Search

Summary: Purpose: We compared propofol with high-dose barbiturates in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and propose a protocol for the administration of propofol in RSE in adults, correlating propofol's effect with plasma levels. Methods: Sixteen patients with RSE were included; 8 were treated primarily with high-dose barbiturates and 8 were treated primarily with propofol. Results: Both groups of patients had multiple medical problems and a subsequent high mortality. A smaller but not statistically significant fraction of patients had their seizures controlled with propofol (63%) than with high-dose barbiturate therapy (82%). The time from initiation of high-dose barbiturate therapy to attainment of control of RSE was longer (123 min) than the time to attainment of seizure control in the group receiving propofol (2.6 min, p = 0.002). Plasma concentrations of propofol associated with control of SE were 14 μM ± 4 (2.5 μg/ml). Recurrent seizures were common when propofol infusions were suddenly discontinued but not when the infusions were gradually tapered. Conclusions: If used appropriately, propofol infusions can effectively and quickly terminate many but not all episodes of RSE. Propofol is a promising agent for use in treating RSE, but more studies are required to determine its true value in comparison with other agents.

beta-Adrenergic antagonism decreases the size of myocardial infarction and provides myocardial protection during hypothermic arrest for cardiac surgery. However, concern regarding the negative inotropic and chronotropic effects of beta-adrenergic antagonism persisting after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has impeded the use of esmolol for this purpose during cardiac surgery. This is a randomized, double-blind prospective study of the effects of esmolol infused during CPB and the effects of hypothermic CPB on esmolol. Patients scheduled for CPB were randomized to receive intravenous esmolol (300.micrograms.kg-1.min-1 during CPB after a bolus of 2 mg/kg prior to CPB) or placebo. Infusion was stopped at 10 min after release of aortic cross-clamp. Hemodynamics were measured, as well as serum esmolol, catecholamines, lactate, and potassium. Postoperative variables measured included electrocardiographic changes, creatine kinase (CK)-MB fractions, post-CPB dysrhythmias and drugs, hospitalization time and cost, and mortality. Esmolol was administered to 16 patients and placebo to 14. Esmolol levels reached a high of 10.5 +/- 0.9 micrograms/mL during CPB, but decreased to 0.1 +/- 0.02 microgram/mL within 30 min after stopping infusion. Cardiac indices (cardiac index, stroke volume index, left cardiac work index, left ventricular stroke work index, right cardiac work index, and right ventricular stroke work index) were higher in the esmolol group for the first hour post-CPB (P < 0.05). Systemic arterial lactate and coronary sinus lactate were lower in the esmolol group after CPB (P < 0.05), but myocardial lactate extraction was not significantly different between groups. After CPB, hemoglobin was lower in the esmolol group (P < 0.05) due to longer CPB and aortic cross-clamp time (P < 0.05), but oxygen consumption was less than in the control group (P < 0.05). Post-CPB serum potassium was higher in the esmolol group (P < 0.05). Results are confounded by more chronically beta-adrenergically blocked patients randomized to the esmolol group (P < 0.05). Esmolol infused during CPB in this series of patients was associated with high concentrations during CPB but did not result in any adverse clinical effects after CPB.

A new cyclic opioid peptide of sequence Tyr-D-Pen-Gly-Phe-Cys-Phe (HBP2) was examined in the mouse isolated vas deferens (MVD) bioassay. Studies with receptor-selective opioid antagonists showed the peptide to be highly selective for delta opioid receptors. HBP2 and the standard delta agonist DPDPE were simultaneously compared using the technique of partial irreversible receptor blockade; data were analyzed using the operational model of pharmacologic agonism. HBP2 was approximately 160 times as potent as DPDPE; estimation of the affinity and efficacy of the two peptides revealed that the potency increase was due to a 5.3-fold increase in efficacy, as well as a 37-fold increase affinity. This contrasts with our previous findings with other cyclic enkephalin analogs, in which increased affinity was achieved without a change in apparent efficacy. Analysis of concentration-response curve shape suggested in addition the possibility of heterogeneity in transduction mechanisms for MVD delta receptors.

Peptide E is a μ-selective opioid peptide derived from proenkephalin A which contains [Met 5 ]-enkephalin at the amino end and [Leu 5 ]-enkephalin at the carboxyl end. Peptide E is further processed both centrally and peripherally to a [Leu 5 ]-enkephalincontaining fragment which was investigated to determine if processing leads to alterations in receptor selectivity. Peptide E-(15–25) inhibited electrically stimulated contractions in both the mouse vas deferens, longitudinal muscle, myenteric (IC 50 = 459 nmol/ L), and guinea pig ileum (IC 50 = 2630 nmol/L), indicating a sixfold δ-receptor selectivity. When administered intracerebroventricularly to mice, peptide E-(15–25) also produced potent analgesia which was completely antagonized by naloxone pretreatment, but the peptide had no effect on intestinal transit as measured by the radiochromium geometric center method. This is consistent with earlier findings that intracerebroventricular δ-opioid-selective agents are analgesic but do not inhibit intestinal transit. In vitro radioligand binding assays were performed using male Sprague-Dawley rat whole brain homogenates. The IC 50 for peptide E against [ 3 H]naloxone was 1.8 nmol/L compared with the δ-opioid ligand, [ 3 H] [d-Pen 2 , d-Pen 5 ]-enkephalin of 38.8 nmol/L. The IC 50 for peptide E-(15–25) against [ 3 H]naloxone was 497 nmol/L, but for [ 3 H] [d-Pen 2 , d-Pen 5 ]-enkephalin it was 50.6 nmol/L. Therefore, peptide E loses μ-opioid receptor affinity (1.8–497 nmol/L) after proteolytic processing and the loss of the amino terminal tyrosine but maintains a high δ-opioid affinity (38.8–50.6 nmol/L). These studies demonstrate that enzymatic peptide processing of peptide E to peptide E-(15–25) leads to a shift from μ to δ-receptor selectivity and a different spectrum of biological effects on gut motility.

Verapamil clearance is reduced during halothane administration. This study evaluated relative contributions of reduced hepatic flow rate and hepatic metabolizing enzyme inhibition by halothane as a cause of reduced verapamil clearance. An isolated perfused rat liver model was utilized in which flow rate could be fixed during halothane administration. Perfusions were performed on five to six livers under each of the following conditions: (a) control--40 mL/min flow rate with no anesthetic exposure; (b) 1.5% halothane--40 mL/min; (c) 2.25% halothane--40 mL/min; (d) reduced flow--20 mL/min with no anesthetic exposure; and (e) reduced flow with 1.5% halothane--20 mL/min. Halothane caused dose-dependent decreases in both total hepatic and intrinsic clearance rates (P less than 0.05). With no anesthetic exposure, a flow reduction of 50% (20 mL/min) also gave a large reduction (P less than 0.05) in hepatic clearance of verapamil compared with the control condition (40 mL/min). The addition of 1.5% halothane to the reduced flow condition was not associated with further reduction in hepatic clearance rate. Results of this study suggest that although both reduced hepatic perfusion and hepatic enzymatic inhibition by halothane administration are associated with decreased verapamil clearance, a greater proportion of this decrease appears to be due to reductions in hepatic flow. The present results may apply to other drugs used in anesthesia that have high hepatic extraction ratios; thus, clearance of these drugs may be more dependent on hepatic blood flow than on hepatic enzyme activity.