall high risk of bias, according to PROBAST. In the IPD meta-analysis, the models had summary C-statistics ranging from 0.53 to 0.65 and summary calibration slopes ranging from 0.40 to 0.88, with risk predictions that were generally too extreme compared with the observed risks. The models had little to no clinical utility, as assessed by net benefit. However, there remained uncertainty in the performance of some models due to small available sample sizes. Conclusions The three validated stillbirth prediction models showed generally poor and uncertain predictive performance in new data, with limited evidence to support their clinical application. The findings suggest methodological shortcomings in their development, including overfitting. Further research is needed to further validate these and other models, identify stronger prognostic factors and develop more robust prediction models. (c) 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Bioequivalence of subcutaneous injections of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon(R)) by Pen-injector and syringe.

Author

Voortman, Gerrit, Van de Post, Jeroen, Schoemaker, Rik C., van Gerven, Joop M. A., Voortman, G, van de Post, J, Schoemaker, R C, and van Gerven, J M

Abstract

A randomized, single-centre, cross-over study was designed to compare the bioavailability of two pharmaceutical formulations of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (recFSH; Puregon(R)): (i) a dissolved cake injected by a normal syringe; and (ii) a ready-for-use solution injected using a device referred to as Puregon(R)Pen. Twenty-two healthy female volunteers underwent one of two administration sequences: Puregon(R)Pen/syringe or syringe/Puregon(R)Pen, by which they received a single subcutaneous dose of recFSH (150 IU). Endogenous gonadotrophin production had been previously suppressed using an oral contraceptive (Lyndiol(R)). Pharmacokinetic parameters characterizing rate [peak concentration (Cmax) and time of peak concentration (tmax)] and extent [area under the curve (AUC) and clearance (CL)] of absorption were obtained from 20 subjects. After injection with both formulations, serum FSH concentrations reached a peak of 3.4 IU/l at 13 h after injection. The elimination half-life was approximately 34 h, irrespective of formulation. A difference of approximately 18% was found between serum FSH concentrations obtained using the two formulations, which was caused by differences between the anticipated and the actual volume injected with the normal syringe. After correction for injection losses by weighing the amount injected with a normal syringe, the two formulations were found to be bioequivalent with respect to Cmax, AUC and CL. For tmax, bioequivalence could not be proven due to high intra-subject variability and broad absorption peaks of FSH. Both methods were well tolerated, local reactions being generally mild and short-lived. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
1999
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Development and validation of a prognostic model to predict birth weight: individual participant data meta-analysis.

Author

Allotey J, Archer L, Snell KIE, Coomar D, Massé J, Sletner L, Wolf H, Daskalakis G, Saito S, Ganzevoort W, Ohkuchi A, Mistry H, Farrar D, Mone F, Zhang J, Seed PT, Teede H, Da Silva Costa F, Souka AP, Smuk M, Ferrazzani S, Salvi S, Prefumo F, Gabbay-Benziv R, Nagata C, Takeda S, Sequeira E, Lapaire O, Cecatti JG, Morris RK, Baschat AA, Salvesen K, Smits L, Anggraini D, Rumbold A, van Gelder M, Coomarasamy A, Kingdom J, Heinonen S, Khalil A, Goffinet F, Haqnawaz S, Zamora J, Riley RD, Thangaratinam S, Kwong A, Savitri AI, Bhattacharya S, Uiterwaal CS, Staff AC, Andersen LB, Olive EL, Redman C, Macleod M, Thilaganathan B, Ramírez JA, Audibert F, Magnus PM, Jenum AK, McAuliffe FM, West J, Askie LM, Zimmerman PA, Riddell C, van de Post J, Illanes SE, Holzman C, van Kuijk SMJ, Carbillon L, Villa PM, Eskild A, Chappell L, Velauthar L, van Oostwaard M, Verlohren S, Poston L, Ferrazzi E, Vinter CA, Brown M, Vollebregt KC, Langenveld J, Widmer M, Haavaldsen C, Carroli G, Olsen J, Zavaleta N, Eisensee I, Vergani P, Lumbiganon P, Makrides M, Facchinetti F, Temmerman M, Gibson R, Frusca T, Norman JE, Figueiró-Filho EA, Laivuori H, Lykke JA, Conde-Agudelo A, Galindo A, Mbah A, Betran AP, Herraiz I, Trogstad L, Smith GGS, Steegers EAP, Salim R, Huang T, Adank A, Meschino WS, Browne JL, Allen RE, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Crowther CA, Jørgensen JS, Forest JC, Mol BW, Giguère Y, Kenny LC, Odibo AO, Myers J, Yeo S, McCowan L, Pajkrt E, Haddad BG, Dekker G, Kleinrouweler EC, LeCarpentier É, Roberts CT, Groen H, Skråstad RB, Eero K, Pilalis A, Souza RT, Hawkins LA, Figueras F, and Crovetto F

Abstract

Objective: To predict birth weight at various potential gestational ages of delivery based on data routinely available at the first antenatal visit., Design: Individual participant data meta-analysis., Data Sources: Individual participant data of four cohorts (237 228 pregnancies) from the International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications (IPPIC) network dataset., Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies: Studies in the IPPIC network were identified by searching major databases for studies reporting risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and stillbirth, from database inception to August 2019. Data of four IPPIC cohorts (237 228 pregnancies) from the US (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2018; 233 483 pregnancies), UK (Allen et al, 2017; 1045 pregnancies), Norway (STORK Groruddalen research programme, 2010; 823 pregnancies), and Australia (Rumbold et al, 2006; 1877 pregnancies) were included in the development of the model., Results: The IPPIC birth weight model was developed with random intercept regression models with backward elimination for variable selection. Internal-external cross validation was performed to assess the study specific and pooled performance of the model, reported as calibration slope, calibration-in-the-large, and observed versus expected average birth weight ratio. Meta-analysis showed that the apparent performance of the model had good calibration (calibration slope 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.10; calibration-in-the-large 44.5 g, -18.4 to 107.3) with an observed versus expected average birth weight ratio of 1.02 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.07). The proportion of variation in birth weight explained by the model (R 2 ) was 46.9% (range 32.7-56.1% in each cohort). On internal-external cross validation, the model showed good calibration and predictive performance when validated in three cohorts with a calibration slope of 0.90 (Allen cohort), 1.04 (STORK Groruddalen cohort), and 1.07 (Rumbold cohort), calibration-in-the-large of -22.3 g (Allen cohort), -33.42 (Rumbold cohort), and 86.4 g (STORK Groruddalen cohort), and observed versus expected ratio of 0.99 (Rumbold cohort), 1.00 (Allen cohort), and 1.03 (STORK Groruddalen cohort); respective pooled estimates were 1.00 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.23; calibration slope), 9.7 g (-154.3 to 173.8; calibration-in-the-large), and 1.00 (0.94 to 1.07; observed v expected ratio). The model predictions were more accurate (smaller mean square error) in the lower end of predicted birth weight, which is important in informing clinical decision making., Conclusions: The IPPIC birth weight model allowed birth weight predictions for a range of possible gestational ages. The model explained about 50% of individual variation in birth weights, was well calibrated (especially in babies at high risk of fetal growth restriction and its complications), and showed promising performance in four different populations included in the individual participant data meta-analysis. Further research to examine the generalisability of performance in other countries, settings, and subgroups is required., Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42019135045., Competing Interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: support from the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment UK programme for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results