Search

Let $\mathcal{H}$ be a graph class and $k\in\mathbb{N}$. We say a graph $G$ admits a \emph{$k$-identification to $\mathcal{H}$} if there is a partition $\mathcal{P}$ of some set $X\subseteq V(G)$ of size at most $k$ such that after identifying each part in $\mathcal{P}$ to a single vertex, the resulting graph belongs to $\mathcal{H}$. The graph parameter ${\sf id}_{\mathcal{H}}$ is defined so that ${\sf id}_{\mathcal{H}}(G)$ is the minimum $k$ such that $G$ admits a $k$-identification to $\mathcal{H}$, and the problem of \textsc{Identification to $\mathcal{H}$} asks, given a graph $G$ and $k\in\mathbb{N}$, whether ${\sf id}_{\mathcal{H}}(G)\le k$. If we set $\mathcal{H}$ to be the class $\mathcal{F}$ of acyclic graphs, we generate the problem \textsc{Identification to Forest}, which we show to be {\sf NP}-complete. We prove that, when parameterized by the size $k$ of the identification set, it admits a kernel of size $2k+1$. For our kernel we reveal a close relation of \textsc{Identification to Forest} with the \textsc{Vertex Cover} problem. We also study the combinatorics of the \textsf{yes}-instances of \textsc{Identification to $\mathcal{H}$}, i.e., the class $\mathcal{H}^{(k)}:=\{G\mid {\sf id}_{\mathcal{H}}(G)\le k\}$, {which we show to be minor-closed for every $k$} when $\mathcal{H}$ is minor-closed. We prove that the minor-obstructions of $\mathcal{F}^{(k)}$ are of size at most $2k+4$. We also prove that every graph $G$ such that ${\sf id}_{\mathcal{F}}(G)$ is sufficiently big contains as a minor either a cycle on $k$ vertices, or $k$ disjoint triangles, or the \emph{$k$-marguerite} graph, that is the graph obtained by $k$ disjoint triangles by identifying one vertex of each of them into the same vertex., Comment: 18 pages, 5 figures

Let ${\cal G}$ and ${\cal H}$ be minor-closed graph classes. The pair $({\cal H},{\cal G})$ is an Erd\H{o}s-P\'osa pair (EP-pair) if there is a function $f$ where, for every $k$ and every $G\in{\cal G},$ either $G$ has $k$ pairwise vertex-disjoint subgraphs not belonging to ${\cal H},$ or there is a set $S\subseteq V(G)$ where $|S|\leq f(k)$ and $G-S\in{\cal H}.$ The classic result of Erd\H{o}s and P\'osa says that if $\mathcal{F}$ is the class of forests, then $({\cal F},{\cal G})$ is an EP-pair for every ${\cal G}$. The class ${\cal G}$ is an EP-counterexample for ${\cal H}$ if ${\cal G}$ is minimal with the property that $({\cal H},{\cal G})$ is not an EP-pair. We prove that for every ${\cal H}$ the set $\mathfrak{C}_{\cal H}$ of all EP-counterexamples for ${\cal H}$ is finite. In particular, we provide a complete characterization of $\mathfrak{C}_{\cal H}$ for every ${\cal H}$ and give a constructive upper bound on its size. Each class ${\cal G}\in \mathfrak{C}_{\cal H}$ can be described as all minors of a sequence of grid-like graphs $\langle \mathscr{W}_{k} \rangle_{k\in \mathbb{N}}.$ Moreover, each $\mathscr{W}_{k}$ admits a half-integral packing: $k$ copies of some $H\not\in{\cal H}$ where no vertex is used more than twice. This gives a complete delineation of the half-integrality threshold of the Erd\H{o}s-P\'osa property for minors and yields a constructive proof of Thomas' conjecture on the half-integral Erd\H{o}s-P\'osa property for minors (recently confirmed, non-constructively, by Liu). Let $h$ be the maximum size of a graph in ${\cal H}.$ For every class ${\cal H},$ we construct an algorithm that, given a graph $G$ and a $k,$ either outputs a half-integral packing of $k$ copies of some $H \not\in {\cal H}$ or outputs a set of at most ${2^{k^{\cal O}_h(1)}}$ vertices whose deletion creates a graph in ${\cal H}$ in time $2^{2^{k^{{\cal O}_h(1)}}}\cdot |G|^4\log |G|.$, Comment: Accepted to FOCS 2024

Given a graph $G$ and a vertex set $X$, the annotated treewidth tw$(G,X)$ of $X$ in $G$ is the maximum treewidth of an $X$-rooted minor of $G$, i.e., a minor $H$ where the model of each vertex of $H$ contains some vertex of $X$. That way, tw$(G,X)$ can be seen as a measure of the contribution of $X$ to the tree-decomposability of $G$. We introduce the logic CMSO/tw as the fragment of monadic second-order logic on graphs obtained by restricting set quantification to sets of bounded annotated treewidth. We prove the following Algorithmic Meta-Theorem (AMT): for every non-trivial minor-closed graph class, model checking for CMSO/tw formulas can be done in quadratic time. Our proof works for the more general CMSO/tw+dp logic, that is CMSO/tw enhanced by disjoint-path predicates. Our AMT can be seen as an extension of Courcelle's theorem to minor-closed graph classes where the bounded-treewidth condition in the input graph is replaced by the bounded-treewidth quantification in the formulas. Our results yield, as special cases, all known AMTs whose combinatorial restriction is non-trivial minor-closedness.

In 1986 Robertson and Seymour proved a generalization of the seminal result of Erd\H{o}s and P\'osa on the duality of packing and covering cycles: A graph has the Erd\H{o}s-P\'osa property for minors if and only if it is planar. In particular, for every non-planar graph $H$ they gave examples showing that the Erd\H{o}s-P\'osa property does not hold for $H.$ Recently, Liu confirmed a conjecture of Thomas and showed that every graph has the half-integral Erd\H{o}s-P\'osa property for minors. Liu's proof is non-constructive and to this date, with the exception of a small number of examples, no constructive proof is known. In this paper, we initiate the delineation of the half-integrality of the Erd\H{o}s-P\'osa property for minors. We conjecture that for every graph $H,$ there exists a unique (up to a suitable equivalence relation) graph parameter ${\textsf{EP}}_H$ such that $H$ has the Erd\H{o}s-P\'osa property in a minor-closed graph class $\mathcal{G}$ if and only if $\sup\{\textsf{EP}_H(G) \mid G\in\mathcal{G}\}$ is finite. We prove this conjecture for the class $\mathcal{H}$ of Kuratowski-connected shallow-vortex minors by showing that, for every non-planar $H\in\mathcal{H},$ the parameter ${\sf EP}_H(G)$ is precisely the maximum order of a Robertson-Seymour counterexample to the Erd\H{o}s-P\'osa property of $H$ which can be found as a minor in $G.$ Our results are constructive and imply, for the first time, parameterized algorithms that find either a packing, or a cover, or one of the Robertson-Seymour counterexamples, certifying the existence of a half-integral packing for the graphs in $\mathcal{H}.$

We revisit a graph width parameter that we dub bipartite treewidth, along with its associated graph decomposition that we call bipartite tree decomposition. Bipartite treewidth can be seen as a common generalization of treewidth and the odd cycle transversal number. Intuitively, a bipartite tree decomposition is a tree decomposition whose bags induce almost bipartite graphs and whose adhesions contain at most one vertex from the bipartite part of any other bag, while the width of such decomposition measures how far the bags are from being bipartite. Adapted from a tree decomposition originally defined by Demaine, Hajiaghayi, and Kawarabayashi [SODA 2010] and explicitly defined by Tazari [Th. Comp. Sci. 2012], bipartite treewidth appears to play a crucial role for solving problems related to odd-minors, which have recently attracted considerable attention. As a first step toward a theory for solving these problems efficiently, the main goal of this paper is to develop dynamic programming techniques to solve problems on graphs of small bipartite treewidth. For such graphs, we provide a number of para-NP-completeness results, FPT-algorithms, and XP-algorithms, as well as several open problems. In particular, we show that $K_t$-Subgraph-Cover, Weighted Vertex Cover/Independent Set, Odd Cycle Transversal, and Maximum Weighted Cut are $FPT$ parameterized by bipartite treewidth. We provide the following complexity dichotomy when $H$ is a 2-connected graph, for each of $H$-Subgraph-Packing, $H$-Induced-Packing, $H$-Scattered-Packing, and $H$-Odd-Minor-Packing problem: if $H$ is bipartite, then the problem is para-NP-complete parameterized by bipartite treewidth while, if $H$ is non-bipartite, then it is solvable in XP-time. We define 1-${\cal H}$-treewidth by replacing the bipartite graph class by any class ${\cal H}$. Most of the technology developed here works for this more general parameter., Comment: Presented in IPEC 2023

The Graph Minors Structure Theorem (GMST) of Robertson and Seymour states that for every graph $H,$ any $H$-minor-free graph $G$ has a tree-decomposition of bounded adhesion such that the torso of every bag embeds in a surface $\Sigma$ where $H$ does not embed after removing a small number of apex vertices and confining some vertices into a bounded number of bounded depth vortices. However, the functions involved in the original form of this statement were not explicit. In an enormous effort Kawarabayashi, Thomas, and Wollan proved a similar statement with explicit (and single-exponential in $|V(H)|$) bounds. However, their proof replaces the statement ``a surface where $H$ does not embed'' with `` a surface of Euler-genus in $\mathcal{O}(|H|^2)$''. In this paper we close this gap and prove that the bounds of Kawarabayashi, Thomas, and Wollan can be achieved with a tight bound on the Euler-genus. Moreover, we provide a more refined version of the GMST focussed exclusively on excluding, instead of a single graph, grid-like graphs that are minor-universal for a given set of surfaces. This allows us to give a description, in the style of Robertson and Seymour, of graphs excluding a graph of fixed Euler-genus as a minor, rather than focussing on the size of the graph., Comment: We split the article into two volumes. The first volume, concerned with extracting surfaces from the GMST, has become the new version of this article, while the second volume will be a different upload. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2304.04517

In a recent work, we introduced a parametric framework for obtaining obstruction characterizations of graph parameters with respect to a quasi-ordering $\leqslant$ on graphs. Towards this, we proposed the concepts of class obstruction, parametric obstruction, and universal obstruction as combinatorial objects that determine the approximate behaviour of a graph parameter. In this work, we explore its potential as a unifying framework for classifying graph parameters. Under this framework, we survey existing graph-theoretic results on many known graph parameters. Additionally, we provide some unifying results on their classification.

The branchwidth of a graph has been introduced by Roberson and Seymour as a measure of the tree-decomposability of a graph, alternative to treewidth. Branchwidth is polynomially computable on planar graphs by the celebrated ``Ratcatcher''-algorithm of Seymour and Thomas. We investigate an extension of this algorithm to minor-closed graph classes, further than planar graphs, as follows: Let $H_{1}$ be a graph embeddable in the torus and $H_{2}$ be a graph embeddable in the projective plane. We prove that every $\{H_{1},H_{2}\}$-minor free graph $G$ contains a subgraph $G'$ where the difference between the branchwidth of $G$ and the branchwidth of $G'$ is bounded by some constant, depending only on $H_{1}$ and $H_{2}$. Moreover, the graph $G'$ admits a tree decomposition where all torsos are planar. This decomposition can be used for deriving a constant-additive approximation for branchwidth: For $\{H_{1},H_{2}\}$-minor free graphs, there is a constant $c$ (depending on $H_{1}$ and $H_{2}$) and an $\Ocal(|V(G)|^{3})$-time algorithm that, given a graph $G$, outputs a value $b$ such that the branchwidth of $G$ is between $b$ and $b+c$., Comment: Accepted to WG 2024

We establish a parametric framework for obtaining obstruction characterizations of graph parameters with respect to a quasi-ordering $\leqslant$ on graphs. At the center of this framework lies the concept of a $\leqslant$-parametric graph: a non $\leqslant$-decreasing sequence $\mathscr{G} = \langle \mathscr{G}_{t} \rangle_{t \in \mathbb{N}}$ of graphs indexed by non-negative integers. Parametric graphs allow us to define combinatorial objects that capture the approximate behaviour of graph parameters. A finite set $\mathfrak{G}$ of $\leqslant$-parametric graphs is a $\leqslant$-universal obstruction for a parameter $\mathsf{p}$ if there exists a function $f \colon \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}$ such that, for every $k \in \mathbb{N}$ and every graph $G$, 1) if $\mathsf{p}(G) \leq k$, then for every $\mathscr{G} \in \mathfrak{G},$ $\mathscr{G}_{f(k)} \not\leqslant G$, and 2) if for every $\mathscr{G} \in \mathfrak{G},$ $\mathscr{G}_{k} \not\leqslant G$, then $\mathsf{p}(G) \leq f(k).$ To solidify our point of view, we identify sufficient order-theoretic conditions that guarantee the existence of universal obstructions and in this case we examine algorithmic implications on the existence of fixed-parameter tractable algorithms. Our parametric framework has further implications related to finite obstruction characterizations of properties of graph classes. A $\leqslant$-class property is defined as any set of $\leqslant$-closed graph classes that is closed under set inclusion. By combining our parametric framework with established results from order theory, we derive a precise order-theoretic characterization that ensures $\leqslant$-class properties can be described in terms of the exclusion of a finite set of $\leqslant$-parametric graphs.

Disjoint-paths logic, denoted $\mathsf{FO}$+$\mathsf{DP}$, extends first-order logic ($\mathsf{FO}$) with atomic predicates $\mathsf{dp}_k[(x_1,y_1),\ldots,(x_k,y_k)]$, expressing the existence of internally vertex-disjoint paths between $x_i$ and $y_i$, for $1\leq i\leq k$. We prove that for every graph class excluding some fixed graph as a topological minor, the model checking problem for $\mathsf{FO}$+$\mathsf{DP}$ is fixed-parameter tractable. This essentially settles the question of tractable model checking for this logic on subgraph-closed classes, since the problem is hard on subgraph-closed classes not excluding a topological minor (assuming a further mild condition of efficiency of encoding).

\noindent By a seminal result of Valiant, computing the permanent of $(0,1)$-matrices is, in general, $\#\mathsf{P}$-hard. In 1913 P\'olya asked for which $(0,1)$-matrices $A$ it is possible to change some signs such that the permanent of $A$ equals the determinant of the resulting matrix. In 1975, Little showed these matrices to be exactly the biadjacency matrices of bipartite graphs excluding $K_{3,3}$ as a \{matching minor}. This was turned into a polynomial time algorithm by McCuaig, Robertson, Seymour, and Thomas in 1999. However, the relation between the exclusion of some matching minor in a bipartite graph and the tractability of the permanent extends beyond $K_{3,3}.$ Recently it was shown that the exclusion of any planar bipartite graph as a matching minor yields a class of bipartite graphs on which the {permanent} of the corresponding $(0,1)$-matrices can be computed efficiently. In this paper we unify the two results above into a single, more general result in the style of the celebrated structure theorem for single-crossing-minor-free graphs. We identify a class of bipartite graphs strictly generalising planar bipartite graphs and $K_{3,3}$ which includes infinitely many non-Pfaffian graphs. The exclusion of any member of this class as a matching minor yields a structure that allows for the efficient evaluation of the permanent. Moreover, we show that the evaluation of the permanent remains $\#\mathsf{P}$-hard on bipartite graphs which exclude $K_{5,5}$ as a matching minor. This establishes a first computational lower bound for the problem of counting perfect matchings on matching minor closed classes., Comment: Accepted in SODA 2023

The disjoint paths logic, FOL+DP, is an extension of First-Order Logic (FOL) with the extra atomic predicate $\mathsf{dp}_k(x_1,y_1,\ldots,x_k,y_k),$ expressing the existence of internally vertex-disjoint paths between $x_i$ and $y_i,$ for $i\in\{1,\ldots, k\}$. This logic can express a wide variety of problems that escape the expressibility potential of FOL. We prove that for every proper minor-closed graph class, model-checking for FOL+DP can be done in quadratic time. We also introduce an extension of FOL+DP, namely the scattered disjoint paths logic, FOL+SDP, where we further consider the atomic predicate $s{\sf -sdp}_k(x_1,y_1,\ldots,x_k,y_k),$ demanding that the disjoint paths are within distance bigger than some fixed value $s$. Using the same technique we prove that model-checking for FOL+SDP can be done in quadratic time on classes of graphs with bounded Euler genus., Comment: An extended abstract of this paper appeared in the Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2023)

Let ${\cal G}$ be a minor-closed graph class and let $G$ be an $n$-vertex graph. We say that $G$ is a $k$-apex of ${\cal G}$ if $G$ contains a set $S$ of at most $k$ vertices such that $G\setminus S$ belongs to ${\cal G}$. Our first result is an algorithm that decides whether $G$ is a $k$-apex of ${\cal G}$ in time $2^{{\sf poly}(k)}\cdot n^2$, where ${\sf poly}$ is a polynomial function depending on ${\cal G}$. This algorithm improves the previous one, given by Sau, Stamoulis, and Thilikos [ICALP 2020], whose running time was $2^{{\sf poly}(k)}\cdot n^3$. The elimination distance of $G$ to ${\cal G}$, denoted by ${\sf ed}_{\cal G}(G)$, is the minimum number of rounds required to reduce each connected component of $G$ to a graph in ${\cal G}$ by removing one vertex from each connected component in each round. Bulian and Dawar [Algorithmica 2017] provided an FPT-algorithm, with parameter $k$, to decide whether ${\sf ed}_{\cal G}(G)\leq k$. However, its dependence on $k$ is not explicit. We extend the techniques used in the first algorithm to decide whether ${\sf ed}_{\cal G}(G)\leq k$ in time $2^{2^{2^{{\sf poly}(k)}}}\cdot n^2$. This is the first algorithm for this problem with an explicit parametric dependence in $k$. In the special case where ${\cal G}$ excludes some apex-graph as a minor, we give two alternative algorithms, running in time $2^{2^{{\cal O}(k^2\log k)}}\cdot n^2$ and $2^{{\sf poly}(k)}\cdot n^3$ respectively, where $c$ and ${\sf poly}$ depend on ${\cal G}$. As a stepping stone for these algorithms, we provide an algorithm that decides whether ${\sf ed}_{\cal G}(G)\leq k$ in time $2^{{\cal O}({\sf tw}\cdot k+{\sf tw}\log{\sf tw})}\cdot n$, where ${\sf tw}$ is the treewidth of $G$. Finally, we provide explicit upper bounds on the size of the graphs in the minor-obstruction set of the class of graphs ${\cal E}_k({\cal G})=\{G\mid{\sf ed}_{\cal G}(G)\leq k\}$., Comment: 75 pages. TheoretiCS journal article. Abstract abbreviated to fit arXiv limitation

Given a graph $G$, we define ${\bf bcg}(G)$ as the minimum $k$ for which $G$ can be contracted to the uniformly triangulated grid $\Gamma_{k}$. A graph class ${\cal G}$ has the SQG${\bf C}$ property if every graph $G\in{\cal G}$ has treewidth $\mathcal{O}({\bf bcg}(G)^{c})$ for some $1\leq c<2$. The SQG${\bf C}$ property is important for algorithm design as it defines the applicability horizon of a series of meta-algorithmic results, in the framework of bidimensionality theory, related to fast parameterized algorithms, kernelization, and approximation schemes. These results apply to a wide family of problems, namely problems that are contraction-bidimensional. Our main combinatorial result reveals a wide family of graph classes that satisfy the SQG${\bf C}$ property. This family includes, in particular, bounded-degree string graphs. This considerably extends the applicability of bidimensionality theory for contraction bidimensional problems.

We introduce a new kernelization tool, called rainbow matching technique}, that is appropriate for the design of polynomial kernels for packing problems and their hitting counterparts. Our technique capitalizes on the powerful combinatorial results of [Graf, Harris, Haxell, SODA 2021]. We apply the rainbow matching technique on four (di)graph packing or hitting problems, namely the Triangle-Packing in Tournament problem (TPT), where we ask for a packing of $k$ directed triangles in a tournament, Directed Feedback Vertex Set in Tournament problem (FVST), where we ask for a (hitting) set of at most $k$ vertices which intersects all triangles of a tournament, the Induced 2-Path-Packing (IPP) where we ask for a packing of $k$ induced paths of length two in a graph and Induced 2-Path Hitting Set problem (IPHS), where we ask for a (hitting) set of at most $k$ vertices which intersects all induced paths of length two in a graph. The existence of a sub-quadratic kernels for these problems was proven for the first time in [Fomin, Le, Lokshtanov, Saurabh, Thomass\'e, Zehavi. ACM Trans. Algorithms, 2019], where they gave a kernel of $O(k^{3/2})$ vertices for the two first problems and $O(k^{5/3})$ vertices for the two last. In the same paper it was questioned whether these bounds can be (optimally) improved to linear ones. Motivated by this question, we apply the rainbow matching technique and prove that TPT and FVST admit (almost linear) kernels of $k^{1+\frac{O(1)}{\sqrt{\log{k}}}}$ vertices and that IPP and IPHS admit kernels of $O(k)$ vertices., Comment: Accepted to SODA 2023

The Graph Minors Structure Theorem of Robertson and Seymour asserts that, for every graph $H,$ every $H$-minor-free graph can be obtained by clique-sums of ``almost embeddable'' graphs. Here a graph is ``almost embeddable'' if it can be obtained from a graph of bounded Euler-genus by pasting graphs of bounded pathwidth in an ``orderly fashion'' into a bounded number of faces, called the \textit{vortices}, and then adding a bounded number of additional vertices, called \textit{apices}, with arbitrary neighborhoods. Our main result is a {full classification} of all graphs $H$ for which the use of vortices in the theorem above can be avoided. To this end we identify a (parametric) graph $\mathscr{S}_{t}$ and prove that all $\mathscr{S}_{t}$-minor-free graphs can be obtained by clique-sums of graphs embeddable in a surface of bounded Euler-genus after deleting a bounded number of vertices. We show that this result is tight in the sense that the appearance of vortices cannot be avoided for $H$-minor-free graphs, whenever $H$ is not a minor of $\mathscr{S}_{t}$ for some $t\in\mathbb{N}.$ Using our new structure theorem, we design an algorithm that, given an $\mathscr{S}_{t}$-minor-free graph $G,$ computes the generating function of all perfect matchings of $G$ in polynomial time. Our results, combined with known complexity results, imply a complete characterization of minor-closed graph classes where the number of perfect matchings is polynomially computable: They are exactly those graph classes that do not contain every $\mathscr{S}_{t}$ as a minor. This provides a \textit{sharp} complexity dichotomy for the problem of counting perfect matchings in minor-closed classes., Comment: An earlier version of this paper has appeared at FOCS 2022 We also changed the term "vga-hierarchy" with the more appropriate term "vga-lattice". arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2010.12397 by other authors

A linkage in a graph $G$ of size $k$ is a subgraph $L$ of $G$ whose connected components are $k$ paths. The pattern of a linkage of size $k$ is the set of $k$ pairs formed by the endpoints of these paths. A consequence of the Unique Linkage Theorem is the following: there exists a function $f:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}$ such that if a plane graph $G$ contains a sequence $\mathcal{C}$ of at least $f(k)$ nested cycles and a linkage of size at most $k$ whose pattern vertices lay outside the outer cycle of $\mathcal{C},$ then $G$ contains a linkage with the same pattern avoiding the inner cycle of $\mathcal{C}$. In this paper we prove the following variant of this result: Assume that all the cycles in $\mathcal{C}$ are "orthogonally" traversed by a linkage $P$ and $L$ is a linkage whose pattern vertices may lay either outside the outer cycle or inside the inner cycle of $\mathcal{C}:=[C_{1},\ldots,C_{p},\ldots,C_{2p-1}]$. We prove that there are two functions $g,f:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}$, such that if $L$ has size at most $k$, $P$ has size at least $f(k),$ and $|\mathcal{C}|\geq g(k)$, then there is a linkage with the same pattern as $L$ that is "internally combed" by $P$, in the sense that $L\cap C_{p}\subseteq P\cap C_{p}$. In fact, we prove this result in the most general version where the linkage $L$ is $s$-scattered: no two vertices of distinct paths of $L$ are within distance at most $s$. We deduce several variants of this result in the cases where $s=0$ and $s>0$. These variants permit the application of the unique linkage theorem on several path routing problems on embedded graphs., Comment: This is an extension of the combinatorial results appeared in [Petr A. Golovach, Giannos Stamoulis, Dimitrios M. Thilikos: Hitting Topological Minor Models in Planar Graphs is Fixed Parameter Tractable. SODA 2020: 931-950]. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1907.02919

We consider the mixed search game against an agile and visible fugitive. This is the variant of the classic fugitive search game on graphs where searchers may be placed to (or removed from) the vertices or slide along edges. Moreover, the fugitive resides on the edges of the graph and can move at any time along unguarded paths. The mixed search number against an agile and visible fugitive of a graph $G$, denoted $avms(G)$, is the minimum number of searchers required to capture to fugitive in this graph searching variant. Our main result is that this graph searching variant is monotone in the sense that the number of searchers required for a successful search strategy does not increase if we restrict the search strategies to those that do not permit the fugitive to visit an already clean edge. This means that mixed search strategies against an agile and visible fugitive can be polynomially certified, and therefore that the problem of deciding, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k,$ whether $avms(G)\leq k$ is in NP. Our proof is based on the introduction of the notion of tight bramble, that serves as an obstruction for the corresponding search parameter. Our results imply that for a graph $G$, $avms(G)$ is equal to the Cartesian tree product number of $G$ that is the minimum $k$ for which $G$ is a minor of the Cartesian product of a tree and a clique on $k$ vertices., Comment: 14 pages, 5 figures

A strict bramble of a graph $G$ is a collection of pairwise-intersecting connected subgraphs of $G.$ The order of a strict bramble ${\cal B}$ is the minimum size of a set of vertices intersecting all sets of ${\cal B}.$ The strict bramble number of $G,$ denoted by ${\sf sbn}(G),$ is the maximum order of a strict bramble in $G.$ The strict bramble number of $G$ can be seen as a way to extend the notion of acyclicity, departing from the fact that (non-empty) acyclic graphs are exactly the graphs where every strict bramble has order one. We initiate the study of this graph parameter by providing three alternative definitions, each revealing different structural characteristics. The first is a min-max theorem asserting that ${\sf sbn}(G)$ is equal to the minimum $k$ for which $G$ is a minor of the lexicographic product of a tree and a clique on $k$ vertices (also known as the lexicographic tree product number). The second characterization is in terms of a new variant of a tree decomposition called lenient tree decomposition. We prove that ${\sf sbn}(G)$ is equal to the minimum $k$ for which there exists a lenient tree decomposition of $G$ of width at most $k.$ The third characterization is in terms of extremal graphs. For this, we define, for each $k,$ the concept of a $k$-domino-tree and we prove that every edge-maximal graph of strict bramble number at most $k$ is a $k$-domino-tree. We also identify three graphs that constitute the minor-obstruction set of the class of graphs with strict bramble number at most two. We complete our results by proving that, given some $G$ and $k,$ deciding whether ${\sf sbn}(G) \leq k$ is an ${\sf NP}$-complete problem.

We introduce the graph theoretical parameter of edge treewidth. This parameter occurs in a natural way as the tree-like analogue of cutwidth or, alternatively, as an edge-analogue of treewidth. We study the combinatorial properties of edge-treewidth. We first observe that edge-treewidth does not enjoy any closeness properties under the known partial ordering relations on graphs. We introduce a variant of the topological minor relation, namely, the weak topological minor relation and we prove that edge-treewidth is closed under weak topological minors. Based on this new relation we are able to provide universal obstructions for edge-treewidth. The proofs are based on the fact that edge-treewidth of a graph is parametetrically equivalent with the maximum over the treewidth and the maximum degree of the blocks of the graph. We also prove that deciding whether the edge-treewidth of a graph is at most k is an NP-complete problem., Comment: 22 pages, 10 figures

We introduce a novel model-theoretic framework inspired from graph modification and based on the interplay between model theory and algorithmic graph minors. The core of our framework is a new compound logic operating with two types of sentences, expressing graph modification: the modulator sentence, defining some property of the modified part of the graph, and the target sentence, defining some property of the resulting graph. In our framework, modulator sentences are in counting monadic second-order logic (CMSOL) and have models of bounded treewidth, while target sentences express first-order logic (FOL) properties along with minor-exclusion. Our logic captures problems that are not definable in first-order logic and, moreover, may have instances of unbounded treewidth. Also, it permits the modeling of wide families of problems involving vertex/edge removals, alternative modulator measures (such as elimination distance or $\mathcal{G}$-treewidth), multistage modifications, and various cut problems. Our main result is that, for this compound logic, model-checking can be done in quadratic time. All derived algorithms are constructive and this, as a byproduct, extends the constructibility horizon of the algorithmic applications of the Graph Minors theorem of Robertson and Seymour. The proposed logic can be seen as a general framework to capitalize on the potential of the irrelevant vertex technique. It gives a way to deal with problem instances of unbounded treewidth, for which Courcelle's theorem does not apply. The proof of our meta-theorem combines novel combinatorial results related to the Flat Wall theorem along with elements of the proof of Courcelle's theorem and Gaifman's theorem. We finally prove extensions where the target property is expressible in FOL+DP, i.e., the enhancement of FOL with disjoint-paths predicates.

In general, a graph modification problem is defined by a graph modification operation $\boxtimes$ and a target graph property ${\cal P}$. Typically, the modification operation $\boxtimes$ may be vertex removal}, edge removal}, edge contraction}, or edge addition and the question is, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, whether it is possible to transform $G$ to a graph in ${\cal P}$ after applying $k$ times the operation $\boxtimes$ on $G$. This problem has been extensively studied for particilar instantiations of $\boxtimes$ and ${\cal P}$. In this paper we consider the general property ${\cal P}_{{\phi}}$ of being planar and, moreover, being a model of some First-Order Logic sentence ${\phi}$ (an FOL-sentence). We call the corresponding meta-problem Graph $\boxtimes$-Modification to Planarity and ${\phi}$ and prove the following algorithmic meta-theorem: there exists a function $f:\Bbb{N}^{2}\to\Bbb{N}$ such that, for every $\boxtimes$ and every FOL sentence ${\phi}$, the Graph $\boxtimes$-Modification to Planarity and ${\phi}$ is solvable in $f(k,|{\phi}|)\cdot n^2$ time. The proof constitutes a hybrid of two different classic techniques in graph algorithms. The first is the irrelevant vertex technique that is typically used in the context of Graph Minors and deals with properties such as planarity or surface-embeddability (that are not FOL-expressible) and the second is the use of Gaifman's Locality Theorem that is the theoretical base for the meta-algorithmic study of FOL-expressible problems.

The Weighted $\mathcal{F}$-Vertex Deletion for a class ${\cal F}$ of graphs asks, weighted graph $G$, for a minimum weight vertex set $S$ such that $G-S\in{\cal F}.$ The case when ${\cal F}$ is minor-closed and excludes some graph as a minor has received particular attention but a constant-factor approximation remained elusive for Weighted $\mathcal{F}$-Vertex Deletion. Only three cases of minor-closed ${\cal F}$ are known to admit constant-factor approximations, namely Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set and Diamond Hitting Set. We study the problem for the class ${\cal F}$ of $\theta_c$-minor-free graphs, under the equivalent setting of the Weighted $c$-Bond Cover problem, and present a constant-factor approximation algorithm using the primal-dual method. For this, we leverage a structure theorem implicit in [Joret, Paul, Sau, Saurabh, and Thomass\'{e}, SIDMA'14] which states the following: any graph $G$ containing a $\theta_c$-minor-model either contains a large two-terminal protrusion, or contains a constant-size $\theta_c$-minor-model, or a collection of pairwise disjoint constant-sized connected sets that can be contracted simultaneously to yield a dense graph. In the first case, we tame the graph by replacing the protrusion with a special-purpose weighted gadget. For the second and third case, we provide a weighting scheme which guarantees a local approximation ratio. Besides making an important step in the quest of (dis)proving a constant-factor approximation for Weighted $\mathcal{F}$-Vertex Deletion, our result may be useful as a template for algorithms for other minor-closed families., Comment: Accepted for publication to the Journal of Computer and System Sciences

The elimination distance to some target graph property P is a general graph modification parameter introduced by Bulian and Dawar. We initiate the study of elimination distances to graph properties expressible in first-order logic. We delimit the problem's fixed-parameter tractability by identifying sufficient and necessary conditions on the structure of prefixes of first-order logic formulas. Our main result is the following meta-theorem: for every graph property P expressible by a first order-logic formula \phi\in \Sigma_3, that is, of the form \phi=\exists x_1\exists x_2\cdots \exists x_r \forall y_1\forall y_2\cdots \forall y_s \exists z_1\exists z_2\cdots \exists z_t \psi, where \psi is a quantifier-free first-order formula, checking whether the elimination distance of a graph to P does not exceed k, is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by k. Properties of graphs expressible by formulas from \Sigma_3 include being of bounded degree, excluding a forbidden subgraph, or containing a bounded dominating set. We complement this theorem by showing that such a general statement does not hold for formulas with even slightly more expressive prefix structure: there are formulas \phi\in \Pi_3, for which computing elimination distance is W[2]-hard.

For a finite collection of graphs ${\cal F}$, the ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION problem consists in, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, decide whether there exists $S \subseteq V(G)$ with $|S| \leq k$ such that $G \setminus S$ does not contain any of the graphs in ${\cal F}$ as a minor. We are interested in the parameterized complexity of ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION when the parameter is the treewidth of $G$, denoted by $tw$. Our objective is to determine, for a fixed ${\cal F}$, the smallest function $f_{{\cal F}}$ such that ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION can be solved in time $f_{{\cal F}}(tw) \cdot n^{O(1)}$ on $n$-vertex graphs. We provide lower bounds under the ETH on $f_{{\cal F}}$ for several collections ${\cal F}$. We first prove that for any ${\cal F}$ containing connected graphs of size at least two, $f_{{\cal F}}(tw)= 2^{\Omega(tw)}$, even if the input graph $G$ is planar. Our main contribution consists of superexponential lower bounds for a number of collections ${\cal F}$, inspired by a reduction of Bonnet et al.~[IPEC, 2017]. In particular, we prove that when ${\cal F}$ contains a single connected graph $H$ that is either $P_5$ or is not a minor of the banner (that is, the graph consisting of a $C_4$ plus a pendent edge), then $f_{{\cal F}}(tw)= 2^{\Omega(tw \cdot \log tw)}$. This is the third of a series of articles on this topic, and the results given here together with other ones allow us, in particular, to provide a tight dichotomy on the complexity of $\{H\}$-M-DELETION, in terms of $H$, when $H$ is connected., Comment: 41 pages, 20 figures. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1907.04442, arXiv:1704.07284

For a finite collection of graphs ${\cal F}$, the ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION (resp. ${\cal F}$-TM-DELETION) problem consists in, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, decide whether there exists $S \subseteq V(G)$ with $|S| \leq k$ such that $G \setminus S$ does not contain any of the graphs in ${\cal F}$ as a minor (resp. topological minor). We are interested in the parameterized complexity of both problems when the parameter is the treewidth of $G$, denoted by $tw$, and specifically in the cases where ${\cal F}$ contains a single connected planar graph $H$. We present algorithms running in time $2^{O(tw)} \cdot n^{O(1)}$, called single-exponential, when $H$ is either $P_3$, $P_4$, $C_4$, the paw, the chair, and the banner for both $\{H\}$-M-DELETION and $\{H\}$-TM-DELETION, and when $H=K_{1,i}$, with $i \geq 1$, for $\{H\}$-TM-DELETION. Some of these algorithms use the rank-based approach introduced by Bodlaender et al. [Inform Comput, 2015]. This is the second of a series of articles on this topic, and the results given here together with other ones allow us, in particular, to provide a tight dichotomy on the complexity of $\{H\}$-M-DELETION in terms of $H$., Comment: 36 pages, 2 figures

We introduce the block elimination distance as a measure of how close a graph is to some particular graph class. Formally, given a graph class ${\cal G}$, the class ${\cal B}({\cal G})$ contains all graphs whose blocks belong to ${\cal G}$ and the class ${\cal A}({\cal G})$ contains all graphs where the removal of a vertex creates a graph in ${\cal G}$. Given a hereditary graph class ${\cal G}$, we recursively define ${\cal G}^{(k)}$ so that ${\cal G}^{(0)}={\cal B}({\cal G})$ and, if $k\geq 1$, ${\cal G}^{(k)}={\cal B}({\cal A}({\cal G}^{(k-1)}))$. The block elimination distance of a graph $G$ to a graph class ${\cal G}$ is the minimum $k$ such that $G\in{\cal G}^{(k)}$ and can be seen as an analog of the elimination distance parameter, with the difference that connectivity is now replaced by biconnectivity. We show that, for every non-trivial hereditary class ${\cal G}$, the problem of deciding whether $G\in{\cal G}^{(k)}$ is NP-complete. We focus on the case where ${\cal G}$ is minor-closed and we study the minor obstruction set of ${\cal G}^{(k)}$. We prove that the size of the obstructions of ${\cal G}^{(k)}$ is upper bounded by some explicit function of $k$ and the maximum size of a minor obstruction of ${\cal G}$. This implies that the problem of deciding whether $G\in{\cal G}^{(k)}$ is constructively fixed parameter tractable, when parameterized by $k$. Our results are based on a structural characterization of the obstructions of ${\cal B}({\cal G})$, relatively to the obstructions of ${\cal G}$. We give two graph operations that generate members of ${\cal G}^{(k)}$ from members of ${\cal G}^{(k-1)}$ and we prove that this set of operations is complete for the class ${\cal O}$ of outerplanar graphs. This yields the identification of all members ${\cal O}\cap{\cal G}^{(k)}$, for every $k\in\mathbb{N}$ and every non-trivial minor-closed graph class ${\cal G}$.

Let $\mathcal{G}$ be a minor-closed graph class. We say that a graph $G$ is a $k$-apex of $\mathcal{G}$ if $G$ contains a set $S$ of at most $k$ vertices such that $G\setminus S$ belongs to $\mathcal{G}.$ We denote by $\mathcal{A}_k (\mathcal{G})$ the set of all graphs that are $k$-apices of $\mathcal{G}.$ We prove that every graph in the obstruction set of $\mathcal{A}_k (\mathcal{G}),$ i.e., the minor-minimal set of graphs not belonging to $\mathcal{A}_k (\mathcal{G}),$ has size at most $2^{2^{2^{2^{\mathsf{poly}(k)}}}},$ where $\mathsf{poly}$ is a polynomial function whose degree depends on the size of the minor-obstructions of $\mathcal{G}.$ This bound drops to $2^{2^{\mathsf{poly}(k)}}$ when $\mathcal{G}$ excludes some apex graph as a minor., Comment: 48 pages and 12 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2004.12692

We introduce the rendezvous game with adversaries. In this game, two players, {\sl Facilitator} and {\sl Disruptor}, play against each other on a graph. Facilitator has two agents, and Disruptor has a team of $k$ agents located in some vertices of the graph. They take turns in moving their agents to adjacent vertices (or staying). Facilitator wins if his agents meet in some vertex of the graph. The goal of Disruptor is to prevent the rendezvous of Facilitator's agents. Our interest is to decide whether Facilitator can win. It appears that, in general, the problem is PSPACE-hard and, when parameterized by $k$, co-W[2]-hard. Moreover, even the game's variant where we ask whether Facilitator can ensure the meeting of his agents within $\tau$ steps is co-NP-complete already for $\tau=2$. On the other hand, for chordal and $P_5$-free graphs, we prove that the problem is solvable in polynomial time. These algorithms exploit an interesting relation of the game and minimum vertex cuts in certain graph classes. Finally, we show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by both the graph's neighborhood diversity and $\tau$.

We introduce a supporting combinatorial framework for the Flat Wall Theorem. In particular, we suggest two variants of the theorem and we introduce a new, more versatile, concept of wall homogeneity as well as the notion of regularity in flat walls. All proposed concepts and results aim at facilitating the use of the irrelevant vertex technique in future algorithmic applications., Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2004.12692

We consider a cops and robber game where the cops are blocking edges of a graph, while the robber occupies its vertices. At each round of the game, the cops choose some set of edges to block and right after the robber is obliged to move to another vertex traversing at most $s$ unblocked edges ($s$ can be seen as the speed of the robber). Both parts have complete knowledge of the opponent's moves and the cops win when they occupy all edges incident to the robbers position. We introduce the capture cost on $G$ against a robber of speed $s$. This defines a hierarchy of invariants, namely $\delta^{1}_{\rm e},\delta^{2}_{\rm e},\ldots,\delta^{\infty}_{\rm e}$, where $\delta^{\infty}_{\rm e}$ is an edge-analogue of the admissibility graph invariant, namely the {\em edge-admissibility} of a graph. We prove that the problem asking wether $\delta^{s}_{\rm e}(G)\leq k$, is polynomially solvable when $s\in \{1,2,\infty\}$ while, otherwise, it is NP-complete. Our main result is a structural theorem for graphs of bounded edge-admissibility. We prove that every graph of edge-admissibility at most $k$ can be constructed using $(\leq k)$-edge-sums, starting from graphs whose all vertices, except possibly from one, have degree at most $k$. Our structural result is approximately tight in the sense that graphs generated by this construction always have edge-admissibility at most $2k-1$. Our proofs are based on a precise structural characterization of the graphs that do not contain $\theta_{r}$ as an immersion, where $\theta_{r}$ is the graph on two vertices and $r$ parallel edges., Comment: The paper has appeared as "Stratis Limnios, Christophe Paul, Joanny Perret, Dimitrios M. Thilikos: Edge degeneracy: Algorithmic and structural results. Theor. Comput. Sci. 839: 164-175 (2020)". This is a new version where a typo has been corrected. In particular, "$1,2,3$" is now "$1,2$" and "$\Bbb{N}_{\geq 4}$" is now "$\Bbb{N}_{\geq 3}$"

Let ${\cal G}$ be a minor-closed graph class. We say that a graph $G$ is a $k$-apex of ${\cal G}$ if $G$ contains a set $S$ of at most $k$ vertices such that $G\setminus S$ belongs to ${\cal G}$. We denote by ${\cal A}_k ({\cal G})$ the set of all graphs that are $k$-apices of ${\cal G}.$ In the first paper of this series we obtained upper bounds on the size of the graphs in the minor-obstruction set of ${\cal A}_k ({\cal G})$, i.e., the minor-minimal set of graphs not belonging to ${\cal A}_k ({\cal G}).$ In this article we provide an algorithm that, given a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices, runs in $2^{{\sf poly}(k)}\cdot n^3$-time and either returns a set $S$ certifying that $G \in {\cal A}_k ({\cal G})$, or reports that $G \notin {\cal A}_k ({\cal G})$. Here ${\sf poly}$ is a polynomial function whose degree depends on the maximum size of a minor-obstruction of ${\cal G}.$ In the special case where ${\cal G}$ excludes some apex graph as a minor, we give an alternative algorithm running in $2^{{\sf poly}(k)}\cdot n^2$-time., Comment: 37 pages, 3 figures

The graph parameter of pathwidth can be seen as a measure of the topological resemblance of a graph to a path. A popular definition of pathwidth is given in terms of node search where we are given a system of tunnels that is contaminated by some infectious substance and we are looking for a search strategy that, at each step, either places a searcher on a vertex or removes a searcher from a vertex and where an edge is cleaned when both endpoints are simultaneously occupied by searchers. It was proved that the minimum number of searchers required for a successful cleaning strategy is equal to the pathwidth of the graph plus one. Two desired characteristics for a cleaning strategy is to be monotone (no recontamination occurs) and connected (clean territories always remain connected). Under these two demands, the number of searchers is equivalent to a variant of pathwidth called {\em connected pathwidth}. We prove that connected pathwidth is fixed parameter tractable, in particular we design a $2^{O(k^2)}\cdot n$ time algorithm that checks whether the connected pathwidth of $G$ is at most $k.$ This resolves an open question by [Dereniowski, Osula, and Rz{\k{a}}{\.{z}}ewski, Finding small-width connected path-decompositions in polynomial time. Theor. Comput. Sci., 794:85-100, 2019]. For our algorithm, we enrich the typical sequence technique that is able to deal with the connectivity demand. Typical sequences have been introduced in [Bodlaender and Kloks. Efficient and constructive algorithms for the pathwidth and treewidth of graphs. J. Algorithms, 21(2):358-402, 1996] for the design of linear parameterized algorithms for treewidth and pathwidth. The proposed extension is based on an encoding of the connectivity property that is quite versatile and may be adapted so to deliver linear parameterized algorithms for the connected variants of other width parameters as well.

Neural networks are the pinnacle of Artificial Intelligence, as in recent years we witnessed many novel architectures, learning and optimization techniques for deep learning. Capitalizing on the fact that neural networks inherently constitute multipartite graphs among neuron layers, we aim to analyze directly their structure to extract meaningful information that can improve the learning process. To our knowledge graph mining techniques for enhancing learning in neural networks have not been thoroughly investigated. In this paper we propose an adapted version of the k-core structure for the complete weighted multipartite graph extracted from a deep learning architecture. As a multipartite graph is a combination of bipartite graphs, that are in turn the incidence graphs of hypergraphs, we design k-hypercore decomposition, the hypergraph analogue of k-core degeneracy. We applied k-hypercore to several neural network architectures, more specifically to convolutional neural networks and multilayer perceptrons for image recognition tasks after a very short pretraining. Then we used the information provided by the hypercore numbers of the neurons to re-initialize the weights of the neural network, thus biasing the gradient optimization scheme. Extensive experiments proved that k-hypercore outperforms the state-of-the-art initialization methods.

The irrelevant vertex technique provides a powerful tool for the design of parameterized algorithms for a wide variety of problems on graphs. A common characteristic of these problems, permitting the application of this technique on surface-embedded graphs, is the fact that every graph of large enough treewidth contains a vertex that is irrelevant, in the sense that its removal yields an equivalent instance of the problem. The straightforward application of this technique yields algorithms with running time that is quadratic in the size of the input graph. This running time is due to the fact that it takes linear time to detect one irrelevant vertex and the total number of irrelevant vertices to be detected is linear as well. Using advanced techniques, sub-quadratic algorithms have been designed for particular problems, even in general graphs. However, designing a general framework for linear-time algorithms has been open, even for the bounded-genus case. In this paper we introduce a general framework that enables finding in linear time an entire set of irrelevant vertices whose removal yields a bounded-treewidth graph, provided that the input graph has bounded genus. Our technique consists of decomposing any surface-embedded graph into a tree-structured collection of bounded-treewidth subgraphs where detecting globally irrelevant vertices can be done locally and independently. Our method is applicable to a wide variety of known graph containment or graph modification problems where the irrelevant vertex technique applies. Examples include the (Induced) Minor Folio problem, the (Induced) Disjoint Paths problem, and the $\mathcal{F}$-Minor-Deletion problem., Comment: Accepted for publication to SODA 2025

For a fixed finite collection of graphs ${\cal F}$, the ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION problem asks, given an $n$-vertex input graph $G,$ for the minimum number of vertices that intersect all minor models in $G$ of the graphs in ${\cal F}$. by Courcelle Theorem, this problem can be solved in time $f_{{\cal F}}(tw)\cdot n^{O(1)},$ where $tw$ is the treewidth of $G$, for some function $f_{{\cal F}}$ depending on ${\cal F}$ In a recent series of articles, we have initiated the programme of optimizing asymptotically the function $f_{{\cal F}}$. Here we provide an algorithm showing that $f_{{\cal F}}(tw) = 2^{O(tw\cdot \log tw)}$ for every collection ${\cal F}$. Prior to this work, the best known function $f_{{\cal F}}$ was double-exponential in $tw$. In particular, our algorithm vastly extends the results of Jansen et al. [SODA 2014] for the particular case ${\cal F}=\{K_5,K_{3,3}\}$ and of Kociumaka and Pilipczuk [Algorithmica 2019] for graphs of bounded genus, and answers an open problem posed by Cygan et al. [Inf Comput 2017]. We combine several ingredients such as the machinery of boundaried graphs in dynamic programming via representatives, the Flat Wall Theorem, Bidimensionality, the irrelevant vertex technique, treewidth modulators, and protrusion replacement. Together with our previous results providing single-exponential algorithms for particular collections ${\cal F}$ [Theor Comput Sci 2020] and general lower bounds [J Comput Syst Sci 2020], our algorithm yields the following complexity dichotomy when ${\cal F} = \{H\}$ contains a single connected graph $H,$ assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis: $f_H(tw)=2^{\Theta(tw)}$ if $H$ is a contraction of the chair or the banner, and $f_H(tw)=2^{\Theta(tw\cdot \log tw)}$ otherwise., Comment: 51 pages, 17 figures

For a finite collection of graphs ${\cal F}$, the \textsc{${\cal F}$-TM-Deletion} problem has as input an $n$-vertex graph $G$ and an integer $k$ and asks whether there exists a set $S \subseteq V(G)$ with $|S| \leq k$ such that $G \setminus S$ does not contain any of the graphs in ${\cal F}$ as a topological minor. We prove that for every such ${\cal F}$, \textsc{${\cal F}$-TM-Deletion} is fixed parameter tractable on planar graphs. Our algorithm runs in a $2^{\mathcal{O}(k^2)}\cdot n^{2}$ time or, alternatively in $2^{\mathcal{O}(k)}\cdot n^{4}$ time. Our techniques can easily be extended to graphs that are embeddable on any fixed surface., Comment: A preliminary version of these results appeared in [Petr A. Golovach, Giannos Stamoulis, Dimitrios M. Thilikos: Hitting Topological Minor Models in Planar Graphs is Fixed Parameter Tractable. SODA 2020: 931-950]

A graph is called a pseudoforest if none of its connected components contains more than one cycle. A graph is an apex-pseudoforest if it can become a pseudoforest by removing one of its vertices. We identify 33 graphs that form the minor-obstruction set of the class of apex-pseudoforests, i.e., the set of all minor-minimal graphs that are not apex-pseudoforests.

The concept of Reload cost in a graph refers to the cost that occurs while traversing a vertex via two of its incident edges. This cost is uniquely determined by the colors of the two edges. This concept has various applications in transportation networks, communication networks, and energy distribution networks. Various problems using this model are defined and studied in the literature. The problem of finding a spanning tree whose diameter with respect to the reload costs is the smallest possible, the problems of finding a path, trail or walk with minimum total reload cost between two given vertices, problems about finding a proper edge coloring of a graph such that the total reload cost is minimized, the problem of finding a spanning tree such that the sum of the reload costs of all paths between all pairs of vertices is minimized, and the problem of finding a set of cycles of minimum reload cost, that cover all the vertices of a graph, are examples of such problems. % In this work we focus on the last problem. Noting that a cycle cover of a graph is a 2-factor of it, we generalize the problem to that of finding an $r$-factor of minimum reload cost of an edge colored graph. We prove several NP-hardness results for special cases of the problem. Namely, bounded degree graphs, planar graphs, bounded total cost, and bounded number of distinct costs. For the special case of $r=2$, our results imply an improved NP-hardness result. On the positive side, we present a polynomial-time solvable special case which provides a tight boundary between the polynomial and hard cases in terms of $r$ and the maximum degree of the graph. We then investigate the parameterized complexity of the problem, prove W[1]-hardness results and present an FPT algorithm.

We study the concept of \emph{compactor}, which may be seen as a counting-analogue of kernelization in counting parameterized complexity. For a function $F:\Sigma^*\to \Bbb{N}$ and a parameterization $\kappa: \Sigma^*\to \Bbb{N}$, a compactor $({\sf P},{\sf M})$ consists of a polynomial-time computable function ${\sf P}$, called \emph{condenser}, and a computable function ${\sf M}$, called \emph{extractor}, such that $F={\sf M}\circ {\sf P}$, and the condensing ${\sf P}(x)$ of $x$ has length at most $s(\kappa(x))$, for any input $x\in \Sigma^*.$ If $s$ is a polynomial function, then the compactor is said to be of polynomial-size. Although the study on counting-analogue of kernelization is not unprecedented, it has received little attention so far. We study a family of vertex-certified counting problems on graphs that are MSOL-expressible; that is, for an MSOL-formula $\phi$ with one free set variable to be interpreted as a vertex subset, we want to count all $A\subseteq V(G)$ where $|A|=k$ and $(G,A)\models \phi.$ In this paper, we prove that every vertex-certified counting problems on graphs that is \emph{MSOL-expressible} and \emph{treewidth modulable}, when parameterized by $k$, admits a polynomial-size compactor on $H$-topological-minor-free graphs with condensing time $O(k^2n^2)$ and decoding time $2^{O(k)}.$ This implies the existence of an {\sf FPT}-algorithm of running time $O(n^2k^2)+2^{O(k)}.$ All aforementioned complexities are under the Uniform Cost Measure (UCM) model where numbers can be stored in constant space and arithmetic operations can be done in constant time., Comment: An extended abstract of this paper was accepted to ISAAC 2018

In 1990, Thomas proved that every graph admits a tree decomposition of minimum width that additionally satisfies a certain vertex-connectivity condition called leanness [A Menger-like property of tree-width: The finite case. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 48(1):67-76, 1990]. This result had many uses and has been extended to several other decompositions. In this paper, we consider tree-cut decompositions, that have been introduced by Wollan as a possible edge-version of tree decompositions [The structure of graphs not admitting a fixed immersion. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 110:47-66, 2015]. We show that every graph admits a tree-cut decomposition of minimum width that additionally satisfies an edge-connectivity condition analogous to Thomas' leanness., Comment: To appear in Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B. Layout aside, this version is identical to the published one

We study the class L of link-types that admit a K4-minor-free diagram, i.e., they can be projected on the plane so that the resulting graph does not contain any subdivision of K4. We prove that L is the closure of a subclass of torus links under the operation of connected sum. Using this structural result, we enumerate L and subclasses of it, with respect to the minimum number of crossings or edges in a projection of L' in L. Further, we obtain counting formulas and asymptotic estimates for the connected K4-minor-free link-diagrams, minimal K4-minor-free link-diagrams, and K4-minor-free diagrams of the unknot., Comment: Final version. To appear in European Journal of Combinatorics

We consider the problems of deciding whether an input graph can be modified by removing/adding at most k vertices/edges such that the result of the modification satisfies some property definable in first-order logic. We establish a number of sufficient and necessary conditions on the quantification pattern of the first-order formula \phi for the problem to be fixed-parameter tractable or to admit a polynomial kernel.

A partial complement of the graph $G$ is a graph obtained from $G$ by complementing all the edges in one of its induced subgraphs. We study the following algorithmic question: for a given graph $G$ and graph class $\mathcal{G}$, is there a partial complement of $G$ which is in $\mathcal{G}$? We show that this problem can be solved in polynomial time for various choices of the graphs class $\mathcal{G}$, such as bipartite, degenerate, or cographs. We complement these results by proving that the problem is NP-complete when $\mathcal{G}$ is the class of $r$-regular graphs.

We define a general variant of the graph clustering problem where the criterion of density for the clusters is (high) connectivity. In {\sc Clustering to Given Connectivities}, we are given an $n$-vertex graph $G$, an integer $k$, and a sequence $\Lambda=\langle \lambda_{1},\ldots,\lambda_{t}\rangle$ of positive integers and we ask whether it is possible to remove at most $k$ edges from $G$ such that the resulting connected components are {\sl exactly} $t$ and their corresponding edge connectivities are lower-bounded by the numbers in $\Lambda$. We prove that this problem, parameterized by $k$, is fixed parameter tractable i.e., can be solved by an $f(k)\cdot n^{O(1)}$-step algorithm, for some function $f$ that depends only on the parameter $k$. Our algorithm uses the recursive understanding technique that is especially adapted so to deal with the fact that, in out setting, we do not impose any restriction to the connectivity demands in $\Lambda$.

We initiate the algorithmic study of the following "structured augmentation" question: is it possible to increase the connectivity of a given graph G by superposing it with another given graph H? More precisely, graph F is the superposition of G and H with respect to injective mapping \phi: V(H)->V(G) if every edge uv of F is either an edge of G, or \phi^{-1}(u)\phi^{-1}(v) is an edge of H. We consider the following optimization problem. Given graphs G,H, and a weight function \omega assigning non-negative weights to pairs of vertices of V(G), the task is to find \varphi of minimum weight \omega(\phi)=\sum_{xy\in E(H)}\omega(\phi(x)\varphi(y)) such that the edge connectivity of the superposition F of G and H with respect to \phi is higher than the edge connectivity of G. Our main result is the following "dichotomy" complexity classification. We say that a class of graphs C has bounded vertex-cover number, if there is a constant t depending on C only such that the vertex-cover number of every graph from C does not exceed t. We show that for every class of graphs C with bounded vertex-cover number, the problems of superposing into a connected graph F and to 2-edge connected graph F, are solvable in polynomial time when H\in C. On the other hand, for any hereditary class C with unbounded vertex-cover number, both problems are NP-hard when H\in C. For the unweighted variants of structured augmentation problems, i.e. the problems where the task is to identify whether there is a superposition of graphs of required connectivity, we provide necessary and sufficient combinatorial conditions on the existence of such superpositions. These conditions imply polynomial time algorithms solving the unweighted variants of the problems.

For a finite collection of graphs ${\cal F}$, the ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION problem consists in, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, deciding whether there exists $S \subseteq V(G)$ with $|S| \leq k$ such that $G \setminus S$ does not contain any of the graphs in ${\cal F}$ as a minor. We are interested in the parameterized complexity of ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION when the parameter is the treewidth of $G$, denoted by $tw$. Our objective is to determine, for a fixed ${\cal F}$, the smallest function $f_{{\cal F}}$ such that {${\cal F}$-M-DELETION can be solved in time $f_{{\cal F}}(tw) \cdot n^{O(1)}$ on $n$-vertex graphs. We prove that $f_{{\cal F}}(tw) = 2^{2^{O(tw \cdot\log tw)}}$ for every collection ${\cal F}$, that $f_{{\cal F}}(tw) = 2^{O(tw \cdot\log tw)}$ if ${\cal F}$ contains a planar graph, and that $f_{{\cal F}}(tw) = 2^{O(tw)}$ if in addition the input graph $G$ is planar or embedded in a surface. We also consider the version of the problem where the graphs in ${\cal F}$ are forbidden as topological minors, called ${\cal F}$-TM-DELETION. We prove similar results for this problem, except that in the last two algorithms, instead of requiring ${\cal F}$ to contain a planar graph, we need it to contain a subcubic planar graph. This is the first of a series of articles on this topic., Comment: 36 pages