Search

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with implantation of the Orsiro Mission stent remains unclear. The BIOFLOW-DAPT (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04137510) trial is a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled study designed to assess the safety of the Orsiro Mission versus the Resolute Onyx stent in HBR patients. Patients are treated with DAPT (aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor) for 1 month, followed by a single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT). The primary endpoint is the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and definite or probable stent thrombosis at 1 year. With a final sample size of 1948 HBR patients, this study is powered to assess the noninferiority of the Orsiro Mission stent with respect to the primary study endpoint. The BIOFLOW-DAPT is the first randomized clinical trial investigating 1-month DAPT duration in HBR patients after implantation of the Orsiro Mission stent.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04137510 Study design and key features. Patient selection starts before the index PCI, when consented patients will be randomized to the Orsiro Mission or the Resolute Onyx stent with mandated 1-month DAPT. At 1 month, eligibility is reassessed and if met, patients will discontinue DAPT and continue with P2Y12 inhibitor or aspirin monotherapy. PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; DES, drug-eluting stent; HBR, high bleeding risk; P2Y12i, P2Y12 inhibitor; ST, stent thrombosis.

OBJECTIVES: The long-term clinical outcome of covered stents in the percutaneous treatment of diseased saphenous vein graft (SVG) has been disappointing. The single self-expanding polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered Symbiot stent with a unique profile may present advantages that translate into superior long-term clinical outcomes. This study evaluated the safety, effectiveness and clinical outcome of the Symbiot covered stent system (Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass.) and FilterWire EX (Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass.) versus bare metal stents (BMS) in SVG intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 2003 and August 2005, 90 patients with degenerative SVG lesions were prospectively randomized at 6 study sites to Symbiot implantation (n = 30), BMS with FilterWire as embolic protection device (EPD, n = 30), or BMS without EPD (control group, n = 30). The primary end point was reduction in peri-procedural cardiac enzyme rise. The major secondary end points were in-hospital, 6-month and long-term target vessel failure rates, defined as the cumulative of death, myocardial infarction and clinically driven target lesion revascularization. There was no significant reduction in median [IQR] post-procedural troponin-I rise in the Symbiot group compared to the FilterWire or the control group (0.08 [0-1.40] microg/l; 0.06 [0-0.28] microg/l; and 0.04 [0-0.31] microg/l, P = 0.58). At 7.4 +/- 1.3 (mean +/- SD) years, there were numerically less deaths in the Symbiot group, although this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.20). There was no significant difference in TVF-free survival between the treatment groups (P = 0.98). CONCLUSION: This study failed to show a procedural or long-term clinical advantage for the Symbiot PTFE-covered stent in the treatment of degenerated SVG.