Search

Lynch syndrome is known by healthcare providers mainly for patients with colorectal cancer. Awareness of other associated tumors, such as endometrial or ovarian cancer, is low. This study aimed to analyze the prevalence of Lynch syndrome in unselected patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer. In addition, the willingness of patients and family members to undergo germline mutation testing was investigated.The medical records of all patients diagnosed with endometrial or ovarian cancer at the Department of Gynecology and Obsterics, University Hospital Dresden, between 1998 and 2012, were screened for a family history of HNPCC-associated cancer. Telephone interviews were used to screen, inform, and enroll patients in this genetic analysis study. Molecular analysis was performed by prescreening of tumor tissue, followed by germline mutation analysis.Two hundred and eighty-three patients were diagnosed with endometrial cancer, 291 with ovarian cancer, and 14 with both. A positive family history for tumors associated with Lynch syndrome was documented for 61 patients. Two pathogenic mutations in the genes MLH1 and MSH2 in nine genetic analyses had already been detected before. After genetic counseling, only 10 of 31 index patients (32.3 %) consented for mutation analysis. However, no additional pathogenic heterozygous mutations were found.In this retrospective cohort study in unselected patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer, only a small number of patients with suspected Lynch syndrome could be identified. Of those, acceptance of germline analyses was moderate, only. As a result, the rate of identified pathogenic germline mutations was lower than expected. Therefore, we are convinced that more information on cancer risks, options for predictive molecular testing and preventive procedures, needs to be provided to patients and gynecologists.

Background Ganglioneuromatous polyposis (GP) is a very rare disorder which may be associated with other clinical manifestations and syndromes, such as Cowden syndrome, multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type II and neurofibromatosis (NF) 1. The risk for malignant transformation of ganglioneuromas is unknown, and the combination of GP with colon cancer has been only very seldom reported. Methods and results We report the case of a 60-year old male patient with adenocarcinoma, adenomas and lipomas of the colon and multiple gastroduodenal lesions combined with generalised lipomatosis and macrocephaly. Based on the initial endoscopic and histological findings, a (restorative) proctocolectomy was recommended but declined by the patient. Instead, a colectomy was performed. The histological examination revealed an unforeseen GP in addition to the colon cancer. Extensive molecular diagnostics allowed for the differential diagnosis of the causes of the clinical manifestations, and the clinical suspicion of Cowden syndrome could not be confirmed using Sanger Sequencing and MLPA for the analysis of PTEN. Finally, a pathogenic germline mutation in PTEN (heterozygous stop mutation in exon 2: NM_000314 (PTEN):c.138C > A; p.Tyr46*) could be detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS), confirming an unusual presentation of Cowden syndrome with GP. Conclusions Cowden syndrome should be considered in cases of GP with extracolonic manifestation and verified by combined clinical and molecular diagnostics. Because GP may represent a premalignant condition, a surgical-oncological prophylactic procedure should be considered. Based on our experience, we recommend early implementation of Panel NGS rather than classical Sanger sequencing for genetic diagnostics, especially if various diagnoses are considered.

N-Acetyltransferase (NAT) 2 is an important enzyme involved in the metabolism of different xenobiotics, including potential carcinogens. Allelic variants of the NAT2 gene are determined by a pattern of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) resulting in slow (SA), intermediate (IA) or rapid acetylator (RA) phenotypes and causing the individual differences in the NAT2 metabolic capacity. To clarify the potential modifying role of the NAT2 acetylator status in microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC), we studied 140 patients with sporadic CRC (group 1) and 69 patients with CRC who met at least one criterion of the revised Bethesda guidelines (group 2). We did not observe any significant difference in the NAT2 acetylator status frequency between patients in both groups and 100 healthy controls (P=0.486). Regardless of a younger median age of tumour onset (AO) of 41 years in group 2 patients compared to 64 years in group 1 patients, no significant difference in AO was found between RA and SA status patients in both groups. The median AO in group 1 was 65 years in patients with RA and 63 years with SA status (P=0.065). The median AO in group 2 was 40 years in patients with RA and 42 years with SA status (P=0.814). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that neither the NAT2 acetylator status (P=0.064 and 0.810, respectively) nor the gender (P=0.165 and 0.918, respectively) was a risk factor for the AO in both groups. These data do not support the hypothesis that the NAT2 acetylatorship acts as a modifying factor on the AO in sporadic and familial, microsatellite stable CRC.

Ursache des klinisch durch die Amsterdam-Kriterien definierten HNPCC sind hochpenetrante Keimbahnmutationen in den DNAMismatchrepair( MMR)-Genen MLH1, MSH2, seltener in MSH6 und PMS2. Mutationsträger in diesen MMR-Genen haben ein hohes kumulatives Risiko (52–92%) für die Entwicklung kolorektaler – einschließlich syn- und metachroner – Karzinome, die sich meist in früheren Lebensjahren als bei sporadischen Fällen entwickeln. Darüber hinaus findet sich bei diesen Mutationsträgern ein deutlich erhöhtes Risiko für extrakolonische Karzinome, insbesondere des Endometriums, seltener der Ovarien, des Magens, der ableitenden Harnwege und des Dünndarms. Aus dieser Risikokonstellation erwächst die Frage nach einem spezifischen, individualisierten Therapiekonzept bei HNPCC-Patienten bzw. Mutationsträgern. Prinzipiell könnten drei Möglichkeiten des chirurgischen Vorgehens bezüglich des Kolorektums in Frage kommen: 1. prophylaktische Resektion bei gesunden Mutationsträgern 2. onkologische Resektion bei Karzinommanifestation 3. erweiterte Resektion mit zusätzlich prophylaktischer Intention bei Manifestation des ersten Kolon- oder Rektumkarzinoms. Die erste Möglichkeit kann nach kritischer Evaluation verschiedener Argumente als Option der Prävention nicht empfohlen werden. Zur Zeit kann sicherlich auch keine endgültige Empfehlung abgegeben werden, ob die zweite oder dritte Option des operativen Vorgehens favorisiert werden sollte. Die Indikation zur prophylaktischen Hysterektomie und Oophorektomie sollte nach ausführlicher genetischer, chirurgischer und gynäkologischer Beratung bei postmenopausalen Patientinnen, die die Amsterdam-Kriterien erfüllen oder Trägerinnen einer pathogenen Keimbahnmutation in einem MMR-Gen sind und bei denen dieser Eingriff mit einer anderweitig indizierten Operation kombiniert werden kann, erwogen werden. Eine exakte Prädiktion des individuellen Risikos und Erkrankungsalters auf Grundlage der Analyse von Interaktionen zwischen endogenen und exogenen, modifizierenden Faktoren ist Voraussetzung für individuelle Empfehlungen für «maßgeschneiderte»Vorsorgeprogramme oder prophylaktische chirurgische Maßnahmen. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), clinically defined by the Amsterdam criteria, is caused by highly penetrant germ line mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, mostly in MLH1 and MSH2, infrequently in MSH6 und PMS2. Mutation carriers are at high cumulative risk (52-92%) for developing colorectal cancer (CRC), including syn- and metachronous colorectal carcinomas, with a younger age of onset compared with sporadic CRC. In addition, there is a remarkably increased risk in these mutation carriers for extracolonic carcinomas, especially for endometrial and ovarian carcinomas but also for gastric, ureter and renal pelvis and small bowel cancer. Therefore, the question arises if an individually tailored conception of treatment should be applied to HNPCC patients and mutation carriers. On principle, there are three options of surgical approach conceivable concerning the colorectum: i) prophylactic resection in healthy mutation carriers ii) oncological resection in the case of CRC iii) extended resection with an additional prophylactic intent in the case of first CRC. After critical evaluation of various arguments, the first option cannot be recommended for CRC prevention. However, a final recommendation neither for the second nor the third option of surgical approach can be given at the moment. The indication for a prophylactic hysterectomy and oophorectomy should be weighted in the following postmenopausal patients after intensive genetic, surgical and gynecologic counselling: patients fulfilling the Amsterdam II criteria or who have been identified as mutation carriers of a disease causing germ line mutation in one of the MMR genes and who have to be operated on due to another cause. A precise prediction of the individual risk and age of onset on the basis of the analysis of interactions between endogenous and exogenous modifying factors is the precondition for recommendations concerning individually tailored surveillance or prophylactic surgery. Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

Mononucleotide repeat sequences are particularly prone to frameshift mutations in tumors with biallelic inactivation of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1 or MSH2. In these tumors, several genes harboring mononucleotide repeats in their coding region have been proposed as targets involved in tumor progression, among which are also the MMR genes MSH3 and MSH6. We have analyzed the expression of the MSH3 and MSH6 proteins by immunohistochemistry in 31 colorectal carcinomas in which MLH1 was inactivated. Loss of MSH3 expression was identified in 15 tumors (48.5%), whereas all tumors expressed MSH6. Frameshift mutations at coding microsatellites were more frequent in MSH3 (16 of 31) than in MSH6 (3 of 31; Fisher’s exact test, P < 0.001). Frameshift mutations and allelic losses of MSH3 were more frequent in MSH3-negative tumors compared with those with normal expression (22 mutations in 30 alleles versus 8 mutations in 28 alleles; χ2, P = 0.001). Biallelic inactivation was evident or inferred for 60% of MSH3-negative tumors but none of the tumors with normal MSH3 expression. In contrast, we did not identify frameshift mutations in the (A)8 tract of MSH3 in a control group of 18 colorectal carcinomas in which the MMR deficiency was based on the inactivation of MSH2. As it has been suggested that mutations of MSH3 might play a role in tumor progression, we studied the association between MSH3 expression and disease stage assessed by lymph node and distant metastases status. Dukes stages C and D were more frequent in primary tumors with loss of MSH3 expression (9 of 13), compared with tumors with retained expression (1 of 14; Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.001), suggesting that MSH3 abrogation may be a predictor of metastatic disease or even favor tumor cell spread in MLH1-deficient colorectal cancers.

A better understanding of the molecular basis of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes such as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) has profound consequences for both the diagnosis and (prophylactic) treatment of (pre)malignant neoplastic lesions. Sequence analysis of the underlying genes for these conditions and the detection of disease-causing genetic alterations in an index patient enable predictive testing for individuals at risk within an affected family. However, the clinical implications of predictive molecular testing depend on the overall penetrance and variability in the expression of pathogenic mutations. The extent of these parameters differs considerably among the various known hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes. Hence the integration of genetic information into the daily surgical practice remains challenging. This review provides an update on the indications for family assessment, purpose and limitations of the genetic testing and resulting recommendations for prophylactic surgery in FAP and HNPCC.

Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) is an autosomal dominant predisposition to multiple juvenile polyps in the gastrointestinal tract. Germline mutations in the MADH4 or BMPR1A genes have been found to be causative of the disease in a subset of JPS patients. So far, no genotype-phenotype correlation has been reported. We examined 29 patients with the clinical diagnosis of JPS for germline mutations in the MADH4 or BMPR1A genes and identified MADH4 mutations in seven (24%) and BMPR1A mutations in five patients (17%). A remarkable prevalence of massive gastric polyposis was observed in patients with MADH4 mutations when compared with patients with BMPR1A mutations or without identified mutations. This is the first genotype-phenotype correlation observed in JPS.

Die Entwicklung moderner minimal-invasiver Diagnose- und Behandlungsverfahren auf dem Gebiet der kolorektalen Adenome und Karzinome ermöglicht eine effektive Überwachung von Risikopersonen, andererseits erfolgt durch die endoskopische Abtragung oder transanale bzw. TEM-technische Resektion von Adenomen bereits eine erhebliche Karzinomprävention. Die Einführung der laparoskopischen Technik bei der Resektion kolorektaler Tumoren könnte nach Evaluierung der bisherigen Ergebnisse zu einer weiteren Verringerung der Hospitalisierung und operationsassoziierten Morbidität der Patienten bei gleicher Prognose führen. Kennzeichnend für familiäre Formen des kolorektalen Karzinoms ist das hohe Risiko für die Entwicklung kolorektaler Tumoren, jedoch auch für weitere extrakolonische Neoplasien. Dies trifft für das hereditäre Nicht-Polyposis-assoziierte kolorektale Karzinom (HNPCC), die familiäre Polyposis (FAP) und die selteneren Formen wie Peutz-Jeghers-Syndrom und juvenile Polyposis zu. Die Anwendung der molekularen Diagnostik in diesen Familien ermöglicht durch die Identifizierung von Mutationsträgern und Nichtmutationsträgern einerseits die gezielte Eingliederung von Hochrisikopersonen (Mutationsträgern) in spezielle, auf das jeweilige Syndrom zugeschnittene Überwachungs- und Vorsorgeprogramme und erspart andererseits Personen mit durchschnittlichem Risiko (Nichtmutationsträgern) unnötige und teilweise invasive Diagnostik. Bezüglich des chirurgischen Vorgehens bei Patienten mit einer Form des hereditären kolorektalen Karzinoms gibt es bereits etablierte Verfahren, wie die Durchführung einer restaurativen Proktokolektomie bei der FAP, bei anderen Formen, wie bei HNPCC, sind diese noch in der Diskussion. Wesentliche Fortschritte bei der Prävention kolorektaler Tumoren sind in den nächsten Jahren möglicherweise auf dem Gebiet der Chemoprävention zu erwarten. Development of modern, minimally invasive methods for diagnosis and treatment in the field of colorectal tumours enables an effective surveillance for persons at high risk as well as a distinct cancer prevention by endoscopic, transanal or TEM removal of colorectal adenomas. Introduction of laparoscopic techniques in the resection of colorectal tumours could entail, after evaluation of preliminary results, a decreased duration of hospitalisation and procedure-associated morbidity in patients with the same prognosis. The very high risk for development of colorectal tumours as well as for some extracolonic neoplasia is typical for familial colorectal cancer syndromes. This concerns hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome, familial polyposis coli, and the infrequent forms like Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and juvenile polyposis. Molecular diagnostics has the power to identify carriers and noncarriers of a mutated gene in these families and therefore may permit clear-cut decisions regarding inclusion in special surveillance programmes, which is recommended for all persons at risk from affected families. Concerning the surgical approach in patients with hereditary colorectal cancer, well-accepted routine procedures like restorative proctocolectomy in familiar polyposis patients have already been established; in other forms like HNPCC the best surgical modality is still under discussion. Remarkable progress in the prevention of colorectal tumours could be expected from chemoprevention trials in the next years. Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

Germline mutations in human mismatch repair (MMR) genes yield a predisposition for the hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) syndrome. In contrast to hMLH1 and hMSH2, little is known about the overall involvement of hMSH6 in colorectal cancer. We investigated 82 tumors from patients who fulfilled the Bethesda guidelines for HNPCC as well as 146 sporadic tumors, analyzing microsatellite instability and expression of the 4 MMR proteins hMSH6, hMSH2, hMLH1 and hPMS2. Four tumors with lost expression and 1 tumor with cytoplasmic expression of hMSH6 were identified. Sequence analysis revealed germline mutations in 4 of the 5 patients, including 1 patient with sporadic disease. The lost or reduced expression of hMSH2 and hMLH1 was always identical to its heterodimerization partners, hMSH6 and hPMS2, respectively. Furthermore, hMSH2 expression was reduced upon hMSH6 deficiency. Abnormal expression of 1 or more of the 4 proteins was always associated with a high level of microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Conversely, all but 1 of the 44 MSI-H tumors had abnormal expression of 1 or more of the proteins, basically excluding additional genes associated with the MSI-H phenotype. We conclude that the involvement of somatic or epigenetic hMSH6 inactivation in colorectal cancer is rare. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is associated with highly penetrant germline mutations in mismatch repair genes. Due to a high lifetime risk in gene carriers for synchronous and for metachronous colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer in women, prophylactic and extended surgery are considered as options for gene carriers. A 54-year-old patient with a history of metachronous rectal cancer and a family history fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria presented with carcinoma of the cecum and highly dysplastic adenomas of the splenic flexure and descending colon. As a result of these findings, medical history and molecular diagnosis, the decision was made to perform colectomy and prophylactic hysterectomy with oophorectomy; histological examination of the specimen showed three synchronous colon carcinomas. The 31-year-old son carrying the pathogenic mutation refused to be included in the HNPCC surveillance program. One year later he presented with symptoms of bowel obstruction, and a carcinoma of the descending colon was diagnosed. Intraoperatively, in addition to the colon cancer, a small bowel cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis were found. In another family fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria without known germline mutation a woman presented with synchronous cancer of the ascending colon and the lower rectum at the age of 49 years. Proctocolectomy and prophylactic hysterectomy were performed, which revealed an additional colon cancer and endometrial cancer. We discuss approaches for individual decision making for surgery in HNPCC patients. Is a subtotal colectomy indicated in the case of first colon cancer in HNPCC patients, or if the first tumor occurs in the lower rectum, should a proctocolectomy or a restorative proctocolectomy be considered? The aim of prospective clinical studies should be to assess acceptability, survival rates, mortality, and the quality of life in HNPCC patients who have undergone surveillance and standard oncological resections versus extended or prophylactic surgery.

Hereditary Colorectal Carcinomas – Reflection on Preventive Surgery Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) accounts for about 5% of all colorectal cancers and is the most frequent familial form; familial adenomatous polyposis coli accounts for about 1%. Prerequisitive for individually tailored surveillance is the identification of the pathogenic germline mutation. In classical FAP, surgical standard is a restorative proctocolectomy while in HNPCC there is no surgical standard other than standard oncological resection due to missing evidence. In HNPCC, prophylactic colectomy before the onset of the first colorectal cancer is not recommended. Main arguments for the extension of the resection in the case of the first colorectal carcinoma in HNPCC are the rate of metachronous colorectal carcinomas of 40–45% in a 10-year interval and rapid tumor progression. In HNPCC, in the case of first colon cancer a subtotal colectomy seems to be indicated. A proctocolectomy or, if indicated, a restorative proctocolectomy may be considered in the case of carcinomas in the lower rectum. These considerations should be evaluated in a prospective clinical trial. Counselling, molecular diagnosis and surgery in patients with hereditary colorectal cancers should only be performed in interdisciplinary centers. Das «Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer» (HNPCC)-Syndrom bildet mit zirka 5% aller kolorektalen Karzinome die größte Gruppe der familiären Formen; die familiäre adenomatöse Polyposis coli (FAP) macht zirka 1% aus. Voraussetzung für die Indikationsstellung zu individuellen Vorsorgeprogrammen ist die Identifizierung der pathogenen Keimbahnmutation. Bei der klassischen FAP ist die Durchführung einer restaurativen Proktokolektomie die Therapie der Wahl, beim HNPCC-Syndrom gibt es aufgrund fehlender Daten klinischer Studien noch keinen Operationsstandard, der über eine Resektion entsprechend den onkologischen Resektionsprinzipien hinausgeht. Eine prophylaktische Kolektomie vor Manifestation eines kolorektalen Karzinoms bei HNPCC kann bei der gegenwärtigen Datenlage nicht empfohlen werden. Hauptargumente für die Erweiterung des Eingriffs bei manifestem kolorektalem Karzinom bei HNPCC-Patienten sind das Risiko metachroner kolorektaler Karzinome von 40–45% in einem Zeitraum von 10 Jahren und die rasche Tumorprogression. Bei Erstmanifestation eines Kolonkarzinoms erscheint die Durchführung einer subtotalen Kolektomie indiziert. Bei Erstmanifestation des Karzinoms im unteren Rektumdrittel ist die Durchführung einer Proktokolektomie bzw. unter entsprechenden onkologischen und funktionellen Voraussetzungen eine Kolektomie mit Proktomukosektomie und Ileum-Pouch zu erwägen. Die Evaluierung dieser Überlegungen sollte im Rahmen einer prospektiven klinischen Studie erfolgen. Die Beratung, molekulare Diagnostik und chirurgische Therapie von Patienten mit hereditären kolorektalen Karzinomen sollte zunächst nur entsprechenden interdisziplinären Zentren vorbehalten bleiben. Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

Only approximately 30% of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis qualify for curative therapy, which is in most cases liver lesion resection. Due primarily to the extent of the tumors and patient comorbidities, palliative therapy remains the only option in non-resection cases. Palliation enables local, symptomatic control and prolonged survival in some cases. As established methods are continuously improved, new palliative therapy methods are tested in clinical trials and subsequently introduced into clinical practice. The present review provides an overview of current colorectal liver metastasis treatment when resection is not an option. This review gives the basis for an interdisciplinary decision making process for the treatment of liver metastasis.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), clinically defined by the Amsterdam criteria, is associated with mismatch repair gene germline mutations. This study was performed to evaluate the efficiency of combined clinical and molecular diagnostics in identifying carriers of a mutated gene in families meeting criteria of the Bethesda guidelines and to examine the influence of molecular diagnosis on clinical decision-making in carriers and noncarriers. Seventy-two patients meeting criteria of the Bethesda guidelines were tested for microsatellite instabilities (MSI). MSI-H tumors were found in 38 (52.8%) index patients. Complete sequencing of hMLH1 and hMSH2 in 38 MSI-H patients and of hMSH6 in one of these patients revealed 15 pathogenic germline mutations, including three novel mutations, and three novel unclassified germline variants. Twelve of the 15 pathogenic mutations were found in patients fulfilling the Amsterdam I/II criteria. Surgical and genetic counseling was offered to the affected families; as a result of molecular diagnosis in the 15 families, 26 index patients and affected carriers and 8 asymptomatic carriers of a mutated mismatch repair gene were included in the surveillance program, and 26 noncarriers were excluded from this program. Although germline mutations are detected in only 20.8% of patients fulfilling criteria of the Bethesda guidelines, family history and MSI-H tumor classification are both strong indicators for germline mutations in hMSH2, hMLH1, and hMSH6 genes, resulting in a 51.9% mutation detection rate. Identification of individual mutation status allows clear-cut decisions on whether or not inclusion in surveillance programs is indicated.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is one of the most common hereditary cancer-susceptibility syndromes. Germline mutations in mismatch repair genes are associated with the clinical phenotype of HNPCC. We report ten novel germline mutations, three in MSH2 and seven in MLH1. All but one mutation have been found in families fulfilling criteria of the Bethesda guidelines; four of them additionally fulfilled the Amsterdam criteria I or II. Eight mutations were considered pathogenic and predictive diagnostics in healthy family members at risk shall be undertaken; these include five frameshift mutations leading to premature stop codons, in MSH2: c.1672delT (p.S558Xfs) and c.2466_2467delTG (p.C822X) and in MLH1: c.1023delG (p.R341Xfs), c.1127_1128dupAT (p.K377Xfs) and c.1310delC (p.P437Xfs); three mutations leading to splice aberrations, in MSH2: c.1661G>C (r.1511_1661del) and in MLH1: c.677+3A>C (r.589_677del) and c.1990-2A>G predicted to result in a splice site defect. The remaining two mutations are unclassified variants with assumed pathogenicity: one missense mutation in the highly conserved ATPase domain of MLH1 (c.122A>G [p.D41G]) and one in-frame insertion of twelve nucleotides in MLH1 (c.2155_2156insATGTGTTCCACA [p.I719delinsNVFHI]). These two mutations were not found in 102 alleles of healthy control individuals. The corresponding tumors from all patients showed a high level of microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) revealed complete loss of expression of the affected protein in the tumor cells from all but three patients. The tumors from the patients with the mutations c.1127_1128dupAT and c.1990-2A>G showed a reduction of expression of the MLH1-protein, rather than complete loss. In the tumor from the patient with the missense mutation c.122A>G [p.D41G] a normal expression of the proteins coded by MLH1 and MSH2 was noticed. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Germline mutations in mismatch repair genes are responsible for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), the most common hereditary cancer-susceptibility syndrome. We report six novel germline mutations, three in MSH2 and three in MLH1. All but one mutation have been found in families fulfilling the criteria of the Bethesda guidelines; two of them additionally fulfilled the Amsterdam criteria. We identified two nonsense mutations in MSH2 (c.1764T>G [p.Y588X], c.2579C>A [p.S860X]), one duplication of four nucleotides causing premature stop codon (MLH1: c.821_824dupAAGC [p.A275fsX307]), one splice site mutation resulting in skipping of exon 8 from the MLH1 transcript (c.677+3A>G), one duplication of 18 nucleotides leading to duplication of six amino acids in the mismatch-binding domain of MSH2 (c.4_21dup [p.A2_E7dup) and one missense mutation in the PMS2 interaction domain of MLH1 (c.1756G>C [p.A586P]). The three latter mutations were not found in 73, 90 and 94 healthy control individuals, respectively. The corresponding tumors from all patients showed a high level of microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Immunohistochemistry (IH) revealed complete loss of expression of the affected protein in the tumor cells from the patients with the nonsense, splice-site and missense mutation. The tumor from the patient with the c.821_824dupAAGC mutation showed a reduced, rather than lost, expression of the MLH1-protein.

Near-complete association between microsatellite instability and abnormal immunostaining of the mismatch repair proteins hMSH2, hMSH6, hMLH1 and hPMS2 and involvement of hMSH6 in sporadic and hereditary colorectal cancers

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is the most frequent hereditary form of colorectal cancer and is caused by germline mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. The majority of mutations occur in MLH1 and MSH2. We report hereby seven novel germline mutations in these two genes (five in MLH1 and two in MSH2). All mutations have been found in families fulfilling criteria of the Bethesda guidelines and four of which also fulfilled the Amsterdam criteria. We identified three insertions or deletions of 1 bp leading to premature stop codons (MLH1: c.341delC, c.1413-1414insA; MSH2: c.1119delG) and three nonsense mutations (MLH1: c.67G>T [E23X], c.436C>T [Q146X]; MSH2: c.1857T>G [Y619X]). The corresponding tumors showed a high level of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and a complete loss of expression of the affected protein. In addition, a missense mutation in MLH1 was identified (c.1984A>C [T662P]). The respective tumor also showed a high level of microsatellite instability but a reduced, rather then lost, expression of the MLH1-protein. This missense mutation was not found in 107 healthy control individuals and in 54 HNPCC patients. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.