Search

The regulation of microbial subpopulations in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) with desired functions can guarantee nutrient removal. In nature, "good fences make good neighbors," which can be applied to engineering microbial consortia. Herein, a membrane-based segregator (MBSR) was proposed, where porous membranes not only promote the diffusion of metabolic products but also isolate incompatible microbes. The MBSR was integrated with an anoxic/aerobic membrane bioreactor (i.e., an experimental MBR). The long-term operation showed that the experimental MBR exhibited higher nitrogen removal (10.45 ± 2.73 mg/L total nitrogen) than the control MBR (21.68 ± 4.23 mg/L) in the effluent. The MBSR resulted in much lower oxygen reduction potential in the anoxic tank of the experimental MBR (-82.00 mV) compared to that of the control MBR (83.25 mV). The lower oxygen reduction potential can inevitably aid in the occurrence of denitrification. The 16S rRNA sequencing showed that the MBSR significantly enriched acidogenic consortia, which yielded considerable volatile fatty acids by fermenting the added carbon sources and allowed efficient transfer of these small molecules to the denitrifying community. Moreover, the sludge communities of the experimental MBR harbored a higher abundance of denitrifying bacteria than those of the control MBR. Metagenomic analysis further corroborated these sequencing results. The spatially structured microbial communities in the experimental MBR system demonstrate the practicability of the MBSR, achieving nitrogen removal efficiency superior to that of mixed populations. Our study provides an engineering method for modulating the assembly and metabolic division of labor of subpopulations in WWTPs. IMPORTANCE This study provides an innovative and applicable method for regulating subpopulations (activated sludge and acidogenic consortia), which contributes to the precise control of the metabolic division of labor in biological wastewater treatment processes., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.