Search

John A Glaspy,1 Michelle Z Lim-Watson,2 Michael A Libre,3 Swagata S Karkare,3 Nandini Hadker,3 Aleksandra Bajic-Lucas,2 William E Strauss,2 Naomi V Dahl2 1UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA; 3Trinity LifeSciences, Waltham, MA, USACorrespondence: Naomi V DahlAMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1100 Winter Street, Waltham, MA 02451, USATel +1 617-498-7650Email ndahl@amagpharma.comBackground: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a prevalent yet underdiagnosed condition with a significant impact on quality of life. Oral iron supplementation is often poorly tolerated or yields inadequate response, requiring the use of intravenous iron (IVI) in some patients. Administration of certain IVI preparations has been associated with decreases in serum phosphate levels and clinically significant hypophosphatemia, which has been reported to lead to adverse events including serious fatigue and osteomalacia.Objective: The purpose of this study was to systematically assess the prevalence, clinical consequences, and reporting of treatment-emergent hypophosphatemia within literature investigating IVI therapies marketed in the United States (US).Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted using the PubMed database to identify publications reporting serum phosphate levels or rates of hypophosphatemia within adult IDA patient populations receiving current US-marketed IVIs.Results: The SLR yielded 511 unique publications, with 40 records meeting the final inclusion criteria. Most studies did not report phosphate monitoring methodology or an explicit definition of hypophosphatemia. Hypophosphatemia rates ranged from 0.0% to 92.1% for ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), 0.0% to 40.0% for iron sucrose, 0.4% for ferumoxytol, and 0.0% for low-molecular-weight (LMW) iron dextran. Randomized controlled studies described hypophosphatemia as “asymptomatic” or did not report on other associated sequelae. Eleven case reports detailed treatment-emergent hypophosphatemia in patients treated with FCM. Patients with acute hypophosphatemia primarily developed severe fatigue; those with repeated FCM dosing developed chronic hypophosphatemia associated with osteomalacia and bone deformities.Conclusion: Studies analyzed in this SLR reported a range of hypophosphatemia rates, with the highest consistently seen in patients treated with FCM. Across the clinical literature, there appeared to be minimal standardization of phosphate monitoring and definitions of hypophosphatemia. Although multiple cases have documented serious clinical consequences of hypophosphatemia associated with certain IVIs, current trials neither consistently nor adequately assess the frequency and severity of treatment-emergent hypophosphatemia and may underestimate its prevalence.Keywords: IDA, phosphate, hypophosphatemia, iron supplementation

William E Strauss,1 Michael Auerbach2 1AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA; 2Auerbach Hematology and Oncology, Baltimore, MD, USA Abstract: Most physicians appear to be aware of the health consequences of advanced anemia, especially in the acute setting, frequently responding with a not inconsequential therapeutic default of transfusion. In contrast, the profound impact that chronic anemia, of any degree, may have on a patient’s performance is underappreciated. The focus of this review is to 1) delineate the consistent and broad impact of anemia on patient quality of life as documented by multiple well-validated patient-reported outcome instruments and 2) demonstrate the essential normalization of the debilitation as assessed by these instruments following the administration of intravenous iron. Keywords: anemia, health-related quality of life, intravenous iron, iron deficiency anemia

Saroj Vadhan-Raj,1 Naomi V Dahl,2 Kristine Bernard,2 Zhu Li,2 William E Strauss2 1Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; 2AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA Purpose: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is common in cancer patients due to blood loss and inflammation. Many do not tolerate oral iron or adequately respond. Intravenous (IV) iron is commonly used as an adjunct to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents; data on the use of IV iron monotherapy in these patients are limited. This study aimed to evaluate IV ferumoxytol for the treatment of cancer patients with IDA with a history of unsatisfactory oral iron therapy or in whom oral iron could not be used. Patients and methods: This post hoc analysis of pooled data from two multicenter, randomized, controlled, Phase III trials evaluating IV ferumoxytol (510 mg ×2) vs placebo or iron sucrose (200 mg ×5) included a subgroup of 98 patients with cancer that the investigator identified as the primary cause of their IDA, or with cancer whose IDA was attributed to another comorbid condition (ferumoxytol, n=75; iron sucrose, n=13; placebo, n=10). Gastrointestinal cancers were most common (42), followed by breast (14), cervix (ten), and lung (nine). The primary endpoint was the mean change in hemoglobin (Hgb) from baseline to week 5. Results: At week 5, both ferumoxytol and iron sucrose produced significant increases in Hgb from baseline (1.8 g/dL [P20% nor initiated in any treatment group. Overall rates of adverse events and serious adverse events in the cancer subgroup mirrored those in the overall study population. Conclusion: Monotherapy with IV iron appears to be an effective option for cancer patients with IDA who do not respond to or cannot tolerate oral iron therapy. Keywords: anemia, cancer, ferumoxytol, hemoglobin, efficacy, intravenous iron

Naomi V Dahl,1 Robert F Kaper,2 William E Strauss,1 Frank A Corvino,3 Marko Zivkovic3 1Medical Affairs, 2Medical & Scientific Affairs, AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Waltham, MA, 3Genesis Research, Hoboken, NJ, USA Objective: Ferumoxytol has demonstrated superior efficacy compared with oral iron in treating iron deficiency anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. However, an economic evaluation of ferumoxytol has not been conducted. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of treating iron deficiency anemia in adult non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients with ferumoxytol as compared with oral iron, alone or in combination with erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs). Methods: A decision analytic model compared health outcomes and costs associated with 5-week outpatient treatment of adult non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients with ferumoxytol or oral iron, each as monotherapy or in combination with ESAs in the USA. Direct costs include the following: drug acquisition and administration, adverse events, and medical management. Efficacy was determined as mean increase in hemoglobin (g/dL) from baseline over the 5-week period. Clinical inputs were derived from patient-level data from two Phase III randomized controlled trials of ferumoxytol vs. oral iron in non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients, and cost inputs from RED BOOKTM and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data. Sensitivity analyses were performed to identify cost drivers and assess the stability of results. Results: The 5-week treatment cost was $2,489, $5,216, $1,298, and $4,263 per patient for ferumoxytol, ferumoxytol with ESAs, oral iron, and oral iron with ESAs, respectively. The corresponding incremental costs per g/dL increase in hemoglobin, relative to ferumoxytol alone, were $398, $3,558, and $4,768 per patient. Efficacy was the main driver of cost-effectiveness for all treatments. Adverse event and medical management costs were the principal drivers of oral iron monotherapy costs, while drug acquisition substantially contributed to the overall cost for the remaining treatments. Conclusion: These results suggest that ferumoxytol is a cost-effective treatment for iron deficiency anemia in non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients over a 5-week period compared with oral iron with or without ESAs. Ferumoxytol is more cost-effective as monotherapy. Keywords: incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, ICER, health care costs, intravenous iron, iron therapy, erythropoietin

N Franklin Adkinson,1 William E Strauss,2 Kristine Bernard,2 Robert F Kaper,2 Iain C Macdougall,3 Julie S Krop2 1Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; 2AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA; 3Department of Renal Medicine, King’s College Hospital, London, UK Background: Intravenous (IV) iron is often used to treat iron deficiency anemia in patients who are unable to tolerate or are inadequately managed with oral iron. However, IV iron treatment has been associated with acute hypersensitivity reactions. The comparative risk of adverse events (AEs) with IV iron preparations has been assessed by a few randomized controlled trials, which are most often limited by small patient numbers, which lack statistical power to identify differences in low-frequency AE such as hypersensitivity reactions.Materials and methods: Ferumoxytol versus Ferric Carboxymaltose for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia (FIRM) is a randomized, double-blind, international, multicenter, Phase III study designed to compare the safety of ferumoxytol and ferric carboxymaltose (FCM). The study includes adults with hemoglobin

David C Ford,1 Naomi V Dahl,2 William E Strauss,2 Charles F Barish,3 David J Hetzel,4 Kristine Bernard,2 Zhu Li,2 Lee F Allen,2 1Toronto Digestive Disease Associates, Inc, Vaughan Endoscopy Clinic, Vaughan, ON, Canada; 2AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Waltham, MA, 3Wake Gastroenterology, Wake Research Associates, Raleigh, NC, USA; 4Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia Introduction: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is common in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) disorders and can adversely affect quality of life. Oral iron is poorly tolerated in many patients with GI disorders. Ferumoxytol is approved for the intravenous treatment of IDA in patients with chronic kidney disease. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ferumoxytol in patients with IDA and concomitant GI disorders. Patients and methods: This analysis included 231 patients with IDA and GI disorders from a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating ferumoxytol (510 mg ×2) versus placebo in patients who had failed or were intolerant of oral iron therapy. The primary study end point was the proportion of patients achieving a ≥20 g/L increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) from baseline to Week 5. Other end points included mean change in Hgb, proportion of patients achieving Hgb ≥120 g/L, mean change in transferrin saturation, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Results: Significantly more patients with IDA receiving ferumoxytol achieved a ≥20 g/L increase in Hgb versus placebo (82.1% vs 1.7%, respectively; P

Few trials have examined rates of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) with intravenous iron formulations used to treat iron deficiency anemia (IDA). This randomized, multicenter, double-blind clinical trial compared the safety, and efficacy of ferumoxytol versus ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), focusing on rates of HSRs and hypotension as the primary end point. Patients with IDA of any etiology in whom oral iron was unsatisfactory or intolerable received ferumoxytol (n = 997) or FCM (n = 1000) intravenously over ≥15 minutes on days 1 and 8 or 9 for total respective doses of 1.02 g and 1.50 g. Composite incidences of moderate-to-severe HSRs, including anaphylaxis, or moderate-to-severe hypotension from baseline to week 5 (primary safety end point) were 0.6% and 0.7% in the ferumoxytol and FCM groups, respectively, with ferumoxytol noninferior to FCM. No anaphylaxis was reported in either group. The secondary safety end point of incidences of moderate-to-severe HSRs, including anaphylaxis, serious cardiovascular events, and death from baseline to week 5 were 1.3% and 2.0% in the ferumoxytol and FCM groups, respectively (noninferiority test P < .0001). Least-squares mean changes in hemoglobin at week 5 were 1.4 g/dL and 1.6 g/dL in the ferumoxytol and FCM groups, respectively (noninferiority test P < .0001). Incidence of hypophosphatemia was 0.4% for ferumoxytol and 38.7% for FCM., (© 2018 The Authors American Journal of Hematology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported that one of the authors' name is spelled incorrectly. In this Erratum the incorrect and correct author name are shown. The original publication of this article has been corrected.

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common manifestation of chronic kidney disease (CKD), affecting most patients on hemodialysis and imposing a substantial clinical burden. Treatment with iron supplementation increases hemoglobin levels and can reduce the severity of anemia in patients with CKD. While correcting anemia in these patients is an important therapeutic goal, there is a lack of long-term trials directly comparing intravenous iron therapies in patients with CKD receiving hemodialysis., Methods/design: The Ferumoxytol for Anemia of CKD Trial (FACT) is a 13-month, open-label, randomized, multicenter, international, prospective study with 2 substudies. Entry criteria for the main study include adults with IDA (defined as hemoglobin <11.5 g/dL [<115.0 g/L] and a transferrin saturation <30%), serum ferritin <800 ng/mL (<1798 pmol/L), and receiving hemodialysis for ≥3 months. Patients are randomized to receive ferumoxytol (1.02 g over 2 doses) or iron sucrose (1.0 g over 10 doses) during the initial 5-week treatment period. Those with persistent/recurrent IDA over the 11-month observation period will receive additional 5-week treatment periods, as appropriate. The primary efficacy endpoint of the main study is the mean change in hemoglobin from Baseline to Week 5 for each treatment period. The secondary efficacy endpoints include the mean change in transferrin saturation from Baseline to Week 5 and the proportion of patients with a hemoglobin increase of ≥1.0 g/dL at any time from Baseline to Week 5. Safety will be assessed through an examination of the adverse event profile over the course of the study. An "oxidative stress" substudy in approximately 100 patients will assess the effects of treatment on biomarkers of oxidative stress/inflammation during the initial 5-week treatment period, and a magnetic resonance imaging substudy in approximately 70 patients will assess the potential for iron deposition in target tissues over 24 months., Discussion: FACT fulfills the need for a long-term comparative trial in patients with IDA and CKD receiving hemodialysis. The efficacy and safety results will provide useful information for guiding therapy in this population. Two hundred ninety-six patients have been enrolled, and completion of the main study is expected soon., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01227616 (registered October 22, 2010); EudraCT number: 2010-022133-28.

Background: Iron deficiency anemia is highly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease and is often treated with intravenous iron. There are few trials directly comparing the safety and efficacy of different intravenous iron products., Methods: This post-hoc analysis pooled data from 767 patients enrolled in two randomized, controlled, open-label trials of similar design comparing the treatment of iron deficiency anemia with ferumoxytol and iron sucrose across patients with all stages of renal function. One trial was conducted in adults with CKD either on or not on dialysis and the second in adults with IDA of any underlying cause and a history of unsatisfactory oral iron therapy or in whom oral iron could not be used who had normal to no worse than moderately impaired renal function. Patients were categorized by chronic kidney disease stage (i.e., estimated glomerular filtration rate), and the primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in hemoglobin from Baseline to Week 5., Results: The overall incidence of adverse events was numerically lower in ferumoxytol-treated patients compared to those treated with iron sucrose (42.4 vs. 50.2 %, respectively); the incidence of treatment-related adverse events was generally similar between the two treatment groups (13.6 vs. 16.0 %, respectively). Adverse events of Special Interest (i.e., hypotension, hypersensitivity) occurred at lower rates in those treated with ferumoxytol compared to those treated with iron sucrose (2.5 vs. 5.3 %, respectively). Overall, mean hemoglobin increased in both treatment groups, regardless of degree of renal insufficiency, although greater increases were seen among those with less severe kidney damage. Mean increases in hemoglobin from Baseline to Week 5 were significantly greater with ferumoxytol than with iron sucrose treatment in the subgroup with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥90 mL/min (Least Squares mean difference = 0.53 g/dL; p < 0.001). There were no other consistent, significant differences in hemoglobin levels between treatment groups for the other chronic kidney disease categories except for isolated instances favoring ferumoxytol., Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of ferumoxytol is at least comparable to iron sucrose in patients with varying degrees of renal function., Trial Registration: (CKD-201; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01052779; registered 15 January, 2010), (IDA-302; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01114204; registered 29 April, 2010).

Background and Objectives: Few randomized controlled trials have compared intravenous iron products head to head in CKD patients with iron deficiency anemia. This study compared the efficacy and safety of two intravenous iron products (ferumoxytol [Feraheme injection] and iron sucrose [Venofer]) in patients with CKD and iron deficiency anemia., Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: In this phase II, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter clinical trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to either 1.02 g ferumoxytol (2 × 510-mg injections) or 1.0 g iron sucrose administered as either a slow injection or infusion (10 doses for dialysis patients and 5 doses for nondialysis patients). Inclusion criteria included hemoglobin<11.0 g/dl, transferrin saturation<30%, and eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) or a diagnosis of underlying CKD (e.g., nephropathy or nephritis). The primary end point was change in hemoglobin from baseline to week 5., Results: In total, 162 patients were randomized. Demographics were balanced between the treatment groups. Adverse event profiles of the two regimens were fairly similar: overall adverse events, 48% ferumoxytol versus 65% iron sucrose; related adverse events, 10% ferumoxytol versus 16% iron sucrose; and adverse events leading to study discontinuation, 1% ferumoxytol versus 5% iron sucrose. Rates of serious adverse events and related serious adverse events were similar between the ferumoxytol and iron sucrose groups: serious adverse events, 9% versus 7%, respectively and related serious adverse events, 1% versus 1%, respectively. Overall, increases in hemoglobin were similar between treatment groups. Based on an ANOVA model adjusted for baseline hemoglobin level and dialysis status, the least squares mean change from baseline to week 5 was 0.8 ± 0.1 g/dl in the ferumoxytol-treated group and 0.7 ± 0.1 g/dl in the iron sucrose group. The difference in the mean change from baseline between the two treatment groups was 0.1 g/dl (95% confidence interval, -0.2 to 0.4)., Conclusion: In this randomized, controlled trial, ferumoxytol and iron sucrose showed comparable efficacy and adverse events rates.

Background: Evaluations of therapy for the treatment of angina have traditionally consisted of a combination of objective measures, such as exercise tolerance, and subjective markers, such as angina attack rate. Recently, the need to assess "how patients feel"--their quality of life (QOL)--has been regarded with increasing importance. Standard instruments are available to assess QOL and its change after therapeutic intervention. Although QOL instruments have been used to assess the efficacy of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), they have not been used previously to compare the impact of PTCA with that of medical therapy in patients with angina pectoris. We report on the changes in self-assessed QOL among patients randomly assigned to treatment by PTCA or medical therapy and relate these measurements to changes in exercise performance and coronary angiograms., Methods and Results: Patients with stable angina, a positive exercise tolerance test, and at least 70% stenosis (index lesion) in the proximal two thirds of one major coronary artery were randomly assigned to receive PTCA or medical therapy. Six months after randomization, each patient underwent repeat exercise testing and coronary angiography. Before randomization and at the 6-month visit, patients completed a self-administered QOL questionnaire that measured physical functioning and psychological well-being. We compared the changes in QOL with changes between the baseline and 6-month exercise tests, stratified by terciles (decrease in duration, 0- to 2-minute increase, and > 2-minute improvement). We also stratified patients by whether there was more or less than 2 SD change (18.8%) in diameter stenosis of the index lesion (initial minus follow-up angiogram), and we related these to changes in QOL measures. One hundred eighty-two patients with one-vessel disease completed baseline and 6-month questionnaires. At baseline, there were no differences in any QOL measurements between treatment groups. At the 6-month follow-up visit, there was greater improvement in both physical functioning and psychological well-being scores for patients receiving PTCA (+7.36 +/- 15.6, PTCA; +1.98 +/- 14.7, medical therapy; P < .02). Improvement in QOL variables was noted only in patients demonstrating an increase in exercise performance. Also, patients assigned to either treatment whose angiograms demonstrated more than 18.8% improvement in index lesion percent stenosis experienced a significant increase in their QOL scores., Conclusions: This was the first study of the relative changes in QOL measures assessed with the use of previously validated and standardized instruments in patients randomly assigned to treatment with PTCA or medical therapy. Patients assigned to PTCA demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in both physical and psychological measures. This improvement was noted in patients whose exercise performance improved and whose angiograms demonstrated an improvement in lesion severity.

Nicorandil (nicotinamidoethyl nitrate) is a novel vasodilator. Its vasodilator properties are related both to the nicotinamide and nitrate moieties. Classic nitrates such as nitroglycerin (NTG) and isosorbide dinitrate demonstrate in vitro inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation. Such effects have been shown to occur in a dose-related manner, are potentiated by reduced thiols and by increasing preincubation time, and are associated with increases in intracellular cyclic GMP. We explored the effect of nicorandil on ADP-induced human platelet aggregation and the role of reduced thiol N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in modulating this response. Nicorandil significantly inhibited aggregation to ADP dose dependently (IC50 3.0 mM). These effects were associated with inhibition of fibrinogen binding to the platelet surface (IC50 2 mM). Addition of nicorandil after maximal ADP-induced aggregation was achieved resulted in disaggregation. Addition of a source of reduced thiol (NAC) potentiated the antiaggregatory effects of nicorandil threefold (p < 0.05). Platelet inhibition by nicorandil was also augmented by increase in duration of preincubation, with maximal effects observed at 180 min. Preincubation of platelets with 10 mM nicorandil resulted in attenuated inhibition of platelet aggregation on gel filtration and subsequent exposure to additional nicorandil, indicative of tolerance induction. Methylene blue (MB), an inhibitor of guanylate cyclase, significantly reversed nicorandil-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation. Moreover, in accordance with this mechanism, nicorandil increased intracellular platelet cyclic GMP levels. Although the antiplatelet effect of nicotinamide was partially reversed by the K+ channel inhibitor iberotoxin, preincubation with iberotoxin had no impact on inhibition of platelet aggregation by nicorandil.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Although congestive heart failure has been reported with the combination of a beta blocker and either verapamil or nifedipine, it has not previously been reported for combination therapy that includes diltiazem. The following case documents the occurrence of clinical congestive failure in a patient with baseline left ventricular dysfunction and severe angina pectoris. Although the patients had tolerated propranolol therapy for years without difficulty, and high-dose diltiazem monotherapy with an excellent clinical response, the combination of diltiazem and propranolol resulted in the development of congestive heart failure. Thus, although generally well tolerated, given the suitable scenario of reduced left ventricular function, the combination of diltiazem and a beta blocker may adversely affect left ventricular performance.

Twenty-four patients with stable angina were evaluated in a 14 week crossover trial. A single-blind placebo period (baseline 1) was followed by two double-blind periods evaluating maximum tolerated doses of diltiazem (up to 360 mg daily) vs placebo. Over the next 1 to 4 weeks, propranolol was started and increased until clinically documented beta-blockade was achieved (baseline 2). The final phase consisted of a pair of evaluation periods comparing propranolol plus the maximum tolerated dose of diltiazem to propranolol and placebo. The daily rate of angina attack was 1.6 during baseline, was unchanged during placebo therapy, but fell during treatment with diltiazem to 0.6 (p less than .005). With the addition of diltiazem to propranolol, the angina rate was improved (0.3) compared with that with either propranolol alone (0.6) or propranolol and placebo (0.5) (p less than .01). Total exercise duration during baseline 1 was 360 sec and increased to 497 sec with diltiazem, 481 sec with propranolol, and 527 sec with the combination of diltiazem and propranolol. Two patients with reduced ejection fractions developed congestive heart failure with propranolol. The combination of diltiazem and propranolol similarly resulted in congestive heart failure in one patient who had tolerated both drugs alone.

Diseases that cause symptoms incompletely relieved by available modes of treatment stimulate search for new therapies. Chronic disease processes, in which interventions are palliative rather than curative provide a particular challenge in determining the value of therapeutic intervention. Management of patients with angina pectoris is an example of this challenge.

The direct-current magnetocardiogram, which shows the T-Q (baseline) shift, is used to clarify the cause of S-T depression induced by stress testing in the human heart. Measurements are made of the amount of baseline shift associated with the S-T depression. Results are presented of a well-documented patient, with typical coronary artery disease, undergoing a two-step exercise test. Before exercise, there was no S-T or baseline shift. During exercise, the S-T segment became depressed and the baseline segment was simultaneously elevated, at about 70% of the S-T amplitude. After termination of exercise, the baseline elevation disappeared somewhat more rapidly than the S-T depression. These results were consistent in repeated tests of this patient. Because the baseline shift is a reflection of an injury current, these results confirm the belief that exercise-induced S-T depression is mostly due to an injury current which is interrupted during the S-T interval. The baseline shift seen here is the first non-invasive measurement of an injury current in the human heart, and its presence and time-course generally agree with measurements in the animal heart. This work also confirms that the direct-current magnetocardiogram, although not practical for clinical purposes, is useful as a research tool.