Search

Jagadeswara R Earla,1 George J Hutton,2 J Douglas Thornton,1 Hua Chen,1 Michael L Johnson,1 Rajender R Aparasu1 1Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA; 2Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USACorrespondence: Rajender R AparasuPharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Texas Medical Center, 4849 Calhoun Road, Houston, TX 77204-5047, USATel +1 832-842-8374Email rraparasu@uh.eduBackground: Oral fingolimod is convenient to use than injectable disease modifying agents (DMAs) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the existing literature regarding the comparative adherence trajectories between oral fingolimod and injectable DMAs is limited.Objective: To compare the adherence trajectories between oral DMA, fingolimod, and injectable DMAs in patients with MS.Methods: A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted using adults (≥ 18 years) with MS (ICD-9-CM: 340 and a DMA prescription) from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database between 2010 and 2012. Patients were grouped into oral fingolimod or injectable DMA users based on the index DMA among patients with MS. The annual DMA adherence trajectories, based on the proportion of days covered (PDC), were examined using group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) during the one-year follow-up period after treatment initiation. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression using stabilized inverse probability treatment weights (IPTW) was performed to assess the association between the DMA route of administration (Oral vs Injectable) and the adherence trajectory groups. The balance of covariates between oral and injectable DMAs before and after IPTW was checked against a standardized difference threshold of 0.25.Results: The study cohort consisted of 1,700 MS patients who were initiated with oral (15.8%) or injectable (84.2%) DMAs between 2010 and 2012. The adherence rates (PDC≥ 0.8) in oral fingolimod and injectable DMA users were found to be 64.7% and 50.8%, respectively. The GBTM grouped individuals in the study cohort into three adherence trajectories – rapid discontinuers (23.5%), complete adherers (49.9%), and slow decliners (26.6%). The multinomial logistic regression model with stabilized IPTW revealed that oral fingolimod users had higher odds to be a complete adherer (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.85– 4.16) or a slow discontinuer (AOR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.70– 4.05) than injectable DMA users.Conclusions: Oral DMA fingolimod was associated with better adherence than injectable DMAs across group-based trajectories. Further research is warranted to evaluate the adherence trajectories with newer oral DMAs introduced in the last decade for MS.Keywords: group based trajectory modelling, GBTM, adherence trajectory, multiple sclerosis, disease modifying agent, DMA, fingolimod, injectable DMA

Background: Fingolimod is the first approved oral disease-modifying agent (DMA) in 2010 to treat Multiple Sclerosis (MS). There is limited real-world evidence regarding the determinants associated with fingolimod use in the early years. Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the factors associated with fingolimod prescribing in the initial years after the market approval. Methods: A retrospective, longitudinal study was conducted involving adults (≥18 years) with MS from the 2010–2012 IBM MarketScan. Individuals with MS were selected based on ICD-9-CM: 340 and a newly initiated DMA prescription. Based on the index/first DMA prescription, patients were classified as fingolimod or injectable users. All covariates were measured during the six months baseline period prior to the index date. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the predisposing, enabling, and need factors, conceptualized as per the Andersen Behavioral Model (ABM), associated with prescribing of fingolimod versus injectable DMA for MS. Results: The study cohort consisted of 3118 MS patients receiving DMA treatment. Of which, 14.4% of patients with MS initiated treatment with fingolimod within two years after the market entry, while the remaining 85.6% initiated with injectable DMAs. Multivariable regression revealed that the likelihood of prescribing oral DMA increased by 2–3 fold during 2011 and 2012 compared to 2010. Patients with ophthalmic (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]-2.60), heart (aOR-2.21) and urinary diseases (aOR-1.37) were more likely to receive fingolimod. Patients with other neurological disorders (aOR-0.50) were less likely to receive fingolimod than those without neurological disorders. Use of symptomatic medication (for impaired walking (aOR-2.60), bladder dysfunction (aOR-1.54), antispasmodics (aOR-1.48), and neurologist consultation (aOR-1.81) were associated with higher odds of receiving fingolimod. However, patients with non-MS associated emergency visits (aOR-0.64) had lower odds of receiving fingolimod than those without emergency visits. Conclusions: During the initial years after market approval, patients with highly active MS were more likely to receive oral fingolimod than injectable DMAs. More research is needed to understand the determinants of newer oral DMAs.

Background: Fingolimod is the first approved oral disease-modifying agent (DMA) in 2010 to treat Multiple Sclerosis (MS). There is limited real-world evidence regarding the determinants associated with fingolimod use in the early years., Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the factors associated with fingolimod prescribing in the initial years after the market approval., Methods: A retrospective, longitudinal study was conducted involving adults (≥18 years) with MS from the 2010-2012 IBM MarketScan. Individuals with MS were selected based on ICD-9-CM: 340 and a newly initiated DMA prescription. Based on the index/first DMA prescription, patients were classified as fingolimod or injectable users. All covariates were measured during the six months baseline period prior to the index date. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the predisposing, enabling, and need factors, conceptualized as per the Andersen Behavioral Model (ABM), associated with prescribing of fingolimod versus injectable DMA for MS., Results: The study cohort consisted of 3118 MS patients receiving DMA treatment. Of which, 14.4% of patients with MS initiated treatment with fingolimod within two years after the market entry, while the remaining 85.6% initiated with injectable DMAs. Multivariable regression revealed that the likelihood of prescribing oral DMA increased by 2-3 fold during 2011 and 2012 compared to 2010. Patients with ophthalmic (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]-2.60), heart (aOR-2.21) and urinary diseases (aOR-1.37) were more likely to receive fingolimod. Patients with other neurological disorders (aOR-0.50) were less likely to receive fingolimod than those without neurological disorders. Use of symptomatic medication (for impaired walking (aOR-2.60), bladder dysfunction (aOR-1.54), antispasmodics (aOR-1.48), and neurologist consultation (aOR-1.81) were associated with higher odds of receiving fingolimod. However, patients with non-MS associated emergency visits (aOR-0.64) had lower odds of receiving fingolimod than those without emergency visits., Conclusions: During the initial years after market approval, patients with highly active MS were more likely to receive oral fingolimod than injectable DMAs. More research is needed to understand the determinants of newer oral DMAs., Competing Interests: None., (© 2021 The Author(s).)