Search

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a complex condition characterized by a multifaceted pathophysiology. It presents significant diagnostic and prognostic challenges in clinical settings. This narrative review explores the evolving role of biofluid biomarkers as essential tools in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of TBI. In recent times, preclinical and clinical trials utilizing these biofluid biomarkers have been actively pursued internationally. Among the biomarkers for nerve tissue proteins are neuronal biomarkers like neuronal specific enolase and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1; astroglia injury biomarkers such as S100B and glial fibrillary acidic protein; axonal injury and demyelination biomarkers, including neurofilaments and myelin basic protein; new axonal injury and neurodegeneration biomarkers like total tau and phosphorylated tau; and others such as spectrin breakdown products and microtubule-associated protein 2. The interpretation of these biomarkers can be influenced by various factors, including secretion from organs other than the injury site and systemic conditions. This review highlights the potential of these biomarkers to transform TBI management and emphasizes the need for continued research to validate their efficacy, refine testing platforms, and ultimately improve patient care and outcomes., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Korean Society for Neurorehabilitation.)

We studied whether the serum levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein ( GFAP) and of antibodies against the N-methyl- d-aspartate receptor subunit NR2 ( NR2 RNMDA) can discriminate between intracerebral haemorrhage ( ICH) and ischaemic stroke ( IS) in stroke patients. We prospectively recruited patients with suspected stroke (72 confirmed) and 52 healthy controls. The type of brain lesion ( ICH or IS) was established using brain imaging. The levels of GFAP and of antibodies against NR2 RNMDA were measured in blood samples obtained within 12 hrs after stroke onset and 24, 48 and 72 hrs and 1 and 2 weeks later using ELISA immunoassay. Improvement in diagnostic performance was assessed in logistic regression models designed to predict the diagnosis and the type of stroke. GFAP peaks early during haemorrhagic brain lesions (at significantly higher levels), and late in ischaemic events, whereas antibodies against NR2 RNMDA have significantly higher levels during IS at all time-points. Neither of the two biomarkers used on its own could sufficiently discriminate patients, but when they are used in combination they can differentiate at 12 hrs after stroke, between ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke with a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 91%, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]