Search

Aims : The valve-in-valve (ViV) procedure has become a valuable alternative for the treatment of failed surgical bioprostheses (BP) in high-risk patients. However, in small BP, the clinical outcomes have been suboptimal due to high post-procedural gradients. We aimed to examine the effect of size and position of the self-expanding transcatheter heart valve (THV) CoreValve on the haemodynamics of ViV within small BP. Methods and results : Sizes 23 and 26 mm of the CoreValve were implanted in sizes 19 and 21 mm of three BP models: Trifecta, Mitroflow and Epic Supra. The THV was tested in three positions -normal (manufacturer recommendation), low (4 mm below normal) and high (4 mm above normal)- using a pulse duplicator. Haemodynamics were assessed by Doppler echocardiography and flowmeter, and GOA with a high-speed camera. Higher implantation was associated with lower residual gradients (normal position: -9%, high: -25% versus low). High position was, however, associated with increased risk of regurgitation in the Mitroflow and embolisation in the Epic Supra. Using a 26 mm THV instead of a 23 mm was associated with larger EOAs in the Trifecta, smaller in the Mitroflow, and increased risk of embolisation in the Epic Supra. Conclusions : Supra-annular positioning of the CoreValve THV is associated with improved post-ViV haemodynamics in small surgical BP. The haemodynamic outcomes are highly dependent on the model and size of surgical BP.

Aims: Bioprosthetic valve fracture (BVF) may improve transvalvular gradients and transcatheter heart valve (THV) expansion during VIV interventions. However, the optimal timing of BVF is unknown. We assessed the impact of timing of BVF (before versus after) for valve-in-valve (VIV) intervention, on hydrodynamic function and THV expansion. Methods and results: Three THV designs were assessed, a 23 mm SAPIEN 3 (S3), small ACURATE neo (ACn) and 23 mm Evolut R, deployed into 21 mm Mitroflow bioprosthetic surgical valves. We evaluated each THV in three groups: 1) no BVF, 2) BVF before VIV, and 3) BVF after VIV. Hydrodynamic testing was performed using a pulse duplicator to ISO 5840:2013 standard. Transvalvular gradients were lower when BVF was performed after VIV for the S3 (no BVF 15.5 mmHg, BVF before VIV 8.0 mmHg, BVF after VIV 5.6 mmHg), and the ACn (no BVF 9.8 mmHg, BVF before VIV 8.4 mmHg, BVF after VIV 5.1 mmHg). Transvalvular gradients were similar for the Evolut R, irrespective of performance of BVF or timing of BVF. BVF performed after VIV resulted in better expansion in all three THV designs. The ACn and Evolut R samples all had a mild degree of pinwheeling, and BVF timing did not impact on pinwheeling severity. The S3 samples had severe pinwheeling with no BVF, and significant improvement in pinwheeling when BVF was performed after VIV. Conclusions: BVF performed after VIV was associated with superior THV expansion in all three THV designs tested, with lower residual transvalvular gradients in the S3 and ACn THVs. The Evolut R had similar hydrodynamic performance irrespective of BVF timing. Timing of BVF has potential implications on THV function.

Aims : The valve-in-valve (ViV) procedure has become a valuable alternative for the treatment of failed surgical bioprostheses (BP) in high-risk patients. However, in small BP, the clinical outcomes have been suboptimal due to high post-procedural gradients. We aimed to examine the effect of size and position of the self-expanding transcatheter heart valve (THV) CoreValve on the haemodynamics of ViV within small BP. Methods and results : Sizes 23 and 26 mm of the CoreValve were implanted in sizes 19 and 21 mm of three BP models: Trifecta, Mitroflow and Epic Supra. The THV was tested in three positions -normal (manufacturer recommendation), low (4 mm below normal) and high (4 mm above normal)- using a pulse duplicator. Haemodynamics were assessed by Doppler echocardiography and flowmeter, and GOA with a high-speed camera. Higher implantation was associated with lower residual gradients (normal position: -9%, high: -25% versus low). High position was, however, associated with increased risk of regurgitation in the Mitroflow and embolisation in the Epic Supra. Using a 26 mm THV instead of a 23 mm was associated with larger EOAs in the Trifecta, smaller in the Mitroflow, and increased risk of embolisation in the Epic Supra. Conclusions : Supra-annular positioning of the CoreValve THV is associated with improved post-ViV haemodynamics in small surgical BP. The haemodynamic outcomes are highly dependent on the model and size of surgical BP.

The valve-in-valve (VinV) percutaneous procedure is a valuable alternative for the treatment of failed bioprosthetic surgical heart valves (SHV) in high-risk patients (Dvir et al. 2014). There is a few data about the effect of the position of implantation of the transcatheter heart valve (THV) on the hemodynamic performance of the VinV assembly (Azadani et al. 2009). Until now, no study has focused on the hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic CoreValve (CV) within the St-Jude Medical Trifecta (TF) bioprosthesis. The objective of this in vitro study was to (1) assess hemodynamic performance of the VinV implantation of the CV THV within the TF SHV, (2) evaluate the loss of hemodynamic performance due to VinV and (3) compare different VinV assemblies in order to guide clinicians for the selection and positioning of the CV.

The valve-in-valve (VinV) percutaneous procedure is a valuable alternative for the treatment of failed bioprosthetic surgical heart valves (SHV) in high-risk patients (Dvir et al. 2014). There is a few data about the effect of the position of implantation of the transcatheter heart valve (THV) on the hemodynamic performance of the VinV assembly (Azadani et al. 2009). Until now, no study has focused on the hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic CoreValve (CV) within the St-Jude Medical Trifecta (TF) bioprosthesis. The objective of this in vitro study was to (1) assess hemodynamic performance of the VinV implantation of the CV THV within the TF SHV, (2) evaluate the loss of hemodynamic performance due to VinV and (3) compare different VinV assemblies in order to guide clinicians for the selection and positioning of the CV