Search

We evaluated the clinical impact, in daily clinical practice, of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes. Data from 500 unselected consecutive patients were retrospectively analyzed. Only those with a full assessment at baseline (T0) and after 3 (T3), 6 (T6), and 12 (T12) months of treatment with SGLT2i or GLP1RA were included in the study (n = 167). At baseline, patients had a high mean body weight (BW), abdominal circumference (AC), body mass index (BMI), and HOMA index. Despite normal C-peptide values, 39 patients were being treated with insulin (up to 120 IU/day). During therapy, a progressive improvement in BW, BMI, and AC was observed with both the molecules. Fasting glucose and glycated Hb decrease was already significant at T3 in all patients, while the HOMA index selectively improved with SGLT2i therapy. Renal function parameters remained stable regardless of the drug used. Finally, SGLT2i reduced serum uric acid and improved the lipid profile, while GLP1RA reduced serum levels of liver enzymes. Both the therapeutic regimens allowed a significant reduction or complete suspension of unnecessary insulin therapies. Our real life data confirm the results obtained from randomized clinical trials and should be taken as a warning against inappropriate use of insulin in patients with preserved β-cell function.

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) induce body weight loss, but their effect on skeletal muscle mass (SMM) and strength needs to be better elucidated. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of SGLT2i on SMM in a real-life population setting of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Secondary outcomes included changes in liver steatosis and in anthropometric and glucometabolic parameters. Methods: Seventy-one patients were treated with SGLT2is as an add-on to metformin for 52 consecutive weeks. Visits were scheduled at baseline (T0) and after 6 (T6) and 12 months of therapy (T12) and included the checking of laboratory tests, measurement of anthropometric parameters, bioimpedance analysis of body composition, and abdominal ultrasound (US). Results: Fat mass (FM) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) progressively decreased compared to the baseline (FM: −2.9 ± 0.6 kg at T6; −2.8 ± 0.6 kg at T12; VAT: −0.3 ± 0.1 L at T6; −0.4 ± 0.1 L at T12; all p < 0.01). Changes in SMM were less pronounced (−0.4 ± 0.3 kg at T6, ns; −0.7 ± 0.4 kg at T12, p < 0.05), yielding a beneficial increase in the SMM/FM ratio (+0.3 ± 0.05 at T6 and +0.2 ± 0.05 at T12, all p < 0.01). No significant changes in sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, fat-free mass, muscle strength, and water compartments were observed at the end of the follow-up period. Anthropometric and glucometabolic parameters, insulin resistance, liver enzymes, and biometric indices and US grading of hepatic steatosis improved throughout this study. Conclusions: In a real-life setting, SGLT2i therapy is associated with weight loss attributable to FM rather than SMM loss without any relevant deterioration in muscle strength. In addition, SGLT2is proved to have beneficial effects on steatotic liver disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heat shock proteins, besides their protective function against stresses, have been recently indicated as key factors for sperm fertilizing ability. Since sexing sperm by high-speed flow-cytometry subjects them to different physical, mechanical, and chemical stresses, the present study was designed to verify, by immunofluorescence and Western blot, whether the sorting procedure induces any modification in the amount and cellular distribution of heat shock proteins 60, 70, and 90 (Hsp60, Hsp70, Hsp90). Immunolocalization and Western blot quantification of both Hsp60 and Hsp90 did not reveal differences between unsorted and sorted semen. On the contrary, a redistribution of Hsp70 immunoreactivity from the equatorial subsegment toward the equator of sperm cells was recorded after sorting; this relocation suggests capacitation-like changes of sperm membrane. This modification seems to be caused mainly by incubation with Hoechst 33342, while both passage of sperm through flow cytometer and laser beam represent only minor stimuli. A further Hsp70 redistribution seems to be due to the final steps of sperm sorting, charging, and deflection of drops, and to the dilution during collection. On the other hand, staining procedure and mechanical stress seem to be the factors most injurious to sperm viability. Moreover, Hsp70 relocation was deeply influenced by the storage method. In fact, storing sexed spermatozoa, after centrifugation, in a small volume in presence of seminal plasma induced a reversion of Hsp70 redistribution, while storage in the diluted catch fluid of collection tubes caused Hsp70 relocation in most sorted spermatozoa.

Ghrelin is a peptydil hormone that has recently been discovered through an unusual reverse pharmacology pathway. Ghrelin is produced mainly in the stomach, but its expression has also been demonstrated in many other organs such as pituitary, hypothalamus, bowel, kidney, heart, pancreas, testis. It is active on the central nervous system, where it is involved in the regulation of GH secretion, mainly through a GHRH-independent mechanism and directly at the pituitary level. Furthermore, ghrelin controls energy balance, enhancing fat mass deposition and food intake through the activation of the hypothalamic nuclei and the promotion of NPY (neuropeptide Y) and AGRP (Agouti related protein) expression; since it stimulates weight gain, ghrelin is considered a possible important factor in the etiology of obesity. Besides these main actions, ghrelin is active in the cardiovascular, reproductive and endocrine systems, and displays antineoplastic activity. Even though most studies have been conducted in humans and rats, there is increasing interest in the role of ghrelin in domestic species. We have integrated the first studies on ghrelin action with recent data on its involvement in modulating several central and peripheral activities.